Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

devtu-optimize-skills(devtu 优化技能)

devtu-optimize-skills 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

devtu-optimize-skills 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 21,218。

总安装 4,939周安装 210GitHub Stars 1,308下载 1,730核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:devtu-optimize-skills(devtu 优化技能)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse
仓库路径:skills/devtu-optimize-skills
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill devtu-optimize-skills
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill devtu-optimize-skills

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

优化 ToolUniverse 研究技能,强调证据分级与来源标注。要求错误信息具可操作性,schema 必须匹配实际 API。透明声明数据覆盖范围,避免跨工具错误路由。防止静默参数丢弃,所有忽略行为均需显式说明。devtu-optimize-skills 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/devtu-optimize-skills

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill devtu-optimi…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

devtu-optimize-skills 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill devtu-optimize-skills。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

devtu-optimize-skills 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

devtu-optimize-skills 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

devtu-optimize-skills 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

devtu-optimize-skills 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,939 次,近一周安装 210 次,下载 1,730 次,GitHub 1,308 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

devtu-optimize-skills 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 1,308 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
devtu-optimize-skills

devtu 优化技能 · 本页

4,9391,308需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Optimizing ToolUniverse Skills

Best practices for high-quality research skills with evidence grading and source attribution.

Tool Quality Standards

  1. Error messages must be actionable — tell the user what went wrong AND what to do
  2. Schema must match API reality — run python3 -m tooluniverse.cli run <Tool> '<json>' to verify
  3. Coverage transparency — state what data is NOT included
  4. Input validation before API calls — don't silently send invalid values
  5. Cross-tool routing — name the correct tool when query is out-of-scope
  6. No silent parameter dropping — if a parameter is ignored, say so

Core Principles (13 Patterns)

Full details: references/optimization-patterns.md

#PatternKey Idea
1Tool Interface Verificationget_tool_info() before first call; maintain corrections table
2Foundation Data LayerQuery aggregator (Open Targets, PubChem) FIRST
3Versioned IdentifiersCapture both ENSG00000123456 and .12 version
4Disambiguation FirstResolve IDs, detect collisions, build negative filters
5Report-Only OutputNarrative in report; methodology in appendix only if asked
6Evidence GradingT1 (mechanistic) → T2 (functional) → T3 (association) → T4 (mention)
7Quantified CompletenessNumeric minimums per section (>=20 PPIs, top 10 tissues)
8Mandatory ChecklistAll sections exist, even if "Limited evidence"
9Aggregated Data GapsSingle section consolidating all missing data
10Query StrategyHigh-precision seeds → citation expansion → collision-filtered broad
11Tool Failure HandlingPrimary → Fallback 1 → Fallback 2 → document unavailable
12Scalable OutputNarrative report + JSON/CSV bibliography
13Synthesis SectionsBiological model + testable hypotheses, not just paper lists

Optimized Skill Workflow

Phase -1: Tool Verification (check params)
Phase  0: Foundation Data (aggregator query)
Phase  1: Disambiguation (IDs, collisions, baseline)
Phase  2: Specialized Queries (fill gaps)
Phase  3: Report Synthesis (evidence-graded narrative)

Testing Standards

Full details: references/testing-standards.md

Critical rule: NEVER write skill docs without testing all tool calls first.

  • 30+ tests per skill, 100% pass rate
  • All tests use real data (no placeholders)
  • Phase + integration + edge case tests
  • SOAP tools (IMGT, SAbDab, TheraSAbDab) need operation parameter
  • Distinguish transient errors (retry) from real bugs (fix)
  • API docs are often wrong — always verify with actual calls

Pattern 14: Reasoning Frameworks Over Tool Catalogs (CRITICAL)

Skills that just list tools ("call A, then B, then C") score 3-5/10 in usefulness tests. Skills that explain HOW to interpret and combine data score 7-9/10. Every skill MUST include:

14a. Interpretation Tables

Map raw API data to biological/clinical meaning. Don't just retrieve — explain.

Bad (tool catalog)Good (reasoning framework)
"Get GO terms from MGnify"GO terms → interpretation table: butyrate genes = barrier integrity, LPS genes = inflammation
"Get DepMap dependency scores"Score < -0.5 = essential, but pan-essential = bad drug target (toxicity); selective = good target
"Get FAERS counts"PRR > 5 = strong signal, but signal ≠ causation (channeling bias, notoriety bias)

14b. Synthesis Phases

Every multi-phase skill needs a final phase that answers "so what?" — not just collecting data:

  • "What changed and why does it matter?"
  • "Is this cause or consequence?"
  • "What's the actionable recommendation?"

14c. Honest Limitations

If a tool API can't deliver what the skill promises, say so explicitly. Don't describe aspirational capabilities. Example: "DepMap_get_gene_dependencies returns gene metadata only, NOT per-cell-line CRISPR scores."

Pattern 15: Computational Procedures When Tools Can't Help

Some scientific analyses require computation, not just API queries. When no tool exists for a capability, embed a Python code procedure directly in the skill using packages available in ToolUniverse (pandas, scipy, numpy, statsmodels, biopython, networkx).

When to use computational procedures:

GapProcedurePackages
API doesn't return needed data (e.g., DepMap scores)Download CSV + pandas analysispandas
Statistical testing (differential abundance, enrichment)scipy.stats + FDR correctionscipy, statsmodels
Sequence analysis (alignment, conservation)Biopython SeqIO + pairwise alignmentbiopython
Chemical similarity (analog search, fingerprints)RDKit fingerprints + Tanimotordkit (visualization extra)
Network analysis (hub genes, clustering)NetworkX graph metricsnetworkx
Scoring algorithms (ACMG classification, viability scores)Custom Python functionsbuilt-in
Dose feasibility (Cmax vs IC50 comparison)Numerical comparison + PK datapandas, numpy

Template for computational procedures in skills:

**Computational procedure: [Name]**
[When to use this: explain the gap it fills]

\`\`\`python
# [What this computes]
# Requires: [packages] (included in ToolUniverse dependencies)
import pandas as pd
from scipy.stats import mannwhitneyu

# Input: [describe expected input format]
# Output: [describe output]
# [Full working code with example data]
\`\`\`

[Interpretation guidance for the output]

Key rules for computational procedures:

  1. Only use packages in ToolUniverse dependencies (pyproject.toml): pandas, scipy, numpy, networkx, requests, biopython (optional extra)
  2. Include example data so the procedure is immediately testable
  3. Explain the output — a code block without interpretation is useless
  4. Note when external data download is needed (e.g., DepMap CSV from depmap.org)

Pattern 15b: Download-and-Process for Datasets Without REST APIs

Many critical scientific datasets have NO REST API but provide bulk download files. Skills should include concrete download-and-process instructions when this is the only path to essential data.

Template for download-and-process procedures:

**Step 1: Download data files**
- URL: [exact download page URL]
- Files needed: [filename] (~[size]) — [what it contains]
- Registration: [required/not required]
- Update frequency: [quarterly/annually/etc.]

**Step 2: Process with Python**
[Working code with pandas/scipy that loads the CSV and produces the analysis]

**Step 3: Interpret results**
[Table mapping output values to biological/clinical meaning]

**When files are not available**: [Fallback strategy using API tools]

Known download-only datasets that skills reference:

DatasetDownload URLFilesUsed By
DepMap CRISPRdepmap.org/portal/download/all/CRISPRGeneEffect.csv (~300MB), Model.csv (~2MB)functional-genomics, cell-line-profiling
TCGA clinicalportal.gdc.cancer.govClinical + mutation TSVscancer-genomics-tcga
GTEx expressiongtexportal.org/home/downloadsGTEx_Analysis_v8_Annotations.csvexpression-data-retrieval
ClinGen gene-diseaseclinicalgenome.org/docs/gene_curation_list.tsvvariant-interpretation
gnomAD constraintgnomad.broadinstitute.org/downloadsconstraint metrics TSVfunctional-genomics

Critical rule: Always include a fallback for when the download is unavailable (user may not have registration, file may be too large, etc.). The fallback should use available API tools even if they provide less complete data.

Common Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternFix
"Search Log" reportsKeep methodology internal; report findings only
Missing disambiguationAdd collision detection; build negative filters
No evidence gradingApply T1-T4 grades; label each claim
Empty sections omittedInclude with "None identified"
No synthesisAdd biological model + hypotheses
Silent failuresDocument in Data Gaps; implement fallbacks
Wrong tool parametersVerify via get_tool_info() before calling
GTEx returns nothingTry versioned ID ENSG*.version
No foundation layerQuery aggregator first
Untested tool callsTest-driven: test script FIRST
Tool catalog without interpretationAdd interpretation tables explaining what data means
Aspirational capabilitiesBe honest when APIs can't deliver; add computational procedure instead
Missing statistical analysisAdd scipy/pandas code procedure for computation the tools can't do

Quick Fixes for User Complaints

ComplaintFix
"Report too short"Add Phase 0 foundation + Phase 1 disambiguation
"Too much noise"Add collision filtering
"Can't tell what's important"Add T1-T4 evidence tiers
"Missing sections"Add mandatory checklist with minimums
"Too long/unreadable"Separate narrative from JSON
"Just a list of papers"Add synthesis sections
"Tool failed, no data"Add retry + fallback chains

Skill Template

---
name: [domain]-research
description: [What + when triggers]
---

# [Domain] Research

## Workflow
Phase -1: Tool Verification → Phase 0: Foundation → Phase 1: Disambiguate
→ Phase 2: Search → Phase 3: Report

## Phase -1: Tool Verification
[Parameter corrections table]

## Phase 0: Foundation Data
[Aggregator query]

## Phase 1: Disambiguation
[IDs, collisions, baseline]

## Phase 2: Specialized Queries
[Query strategy, fallbacks]

## Phase 3: Report Synthesis
[Evidence grading, mandatory sections]

## Output Files
- [topic]_report.md, [topic]_bibliography.json

## Quantified Minimums
[Numbers per section]

## Completeness Checklist
[Required sections with checkboxes]

Additional References

平台分布

Codex

38.01%
按下载量换算658

Claude

32.27%
按下载量换算558

Cursor

17.99%
按下载量换算311

Gemini CLI

8.99%
按下载量换算156

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills