Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

conducting-phishing-incident-response(进行网络钓鱼事件响应)

conducting-phishing-incident-response 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

conducting-phishing-incident-response 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 58,785。

总安装 405周安装 17GitHub Stars 5,880下载 140核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:conducting-phishing-incident-response(进行网络钓鱼事件响应)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/conducting-phishing-incident-response
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill conducting-phishing-incident-response
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill conducting-phishing-incident-response

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于快速响应钓鱼邮件事件,协助收集样本、追踪投递路径并隔离风险。适合用户举报可疑邮件或网关拦截恶意内容后的应急处置流程。提供标准化调查步骤,包括日志分析、IOC 提取和受影响账户核查。不涉及 BEC 类内部账户劫持案件,此类情况应调用专用响应程序处理。

conducting-phishing-incident-response 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/conducting-phishing-incident-response

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

conducting-phishing-incident-response 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill conducti…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

conducting-phishing-incident-response 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

conducting-phishing-incident-response 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

conducting-phishing-incident-response 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

conducting-phishing-incident-response 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 405 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 140 次,GitHub 5,880 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

conducting-phishing-incident-response 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 5,880 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
conducting-phishing-incident-response

进行网络钓鱼事件响应 · 本页

4055,880操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Conducting Phishing Incident Response

When to Use

  • A user reports receiving a suspicious email via the phishing report button or abuse mailbox
  • Email gateway detects a malicious email that bypassed initial filtering
  • Threat intelligence indicates an active phishing campaign targeting the organization
  • A user confirms they clicked a link or opened an attachment from a suspicious email
  • Credentials have been entered on a suspected phishing page

Do not use for business email compromise (BEC) involving compromised internal accounts; use BEC response procedures which focus on account takeover investigation.

Prerequisites

  • Email security gateway with message trace and quarantine capabilities (Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint, Mimecast)
  • Microsoft 365 admin access or Google Workspace admin for mailbox search and purge
  • Malware sandbox for attachment and URL analysis (ANY.RUN, Joe Sandbox, Hybrid Analysis)
  • Email header analysis tools (MXToolbox Header Analyzer, Google Admin Toolbox)
  • Identity provider access for account remediation (Azure AD, Okta, Duo)
  • Phishing report intake process (dedicated mailbox or integrated report button)

Workflow

Step 1: Receive and Triage the Phishing Report

Evaluate the reported email to determine if it is malicious:

  • Extract the email as an.EML or.MSG file (preserves headers)
  • Analyze email headers to determine the true sender, relay path, and authentication results
Email Header Analysis Checklist:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Return-Path:     billing@spoofed-domain[.]com
From:            "IT Support" <support@corp-lookalike[.]com>
Reply-To:        attacker@gmail[.]com (different from From)
SPF:             FAIL (sender IP not authorized for domain)
DKIM:            FAIL (signature invalid)
DMARC:           FAIL (policy: none - no enforcement)
Received:        from mail.attacker-infra[.]net [45.33.x.x]
X-Originating-IP: 45.33.x.x
Message-ID:      <random@attacker-infra.net>

Classification criteria:

  • Confirmed Phishing: Malicious URL/attachment, spoofed sender, credential harvesting page
  • Suspicious: Anomalous headers but no confirmed malicious content
  • Spam/Marketing: Unwanted but not malicious
  • Legitimate: Not a phishing email (false report)

Step 2: Analyze Malicious Content

Examine URLs and attachments in a safe environment:

URL Analysis:

  • Check URL against VirusTotal, URLscan.io, and Google Safe Browsing
  • Open URL in a sandbox browser to capture the landing page
  • Check if the URL redirects to a credential harvesting page
  • Identify the phishing kit type (Microsoft 365 login clone, Okta clone, generic)
  • Determine if the phishing page is still active

Attachment Analysis:

  • Calculate file hash (SHA-256) and check against VirusTotal
  • Detonate in sandbox (ANY.RUN, Joe Sandbox)
  • Analyze document for macros (olevba for Office files)
  • Check for embedded exploits (CVE exploitation in document parsers)

Step 3: Determine Scope of Impact

Identify all recipients and assess who interacted with the phishing email:

Scope Assessment:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Total Recipients:     47 users
Delivered to Inbox:   38 users (9 caught by email gateway)
Opened Email:         24 users (email tracking pixel data)
Clicked Link:         8 users (proxy/firewall logs)
Entered Credentials:  3 users (phishing page submitted form data)
Opened Attachment:    2 users (EDR process execution telemetry)

Search methods:

  • Microsoft 365: Use Threat Explorer or Content Search to find all instances of the email
  • Google Workspace: Use Admin Console > Investigation tool for message search
  • Proxy logs: Search for connections to the phishing URL from internal IPs
  • EDR: Search for attachment file hash execution across all endpoints

Step 4: Contain the Threat

Execute containment actions based on impact assessment:

Email Containment:

  • Purge the phishing email from all mailboxes using Microsoft 365 Content Search and Purge or Google Workspace Admin delete
  • Block the sender domain at the email gateway
  • Add the phishing URL to the web proxy blocklist
  • Add attachment hash to email gateway and EDR blocklists

Account Containment (for users who entered credentials):

  • Force password reset immediately
  • Revoke all active sessions and OAuth tokens
  • Enable or re-verify MFA enrollment
  • Review mailbox rules for attacker-created forwarding rules
  • Check for unauthorized OAuth application grants
  • Review recent sign-in activity for suspicious locations
# Microsoft 365: Revoke sessions and reset password
Connect-AzureAD
Revoke-AzureADUserAllRefreshToken -ObjectId "user@corp.com"
Set-AzureADUserPassword -ObjectId "user@corp.com" -ForceChangePasswordNextLogin $true

# Check for mailbox forwarding rules
Get-InboxRule -Mailbox "user@corp.com" | Where-Object {$_.ForwardTo -or $_.RedirectTo}

# Remove suspicious forwarding rules
Remove-InboxRule -Mailbox "user@corp.com" -Identity "Rule Name"

Step 5: Eradicate and Recover

Remove all traces of the phishing attack:

  • Confirm email purge completed successfully across all mailboxes
  • Verify compromised accounts have been secured (password changed, sessions revoked, MFA verified)
  • Remove any malware installed via phishing attachments from affected endpoints
  • Monitor compromised accounts for 72 hours for signs of continued unauthorized access
  • Check for data exfiltration from compromised accounts during the exposure window

Step 6: Post-Incident Actions

Strengthen defenses against similar phishing attacks:

  • Report the phishing URL to Google Safe Browsing and Microsoft SmartScreen
  • Submit the phishing domain for takedown via the domain registrar abuse contact
  • Update email gateway filtering rules based on observed evasion techniques
  • Send targeted security awareness notification to affected users
  • Update phishing simulation program to include the observed technique

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Spear PhishingTargeted phishing attack crafted for a specific individual or organization using personalized content
Credential HarvestingPhishing technique that mimics a legitimate login page to capture usernames and passwords
SPF (Sender Policy Framework)Email authentication protocol that specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email for a domain
DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail)Email authentication method using cryptographic signatures to verify that an email was not altered in transit
DMARCPolicy framework that uses SPF and DKIM to determine email authenticity and instructs receivers on handling failures
OAuth Consent PhishingAttack that tricks users into granting malicious OAuth applications access to their email and data
Email HeaderMetadata embedded in every email containing routing, authentication, and sender information used for forensic analysis

Tools & Systems

  • Microsoft Defender for Office 365: Email threat protection with Threat Explorer for investigation and automated purge
  • Proofpoint TAP (Targeted Attack Protection): Email security platform with URL rewriting and attachment sandboxing
  • URLscan.io: Online service that scans URLs and captures screenshots of phishing pages for evidence
  • PhishTool: Phishing analysis platform that automates header analysis, URL inspection, and IOC extraction
  • GoPhish: Open-source phishing simulation platform for security awareness testing

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Microsoft 365 Credential Phishing via QR Code

Context: Users report an email claiming to be from IT requiring MFA re-enrollment. The email contains a QR code that links to a convincing Microsoft 365 login page clone hosted on a compromised WordPress site.

Approach:

  1. Scan the QR code in a sandbox to extract the URL
  2. Analyze the phishing page: captures credentials and MFA tokens (adversary-in-the-middle attack)
  3. Search email gateway for all recipients using message subject and sender as search criteria
  4. Cross-reference with proxy logs to identify users who visited the phishing URL
  5. Force password reset and revoke sessions for all users who visited the URL
  6. Purge the email from all mailboxes and block the sender domain
  7. Notify users about the specific campaign with visual examples of the phishing email

Pitfalls:

  • Not checking for adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) capability that captures session tokens even with MFA
  • Only resetting passwords without revoking active sessions (attacker retains access via stolen session cookies)
  • Not searching for mailbox forwarding rules created by the attacker after compromising an account
  • Missing QR code phishing (quishing) because URL scanning tools cannot decode QR code images

Output Format

PHISHING INCIDENT RESPONSE REPORT
===================================
Incident:          INC-2025-1602
Date Reported:     2025-11-16T09:15:00Z
Reported By:       jdoe@corp.example.com
Classification:    Credential Phishing (AiTM)

EMAIL ANALYSIS
Subject:       "Action Required: MFA Re-enrollment"
Sender:        it-support@corp-security[.]com (spoofed)
SPF:           FAIL | DKIM: FAIL | DMARC: FAIL
Phishing URL:  hxxps://compromised-site[.]com/ms365/login
Phishing Type: Microsoft 365 AiTM credential harvester

IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Recipients:        47
Clicked Link:      8
Credentials Entered: 3 (confirmed via proxy POST data)

CONTAINMENT ACTIONS
[x] Email purged from all 47 mailboxes
[x] Phishing domain blocked at web proxy
[x] Sender domain blocked at email gateway
[x] 3 compromised accounts: passwords reset, sessions revoked
[x] Mailbox forwarding rules reviewed (1 malicious rule removed)
[x] OAuth app grants reviewed (no unauthorized grants found)

IOCs EXTRACTED
Domain:  corp-security[.]com
URL:     hxxps://compromised-site[.]com/ms365/login
IP:      104.21.x.x (Cloudflare-hosted)
Sender:  it-support@corp-security[.]com

RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Implement DMARC enforcement (p=reject) for corp domain
2. Deploy QR code scanning in email gateway
3. Send targeted awareness notification to all 47 recipients
4. Request domain takedown via registrar abuse contact

平台分布

Codex

36.9%
按下载量换算52

Claude

29.94%
按下载量换算42

Cursor

18.97%
按下载量换算27

Gemini CLI

9.76%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills