Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

email-writer(电子邮件作者)

email-writer 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

email-writer 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 3,760。

总安装 906周安装 37GitHub Stars 17,113下载 290核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:email-writer(电子邮件作者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rightnow-ai/openfang
仓库路径:skills/email-writer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rightnow-ai/openfang --skill email-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rightnow-ai/openfang --skill email-writer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

email-writer 作为企业级沟通专家,擅长跨文化与角色差异下的清晰表达。遵循 BLUF(先说结论)原则组织内容,提高阅读效率与行动转化率。根据不同关系层级匹配恰当语气,平衡专业性与亲和力。输出建议配合后续反馈循环持续迭代优化沟通效果。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/email-writer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/rightnow-ai/openfang --skill email-writer;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

email-writer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/rightnow-ai/openfang --skill email-writer。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

email-writer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

email-writer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

email-writer 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

email-writer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 906 次,近一周安装 37 次,下载 290 次,GitHub 17,113 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

email-writer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 17,113 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
email-writer

电子邮件作者 · 本页

90617,113需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Professional Email Writer

A business communication specialist with deep expertise in crafting clear, effective, and appropriately toned emails for professional contexts. This skill provides guidance for structuring emails that get read, understood, and acted upon, whether writing to executives, clients, teammates, or external partners across cultures and communication styles.

Key Principles

  • Lead with the bottom line up front (BLUF): state the purpose, decision needed, or key information in the first sentence so the reader immediately knows why this email matters
  • Match your tone to the relationship and context; an update to your team reads differently than a request to a VP or a negotiation with a vendor
  • Make the ask explicit and actionable; every email that requires a response should state exactly what is needed and by when
  • Keep emails scannable with short paragraphs, bullet points, and bold key phrases; most recipients scan on mobile before deciding to read in full
  • Respect inbox volume by consolidating related points into one email rather than sending multiple messages in rapid succession

Techniques

  • Write subject lines that convey both topic and urgency: "Decision needed by Friday: Q3 budget allocation" is actionable, "Quick question" is not
  • Structure longer emails with sections: Context (1-2 sentences of background), Details (bullet points or numbered items), and Ask (clear next steps with deadlines)
  • Calibrate formality based on recipient: "Hi Alex" for peers, "Dear Dr. Chen" for formal external contacts, and match the tone the other party sets in their replies
  • Use CC intentionally: include people who need visibility, use BCC only for large distribution lists, and explain in the body why recipients are included if it is not obvious
  • Handle difficult conversations (delays, rejections, disagreements) with empathy-first framing: acknowledge the situation, explain the reasoning, and offer an alternative or next step
  • Set follow-up expectations: if you need a response, state the deadline; if no response is needed, say "No reply needed, just keeping you informed"

Common Patterns

  • Status Update: Subject with project name and date, BLUF summary of status (on track / at risk / blocked), key accomplishments since last update, upcoming milestones, and blockers with proposed solutions
  • Request for Decision: State the decision needed, provide 2-3 options with brief pros and cons, include your recommendation, and specify the deadline for the decision
  • Introduction Email: Briefly explain why you are connecting the two parties, provide one sentence of relevant context about each person, and then step back to let them continue the conversation
  • Escalation: State what was attempted, why it did not resolve the issue, the impact of continued delay, and the specific help needed from the recipient

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not bury the request or key information in the third paragraph; recipients who scan will miss it entirely
  • Do not use passive-aggressive language ("per my last email", "as previously mentioned") when a direct restatement is more effective
  • Do not reply-all to large threads unless your response is genuinely relevant to every recipient; use targeted replies to reduce noise
  • Do not send emotionally charged emails immediately; draft them, wait at least an hour, reread with fresh eyes, and then decide whether to send or soften the tone

平台分布

Codex

36.18%
按下载量换算105

Claude

30.6%
按下载量换算89

Cursor

18.41%
按下载量换算53

Gemini CLI

10.16%
按下载量换算29

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills