Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

devtu-self-evolve(devtu 自我进化)

devtu-self-evolve 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

devtu-self-evolve 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 31,975。

总安装 2,607周安装 112GitHub Stars 1,307下载 914核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:devtu-self-evolve(devtu 自我进化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse
仓库路径:skills/devtu-self-evolve
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill devtu-self-evolve
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill devtu-self-evolve

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

devtu-self-evolve 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果时使用。它适用于开发流程中的发现阶段,可辅助 API 差距分析、批量发现和工具构建。

使用时需结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法,安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态。注意该技能可能触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作,需评估安全风险后再部署。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/devtu-self-evolve

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill devtu-self-e…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

devtu-self-evolve 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill devtu-self-evolve。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

devtu-self-evolve 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

devtu-self-evolve 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

devtu-self-evolve 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

devtu-self-evolve 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,607 次,近一周安装 112 次,下载 914 次,GitHub 1,307 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

devtu-self-evolve 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 1,307 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
devtu-self-evolve

devtu 自我进化 · 本页

2,6071,307调用外部服务未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

ToolUniverse Self-Evolution Orchestrator

Coordinates the full development lifecycle by dispatching to specialized devtu skills.

The Cycle

Discover → Create → Test → Fix → Optimize → Ship → Repeat

Each phase maps to a dedicated skill:

PhaseSkillWhat it does
Discoverdevtu-auto-discover-apisGap analysis, web search for APIs, batch discovery
Createdevtu-create-toolBuild tool class + JSON config + test examples
Test*(this skill)*Launch researcher persona agents to find issues
Fixdevtu-fix-toolDiagnose failures, implement fixes, validate
Optimizedevtu-optimize-skillsImprove skill reports, evidence handling, UX
Optimizedevtu-optimize-descriptionsImprove tool JSON descriptions for clarity
Docsdevtu-docs-qualityValidate documentation accuracy
Shipdevtu-githubBranch, commit, push, create PR

Quick Start

Pick an entry point based on what's needed:

  • "Run a test round" → jump to Testing Phase
  • "Expand coverage" → invoke Skill(skill="devtu-auto-discover-apis")
  • "Create a new tool" → invoke Skill(skill="devtu-create-tool")
  • "Fix a broken tool" → invoke Skill(skill="devtu-fix-tool")
  • "Improve skills" → invoke Skill(skill="devtu-optimize-skills")
  • "Full cycle" → follow all phases below in order

Phase 1: Discovery (optional)

Invoke Skill(skill="devtu-auto-discover-apis") to:

  1. Run gap analysis on current tool categories
  2. Search for life science APIs in underrepresented domains
  3. Score and prioritize APIs by coverage, reliability, documentation

Phase 2: Tool Creation (optional)

Invoke Skill(skill="devtu-create-tool") for each new API:

  1. Create Python tool class implementing the API
  2. Create JSON config with parameters, descriptions, test examples
  3. Register in _lazy_registry_static.py and default_config.py
  4. Validate: python -m tooluniverse.cli test <ToolName>

Phase 3: Testing Phase

This is the core testing loop, run directly by this skill.

Setup

  1. Check for open PRs: gh pr list --state open
  2. If unmerged PR → use that branch; if merged → new branch from origin/main
  3. Rebase: git fetch origin && git rebase origin/main

Researcher Persona Agents

Launch 2 agents per round (A + B) using the Agent tool with these parameters:

Each agent gets:

  • Domain specialty (oncology, genomics, pharmacology, etc.)
  • Research question (specific biological question)
  • 5-7 test scenarios exercising different tools
  • Instructions to report issues with severity (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
  • Issue IDs: Feature-{round}{letter}-{num} (e.g., Feature-59A-001)

Agent prompt template — see references/persona-template.md

Verification (CRITICAL)

Before implementing ANY agent-reported issue, verify via CLI:

python3 -m tooluniverse.cli run <ToolName> '<json_args>'

50%+ of agent reports are false positives from MCP interface confusion. Only fix verified issues.

Fix Principles

  1. Prevent, don't recover — fix root cause, not symptoms
  2. Validate at input — reject bad params early with clear guidance
  3. Distinguish "no data" from "bad query" — different messages for each
  4. Fix the abstraction — don't add alias lists that grow forever

Anti-patterns: hint text instead of validation, parameter aliases instead of fixing naming, post-hoc probing instead of pre-validation.

Skill Usefulness Testing (NEW — beyond tool testing)

Standard testing verifies tools work. Usefulness testing verifies skills actually solve scientist problems. Run this after standard testing:

  1. Pick a real research question that the skill claims to answer (not a tool-level test)
  2. Launch an agent following the skill workflow on the real question
  3. Assess honestly: Does the skill produce an actionable answer, or just a data dump?

Score 1-10 rubric:

  • 1-3: Tool catalog — lists tools without interpretation
  • 4-6: Data collector — gathers data but doesn't help combine/interpret
  • 7-8: Reasoning framework — guides interpretation with tables/scoring/synthesis
  • 9-10: Decision engine — produces concrete, defensible recommendations

Common failure patterns found in usefulness tests:

PatternScore ImpactFix
"Call A, then B, then C" without explaining what to DO with results-3Add interpretation tables
Tool params wrong (tool works but skill documents wrong names)-2Verify ALL tool params via get_tool_info()
Promises data the API can't deliver (e.g., DepMap CRISPR scores)-2Be honest about limitations; add computational procedure workaround
No synthesis phase at the end-2Add "so what?" phase that combines all evidence
No evidence grading-1Add T1-T4 or similar confidence tiers
No computational procedures for things tools can't do-1Add Python code blocks using scipy/pandas/numpy

When tools can't help, add computational procedures: Some analyses need Python code, not API calls. Skills should include working code blocks for:

  • Statistical testing (scipy.stats, FDR correction)
  • Data analysis from downloaded files (pandas + CSV from DepMap, TCGA, etc.)
  • Scoring algorithms (ACMG classification, viability scores)
  • Sequence analysis (Biopython)

See devtu-optimize-skills Patterns 14-15 for full guidance.

Phase 4: Fix & Commit

  1. Implement verified fixes (see references/bug-patterns.md for code-level patterns)
  2. Run code-simplifier: Skill(skill="simplify") — always after writing or modifying code
  3. Lint: ruff check src/tooluniverse/<file>.py
  4. Verify syntax: python -c "from tooluniverse.<module> import <Class>"
  5. Test: python -m tooluniverse.cli run <Tool> '<json>'
  6. Pre-commit hook pattern: stage → commit (fails, reformats) → re-stage → commit
  7. Push: git push origin <branch>
Also see Skill(skill="devtu-code-optimization") for reusable fix patterns and anti-patterns.

Phase 5: Optimize (optional)

After fixes are stable:

  • Skill(skill="devtu-optimize-descriptions") — improve tool descriptions
  • Skill(skill="devtu-optimize-skills") — improve research skill quality
  • Skill(skill="devtu-docs-quality") — validate docs accuracy

Phase 6: Ship

Invoke Skill(skill="devtu-github") or manually:

  1. Rebase: git fetch origin && git stash && git rebase origin/main && git stash pop
  2. git push --force-with-lease origin <branch>
  3. Create or update PR: gh pr create / verify with gh pr view <N> --json mergeable
  4. Verify "mergeable": "MERGEABLE" before reporting done

GitHub repo: mims-harvard/ToolUniverse — always verify with git remote -v before pushing.


Git Rules (CRITICAL)

  • NEVER push to main — all work on feature branches
  • NEVER have multiple open fix PRs — keep adding to current branch
  • Always rebase before push: git fetch origin && git rebase origin/main
  • Commit message format: no "BUG" terminology, use "Feature" or "Fix"
  • No AI attribution in commits

Common Issue Categories

CategorySignal
Silent parameter missWrong-field check; param ignored
Always-fires conditional.get("field") on wrong type
Silent normalizationAuto-transform not disclosed
Wrong notation/caseGene fusions, Title Case names
Substring matchShort symbol returns multiple targets
try/except indentMismatched → SyntaxError

Full patterns → references/bug-patterns.md

Round Tracking

After each round: advance counter, update patterns file, keep this SKILL.md under 150 lines.

Current round: 127 (rounds completed: 52-126)

平台分布

Codex

34.12%
按下载量换算312

Claude

30.7%
按下载量换算281

Cursor

17.77%
按下载量换算162

Gemini CLI

9.04%
按下载量换算83

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills