Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ecom-rfm-analysis(ecom rfm 分析)

ecom-rfm-analysis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ecom-rfm-analysis 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 58,406。

总安装 416周安装 17GitHub Stars 125下载 135核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ecom-rfm-analysis(ecom rfm 分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills
仓库路径:skills/ecom-rfm-analysis
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ecom-rfm-analysis
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ecom-rfm-analysis

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

基于 Recency、Frequency、Monetary 三维度对客户进行行为细分,支持精准营销。适用于客户生命周期管理与复购激励策略设计,不依赖 demographic 假设。需使用实际交易数据划分 RFM 等级,输出 actionable 的客户分组建议。

避免将不同年龄或性别客户混同处理,坚持“行为决定策略”原则。ecom-rfm-analysis 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ecom-rfm-analysis

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ecom-rfm-ana…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

ecom-rfm-analysis 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ecom-rfm-analysis。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ecom-rfm-analysis 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ecom-rfm-analysis 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

ecom-rfm-analysis 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ecom-rfm-analysis 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 416 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 135 次,GitHub 125 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ecom-rfm-analysis 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ecom-rfm-analysis

ecom rfm 分析 · 本页

416125只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

RFM Analysis

Overview

RFM segments customers based on three behavioral dimensions: Recency (when they last bought), Frequency (how often they buy), and Monetary (how much they spend). It converts raw transaction data into actionable customer segments for targeted marketing.

Framework

IRON LAW: RFM Uses ACTUAL Behavior, Not Demographics

RFM is behavioral segmentation — it classifies by what customers DO,
not who they ARE. A 25-year-old and a 65-year-old in the same RFM segment
should receive the same treatment. Never mix RFM with demographic
assumptions.

The Three Dimensions

DimensionWhat It MeasuresHow to Calculate
Recency (R)Days since last purchaseToday - Last purchase date
Frequency (F)Number of purchases in periodCount of distinct transactions
Monetary (M)Total spend in periodSum of transaction values

Scoring Method (Quintile-Based)

  1. For each dimension, rank all customers and divide into 5 equal groups (quintiles)
  2. Score 5 (best) to 1 (worst): R=5 means most recent, F=5 means most frequent, M=5 means highest spend
  3. Combine into 3-digit RFM score (e.g., R5-F4-M5 = recent, frequent, high-value)

Note: For Recency, LOWER days = HIGHER score (more recent is better).

Key Segments

SegmentRFM PatternDescriptionStrategy
ChampionsR5, F5, M5Best customers, recent, frequent, high-valueReward, loyalty program, early access
LoyalR4-5, F4-5, M3-5Consistent buyersUpsell, cross-sell, referral program
Potential LoyalistsR4-5, F2-3, M2-3Recent, moderate frequencyNurture to increase frequency
At RiskR2-3, F3-5, M3-5Were frequent/high-value, not buying recentlyWin-back campaign, special offers
HibernatingR1-2, F1-2, M1-2Long dormant, low valueLow-cost reactivation or let go
New CustomersR5, F1, M1-2Just made first purchaseOnboarding, second-purchase incentive

Implementation Steps

Phase 1: Data Preparation

  • Required: Customer ID, Transaction Date, Transaction Amount
  • Clean: Remove refunds, test orders, internal orders
  • Set analysis window (typically 12-24 months)

Phase 2: Calculate RFM Scores

  • Calculate R, F, M for each customer
  • Assign quintile scores (1-5) for each dimension
  • Combine into segments

Phase 3: Segment and Act

  • Map each customer to a named segment (Champions, At Risk, etc.)
  • Design targeted actions per segment
  • Measure results: did targeted customers behave differently?

Output Format

# RFM Analysis: {Business}

## Data Summary
- Customers analyzed: {N}
- Analysis window: {start} to {end}
- Transactions: {N}

## Segment Distribution
| Segment | Count | % | Avg R (days) | Avg F | Avg M |
|---------|-------|---|-------------|-------|-------|
| Champions | {N} | {%} | {days} | {count} | ${X} |
| At Risk | {N} | {%} | ... | ... | ... |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Key Findings
- Top 20% customers contribute {X%} of revenue
- {N} customers at risk of churning (were high-value, now dormant)
- {N} new customers need second-purchase nurturing

## Recommended Actions
| Segment | Action | Channel | Expected Impact |
|---------|--------|---------|----------------|
| Champions | {loyalty reward} | {email/app} | Increase AOV by X% |
| At Risk | {win-back offer} | {email/SMS} | Recover X% of dormant revenue |

Gotchas

  • RFM is backward-looking: It tells you what customers DID, not what they WILL do. Combine with predictive models (CLV prediction) for forward-looking insights.
  • Equal quintiles may not make sense: If 80% of customers bought only once, quintile 1-4 are all "one-time buyers." Consider custom breakpoints based on business context.
  • Monetary can be misleading for subscriptions: If everyone pays the same subscription fee, M dimension adds no information. Drop it and use RF only.
  • B2B vs B2C frequency differs: A B2B customer buying quarterly is "frequent." A B2C customer buying quarterly may be "at risk." Calibrate to business context.
  • Don't over-message At Risk customers: Bombarding dormant customers with emails can increase unsubscribes. One well-crafted win-back campaign is better than weekly emails.

Scripts

ScriptDescriptionUsage
scripts/rfm_score.pyScore customers on R/F/M and assign segment labelspython scripts/rfm_score.py --help

Run python scripts/rfm_score.py --verify to execute built-in sanity tests.

References

  • For Python/SQL implementation code, see references/rfm-implementation.md
  • For CLV prediction extending RFM, see references/clv-prediction.md

平台分布

Codex

36.84%
按下载量换算50

Claude

29.83%
按下载量换算40

Cursor

20.82%
按下载量换算28

Gemini CLI

9.43%
按下载量换算13

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills