Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

cover(cover 搜索)

cover 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

cover 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 42,706。

总安装 1,048周安装 42GitHub Stars 160下载 339核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:cover(cover 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit
仓库路径:skills/cover
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill cover
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill cover

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

cover 用于生成全面的测试套件,支持真实服务集成测试与自动失败修复,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要提升代码覆盖率时使用。它依赖 vitest 或 jest 运行测试,并能自动识别缺失分支覆盖并补充用例,适用于关键路径验证。

通过 /ork:cover 命令触发,可指定模型和认证流程等参数,输出详细的测试报告和改进建议。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。cover 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/cover

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill cover;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

cover 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill cover。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

cover 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

cover 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

cover 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

cover 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,048 次,近一周安装 42 次,下载 339 次,GitHub 160 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

cover 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
cover

cover 搜索 · 本页

1,048160操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Cover — Test Suite Generator

Generate comprehensive test suites for existing code with real-service integration testing and automated failure healing.

Note: If disableSkillShellExecution is enabled (CC 2.1.91), the precondition check for vitest/jest won't run. Verify a test runner is installed before proceeding: npx vitest --version or npx jest --version.

Quick Start

/ork:cover authentication flow
/ork:cover --model=opus payment processing
/ork:cover --tier=unit,integration user service
/ork:cover --real-services checkout pipeline

Argument Resolution

SCOPE = "$ARGUMENTS"  # e.g., "authentication flow"

# Flag parsing
MODEL_OVERRIDE = None
TIERS = ["unit", "integration", "e2e"]  # default: all three
REAL_SERVICES = False

for token in "$ARGUMENTS".split():
    if token.startswith("--model="):
        MODEL_OVERRIDE = token.split("=", 1)[1]
        SCOPE = SCOPE.replace(token, "").strip()
    elif token.startswith("--tier="):
        TIERS = token.split("=", 1)[1].split(",")
        SCOPE = SCOPE.replace(token, "").strip()
    elif token == "--real-services":
        REAL_SERVICES = True
        SCOPE = SCOPE.replace(token, "").strip()

Step -0.5: Effort-Aware Coverage Scaling (CC 2.1.76)

Scale test generation depth based on /effort level:

Effort LevelTiers GeneratedAgentsHeal Iterations
lowUnit only1 agent1 max
mediumUnit + Integration2 agents2 max
high (default)Unit + Integration + E2E3 agents3 max
xhigh (Opus 4.7 only, CC 2.1.111+)Unit + Integration + E2E3 agents4 max (one extra heal pass)
Override: Explicit --tier= flag or user selection overrides /effort downscaling.

Step -1: MCP Probe + Resume Check

# Probe MCPs (parallel):
ToolSearch(query="select:mcp__memory__search_nodes")
ToolSearch(query="select:mcp__context7__resolve-library-id")

Write(".claude/chain/capabilities.json", {
  "memory": <true if found>,
  "context7": <true if found>,
  "skill": "cover",
  "timestamp": now()
})

# Resume check:
Read(".claude/chain/state.json")
# If exists and skill == "cover": resume from current_phase
# Otherwise: initialize state

Step 0: Scope & Tier Selection

AskUserQuestion(
  questions=[
    {
      "question": "What test tiers should I generate?",
      "header": "Test Tiers",
      "options": [
        {"label": "Full coverage (Recommended)", "description": "Unit + Integration (real services) + E2E", "markdown": "```\nFull Coverage\n─────────────\n  Unit            Integration       E2E\n  ┌─────────┐    ┌─────────────┐  ┌──────────┐\n  │ AAA     │    │ Real DB     │  │Playwright│\n  │ Mocks   │    │ Real APIs   │  │Page obj  │\n  │ Factory │    │ Testcontain │  │A11y      │\n  └─────────┘    └─────────────┘  └──────────┘\n  3 parallel test-generator agents\n```"},
        {"label": "Unit + Integration", "description": "Skip E2E, focus on logic and service boundaries", "markdown": "```\nUnit + Integration\n──────────────────\n  Unit tests for business logic\n  Integration tests at API boundaries\n  Real services if docker-compose found\n  Skip: browser automation\n```"},
        {"label": "Unit only", "description": "Fast isolated tests for business logic", "markdown": "```\nUnit Only (~2 min)\n──────────────────\n  AAA pattern tests\n  MSW/VCR mocking\n  Factory-based data\n  Coverage gap analysis\n  Skip: real services, browser\n```"},
        {"label": "Integration only", "description": "API boundary and real-service tests", "markdown": "```\nIntegration Only\n────────────────\n  API endpoint tests (Supertest/httpx)\n  Database tests (real or in-memory)\n  Contract tests (Pact)\n  Testcontainers if available\n```"},
        {"label": "E2E only", "description": "Playwright browser tests", "markdown": "```\nE2E Only\n────────\n  Playwright page objects\n  User flow tests\n  Visual regression\n  Accessibility (axe-core)\n```"}
      ],
      "multiSelect": false
    },
    {
      "question": "Healing strategy for failing tests?",
      "header": "Failure Handling",
      "options": [
        {"label": "Auto-heal (Recommended)", "description": "Fix failing tests up to 3 iterations"},
        {"label": "Generate only", "description": "Write tests, report failures, don't fix"},
        {"label": "Strict", "description": "All tests must pass or abort"}
      ],
      "multiSelect": false
    }
  ]
)

Override TIERS based on selection. Skip this step if --tier= flag was provided.


Task Management (MANDATORY)

# 1. Create main task IMMEDIATELY
TaskCreate(subject=f"Cover: {SCOPE}", description="Generate comprehensive test suite with real-service testing", activeForm=f"Generating tests for {SCOPE}")

# 2. Create subtasks for each phase
TaskCreate(subject="Discover scope and detect frameworks", activeForm="Discovering test scope")    # id=2
TaskCreate(subject="Analyze coverage gaps", activeForm="Analyzing coverage gaps")                  # id=3
TaskCreate(subject="Generate tests (parallel per tier)", activeForm="Generating tests")            # id=4
TaskCreate(subject="Execute generated tests", activeForm="Running tests")                          # id=5
TaskCreate(subject="Heal failing tests", activeForm="Healing test failures")                       # id=6
TaskCreate(subject="Generate coverage report", activeForm="Generating report")                     # id=7

# 3. Set dependencies for sequential phases
TaskUpdate(taskId="3", addBlockedBy=["2"])  # Analysis needs discovery first
TaskUpdate(taskId="4", addBlockedBy=["3"])  # Generation needs gap map
TaskUpdate(taskId="5", addBlockedBy=["4"])  # Execution needs generated tests
TaskUpdate(taskId="6", addBlockedBy=["5"])  # Healing needs test results
TaskUpdate(taskId="7", addBlockedBy=["6"])  # Report needs healed suite

# 4. Before starting each task, verify it's unblocked
task = TaskGet(taskId="2")  # Verify blockedBy is empty

# 5. Update status as you progress
TaskUpdate(taskId="2", status="in_progress")  # When starting
TaskUpdate(taskId="2", status="completed")    # When done — repeat for each subtask

6-Phase Workflow

PhaseActivitiesOutput
1. DiscoveryDetect frameworks, scan scope, find untested codeFramework map, file list
2. Coverage AnalysisRun existing tests, map gaps per tierCoverage baseline, gap map
3. GenerationParallel test-generator agents per tierTest files created
4. ExecutionRun all generated testsPass/fail results
5. HealFix failures, re-run (max 3 iterations)Green test suite
6. ReportCoverage delta, test count, summaryCoverage report

Phase Handoffs

After PhaseHandoff FileKey Outputs
1. Discovery01-cover-discovery.jsonFrameworks, scope files, tier plan
2. Analysis02-cover-analysis.jsonBaseline coverage, gap map
3. Generation03-cover-generation.jsonFiles created, test count per tier
5. Heal05-cover-healed.jsonFinal pass/fail, iterations used

Phase 1: Discovery

Detect the project's test infrastructure and scope the work.

# PARALLEL — all in ONE message:
# 1. Framework detection (hook handles this, but also scan manually)
Grep(pattern="vitest|jest|mocha|playwright|cypress", glob="package.json", output_mode="content")
Grep(pattern="pytest|unittest|hypothesis", glob="pyproject.toml", output_mode="content")
Grep(pattern="pytest|unittest|hypothesis", glob="requirements*.txt", output_mode="content")

# 2. Real-service infrastructure
Glob(pattern="**/docker-compose*.yml")
Glob(pattern="**/testcontainers*")
Grep(pattern="testcontainers", glob="**/package.json", output_mode="content")
Grep(pattern="testcontainers", glob="**/requirements*.txt", output_mode="content")

# 3. Existing test structure
Glob(pattern="**/tests/**/*.test.*")
Glob(pattern="**/tests/**/*.spec.*")
Glob(pattern="**/__tests__/**/*")
Glob(pattern="**/test_*.py")

# 4. Scope files (what to test)
# If SCOPE specified, find matching source files
Grep(pattern=SCOPE, output_mode="files_with_matches")

Real-service decision:

  • docker-compose*.yml found → integration tests use real services
  • testcontainers in deps → use testcontainers for isolated service instances
  • Neither found + --real-services flag → error: "No docker-compose or testcontainers found. Install testcontainers or remove --real-services flag."
  • Neither found, no flag → integration tests use mocks (MSW/VCR)

Load real-service detection details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/real-service-detection.md")

Phase 2: Coverage Analysis

Run existing tests and identify gaps.

# Detect and run coverage command
# TypeScript: npx vitest run --coverage --reporter=json
# Python: pytest --cov=<scope> --cov-report=json
# Go: go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...

# Parse coverage output to identify:
# 1. Files with 0% coverage (priority targets)
# 2. Files below threshold (default 70%)
# 3. Uncovered functions/methods
# 4. Untested edge cases (error paths, boundary conditions)

Output coverage baseline to user immediately (progressive output).

Phase 3: Generation (Parallel Agents)

Spawn test-generator agents per tier. Launch ALL in ONE message with run_in_background=true.

# Unit tests agent
if "unit" in TIERS:
    Agent(
        subagent_type="test-generator",
        prompt=f"""Generate unit tests for: {SCOPE}
        Coverage gaps: {gap_map.unit_gaps}
        Framework: {detected_framework}
        Existing tests: {existing_test_files}

        Focus on:
        - AAA pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert)
        - Parametrized tests for multiple inputs
        - MSW/VCR for HTTP mocking (never mock fetch directly)
        - Factory-based test data (FactoryBoy/faker-js)
        - Edge cases: empty input, errors, timeouts, boundary values
        - Target: 90%+ business logic coverage""",
        isolation="worktree",
        run_in_background=True,
        max_turns=50,
        model=MODEL_OVERRIDE
    )

# Integration + E2E agents follow the same pattern:
# - subagent_type="test-generator", isolation="worktree", run_in_background=True
# - Integration focus: API endpoints (Supertest/httpx), real DB, contract tests (Pact), Zod schema validation
# - E2E focus: Playwright, semantic locators, Page Object Model, axe-core a11y, visual regression
#
# Special case — emulate (Vercel Labs stateful API emulation):
# When integration tests need GitHub/Stripe/Resend/Okta/etc. emulated
# (HMAC webhooks, parallel port isolation, full config from scratch),
# spawn emulate-engineer instead of test-generator for that tier:
# - subagent_type="emulate-engineer", isolation="worktree"
# - Pairs with emulate-seed skill for seed YAML patterns

Output each agent's results as soon as it returns — don't wait for all agents.

Focus mode (CC 2.1.101): In focus mode, include the full coverage report (before/after delta, test count per tier, files created) in your final message.

Phase 4: Execution

Run all generated tests and collect results.

# Run test commands per tier (PARALLEL if independent):
# Unit: npx vitest run tests/unit/ OR pytest tests/unit/
# Integration: npx vitest run tests/integration/ OR pytest tests/integration/
# E2E: npx playwright test

# Collect: pass count, fail count, error details, coverage delta

Phase 5: Heal Loop

Fix failing tests iteratively. Max 3 iterations to prevent infinite loops.

for iteration in range(3):
    if all_tests_pass:
        break

    # For each failing test:
    # 1. Read the test file and the source code it tests
    # 2. Analyze the failure (assertion error? import error? timeout?)
    # 3. Fix the test (not the source code — tests only)
    # 4. Re-run the fixed tests

    # Common fixes:
    # - Wrong assertions (expected value mismatch)
    # - Missing imports or setup
    # - Stale selectors in E2E tests
    # - Race conditions (add proper waits)
    # - Mock configuration errors

Load heal strategy details: Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/heal-loop-strategy.md")

Boundary: heal fixes TESTS, not source code. If a test fails because the source code has a bug, report it — don't silently fix production code.

Phase 6: Report

Generate coverage report with before/after comparison.

Coverage Report: {SCOPE}
═══════════════════════════

Baseline → After
────────────────
  Unit:        67.2% → 91.3% (+24.1%)
  Integration: 42.0% → 78.5% (+36.5%)
  E2E:          0.0% → 65.0% (+65.0%)
  Overall:     48.4% → 82.1% (+33.7%)

Tests Generated
───────────────
  Unit:        23 tests (18 pass, 5 healed)
  Integration: 12 tests (10 pass, 2 healed)
  E2E:          8 tests (8 pass)
  Total:       43 tests

Heal Iterations: 2/3

Files Created
─────────────
  tests/unit/services/test_auth.py
  tests/unit/services/test_payment.py
  tests/integration/api/test_users.py
  tests/integration/api/test_checkout.py
  tests/e2e/checkout.spec.ts
  tests/e2e/pages/CheckoutPage.ts

Real Services Used: PostgreSQL (testcontainers), Redis (docker-compose)

Remaining Gaps
──────────────
  - src/services/notification.ts (0% — no tests generated, out of scope)
  - src/utils/crypto.ts (45% — edge cases not covered)

Next Steps
──────────
  /ork:verify {SCOPE}    # Grade the implementation + tests
  /ork:commit             # Commit generated tests
  /loop 10m npm test -- --coverage  # Watch coverage while coding

Coverage Drift Monitor (CC 2.1.71)

Optionally schedule weekly coverage drift detection:

# Guard: Skip cron in headless/CI (CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_CRON)
# if env CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_CRON is set, run a single check instead
CronCreate(
  schedule="0 2 * * 0",
  prompt="Weekly coverage drift check for {SCOPE}: npm test -- --coverage.
    If coverage >= baseline → CronDelete.
    If coverage drops > 5% → alert with regression details and recommendation."
)

Key Principles

  • Output limits (CC 2.1.77+): Opus 4.6 defaults to 64k output tokens (128k upper bound). For large test suites, chunk generation across multiple agent turns if output approaches the limit.
  • Tests only — never modify production source code, only generate test files
  • Real services when available — prefer testcontainers/docker-compose over mocks for integration tests because mock/prod divergence causes silent failures in production
  • Parallel generation — spawn one test-generator agent per tier in ONE message
  • Heal, don't loop forever — max 3 iterations, then report remaining failures
  • Progressive output — show results as each agent completes
  • Factory over fixtures — use FactoryBoy/faker-js for test data, not hardcoded values
  • Mock at network level — MSW/VCR, never mock fetch/axios directly

Agent Coordination

Context Passing

Each test-generator agent receives: coverage gaps for its tier, test framework config, real-service infrastructure (testcontainers, docker-compose), and fixture patterns from the project.

Monitor + Partial Results (CC 2.1.98)

Use Monitor for streaming test execution output from background agents:

# Stream test suite output in real-time
Bash(command="npm test -- --coverage 2>&1", run_in_background=true)
Monitor(pid=test_task_id)  # Each line → notification

Partial results (CC 2.1.98): If a test-generator crashes mid-generation, synthesize what it produced:

for agent_result in test_gen_results:
    if "[PARTIAL RESULT]" in agent_result.output:
        # Agent crashed — check if it wrote any test files before dying
        partial_tests = Glob(pattern="**/tests/**/*.test.*", path=agent_result.worktree)
        if partial_tests:
            # 6 passing tests from a crashed agent > 0 tests
            # Copy partial tests to main worktree, run them in Phase 4
            for test_file in partial_tests:
                Bash(command=f"cp {test_file} {main_worktree}/{test_file}")
            # Flag as partial in report

SendMessage (Test Healing)

When a generated test fails, the healer agent can request context from the generator:

SendMessage(to="test-generator-unit", message="Test user_service_test.py:42 fails — TypeError on mock return. What's the expected shape?")

Skill Chain

Standard chain: implement → cover → verify → commit. Use addBlockedBy between each.

Verification Gate

Before claiming coverage is complete, apply: Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/shared/rules/verification-gate.md"). Run the coverage report fresh. "Should pass" is not evidence.

Agent Status Protocol

All test-generator agents report using: Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/shared/status-protocol.md"). BLOCKED if tests can't be written due to missing interfaces. NEEDS_CONTEXT if test expectations are unclear.

Related Skills

  • ork:implement — generates tests during implementation (Phase 5); use /ork:cover after for deeper coverage
  • ork:verify — grades existing tests 0-10; chain: implement → cover → verify
  • testing-unit / testing-integration / testing-e2e — knowledge skills loaded by test-generator agents
  • ork:commit — commit generated test files
Session recovery (CC 2.1.108+): After idle periods or interruptions, use /recap to restore conversational context alongside checkpoint-resume state. Enabled by default since CC 2.1.110 (even with telemetry disabled).

References

Load on demand with Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/<file>"):

FileContent
real-service-detection.mdDocker-compose/testcontainers detection, service startup, teardown
heal-loop-strategy.mdFailure classification, fix patterns, iteration budget
coverage-report-template.mdReport format, delta calculation, gap analysis

Version: 1.0.0 (March 2026) — Initial release

平台分布

Codex

36.98%
按下载量换算125

Claude

27.94%
按下载量换算95

Cursor

20.49%
按下载量换算69

Gemini CLI

9.78%
按下载量换算33

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills