Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

estimation(estimation 搜索)

estimation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

estimation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 60,488。

总安装 367周安装 15GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 118核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:estimation(estimation 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/baxtercooper/nexus
仓库路径:skills/estimation
安装命令:
npx skills add baxtercooper/nexus --skill "estimation"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add baxtercooper/nexus --skill "estimation"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

estimation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。主要功能是发现并安装 AI 代理的技能。

通过 github 安装,命令为 npx skills add baxtercooper/nexus --skill "estimation"。建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

来源仓库内路径:skills/estimation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add baxtercooper/nexus --skill "estimation";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

estimation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add baxtercooper/nexus --skill "estimation"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

estimation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

estimation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

estimation 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

estimation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 367 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 118 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

estimation 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
estimation

estimation 搜索 · 本页

367—接触敏感数据MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
estimation
description
Use before committing to a task. Provides complexity analysis and scope assessment. Invoke when user asks "how complex" or before large features.
version
1.0.0

Estimation Skill

Core Principle: Estimate before committing.

When to Invoke

  • Before starting a large or complex task
  • When user asks about complexity or scope
  • Before providing time commitments
  • When decomposing tasks for orchestration
  • When uncertain about task scope

Complexity Factors

Assess each factor to determine overall complexity:

FactorWeightQuestions to Ask
Files to modifyHighHow many files? How spread across codebase?
New patterns requiredHighDoes this require patterns not in codebase?
External dependenciesHighNew APIs, services, or integrations?
Test coverage neededMediumUnit, integration, e2e tests required?
Documentation updatesLowREADME, API docs, comments needed?
Breaking changesHighWill this break existing functionality?
Unknown territoryHighAre you familiar with this code area?

Complexity Scoring

LOW: 1-2 files, existing patterns, no new dependencies
MEDIUM: 3-5 files, minor new patterns, limited dependencies
HIGH: 6+ files, new patterns, new dependencies, cross-cutting
UNKNOWN: Cannot assess without more exploration

Estimation Protocol

Step 1: Scope Analysis

1. What is the task asking for?
2. What files will likely need changes?
3. What patterns exist for similar features?
4. What dependencies are involved?
5. What testing is required?

Step 2: Factor Assessment

For each complexity factor:

  • Score as: none (0), low (1), medium (2), high (3)
  • Note specific concerns

Step 3: Risk Identification

Risks to identify:
- Areas of uncertainty
- Potential blockers
- Dependencies on external factors
- Technical debt implications

Step 4: Output Estimation

Use the template below.


Output Template

estimation:
  timestamp: [ISO 8601]
  task: |
    [Task description]

  scope:
    files_affected:
      known:
        - [file1.ts - reason]
        - [file2.ts - reason]
      likely:
        - [file3.ts - reason]
      unknown: [count or "cannot determine"]

    changes_required:
      - type: [new_file | modification | deletion]
        description: [what change]
      - type: [type]
        description: [what change]

  complexity:
    overall: [low | medium | high | unknown]
    factors:
      files_to_modify: [0-3]
      new_patterns: [0-3]
      external_dependencies: [0-3]
      test_coverage: [0-3]
      documentation: [0-3]
      breaking_changes: [0-3]
      unknown_territory: [0-3]
    total_score: [sum]

  risks:
    - risk: "[Risk description]"
      likelihood: [low | medium | high]
      impact: [low | medium | high]
      mitigation: "[How to address]"

  unknowns:
    - "[What you couldn't determine]"
    - "[What needs clarification]"

  recommendations:
    approach: |
      [Recommended approach]
    alternatives:
      - "[Alternative approach 1]"
    next_steps:
      - "[First step]"
      - "[Second step]"

  confidence: 0.0
  evidence:
    - "[What you examined]"

Complexity Thresholds

Low Complexity (Score 0-5)

  • Can likely be completed in single session
  • Straightforward implementation
  • Well-understood patterns

Medium Complexity (Score 6-10)

  • May require multiple sessions
  • Some exploration needed
  • Some new patterns required

High Complexity (Score 11+)

  • Definitely requires planning
  • Significant exploration needed
  • Consider breaking into phases

Unknown Complexity

  • Cannot assess without more information
  • Recommend context-gathering first
  • Ask user clarifying questions

Rules

[!CRITICAL] NEVER estimate without understanding scope. ALWAYS include unknowns.

Do

  • List specific files you expect to change
  • Identify risks and unknowns
  • Provide confidence level
  • Recommend next steps

Don't

  • Give point estimates (use ranges/categories)
  • Promise delivery timelines
  • Understate complexity to seem helpful
  • Skip the unknown factors

Integration with Other Skills

After EstimationInvoke
Need more context→ context-gathering skill
Ready to plan implementation→ writing-plans skill
Ready to execute→ orchestration skill

Chaining Rules

  1. IF unknowns are significant THEN invoke context-gathering first
  2. IF complexity is high THEN recommend phased approach
  3. AFTER estimation accepted THEN proceed to writing-plans

Example

Task: "Add user authentication to the API"

estimation:
  timestamp: "2024-01-15T10:00:00Z"
  task: |
    Add user authentication to the existing Express API

  scope:
    files_affected:
      known:
        - src/routes/auth.ts - new route file
        - src/middleware/auth.ts - new middleware
        - src/models/user.ts - user model changes
      likely:
        - src/routes/index.ts - route registration
        - tests/auth.test.ts - new tests
      unknown: 2-3 additional files for utilities

    changes_required:
      - type: new_file
        description: Authentication routes (login, register, logout)
      - type: new_file
        description: Auth middleware for protected routes
      - type: modification
        description: Add auth to existing protected routes

  complexity:
    overall: medium
    factors:
      files_to_modify: 2
      new_patterns: 2
      external_dependencies: 2
      test_coverage: 2
      documentation: 1
      breaking_changes: 1
      unknown_territory: 1
    total_score: 11

  risks:
    - risk: "Password hashing library choice"
      likelihood: low
      impact: medium
      mitigation: "Use bcrypt, well-established"
    - risk: "JWT secret management"
      likelihood: medium
      impact: high
      mitigation: "Environment variable, document required setup"

  unknowns:
    - "Which routes should be protected?"
    - "OAuth integration needed?"
    - "Session vs JWT preference?"

  recommendations:
    approach: |
      Implement JWT-based auth with bcrypt password hashing.
      Start with login/register, add middleware, then protect routes.
    alternatives:
      - "Session-based auth with express-session"
      - "OAuth with passport.js"
    next_steps:
      - "Clarify auth requirements with user"
      - "Create detailed plan with writing-plans skill"

  confidence: 0.7
  evidence:
    - "Reviewed existing routes structure"
    - "Checked package.json for auth libraries"
    - "Examined similar features in codebase"

平台分布

kilo

26.19%
按下载量换算31

windsurf

23.97%
按下载量换算28

cline

16.1%
按下载量换算19

OpenCode

13.9%
按下载量换算16

Codex

8.42%
按下载量换算10

github-copilot

3.85%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills