Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维

company-os(公司操作系统)

company-os 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

company-os 是运维类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维类的 954 个 Skill 里排第 356。

总安装 10,296周安装 429GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 3,432核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
2.1.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:company-os(公司操作系统)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/company-os
安装命令:
openclaw skills install company-os
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install company-os

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

提供公司运营方式的元框架指导,涵盖组织结构与高管协作机制设计。适用于企业治理体系搭建、管理流程优化及规模化运营规划场景。结合 EOS、Scaling Up 等方法论提供 OKR-native 的组织架构建议。安装前需评估是否涉及内部制度调整或跨部门协作流程变更。建议参考原始文档了解具体实施路径与角色分工模板。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install company-os;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

company-os 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install company-os。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

company-os 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

company-os 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

company-os 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

company-os 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 10,296 次,近一周安装 429 次,下载 3,432 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

company-os 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
docker-essentials

Docker 基础 · OpenClaw

1,005,15130接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
playwright-scraper-skill

Playwright scraper 技能 · OpenClaw

923,55754接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
moltguard

moltguard 搜索 · OpenClaw

825,096110接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
finance-news

财经新闻 · OpenClaw

275,51210需要联网MIT-0有提醒
security-monitor

安全监视器 · OpenClaw

224,1695需要联网MIT-0有提醒
company-os

公司操作系统 · 本页

10,296—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
company-os
description
The meta-framework for how a company runs — the connective tissue between all C-suite roles. Covers operating system selection (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native, hybrid), accountability charts, scorecards, meeting pulse, issue resolution, and 90-day rocks. Use when setting up company operations, selecting a management framework, designing meeting rhythms, building accountability systems, implementing OKRs, or when user mentions EOS, Scaling Up, operating system, L10 meetings, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, or quarterly planning.
license
MIT
metadata
version
1.0.0
author
Alireza Rezvani
category
c-level
domain
company-operations
updated
2026-03-05
frameworks
os-comparison, implementation-guide

Company Operating System

The operating system is the collection of tools, rhythms, and agreements that determine how the company functions. Every company has one — most just don't know what it is. Making it explicit makes it improvable.

Keywords

operating system, EOS, Entrepreneurial Operating System, Scaling Up, Rockefeller Habits, OKR, Holacracy, L10 meeting, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, issues list, IDS, meeting pulse, quarterly planning, weekly scorecard, management framework, company rhythm, traction, Gino Wickman, Verne Harnish

Why This Matters

Most operational dysfunction isn't a people problem — it's a system problem. When:

  • The same issues recur every week: no issue resolution system
  • Meetings feel pointless: no structured meeting pulse
  • Nobody knows who owns what: no accountability chart
  • Quarterly goals slip: rocks aren't real commitments

Fix the system. The people will operate better inside it.

The Six Core Components

Every effective operating system has these six, regardless of which framework you choose:

1. Accountability Chart

Not an org chart. An accountability chart answers: "Who owns this outcome?"

Key distinction: One person owns each function. Multiple people may work in it. Ownership means the buck stops with one person.

Structure:

CEO
├── Sales (CRO/VP Sales)
│   ├── Inbound pipeline
│   └── Outbound pipeline
├── Product & Engineering (CTO/CPO)
│   ├── Product roadmap
│   └── Engineering delivery
├── Operations (COO)
│   ├── Customer success
│   └── Finance & Legal
└── People (CHRO/VP People)
    ├── Recruiting
    └── People operations

Rules:

  • No shared ownership. "Alice and Bob both own it" means nobody owns it.
  • One person can own multiple seats at early stages. That's fine. Just be explicit.
  • Revisit quarterly as you scale. Ownership shifts as the company grows.

Build it in a workshop:

  1. List all functions the company performs
  2. Assign one owner per function — no exceptions
  3. Identify gaps (functions nobody owns) and overlaps (functions two people think they own)
  4. Publish it. Update it when something changes.

2. Scorecard

Weekly metrics that tell you if the company is on track. Not monthly. Not quarterly. Weekly.

Rules:

  • 5–15 metrics maximum. More than 15 and nothing gets attention.
  • Each metric has an owner and a weekly target (not a range — a number).
  • Red/yellow/green status. Not paragraphs.
  • The scorecard is discussed at the leadership team weekly meeting. Only red metrics get discussion time.

Example scorecard structure:

MetricOwnerTargetThis WeekStatus
New MRRCRO€50K€43K🔴
ChurnCS Lead< 1%0.8%🟢
Active usersCPO2,0002,150🟢
DeploymentsCTO3/week3🟢
Open critical bugsCTO02🔴
RunwayCFO> 18mo16mo🟡

Anti-pattern: Measuring everything. If you track 40 KPIs, you're watching, not managing.

3. Meeting Pulse

The meeting rhythm that drives the company. Not optional — the pulse is what keeps the company alive.

The full rhythm:

MeetingFrequencyDurationWhoPurpose
Daily standupDaily15 minEach teamBlockers only
L10 / Leadership syncWeekly90 minLeadership teamScorecard + issues
Department reviewMonthly60 minDept + leadershipOKR progress
Quarterly planningQuarterly1–2 daysLeadershipSet rocks, review strategy
Annual planningAnnual2–3 daysLeadership1-year + 3-year vision

The L10 meeting (Weekly Leadership Sync): Named for the goal of each meeting being a 10/10. Fixed agenda:

  1. Good news (5 min) — personal + business
  2. Scorecard review (5 min) — flag red items only
  3. Rock review (5 min) — on/off track for each rock
  4. Customer/employee headlines (5 min)
  5. Issues list (60 min) — IDS (see below)
  6. To-dos review (5 min) — last week's commitments
  7. Conclude (5 min) — rate the meeting 1–10, what would make it a 10 next time

4. Issue Resolution (IDS)

The core problem-solving loop. Maximum 15 minutes per issue.

IDS: Identify, Discuss, Solve

  • Identify: What is the actual issue? (Not the symptom — the root cause) State it in one sentence.
  • Discuss: Relevant facts + perspectives. Time-boxed. When discussion starts repeating, stop.
  • Solve: One owner. One action. One due date. Written on the to-do list.

Anti-patterns:

  • "Let's take this offline" — most things taken offline never get resolved
  • Discussing without deciding — a great discussion with no action item is wasted time
  • Revisiting decided issues — once solved, it leaves the list. Reopen only with new information.

The Issues List: A running, prioritized list of all unresolved issues. Owned by the leadership team. Reviewed and pruned weekly. If an issue has been on the list for 3+ meetings and hasn't been discussed, it's either not a real issue or it's too scary to address — both deserve attention.

5. Rocks (90-Day Priorities)

Rocks are the 3–7 most important things each person must accomplish in the next 90 days. They're not the job description — they're the things that move the company forward.

Why 90 days? Long enough for meaningful progress. Short enough to stay real.

Rock rules:

  • Each person: 3–7 rocks maximum. More than 7 and none get done.
  • Company-level rocks (shared priorities): 3–7 for the leadership team
  • Each rock is binary: done or not done. No "60% complete."
  • Set at the quarterly planning session. Reviewed weekly (on/off track).

Bad rock: "Improve our sales process" Good rock: "Implement Salesforce CRM with full pipeline stages and weekly reporting by March 31"

Rock vs. to-do: A to-do takes one action. A rock takes 90 days of consistent work.

6. Communication Cadence

Who gets what information, when, and how.

AudienceWhatWhenFormat
All employeesCompany updateMonthlyWritten + Q&A
All employeesQuarterly results + next prioritiesQuarterlyAll-hands
Leadership teamScorecardWeeklyDashboard
BoardCompany performanceMonthlyBoard memo
InvestorsKey metrics + narrativeMonthly or quarterlyInvestor update
CustomersProduct updatesPer releaseRelease notes

Default rule: If you're deciding whether to share something internally, share it. The cost of under-communication always exceeds the cost of over-communication inside a company.


Operating System Selection

See references/os-comparison.md for full comparison. Quick guide:

If you are...Consider...
10–250 person company, founder-led, operational chaosEOS / Traction
Ambitious growth company, need rigorous strategy cascadeScaling Up
Tech company, engineering culture, hypothesis-drivenOKR-native
Decentralized, flat, high autonomyHolacracy (only if you're patient)
None of the above quite fitCustom hybrid

Implementation Roadmap

Don't implement everything at once. See references/implementation-guide.md for the full 90-day plan.

Quick start (first 30 days):

  1. Build the accountability chart (1 workshop, 2 hours)
  2. Define 5–10 weekly scorecard metrics (leadership team alignment, 1 hour)
  3. Start the weekly L10 meeting (no prep — just start)

These three alone will improve coordination more than most companies achieve in a year.


Common Failure Modes

Partial implementation: "We do OKRs but skip the weekly check-in." Half an operating system is worse than none — it creates theater without accountability.

Meeting fatigue: Adding the full rhythm on top of existing meetings. Start by replacing meetings, not adding them.

Metric overload: Starting with 30 KPIs because "they all matter." Start with 5. Add when the cadence is established.

Rock inflation: Setting 12 rocks per person because "everything is a priority." When everything is a priority, nothing is. Hard limit: 7.

Leader non-compliance: Leadership team skips the L10 or doesn't follow IDS. The operating system mirrors the respect leadership gives it. If leaders don't take it seriously, nobody will.

Annual planning without quarterly review: Setting annual goals and checking in at year-end. Quarterly is the minimum review cycle for any meaningful goal.


Integration with C-Suite

The company OS is the connective tissue. Every other role depends on it:

C-Suite RoleOS Dependency
CEOSets vision that feeds into 1-year plan and rocks
COOOwns the meeting pulse and issue resolution cadence
CFOOwns the financial metrics in the scorecard
CTOOwns engineering rocks and tech scorecard metrics
CHROOwns people metrics (attrition, hiring velocity) in scorecard
Culture ArchitectCulture rituals plug into the meeting pulse
Strategic Alignment EngineValidates that team rocks cascade from company rocks

Key Questions for the Operating System

  • "If I asked five different team leads what the company's top 3 priorities are this quarter, would they give the same answers?"
  • "What was the most important issue raised in last week's leadership meeting? Was it resolved or is it still open?"
  • "Name a metric that would tell us by Friday whether this week was a good week. Do we track it?"
  • "Who owns customer churn? Can you name that person without hesitation?"
  • "When was the last time we updated the accountability chart?"

Detailed References

  • references/os-comparison.md — EOS vs Scaling Up vs OKRs vs Holacracy vs hybrid
  • references/implementation-guide.md — 90-day implementation plan

平台分布

OpenClaw

93.01%
按下载量换算3,192

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills