Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维

communication-playbook(沟通手册)

communication-playbook 用于补充运维相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接运维相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

communication-playbook 是运维类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维类的 954 个 Skill 里排第 237。

总安装 15,594周安装 663GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 5,463核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
0.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:communication-playbook(沟通手册)
来源仓库:https://github.com/chilu18/communication-playbook
安装命令:
openclaw skills install communication-playbook
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install communication-playbook

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

提供 HeySalad 团队的标准化沟通指南与实践模板。适用于内部团队消息撰写、客户邮件回复等沟通任务。包含语气控制、信息优先级排序等最佳实践。安装命令:openclaw skills install communication-playbook。建议根据具体业务场景调整模板内容。

communication-playbook 属于运维类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install communication-playbook;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

communication-playbook 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install communication-playbook。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

communication-playbook 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

communication-playbook 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

communication-playbook 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

communication-playbook 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 15,594 次,近一周安装 663 次,下载 5,463 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

communication-playbook 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
docker-essentials

Docker 基础 · OpenClaw

1,005,15130接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
playwright-scraper-skill

Playwright scraper 技能 · OpenClaw

923,55754接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
moltguard

moltguard 搜索 · OpenClaw

825,096110接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
finance-news

财经新闻 · OpenClaw

275,51210需要联网MIT-0有提醒
security-monitor

安全监视器 · OpenClaw

224,1695需要联网MIT-0有提醒
communication-playbook

沟通手册 · 本页

15,594—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
communication-playbook
description
>

HeySalad Communication Playbook

A distillation of world-class communication standards across eight domains. Apply these principles whenever generating, reviewing, or coaching any form of communication at HeySalad.


QUICK DECISION TREE

Before producing any communication output, identify the domain:

DomainWhen to apply
InternalSlack, team emails, async updates, documentation
ExternalInvestor updates, regulatory comms, customer/partner emails
PresentationsPitch decks, demos, all-hands, stakeholder reviews
WrittenDocs, wikis, changelogs, proposals, reports
Cross-functionalMulti-team projects, RACI, kickoffs, SSOT
MeetingsAgendas, facilitation, notes, decisions
TransparencyWhat to share, how, and with whom
Active Listening1-on-1 coaching, conflict, negotiation, feedback

Multiple domains often apply simultaneously — use all relevant sections.


1. INTERNAL COMMUNICATION

Core Principle: BLUF — Bottom Line Up Front

Every internal message leads with the conclusion. State what you need, then provide supporting context. Never bury the request.

Bad: "Hey, I was looking at the MTN Mobile Money integration and noticed some latency issues. The logs showed errors around 14:00 UTC yesterday. This might be affecting settlement. Can you check?"

Good: "ACTION NEEDED: MTN Mobile Money settlements may be failing. Logs show errors at 14:00 UTC — please investigate and report back by EOD. Details below."

The Four Pillars

  • Clarity — Single, unambiguous purpose per message. No jargon or hedge words.
  • Cadence — Predictable rhythm of updates. Teams know when information arrives.
  • Context — Always share the 'why', not just the 'what'.
  • Confirmation — Close every loop. Confirm receipt, understanding, and next action.

Channel Selection

ChannelUse forAvoid when
Slack/IMQuick questions, real-time coordSensitive topics, complex decisions
EmailFormal updates, paper trail neededUrgent issues, back-and-forth
Video CallNuanced topics, relationship buildingSimple status updates
Loom/Async VideoDemos, walkthroughs, one-to-manyTwo-way dialogue
Written DocDecisions, processes, lasting referenceTime-sensitive comms
In-PersonStrategy, brainstorming, conflict resolutionDistributed teams

Async Message Checklist

Before sending any async message confirm:

  • [ ] Purpose clear in the first line?
  • [ ] Owner of response identified (vs FYI only)?
  • [ ] Deadline or expected response time included?
  • [ ] Right channel for this message?
  • [ ] Single ask, not bundled requests?

Culture Norms (embed in any comms coaching)

  • Default to over-communication during uncertainty
  • Assume positive intent in all message interpretation
  • Praise publicly, critique privately — never call out individuals in group channels
  • Document decisions as they happen — memory is not a system
  • Disagree and commit — voice disagreement, then execute on the decision

2. EXTERNAL COMMUNICATION

The Five Principles

  1. One Voice — All external messaging consistent on positioning, numbers, tone
  2. Precision — No vague language ('soon', 'maybe'). Use specific dates, figures
  3. Professionalism — Spell-check everything. Match audience formality level
  4. Responsiveness — Reply within 24 hours. Acknowledge receipt even without full answer
  5. Confidentiality — Assume all external comms could be forwarded

Investor Updates (monthly cadence)

Structure every investor update as:

  1. Headline — The single biggest thing that happened this month
  2. Progress — Key metrics and milestones vs. last month
  3. Challenges — What is not working and what you are doing about it
  4. Priorities — Top 3 focus areas for next month
  5. Ask — One specific way investors can help
Investors who receive consistent, honest updates — including bad news — are far more likely to support you in a crisis than those who only hear from you when things are good.

Regulatory Correspondence (FCA / Bank of Zambia / EFIU)

  • Always use official titles and reference numbers
  • Never miss a regulator's deadline — ever
  • Log all correspondence: date, contact name, summary, response deadline
  • Do not speculate or make forward-looking statements unless explicitly asked
  • Review every regulatory response with a second person before sending
  • When uncertain, consult legal counsel — never guess on regulatory matters

Customer / Partner — Three-Part Response

  1. Acknowledge — Confirm receipt and understanding
  2. Act or Escalate — Resolution or clear next step with timeline
  3. Affirm — Close with confidence: "We have this handled"

3. PRESENTATION SKILLS

The Pyramid Principle (use for all presentation structure)

        ┌─────────────────────┐
        │   GOVERNING THOUGHT  │  ← State this within 60 seconds
        └──────────┬──────────┘
         ┌─────────┼─────────┐
    Key Arg 1  Key Arg 2  Key Arg 3
         └─────────┼─────────┘
    Supporting Data / Evidence / Examples

Lead with the answer. Audience should never wonder what you are trying to say.

Slide Design Rules

RulePrinciple
One idea per slideIf you say "and also..." you need a new slide
Six-by-SixMax 6 bullets, max 6 words each. Prefer visuals
Headline as insight"Revenue grew 40% MoM" not "Revenue"
Consistent visual languageOne font, one palette, one icon set
The Blank TestKey message understood in under 5 seconds?
Signal not noiseRemove anything decorative that adds no meaning

Delivery Checklist

  • [ ] Open with impact — story, data point, or provocative question
  • [ ] Governing thought stated within first 60 seconds
  • [ ] Signposting used: "First… second… finally…"
  • [ ] Key points followed by a deliberate 2-second pause
  • [ ] Varied vocal pace — slow for key points, faster for setup
  • [ ] Strong close — single, clear call to action
  • [ ] Practiced out loud at least 3 times

Handling Questions

  • Repeat the question before answering (buys thinking time, confirms understanding)
  • "I want to give you an accurate answer — I'll follow up in writing by tomorrow"
  • Never bluff. Uncertainty stated clearly is more credible than a wrong answer

4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION

The Five Principles

  1. Brevity — Write the shortest version that conveys the full meaning
  2. Clarity — Simple, concrete words. Replace technical terms where possible
  3. Specificity — Not "soon" but "by 17:00 Friday". Not "some users" but "34%"
  4. Active Voice — "The team deployed the update" not "The update was deployed"
  5. Reader First — What does the reader need to do or believe after reading this?

Email Structure

  1. Subject — Specific, action-oriented, front-loaded: "ACTION NEEDED: FCA Submission — 14 March"
  2. Opening — One sentence of context if needed
  3. BLUF — Request or key message in 1-2 sentences
  4. Body — Supporting detail, only what is strictly necessary
  5. Action — Clear next step: owner, deadline, format
  6. Close — "Best" or "Thanks" — avoid "Regards"
Write the subject line last, after you know exactly what the message is about.

Audience Calibration

AudienceTone & StyleAvoid
InvestorsDirect, data-driven, confident. Lead with outcomesOverselling, vague milestones, buried bad news
RegulatorsFormal, precise, deferential. Use their terminologySpeculation, informal language
CustomersWarm, human, empathetic. Solve in fewest wordsJargon, delay, passing the buck
TeamClear, direct, motivating. Give context and be honestCorporate speak, vagueness
Press/MediaControlled, strategic, quotableOff-the-record assumptions

Documentation Standards

  • Write docs as if the reader has zero context (they'll read in 6 months)
  • Date every document
  • One owner per doc who keeps it current
  • Link related docs — never duplicate content
  • Archive, do not delete — old decisions have future value

5. CROSS-FUNCTIONAL COLLABORATION

RACI Framework (use at the start of every multi-team initiative)

RoleDefinitionRule
ResponsibleDoes the workCan be multiple people
AccountableAnswerable for the outcomeOnly ONE person ever
ConsultedInput sought before decisionsTwo-way communication
InformedNotified of outcomesOne-way, broadcast only
Warning: Multiple people marked as Accountable = no one accountable. This is the most common RACI failure.

Project Kickoff — Six Required Answers

  1. Why are we doing this? (strategic context and urgency)
  2. What does success look like? (specific, measurable outcomes)
  3. Who is responsible for what? (RACI clarity)
  4. What are the constraints? (timeline, budget, regulatory, technical)
  5. How will we communicate? (cadence, channel, escalation path)
  6. What are the known risks? (blockers and mitigation plans)

Single Source of Truth (SSOT)

Every cross-functional project must have one designated SSOT — a document, board, or tool where all decisions, status updates, and changes are recorded. If it is not in the SSOT, it did not happen.

Conflict Resolution Ladder

  1. State the disagreement clearly, without blame: "I see it differently"
  2. Identify what each party actually needs (not just what they're asking for)
  3. Search for the option that satisfies both underlying needs
  4. If unresolved: escalate to Accountable owner with written summary of both positions
  5. Accountable owner decides — commit and execute

6. MEETING FACILITATION

Meeting Taxonomy

TypePurposeDurationFrequency
Daily StandupDone / Next / Blocked15 minDaily
Weekly Team SyncProgress, priorities, blockers30-60 minWeekly
1-on-1Relationship, coaching, feedback30-45 minWeekly/biweekly
Decision MeetingDeliberation on a specific decisionTime-boxedAs needed
RetrospectiveTeam process reflection60 minMonthly/per sprint
All-HandsCompany update, culture, Q&A30-60 minMonthly

Before the Meeting

  • [ ] Is this necessary, or can this be resolved async?
  • [ ] Agenda written and shared 24+ hours in advance?
  • [ ] Every invitee essential? Remove 'Informed' people from invite
  • [ ] Clear decision or outcome defined?
  • [ ] Timekeeper and note-taker assigned?
  • [ ] Pre-reads shared with sufficient lead time?

During the Meeting

  • Open with intention — State purpose and desired outcome in first 60 seconds
  • Parking Lot — Capture valuable but off-topic items for later
  • Draw out quiet voices — "Before we close, [Name] — what's your read?"
  • Force decisions — Name loops: "We've discussed this from multiple angles — what are we choosing?"

After the Meeting (within 24 hours)

Meeting notes must include:

  • Date and attendees
  • Decisions made
  • Actions assigned (owner + deadline)
  • Parking Lot items with owners

Notes shared with all attendees AND all Informed stakeholders. Actions tracked in a shared system, not just email. Next meeting begins with review of previous actions.


7. TRANSPARENCY

Levels of Transparency

LevelWhat It MeansUse For
Default OpenAll information available without askingDocs, wikis, roadmaps
Share on RequestAvailable to anyone who asksSensitive but non-confidential data
Need to KnowRestricted to those directly involvedPersonnel matters, legal strategy
ConfidentialFormal agreement requiredBoard matters, regulatory submissions

Leadership Transparency Norms

  • Share the 'why' behind decisions — context enables autonomous decision-making
  • Acknowledge mistakes openly and quickly — own errors before they become rumours
  • When you cannot share something: "I can't share the detail here, but I'll update you when I can"
  • Never let people find out important news through informal channels first
  • Model the transparency you want to see in your team

Psychological Safety (prerequisite for transparency)

  • Respond to bad news with curiosity: "Tell me more" not "How did this happen?"
  • Reward people who surface problems early
  • Normalise uncertainty: "I don't know yet" is a complete answer
  • Never use information shared in confidence as ammunition in future disputes
Psychological safety is destroyed in seconds and rebuilt over months. One disproportionate response to bad news can silence an entire team.

8. ACTIVE LISTENING

The Three Listening Levels

LevelDescriptionGoal
Level 1 — InternalThinking about your own response while the speaker talksAvoid this
Level 2 — FocusedFully attentive: words, body language, emotional contentProfessional baseline
Level 3 — GlobalAware of everything including silence and what is not saidHigh-stakes conversations

Six Core Techniques

  1. The Pause — Wait 2-3 seconds before responding. Signals processing, not just waiting.
  2. Reflective Listening — Repeat back in your own words: "What I'm hearing is X — is that right?"
  3. Clarifying Questions — "What would that look like in practice?" / "What's driving that concern?"
  4. Acknowledge Without Agreeing — "I can see why that would feel frustrating" ≠ "You are right"
  5. Non-Verbal Listening — Eye contact, open posture, camera not screen in video calls
  6. Listen for What Is Not Said — Missing stakeholders, omitted constraints, avoided topics are data

Common Failure Modes to Avoid

FailureWhat It Looks Like
Preparing your responseEyes glaze over mid-sentence
FilteringOnly hearing what confirms existing beliefs
InterruptingJumping in before the speaker finishes
Advice-giving too soonOffering solutions before understanding the problem
DistractionPhone visible, notifications on, environment not set up

Active Listening by Context

  • 1-on-1s — Team member should speak 60%+ of the time. Ask questions, don't advise unless asked.
  • Negotiations — Every piece of info shared is a data point. Do not fill silences.
  • Conflict — Each party must feel heard before moving to resolution. Listen first, solve second.

MASTER OUTPUT STANDARDS

When producing any communication output, apply these non-negotiables:

Before Writing Anything

  1. Who is the audience?
  2. What do they need to believe or do after reading this?
  3. What is the ONE key message?
  4. What is the right channel and format?
  5. What is the deadline / response expectation?

Universal Quality Bar

  • Every message has a clear purpose and a clear call to action
  • Active voice throughout
  • Specific over vague — dates, numbers, names
  • Read it once for content, once for length (cut 20%)
  • If it took more than 5 minutes to write, have a second person review it

HeySalad-Specific Context

  • Multi-jurisdictional: UK (HeySalad Payments Ltd), Estonia (HeySalad OÜ), Zambia (HeySalad Technologies / HeySalad Pay)
  • Regulatory audiences: FCA, Bank of Zambia, Estonian EFIU
  • Async-first across time zones — async discipline is non-negotiable
  • Founder-CTO voice: direct, precise, technically credible, commercially aware
  • Company stage: pre-revenue / early revenue, compliance-first, building trust with regulators and investors
  • Tone: confident but not overblown, honest about challenges, specific about progress

COMMON TASK PATTERNS

"Draft an investor update"

→ Use Section 2 investor update formula (5-part structure) → Apply Section 4 written communication principles → Tone: direct, data-driven, honest including on challenges

"Write a regulatory email / response"

→ Use Section 2 regulatory correspondence rules → Formal, precise, deferential, reference numbers included → Flag for second-person review before sending

"Structure this presentation / deck"

→ Apply Pyramid Principle from Section 3 → Governing thought within 60 seconds → One idea per slide, headline as insight

"Help me run this meeting"

→ Section 6: check meeting type, apply before/during/after checklists → Output: agenda template or meeting notes template

"Set up RACI for this project"

→ Section 5: identify R, A, C, I for each workstream → Confirm only ONE Accountable owner → Output as table with names assigned

"Review this message / doc"

→ Apply Section 4 written principles → Check: BLUF, active voice, specificity, audience calibration, length → Return revised version with brief rationale for key changes

"Help with this difficult conversation"

→ Sections 7 (transparency) and 8 (active listening) → Apply acknowledgement without agreement technique → Coach on listening levels and clarifying questions

"Write a team announcement"

→ Section 1 internal communication norms → Lead with the 'why', include context, specify next steps → Tone: motivating, honest, clear


*HeySalad Communication Playbook — v1.0 — 2025* *Founder & CTO: Peter Machona*

平台分布

OpenClaw

77.85%
按下载量换算4,253

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills