Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计未展示

components-standards零部件标准

Agent Skill

components-standards 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

6,192

周安装

221

GitHub Stars

1,598

下载量

2,013
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:components-standards(零部件标准)
来源仓库:https://github.com/maxritter/claude-codepro
仓库路径:skills/components-standards
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/maxritter/claude-codepro --skill 'Components Standards'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/maxritter/claude-codepro --skill 'Components Standards'

简介

建立小型、专注的单职责组件构建标准,支持复杂 UI 组合。

  • 适用于 .jsx/.tsx/.vue 等组件文件的创建与维护场景。
  • 强调 Props 接口定义、状态管理与组件组合最佳实践。
  • 需配合项目现有组件库结构调整具体实现方式。components-standards 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 提供按钮、表单、卡片等基础元素的复用规范。

SKILL.md

Components Standards

Core Rule: Build small, focused components with single responsibility. Compose complex UIs from simple pieces.

When to use this skill

  • When creating new component files (.jsx,.tsx,.vue,.svelte, etc.)
  • When modifying existing components in component directories (components/, ui/, lib/)
  • When defining component props, interfaces, or prop types
  • When implementing component composition to build complex UIs from simpler components
  • When managing component-level state and deciding when to lift state up
  • When creating reusable UI elements like buttons, forms, cards, modals, or layouts
  • When documenting component APIs, props, and usage examples
  • When refactoring monolithic components into smaller, focused components
  • When designing component interfaces for team adoption
  • When implementing encapsulation to keep internal component details private

This Skill provides Claude Code with specific guidance on how to adhere to coding standards as they relate to how it should handle frontend components.

Component Design Principles

Single Responsibility

Each component does one thing well. If you need "and" to describe it, split it.

Bad:

// UserProfileCardWithEditFormAndNotifications - does too much
function UserProfile() {
  return (
    <>
      <ProfileDisplay />
      <EditForm />
      <NotificationList />
    </>
  )
}

Good:

// Three focused components
function UserProfileCard({ user }) { /* display only */ }
function UserEditForm({ user, onSave }) { /* editing only */ }
function UserNotifications({ userId }) { /* notifications only */ }

Composition Over Configuration

Build complex UIs by combining simple components, not by adding props.

Bad - Configuration:

<Card
  showHeader
  showFooter
  headerAlign="left"
  footerAlign="right"
  headerColor="blue"
>
  Content
</Card>

Good - Composition:

<Card>
  <Card.Header align="left" color="blue">Title</Card.Header>
  <Card.Body>Content</Card.Body>
  <Card.Footer align="right">Actions</Card.Footer>
</Card>

Minimal Props

Keep props under 5-7. More props = component doing too much.

When you have many props:

  1. Group related props into objects
  2. Split component into smaller pieces
  3. Use composition instead of configuration

Example - Group related props:

// Bad
function Button({ textColor, bgColor, borderColor, hoverColor }) {}

// Good
function Button({ colors: { text, bg, border, hover } }) {}

Component Interface Design

Explicit Prop Types

Always define prop types with TypeScript interfaces or PropTypes.

React/TypeScript:

interface ButtonProps {
  variant?: 'primary' | 'secondary' | 'danger'
  size?: 'sm' | 'md' | 'lg'
  disabled?: boolean
  onClick: () => void
  children: React.ReactNode
}

function Button({
  variant = 'primary',
  size = 'md',
  disabled = false,
  onClick,
  children
}: ButtonProps) {
  // Implementation
}

Vue:

<script setup lang="ts">
interface Props {
  variant?: 'primary' | 'secondary' | 'danger'
  size?: 'sm' | 'md' | 'lg'
  disabled?: boolean
}

const props = withDefaults(defineProps<Props>(), {
  variant: 'primary',
  size: 'md',
  disabled: false
})
</script>

Sensible Defaults

Provide defaults for optional props. Component should work with minimal configuration.

// User only needs to provide required props
<Button onClick={handleClick}>Save</Button>

// But can customize when needed
<Button variant="danger" size="lg" onClick={handleDelete}>Delete</Button>

State Management

Keep State Local

State lives in the component that uses it. Only lift state when multiple components need it.

Decision tree:

Does only this component need the state?
├─ YES → Keep it local with useState/ref
└─ NO → Do multiple children need it?
    ├─ YES → Lift to common parent
    └─ NO → Do unrelated components need it?
        └─ YES → Use global state (context/store)

Example:

// Local state - only this component needs it
function SearchInput() {
  const [query, setQuery] = useState('')
  return <input value={query} onChange={e => setQuery(e.target.value)} />
}

// Lifted state - parent and siblings need it
function SearchPage() {
  const [query, setQuery] = useState('')
  return (
    <>
      <SearchInput value={query} onChange={setQuery} />
      <SearchResults query={query} />
    </>
  )
}

Avoid Prop Drilling

If passing props through 3+ levels, use composition or context instead.

Bad - Prop drilling:

<Page user={user}>
  <Layout user={user}>
    <Sidebar user={user}>
      <UserMenu user={user} />
    </Sidebar>
  </Layout>
</Page>

Good - Context:

<UserContext.Provider value={user}>
  <Page>
    <Layout>
      <Sidebar>
        <UserMenu /> {/* Reads from context */}
      </Sidebar>
    </Layout>
  </Page>
</UserContext.Provider>

Naming Conventions

Components: PascalCase, descriptive noun or noun phrase

  • Button, UserCard, SearchInput, NavigationMenu
  • Avoid: MyComponent, Component1, Wrapper, Container

Props: camelCase, descriptive

  • onClick, isDisabled, userName, maxLength
  • Boolean props: is*, has*, should*, can*

Event handlers: on* for props, handle* for internal functions

function Form({ onSubmit }) {
  const handleSubmit = (e) => {
    e.preventDefault()
    onSubmit(data)
  }
  return <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>...</form>
}

Encapsulation

Keep implementation details private. Only expose what consumers need.

Bad - Exposing internals:

function DataTable({ data, sortColumn, sortDirection, setSortColumn, setSortDirection }) {
  // Consumer must manage sorting state
}

Good - Encapsulated:

function DataTable({ data, onSort }) {
  const [sortColumn, setSortColumn] = useState('name')
  const [sortDirection, setSortDirection] = useState('asc')
  // Component manages its own sorting state
}

Component Organization

File structure:

components/
├── Button/
│   ├── Button.tsx          # Component implementation
│   ├── Button.test.tsx     # Tests
│   ├── Button.stories.tsx  # Storybook stories (if used)
│   └── index.ts            # Export

Or for simple components:

components/
├── Button.tsx
└── Button.test.tsx

Documentation Requirements

Every reusable component needs:

  1. TypeScript types/interfaces - Self-documenting props
  2. JSDoc comments - For complex props or behavior
  3. Usage example - In comments or Storybook

Example:

/**
 * Primary button component for user actions.
 *
 * @example
 * <Button variant="primary" onClick={handleSave}>
 *   Save Changes
 * </Button>
 */
interface ButtonProps {
  /** Visual style variant */
  variant?: 'primary' | 'secondary' | 'danger'
  /** Size of the button */
  size?: 'sm' | 'md' | 'lg'
  /** Disables interaction */
  disabled?: boolean
  /** Click handler */
  onClick: () => void
  /** Button content */
  children: React.ReactNode
}

When to Split Components

Split when:

  • Component exceeds 200-300 lines
  • Component has multiple responsibilities
  • Part of component is reusable elsewhere
  • Component has complex conditional rendering
  • Testing becomes difficult due to complexity

Example - Before split:

function UserDashboard() {
  // 400 lines of profile display, settings, notifications, activity feed
}

After split:

function UserDashboard() {
  return (
    <DashboardLayout>
      <UserProfile />
      <UserSettings />
      <NotificationPanel />
      <ActivityFeed />
    </DashboardLayout>
  )
}

Testing Components

Every component needs tests for:

  • Rendering with default props
  • Rendering with all prop variations
  • User interactions (clicks, input, etc.)
  • Conditional rendering logic
  • Error states

Example:

describe('Button', () => {
  it('renders with default props', () => {
    render(<Button onClick={jest.fn()}>Click me</Button>)
    expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeInTheDocument()
  })

  it('calls onClick when clicked', () => {
    const handleClick = jest.fn()
    render(<Button onClick={handleClick}>Click me</Button>)
    fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
    expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
  })

  it('is disabled when disabled prop is true', () => {
    render(<Button onClick={jest.fn()} disabled>Click me</Button>)
    expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
  })
})

Common Mistakes to Avoid

God components: Components that do everything. Split them.

Prop drilling: Passing props through many levels. Use composition or context.

Premature abstraction: Don't create reusable components until you need them in 2+ places.

Too many props: More than 7 props usually means component does too much.

Unclear naming: Container, Wrapper, Component don't describe purpose.

Missing prop types: Always define prop types for type safety and documentation.

Decision Checklist

Before completing component work:

  • Component has single, clear responsibility
  • Props are typed with TypeScript/PropTypes
  • Sensible defaults provided for optional props
  • State is as local as possible
  • Component name clearly describes purpose
  • Internal implementation details are private
  • Component is tested
  • Usage is documented (types + example)
  • No prop drilling beyond 2 levels
  • Component is under 300 lines (or split if larger)

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

27.59%
按下载量换算555

OpenCode

23.16%
按下载量换算466

Cursor

15.75%
按下载量换算317

Codex

11.29%
按下载量换算227

windsurf

7.85%
按下载量换算158

trae

3.43%
按下载量换算69

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源字段存在多来源差异,先按来源优先级自动处理,无法消解时进入异常复核队列。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills