Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索操作浏览器clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

deepresearchworkdeepresearchwork 搜索

Agent Skill

deepresearchwork 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

193,368

周安装

7,899

GitHub Stars

17

下载量

62,560
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:deepresearchwork(deepresearchwork 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jiacode/deepresearchwork
安装命令:
openclaw skills install deepresearchwork
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install deepresearchwork

简介

综合研究框架,结合网络搜索、内容分析、来源验证和迭代调查,对任何主题进行深入研究。当您需要使用多个来源、交叉验证和结构化结果进行彻底研究时使用。

SKILL.md

name
deep-research
description
Comprehensive research framework that combines web search, content analysis, source verification, and iterative investigation to conduct in-depth research on any topic. Use when you need to perform thorough research with multiple sources, cross-validation, and structured findings.

Deep Research Framework

Overview

The Deep Research skill provides a systematic approach to conducting thorough investigations on any topic. It combines multiple tools and methodologies to gather, analyze, verify, and synthesize information.

Core Components

1. Research Planning

  • Define research objectives
  • Identify key questions
  • Establish search criteria
  • Determine validation requirements

2. Information Gathering

  • Multi-source web search
  • Content extraction from various formats
  • Source diversity verification
  • Temporal relevance assessment

3. Analysis & Synthesis

  • Cross-reference multiple sources
  • Identify patterns and contradictions
  • Evaluate source credibility
  • Organize findings systematically

4. Validation & Verification

  • Fact-checking against authoritative sources
  • Cross-validation of claims
  • Identify potential biases
  • Assess information reliability

Research Workflow

Phase 1: Initial Investigation

  1. Topic Analysis

- Clarify research scope - Identify key concepts and terms - Define specific questions to answer

  1. Broad Search

- Use web_search to identify major sources - Gather diverse perspectives - Map the landscape of available information

  1. Source Prioritization

- Rank sources by authority and relevance - Identify primary vs. secondary sources - Note publication dates and context

Phase 2: Deep Dive

  1. Detailed Content Extraction

- Use web_fetch to retrieve full articles/pages - Extract key information systematically - Maintain source attribution

  1. Cross-Reference Analysis

- Compare claims across multiple sources - Identify agreements and disagreements - Note inconsistencies for further investigation

  1. Expert Sources

- Seek academic papers, expert opinions - Look for peer-reviewed sources - Identify recognized authorities on the topic

Phase 3: Synthesis & Validation

  1. Pattern Recognition

- Identify consistent themes across sources - Highlight areas of disagreement - Note gaps in available information

  1. Fact Verification

- Cross-check claims against authoritative sources - Verify dates, statistics, and attributions - Identify potential misinformation

  1. Bias Assessment

- Evaluate source objectivity - Identify potential conflicts of interest - Consider temporal context of information

Phase 4: Report Generation

  1. Structured Summary

- Executive summary of key findings - Detailed findings organized by theme - Supporting evidence for each claim

  1. Source Evaluation

- Assessment of source credibility - Identification of limitations - Confidence levels for different claims

  1. Remaining Questions

- Areas requiring further investigation - Conflicting information needing resolution - Gaps in current knowledge

Tools Integration

Web Research

  • web_search: Initial broad search to identify sources
  • web_fetch: Retrieve detailed content from specific URLs
  • browser: For complex sites or when web_fetch fails

Content Processing

  • read: Process downloaded content or documents
  • write: Create structured research notes
  • edit: Refine and organize findings

Memory & Organization

  • memory_get / memory_search: Reference previous research
  • write: Create persistent research records
  • Structured file organization for findings

Research Quality Standards

Source Diversity

  • Include multiple perspectives on controversial topics
  • Balance popular and academic sources
  • Include international viewpoints when relevant
  • Seek primary sources when possible

Temporal Relevance

  • Prioritize recent information for fast-changing topics
  • Consider historical context for trend analysis
  • Note when information was published
  • Flag potentially outdated information

Authority Assessment

  • Prioritize peer-reviewed academic sources
  • Consider author credentials and institutional affiliation
  • Check for potential conflicts of interest
  • Verify organizational reputation

Iterative Research Approach

Cycle 1: General Overview

  • Broad search to understand the topic landscape
  • Identify key terms, concepts, and stakeholders
  • Establish initial research questions

Cycle 2: Focused Investigation

  • Targeted searches based on initial findings
  • Deep dive into specific aspects
  • Begin synthesis of information

Cycle 3: Validation & Refinement

  • Verify key claims across multiple sources
  • Resolve contradictions
  • Refine understanding based on evidence

Cycle 4: Synthesis & Reporting

  • Combine findings into coherent narrative
  • Identify remaining uncertainties
  • Prepare final research report

Output Structure

Research Report Template

# [Research Topic] - Deep Research Report

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of key findings]

## Research Questions
[Specific questions investigated]

## Methodology
[Description of research approach and tools used]

## Key Findings
[Main discoveries organized by theme]

## Supporting Evidence
[Evidence supporting each finding with sources]

## Contradictions/Debates
[Areas of disagreement among sources]

## Source Credibility Assessment
[Evaluation of information sources]

## Limitations
[Identified limitations in research]

## Further Research Needed
[Questions requiring additional investigation]

Use Cases

Academic Research

  • Literature reviews
  • Topic exploration
  • Source verification

Business Intelligence

  • Market analysis
  • Competitive research
  • Technology trends

Fact Checking

  • Claim verification
  • Misinformation identification
  • Source credibility assessment

Personal Learning

  • Deep topic exploration
  • Concept clarification
  • Question resolution

Quality Assurance

  • Always verify critical claims against multiple sources
  • Flag information that seems unreliable
  • Maintain skepticism toward sensational claims
  • Prioritize authoritative sources over anonymous ones
  • Document all sources for verification purposes

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

95.12%
按下载量换算59,507

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills