Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

estimationestimation 搜索

Agent Skill

estimation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,082

周安装

46

GitHub Stars

61

下载量

379
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:estimation(estimation 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
仓库路径:skills/estimation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill estimation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill estimation

简介

estimation 运用类比法、参数法与专家判断等多种成熟估算技术。

  • 支持项目周期、人力投入、成本预算与难度等级多维评估。
  • 遵循行业最佳实践,确保估算结果具备可重复性与可比性。
  • 适用于新项目启动前的可行性分析与资源预申请场景。
  • estimation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Estimation

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Estimation tasks - Working on estimation techniques including analogous, parametric, three-point, and expert judgment methods. provides effort, cost, duration, and complexity estimates for projects, features, and tasks
  • Planning or design - Need guidance on Estimation approaches
  • Best practices - Want to follow established patterns and standards

Overview

Systematically estimate effort, cost, duration, and complexity using proven estimation techniques. Supports analogous, parametric, three-point (PERT), and expert judgment methods for projects, features, and tasks.

What is Estimation?

Estimation is the process of forecasting the resources, time, and cost required to complete work. Good estimation balances:

  • Accuracy: How close to actual results
  • Precision: Consistency of estimates
  • Speed: Time to produce estimates
  • Communication: Shared understanding of uncertainty

Estimation vs Commitment

ConceptDefinitionUse
EstimateBest guess given current knowledgePlanning, forecasting
CommitmentPromise to deliver by date/costContracts, deadlines
TargetDesired outcome to aim forGoals, objectives

Key principle: Estimates are ranges with uncertainty, not single-point guarantees.

Estimation Techniques

Analogous Estimation (Top-Down)

Estimate based on similar past work:

StepAction
1Identify similar completed project/feature
2Retrieve actual effort/cost/duration
3Adjust for differences (complexity, team, technology)
4Apply adjustment factor

Formula:

New Estimate = Historical Actual × Adjustment Factor

Example:
Similar project took 200 hours
New project is ~20% more complex
Estimate = 200 × 1.20 = 240 hours

When to Use: Early phases, limited detail, experienced teams with historical data

Accuracy: +/- 25-50% (improves with good historical data)

Parametric Estimation

Estimate using statistical relationships:

ElementDescription
Unit of WorkMeasurable element (screen, API, table)
Productivity RateEffort per unit from historical data
QuantityNumber of units to produce

Formula:

Estimate = Quantity × Productivity Rate

Example:
10 API endpoints × 16 hours/endpoint = 160 hours

Common Productivity Metrics:

Work TypeMetricTypical Range
UI screensHours/screen8-40 hours
API endpointsHours/endpoint4-24 hours
Database tablesHours/table4-16 hours
Test casesHours/test0.5-4 hours
Documentation pagesHours/page2-8 hours

When to Use: Repeatable work, good historical data, similar technology

Accuracy: +/- 15-25% (with calibrated rates)

Three-Point Estimation (PERT)

Estimate using optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic values:

ValueSymbolDefinition
OptimisticOBest case, everything goes right
Most LikelyMMost probable outcome
PessimisticPWorst case, problems occur

PERT Formula (Weighted Average):

Expected = (O + 4M + P) / 6
Standard Deviation = (P - O) / 6

Example:
O = 5 days, M = 8 days, P = 17 days
Expected = (5 + 4×8 + 17) / 6 = 9 days
Std Dev = (17 - 5) / 6 = 2 days

Confidence Intervals:

ConfidenceCalculationExample (E=9, SD=2)
68%E ± 1 SD7-11 days
95%E ± 2 SD5-13 days
99.7%E ± 3 SD3-15 days

When to Use: Uncertain work, new technology, need to communicate risk

Accuracy: Provides explicit uncertainty range

Expert Judgment

Estimate using collective expert knowledge:

Wideband Delphi Process:

RoundActivity
1Experts estimate independently
2Collect and share anonymous estimates
3Discuss high/low outliers, share rationale
4Re-estimate independently
5Repeat until convergence (or average)

Planning Poker (Agile):

StepAction
1Present item to estimate
2Discuss briefly (2-5 minutes)
3Each team member selects card privately
4Reveal simultaneously
5Discuss outliers
6Re-vote until consensus

Common Scales:

Scale TypeValues
Fibonacci1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89
Modified Fibonacci0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40, 100
T-shirtXS, S, M, L, XL, XXL
Powers of 21, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64

When to Use: Complex work, multiple perspectives needed, team alignment

Function Point Analysis

Estimate based on functional size (for larger systems):

ComponentDescriptionWeight Range
External InputsData entering system3-6
External OutputsData leaving system4-7
External InquiriesRead-only queries3-6
Internal FilesLogical data stores7-15
External InterfacesShared data5-10

Process:

  1. Count each component type
  2. Classify complexity (low/medium/high)
  3. Apply weights
  4. Calculate unadjusted function points
  5. Apply technical complexity factor

When to Use: Large projects, formal contracts, industry benchmarking

Relative Estimation

Story Points

Relative complexity/effort measure:

PointsRelative SizeExample
1TrivialFix typo, config change
2SimpleSimple bug fix, minor feature
3ModerateStandard feature, moderate complexity
5ComplexMulti-component feature
8Very complexIntegration work, significant unknowns
13Epic-sizedConsider breaking down
21+Too largeMust decompose

Baseline: Pick a well-understood story as reference (e.g., "this is a 3")

Velocity: Story points completed per iteration (used for forecasting)

T-Shirt Sizing

Quick relative sizing for roadmap planning:

SizeEffort RangeDuration Range
XS1-4 hours< 1 day
S0.5-2 days1-2 days
M2-5 days3-5 days
L1-2 weeks1-2 weeks
XL2-4 weeks2-4 weeks
XXL1-3 monthsToo big, decompose

Workflow

Phase 1: Prepare

Step 1: Clarify Scope

## Estimation Request

**Item:** [What's being estimated]
**Requester:** [Who needs the estimate]
**Purpose:** [Planning/budgeting/commitment]
**Deadline:** [When estimate is needed]
**Precision:** [ROM/Budget/Definitive]

### Scope Definition

- **In Scope:** [What's included]
- **Out of Scope:** [What's excluded]
- **Assumptions:** [Key assumptions]
- **Constraints:** [Known constraints]

Step 2: Select Estimation Technique

SituationRecommended Technique
Early project phaseAnalogous + T-shirt sizing
Detailed requirementsParametric + Three-point
Agile backlogStory points + Planning poker
New technology/domainExpert judgment + Three-point
Contract/budgetFunction points + Parametric

Phase 2: Estimate

Step 1: Decompose Work

Break down into estimable units (half-day to 2-week chunks)

Step 2: Apply Technique

Use selected technique(s) from above

Step 3: Add Contingency

## Contingency Calculation

| Risk Level | Contingency | When to Use |
|------------|-------------|-------------|
| Low | 10-15% | Well-understood, experienced team |
| Medium | 20-30% | Some unknowns, new team members |
| High | 40-50% | Significant unknowns, new technology |
| Very High | 75-100% | Research, innovation, first-of-kind |

Step 4: Validate

  • Sanity check against similar work
  • Review with team
  • Check for missing items
  • Verify assumptions

Phase 3: Communicate

Step 1: Express as Range

## Estimate Summary

**Effort:** 160-200 hours (confidence: 80%)
**Duration:** 4-5 weeks (with 2 developers)
**Cost:** $24,000-$30,000

**Key Risks:**
- API integration complexity unknown
- Dependency on third-party availability

Step 2: Document Assumptions

## Estimation Assumptions

1. Requirements are stable and complete
2. Team has 80% availability (20% overhead)
3. No major technology changes
4. Dependencies delivered on time
5. [Additional assumptions...]

**If assumptions change, estimate should be revisited.**

Output Formats

Narrative Summary

## Estimation Summary

**Item:** [Feature/Project name]
**Date:** [ISO date]
**Estimator:** estimation-analyst
**Technique:** [Technique used]

### Estimate

| Dimension | Low | Expected | High | Confidence |
|-----------|-----|----------|------|------------|
| Effort | 120h | 160h | 220h | 80% |
| Duration | 4w | 5w | 7w | 80% |
| Cost | $18K | $24K | $33K | 80% |

### Basis of Estimate

- **Historical Reference:** [Similar past work]
- **Productivity Rate:** [If parametric]
- **Expert Input:** [Who contributed]

### Assumptions

1. [Assumption 1]
2. [Assumption 2]

### Risks Affecting Estimate

| Risk | Impact on Estimate |
|------|-------------------|
| [Risk 1] | +20% if occurs |
| [Risk 2] | +15% if occurs |

### Recommendations

1. [Next steps for refining estimate]
2. [When to re-estimate]

Structured Data (YAML)

estimation:
  version: "1.0"
  date: "2025-01-15"
  item: "User Dashboard Feature"
  estimator: "estimation-analyst"
  technique: "three_point"

  scope:
    description: "Interactive user dashboard with analytics"
    in_scope:
      - "Dashboard UI components"
      - "Data visualization"
      - "User preferences"
    out_of_scope:
      - "Backend analytics engine"
      - "Real-time updates"
    assumptions:
      - "API endpoints available"
      - "Design mockups complete"

  estimates:
    effort:
      optimistic: 120
      most_likely: 160
      pessimistic: 240
      expected: 166
      unit: "hours"
      std_deviation: 20
    duration:
      optimistic: 3
      most_likely: 4
      pessimistic: 6
      expected: 4.2
      unit: "weeks"
    cost:
      expected: 24000
      range_low: 18000
      range_high: 36000
      currency: "USD"

  confidence: 0.80
  contingency: 0.20

  breakdown:
    - component: "UI Components"
      effort: 60
      technique: "parametric"
      rate: "15h/component"
      quantity: 4
    - component: "Data Integration"
      effort: 40
      technique: "analogous"
      reference: "PROJ-123"
    - component: "Testing"
      effort: 40
      technique: "percentage"
      percentage: 0.25

  risks:
    - risk: "API complexity higher than expected"
      probability: 0.3
      impact_hours: 30
    - risk: "Design changes during development"
      probability: 0.2
      impact_hours: 20

  historical_comparison:
    similar_item: "Admin Dashboard"
    actual_effort: 180
    adjustment_factor: 0.9

Breakdown Table

## Effort Breakdown

| Component | Technique | Estimate | Contingency | Total |
|-----------|-----------|----------|-------------|-------|
| UI Components | Parametric | 60h | 12h | 72h |
| Data Integration | Analogous | 40h | 10h | 50h |
| Testing | % of Dev | 40h | 8h | 48h |
| Documentation | Parametric | 16h | 4h | 20h |
| **Subtotal** | | **156h** | **34h** | **190h** |
| Management Overhead | 10% | | | 19h |
| **Total** | | | | **209h** |

Estimation Accuracy

Cone of Uncertainty

Estimate accuracy improves as project progresses:

PhaseAccuracy Range
Initial concept0.25x - 4x
Approved project0.5x - 2x
Requirements complete0.67x - 1.5x
Detailed design0.8x - 1.25x
Code complete0.9x - 1.1x

Implication: Early estimates need wider ranges; refine as knowledge grows.

Estimation Levels

LevelAccuracyWhen Used
ROM (Rough Order of Magnitude)-25% to +75%Initial budgeting
Budget-10% to +25%Project approval
Definitive-5% to +10%Execution baseline

Common Pitfalls

PitfallPrevention
Single-point estimatesAlways provide ranges
Optimism biasUse historical data, add contingency
AnchoringEstimate before seeing others' estimates
Planning fallacyInclude realistic overhead and risks
Scope creepDocument assumptions, re-estimate on changes
Precision theaterMatch precision to actual knowledge

Integration

Upstream

  • Requirements - What to estimate
  • risk-analysis - Risks affecting estimates
  • stakeholder-analysis - Who needs estimates, precision required

Downstream

  • Project planning - Resource allocation, scheduling
  • Budgeting - Cost forecasting
  • prioritization - Cost input for value/effort analysis

Related Skills

  • risk-analysis - Risks affecting estimates
  • prioritization - Using estimates for prioritization
  • decision-analysis - Trade-off decisions
  • value-stream-mapping - Estimating process improvement effort

Version History

  • v1.0.0 (2025-12-26): Initial release

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Antigravity

28.52%
按下载量换算108

Claude Code

22.15%
按下载量换算84

Gemini CLI

19.22%
按下载量换算73

Codex

12.63%
按下载量换算48

OpenCode

7.27%
按下载量换算28

trae

3.54%
按下载量换算13

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills