Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

exp-driven-dev(经验驱动开发)

exp-driven-dev 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

exp-driven-dev 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 60,488。

总安装 367周安装 15GitHub Stars 317下载 119核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:exp-driven-dev(经验驱动开发)
来源仓库:https://github.com/menkesu/awesome-pm-skills
仓库路径:skills/exp-driven-dev
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/menkesu/awesome-pm-skills --skill exp-driven-dev
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/menkesu/awesome-pm-skills --skill exp-driven-dev

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

exp-driven-dev 基于 Ronny Kohavi 的 HITS 框架设计实验,验证产品假设的因果效应。适用于新功能上线、A/B 测试部署与指标追踪设置。需明确定义假设、实现方案与检验周期,防止 p-hacking。仅推荐在有明确业务目标与对照组设置时使用。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/exp-driven-dev

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/menkesu/awesome-pm-skills --skill exp-driven-d…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

exp-driven-dev 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/menkesu/awesome-pm-skills --skill exp-driven-dev。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

exp-driven-dev 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

exp-driven-dev 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

exp-driven-dev 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

exp-driven-dev 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 367 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 119 次,GitHub 317 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

exp-driven-dev 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
exp-driven-dev

经验驱动开发 · 本页

367317只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Experimentation-Driven Development

When This Skill Activates

Claude uses this skill when:

  • Building new features that affect core metrics
  • Implementing A/B testing infrastructure
  • Making data-driven decisions
  • Setting up feature flags for gradual rollouts
  • Choosing which metrics to track

Core Frameworks

1. Experiment Design (Source: Ronny Kohavi, Microsoft/Netflix)

The HITS Framework:

H - Hypothesis:

"We believe that [change] will cause [metric] to [increase/decrease] because [reason]"

I - Implementation:

  • Feature flag setup
  • Treatment vs control
  • Sample size calculation

T - Test:

  • Run for statistical significance
  • Monitor guardrail metrics
  • Watch for unexpected effects

S - Ship or Stop:

  • Ship if positive
  • Stop if negative
  • Iterate if inconclusive

Example:

Hypothesis:
"We believe that adding social proof ('X people bought this')
will increase conversion rate by 10%
because it reduces purchase anxiety."

Implementation:
- Control: No social proof
- Treatment: Show "X people bought"
- Sample size: 10,000 users per variant
- Duration: 2 weeks

Test:
- Primary metric: Conversion rate
- Guardrails: Cart abandonment, return rate

Ship or Stop:
- If conversion +5% or more → Ship
- If conversion -2% or less → Stop
- If inconclusive → Iterate and retest

2. Metric Selection

Primary Metric:

  • ONE metric you're trying to move
  • Directly tied to business value
  • Clear success threshold

Guardrail Metrics:

  • Metrics that shouldn't degrade
  • Prevent gaming the system
  • Ensure quality maintained

Example:

Feature: Streamlined checkout

Primary Metric:
✅ Purchase completion rate (+10%)

Guardrail Metrics:
⚠️ Cart abandonment (don't increase)
⚠️ Return rate (don't increase)
⚠️ Support tickets (don't increase)
⚠️ Load time (stay <2s)

3. Statistical Significance

The Math:

Minimum sample size = (Effect size, Confidence, Power)

Typical settings:
- Confidence: 95% (p < 0.05)
- Power: 80% (detect 80% of real effects)
- Effect size: Minimum detectable change

Example:
- Baseline conversion: 10%
- Minimum detectable effect: +1% (to 11%)
- Required: ~15,000 users per variant

Common Mistakes:

  • ❌ Stopping test early (peeking bias)
  • ❌ Running too short (seasonal effects)
  • ❌ Too many variants (dilutes sample)
  • ❌ Changing test mid-flight

4. Feature Flag Architecture

Implementation:

// Feature flag pattern
function checkoutFlow(user) {
  if (isFeatureEnabled(user, 'new-checkout')) {
    return newCheckoutExperience();
  } else {
    return oldCheckoutExperience();
  }
}

// Gradual rollout
function isFeatureEnabled(user, feature) {
  const rolloutPercent = getFeatureRollout(feature);
  const userBucket = hashUserId(user.id) % 100;
  return userBucket < rolloutPercent;
}

// Experiment assignment
function assignExperiment(user, experiment) {
  const variant = consistentHash(user.id, experiment);
  track('experiment_assigned', {
    userId: user.id,
    experiment: experiment,
    variant: variant
  });
  return variant;
}

Decision Tree: Should We Experiment?

NEW FEATURE
│
├─ Affects core metrics? ──────YES──→ EXPERIMENT REQUIRED
│  NO ↓
│
├─ Risky change? ──────────────YES──→ EXPERIMENT RECOMMENDED
│  NO ↓
│
├─ Uncertain impact? ──────────YES──→ EXPERIMENT USEFUL
│  NO ↓
│
├─ Easy to A/B test? ─────────YES──→ WHY NOT EXPERIMENT?
│  NO ↓
│
└─ SHIP WITHOUT TEST ←────────────────┘
   (But still feature flag for rollback)

Action Templates

Template 1: Experiment Spec

# Experiment: [Name]

## Hypothesis
**We believe:** [change]
**Will cause:** [metric] to [increase/decrease]
**Because:** [reasoning]

## Variants

### Control (50%)
[Current experience]

### Treatment (50%)
[New experience]

## Metrics

### Primary Metric
- **What:** [metric name]
- **Current:** [baseline]
- **Target:** [goal]
- **Success:** [threshold]

### Guardrail Metrics
- **Metric 1:** [name] - Don't decrease
- **Metric 2:** [name] - Don't increase
- **Metric 3:** [name] - Maintain

## Sample Size
- **Users needed:** [X per variant]
- **Duration:** [Y days]
- **Confidence:** 95%
- **Power:** 80%

## Implementation

if (experiment('feature-name') === 'treatment') { // New experience } else { // Old experience }


## Success Criteria

- Primary metric improved by [X]%
- No guardrail degradation
- Statistical significance reached
- No unexpected negative effects

## Decision

- **If positive:** Ship to 100%
- **If negative:** Rollback, iterate
- **If inconclusive:** Extend or redesign

Template 2: Feature Flag Implementation

// features.ts
export const FEATURES = {
  'new-checkout': {
    rollout: 10,  // 10% of users
    enabled: true,
    description: 'New streamlined checkout flow'
  },
  'ai-recommendations': {
    rollout: 0,  // Not live yet
    enabled: false,
    description: 'AI-powered product recommendations'
  }
};

// feature-flags.ts
export function isEnabled(userId: string, feature: string): boolean {
  const config = FEATURES[feature];
  if (!config || !config.enabled) return false;

  const bucket = consistentHash(userId) % 100;
  return bucket < config.rollout;
}

// usage in code
if (isEnabled(user.id, 'new-checkout')) {
  return <NewCheckout />;
} else {
  return <OldCheckout />;
}

Template 3: Experiment Dashboard

# Experiment Dashboard

## Active Experiments

### Experiment 1: [Name]
- **Status:** Running
- **Started:** [date]
- **Progress:** [X]% sample size reached
- **Primary metric:** [current result]
- **Guardrails:** ✅ All healthy

### Experiment 2: [Name]
- **Status:** Complete
- **Result:** Treatment won (+15% conversion)
- **Decision:** Ship to 100%
- **Shipped:** [date]

## Key Metrics

### Experiment Velocity
- **Experiments launched:** [X per month]
- **Win rate:** [Y]%
- **Average duration:** [Z] days

### Impact
- **Revenue impact:** +$[X]
- **Conversion improvement:** +[Y]%
- **User satisfaction:** +[Z] NPS

## Learnings
- [Key insight 1]
- [Key insight 2]
- [Key insight 3]

Quick Reference

🧪 Experiment Checklist

Before Starting:

  • Hypothesis written (believe → cause → because)
  • Primary metric defined
  • Guardrails identified
  • Sample size calculated
  • Feature flag implemented
  • Tracking instrumented

During Experiment:

  • Don't peek early (wait for significance)
  • Monitor guardrails daily
  • Watch for unexpected effects
  • Log any external factors (holidays, outages)

After Experiment:

  • Statistical significance reached
  • Guardrails not degraded
  • Decision made (ship/stop/iterate)
  • Learning documented

Real-World Examples

Example 1: Netflix Experimentation

Volume: 250+ experiments running at once Approach: Everything is an experiment Culture: "Strong opinions, weakly held - let data decide"

Example Test:

  • Hypothesis: Bigger thumbnails increase engagement
  • Result: No improvement, actually hurt browse time
  • Decision: Rollback
  • Learning: Saved $$ by not shipping

Example 2: Airbnb's Experiments

Test: New search ranking algorithm Primary: Bookings per search Guardrails:

  • Search quality (ratings of bookings)
  • Host earnings (don't concentrate bookings)
  • Guest satisfaction

Result: +3% bookings, all guardrails healthy → Ship


Example 3: Stripe's Feature Flags

Approach: Every feature behind flag Benefits:

  • Instant rollback (flip flag)
  • Gradual rollout (1% → 5% → 25% → 100%)
  • Test in production safely

Example:

if (experiments.isEnabled('instant-payouts')) {
  return <InstantPayouts />;
}

Common Pitfalls

❌ Mistake 1: Peeking Too Early

Problem: Stopping test before statistical significance Fix: Calculate sample size upfront, wait for it

❌ Mistake 2: No Guardrails

Problem: Gaming the metric (increase clicks but hurt quality) Fix: Always define guardrails

❌ Mistake 3: Too Many Variants

Problem: Not enough users per variant Fix: Limit to 2-3 variants max

❌ Mistake 4: Ignoring External Factors

Problem: Holiday spike looks like treatment effect Fix: Note external events, extend duration


Related Skills

  • metrics-frameworks - For choosing right metrics
  • growth-embedded - For growth experiments
  • ship-decisions - For when to ship vs test more
  • strategic-build - For deciding what to test

Key Quotes

Ronny Kohavi:

"The best way to predict the future is to run an experiment."

Netflix Culture:

"Strong opinions, weakly held. Let data be the tie-breaker."

Airbnb:

"We trust our intuition to generate hypotheses, and we trust data to make decisions."

Further Learning

  • references/experiment-design-guide.md - Complete methodology
  • references/statistical-significance.md - Sample size calculations
  • references/feature-flags-implementation.md - Code examples
  • references/guardrail-metrics.md - Choosing guardrails

平台分布

Codex

37.61%
按下载量换算45

Claude

26.99%
按下载量换算32

Cursor

19.38%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

9.83%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills