Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

conducting-network-penetration-test(进行网络渗透测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

conducting-network-penetration-test 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 40,450。

总安装 1,285周安装 53GitHub Stars 5,910下载 420核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:conducting-network-penetration-test(进行网络渗透测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/conducting-network-penetration-test
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill conducting-network-penetration-test
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill conducting-network-penetration-test

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于评估网络基础设施的安全态势,验证防火墙规则和网络分段有效性。适合识别网络服务漏洞、协议缺陷及配置错误,满足合规审计需求。可测试 IDS/IPS 和 SIEM 系统的实际防御能力,提升整体安全水位。仅限授权范围内使用,禁止对未经许可的网络发起攻击性探测。

conducting-network-penetration-test 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/conducting-network-penetration-test

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

conducting-network-penetration-test 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill conducti…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

conducting-network-penetration-test 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

conducting-network-penetration-test 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

conducting-network-penetration-test 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

conducting-network-penetration-test 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,285 次,近一周安装 53 次,下载 420 次,GitHub 5,910 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

conducting-network-penetration-test 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 5,910 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
conducting-network-penetration-test

进行网络渗透测试 · 本页

1,2855,910操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Conducting Network Penetration Test

When to Use

  • Assessing the security posture of internal or external network infrastructure before or after deployment
  • Validating firewall rules, network segmentation, and access controls under realistic attack conditions
  • Identifying exploitable vulnerabilities in network services, protocols, and configurations
  • Meeting compliance requirements for PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, or ISO 27001 that mandate periodic penetration testing
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of IDS/IPS, SIEM, and SOC detection capabilities against real attack traffic

Do not use for testing networks without explicit written authorization from the asset owner, against production systems without a pre-approved change window and rollback plan, or for denial-of-service testing unless explicitly scoped and authorized.

Prerequisites

  • Signed Rules of Engagement (RoE) document specifying target IP ranges, excluded hosts, testing hours, and emergency contacts
  • Written authorization letter (get-out-of-jail letter) from the network owner
  • Dedicated testing laptop with Kali Linux or equivalent distribution with up-to-date tools
  • VPN or direct network access to the target scope as defined in the RoE
  • Out-of-band communication channel with the client's incident response team
  • Scope document listing in-scope IP ranges, domains, and any explicitly excluded systems (medical devices, SCADA, critical infrastructure)

Workflow

Step 1: Pre-Engagement and Scope Validation

Validate the scope by confirming IP ranges with the client. Verify that all IP addresses in scope are owned by the client using ARIN/RIPE WHOIS lookups. Confirm testing windows, escalation procedures, and any sensitivity constraints. Set up the testing environment with a dedicated VM, VPN connection, and logging enabled on all tools. Create a timestamped activity log that records every command executed, every scan launched, and every exploit attempted throughout the engagement.

Step 2: Host Discovery and Network Mapping

Identify live hosts within the authorized scope using layered discovery techniques:

  • ICMP sweep: nmap -sn -PE -PP -PM 10.10.0.0/16 -oA discovery_icmp to find hosts responding to ping
  • ARP scan (internal networks): nmap -sn -PR 10.10.0.0/24 -oA discovery_arp or arp-scan -l for local subnet enumeration
  • TCP SYN discovery: nmap -sn -PS21,22,25,80,443,445,3389,8080 10.10.0.0/16 -oA discovery_tcp to find hosts with ICMP blocked
  • UDP discovery: nmap -sn -PU53,161,500 10.10.0.0/16 -oA discovery_udp for hosts only responding on UDP

Consolidate live hosts into a target list. Map the network topology by identifying gateways, VLAN boundaries, and trust relationships using traceroute and SNMP community string guessing where authorized.

Step 3: Port Scanning and Service Enumeration

Perform detailed port scanning on discovered hosts:

  • Full TCP scan: nmap -sS -p- --min-rate 1000 -T4 -oA full_tcp <target> to identify all open TCP ports
  • Top UDP ports: nmap -sU --top-ports 200 -T4 -oA top_udp <target> for commonly exploitable UDP services
  • Service version detection: nmap -sV -sC -p <open_ports> -oA service_enum <target> to fingerprint service versions and run default NSE scripts
  • OS fingerprinting: nmap -O --osscan-guess -oA os_detection <target> to identify operating systems

Enumerate discovered services in depth using protocol-specific tools:

  • SMB: enum4linux -a <target>, crackmapexec smb <target> --shares
  • SNMP: snmpwalk -v2c -c public <target>
  • DNS: dig axfr @<dns_server> <domain> for zone transfer attempts
  • LDAP: ldapsearch -x -H ldap://<target> -b "dc=example,dc=com"

Step 4: Vulnerability Identification

Correlate discovered service versions against known vulnerability databases:

  • Run nmap --script vuln -p <ports> <target> for NSE vulnerability scripts
  • Use searchsploit <service> <version> to query the Exploit-DB offline database
  • Cross-reference with NVD (National Vulnerability Database) and CVE records for confirmed vulnerabilities
  • Check for default credentials on management interfaces (Tomcat Manager, Jenkins, phpMyAdmin, database consoles)
  • Test for common misconfigurations: anonymous FTP, open SMTP relays, unrestricted SNMP communities, NFS exports without authentication

Prioritize vulnerabilities by CVSS score, exploitability, and business impact. Document each finding with CVE identifier, affected host, service, and version.

Step 5: Exploitation

Attempt controlled exploitation of validated vulnerabilities using the principle of minimum necessary access:

  • Metasploit Framework: msfconsole with appropriate exploit modules matched to confirmed vulnerabilities. Set RHOSTS, RPORT, and payload options. Prefer bind/reverse TCP Meterpreter for post-exploitation flexibility.
  • Manual exploitation: Use public proof-of-concept exploits from Exploit-DB after code review. Compile and modify as needed for the target environment.
  • Credential attacks: Use hydra or crackmapexec for password spraying against discovered services (SSH, RDP, SMB, HTTP basic auth) using common credential lists. Respect lockout policies.
  • Pass-the-hash / relay: If NTLM hashes are obtained, attempt pass-the-hash with impacket-psexec or relay attacks with impacket-ntlmrelayx where SMB signing is disabled.

Document every exploitation attempt including failures. Capture screenshots of successful compromises showing hostname, IP, current user, and privilege level.

Step 6: Post-Exploitation and Pivoting

After gaining access to a host, demonstrate business impact:

  • Privilege escalation: Check for local privilege escalation paths using linpeas.sh (Linux) or winPEAS.exe (Windows). Look for misconfigured services, SUID binaries, unquoted service paths, or kernel exploits.
  • Credential harvesting: Extract stored credentials from memory (mimikatz), files (config files, browser stores), or cached hashes (hashdump).
  • Lateral movement: Use obtained credentials to pivot to additional systems. Test network segmentation by attempting to reach out-of-scope networks from compromised hosts.
  • Data access demonstration: Identify sensitive data accessible from compromised systems (PII databases, file shares, backup files) and document access without exfiltrating actual data.

Maintain detailed notes on every pivot point, credential obtained, and system accessed to build the attack chain narrative.

Step 7: Cleanup and Reporting

Remove all testing artifacts from compromised systems:

  • Delete uploaded tools, shells, and temporary files
  • Remove any accounts created during testing
  • Revert configuration changes made during exploitation
  • Verify cleanup by re-scanning affected hosts

Prepare the penetration test report with executive summary, methodology description, finding details with CVSS scores, proof-of-concept evidence, and prioritized remediation recommendations.

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Rules of Engagement (RoE)Formal document defining the scope, boundaries, testing hours, authorized actions, and escalation procedures for a penetration test
PivotUsing a compromised host as a relay point to access additional network segments not directly reachable from the tester's position
Service EnumerationThe process of identifying running services, their versions, and configurations on discovered hosts to map the attack surface
Credential SprayingTesting a small number of commonly used passwords against many accounts simultaneously to avoid account lockout thresholds
CVSSCommon Vulnerability Scoring System; an industry-standard framework for rating the severity of vulnerabilities on a 0-10 scale
Lateral MovementTechniques used to move from one compromised system to another within a network, expanding the scope of access
Post-ExploitationActivities performed after initial compromise including privilege escalation, persistence, credential harvesting, and data access

Tools & Systems

  • Nmap: Network discovery, port scanning, service enumeration, and vulnerability detection via the Nmap Scripting Engine (NSE)
  • Metasploit Framework: Exploitation framework providing exploit modules, payloads, encoders, and post-exploitation tools for validated vulnerability exploitation
  • CrackMapExec: Swiss-army knife for Windows/Active Directory environments supporting SMB, WinRM, LDAP, and MSSQL enumeration and exploitation
  • Impacket: Python library providing low-level programmatic access to network protocols (SMB, MSRPC, Kerberos) used for relay attacks and remote execution
  • Burp Suite: Web application proxy used when network services expose HTTP-based management interfaces

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Internal Network Penetration Test for a Financial Institution

Context: The client is a mid-size bank requiring PCI-DSS compliance. Scope includes the internal corporate network (10.10.0.0/16), excluding payment processing systems in a separate VLAN. Testing window is Monday-Friday 20:00-06:00 to minimize impact on operations.

Approach:

  1. Perform ARP-based host discovery on accessible subnets and TCP SYN discovery for hosts with ICMP disabled
  2. Conduct full port scans on all discovered hosts, prioritizing Windows servers and domain controllers
  3. Enumerate SMB shares, SNMP communities, and web management interfaces for quick wins
  4. Identify and exploit an unpatched Apache Tomcat instance with default credentials to gain initial foothold
  5. Escalate privileges via a local Windows kernel vulnerability, then extract cached domain credentials with Mimikatz
  6. Demonstrate lateral movement to the database server containing customer records, proving inadequate network segmentation
  7. Document the complete attack path from initial access to sensitive data, with remediation steps for each vulnerability

Pitfalls:

  • Scanning too aggressively during business hours and triggering IDS alerts or service disruptions
  • Failing to verify that all target IPs are actually owned by the client before scanning
  • Not documenting exploitation attempts that failed, missing the opportunity to report on effective controls
  • Forgetting to clean up Meterpreter sessions and uploaded tools after testing

Output Format

## Finding: Unpatched Apache Tomcat with Default Credentials

**ID**: NET-001
**Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.8)
**Affected Host**: 10.10.5.23 (tomcat-prod.internal.corp)
**Service**: Apache Tomcat 8.5.31 on port 8080
**CVE**: CVE-2019-0232

**Description**:
The Apache Tomcat instance on 10.10.5.23:8080 is running version 8.5.31, which is
vulnerable to CVE-2019-0232 (remote code execution via CGI Servlet). Additionally,
the Tomcat Manager interface is accessible with default credentials (tomcat:tomcat),
allowing deployment of arbitrary WAR files.

**Proof of Concept**:
1. Accessed http://10.10.5.23:8080/manager/html with credentials tomcat:tomcat
2. Deployed malicious WAR file containing a reverse shell payload
3. Obtained command execution as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM

**Impact**:
Full system compromise of the Tomcat server. From this host, the tester
pivoted to 3 additional systems on the same subnet using harvested credentials,
ultimately accessing the customer database containing 50,000+ records.

**Remediation**:
1. Immediately change default Tomcat Manager credentials
2. Upgrade Apache Tomcat to the latest stable release (currently 10.1.x)
3. Restrict access to the Tomcat Manager interface to authorized management IPs only
4. Implement network segmentation between web servers and database tier

平台分布

Codex

34.79%
按下载量换算146

Claude

28.26%
按下载量换算119

Cursor

19.64%
按下载量换算82

Gemini CLI

9.4%
按下载量换算39

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills