- name
- china-claw
- description
- Research and introduce China-based alternatives, counterparts, or “平替” products to OpenClaw, organized by company and product positioning. Use when the user asks about 国内版 OpenClaw、OpenClaw 平替、中国公司做的类似产品、国产 agent 平台、国产多智能体/自动化助手产品, or wants a structured market overview rather than a single product recommendation.
China Claw
Overview
Use this skill to research and explain Chinese products that can be described as OpenClaw-like alternatives or adjacent substitutes. Focus on factual positioning, what each company built, how it compares to OpenClaw, and where the match is strong, partial, or weak.
Workflow
- Clarify the user's goal when needed:
- wanting a market map - wanting a shortlist - wanting one best recommendation - wanting products by company size, use case, or capability
- Search the web for recent information about Chinese companies and products related to:
- AI agent platforms - workflow automation assistants - multi-agent systems - enterprise AI copilots - tool-using AI assistants
- Read multiple sources before concluding.
- Group findings by company, not by random web page.
- For each product, state whether it is:
- close substitute - partial substitute - adjacent product
- End with a recommendation or ranking if the user wants a decision.
Search Strategy
Prefer Chinese search queries and combine product, company, and capability terms.
Recommended query patterns:
国产 OpenClaw 平替中国 AI agent 平台 公司国内 多智能体 产品企业级 AI 助手 平台 中国 公司智能体 工作流 平台 中国AI 自动化 助手 平台 国内<公司名> AI agent<产品名> 智能体 平台
If you already know likely companies, verify them with current sources instead of relying on memory.
Comparison Rules
Compare each product along these axes:
- 定位: personal assistant, enterprise copilot, workflow platform, agent builder, browser automation, knowledge assistant
- 目标用户: individual users, developers, operations teams, enterprises
- 核心能力: tool use, workflow orchestration, browser actions, knowledge retrieval, scheduling, integrations
- 开放性: configurable, extensible, developer-friendly, closed SaaS, internal-only
- 与 OpenClaw 的相似度: high / medium / low
Do not call something a “平替” just because it uses AI. The product should overlap with OpenClaw in at least part of the workflow: assistant orchestration, tools, agents, automation, messaging, memory, or operator-style execution.
Evidence Standards
- Prefer official sites, product docs, launch posts, GitHub pages, or reputable media coverage.
- Avoid writing from hype or marketing copy alone.
- If a product appears discontinued, niche, invite-only, or poorly evidenced, say so.
- If information is thin, mark the confidence as low.
- Do not fabricate features.
Response Patterns
Pattern A: Market Overview
Use when the user asks broadly for “有哪些”.
For each company/product, provide:
- 公司
- 产品
- 一句话定位
- 为什么像 OpenClaw
- 主要差异
- 相似度判断
Then add:
- 推荐先关注的 3 个
- 哪类用户适合哪类产品
Pattern B: Shortlist Recommendation
Use when the user wants actionable recommendations.
Structure:
- 用户需求假设
- 3-5 个最相关产品
- 每个产品的适配理由
- 明确推荐项
- 不推荐或暂不推荐的原因
Pattern C: Company-by-Company Scan
Use when the user names specific companies such as 阿里、字节、百度、腾讯、MiniMax、智谱、月之暗面、面壁等.
For each company:
- 是否有相关产品
- 产品名称
- 与 OpenClaw 的重合点
- 更偏企业、开发者还是消费者
- 当前成熟度判断
Output Quality Bar
- Be specific, not generic.
- Distinguish between “agent platform”, “copilot”, and “chatbot”.
- Prefer recent information when product categories move quickly.
- If the user asks for “各大公司”, include large companies first, then notable startups.
- If the evidence is weak, say “更像相关方向产品，不一定算直接平替”.
Good Framing Language
Preferred wording:
更像 OpenClaw 的部分替代品在工作流/智能体编排层面与 OpenClaw 接近更偏企业内部助手，不是完全对标属于相邻赛道，不算严格意义上的平替
Avoid overstated wording:
完全替代中国版 OpenClawunless a source explicitly positions it that way or the similarity is genuinely strong.