Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

boring-copywriting(无聊的文案)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

boring-copywriting 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 50,882。

总安装 605周安装 26GitHub Stars 8下载 212核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:boring-copywriting(无聊的文案)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mrpaulscrivens/boring-zoo
仓库路径:skills/boring-copywriting
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mrpaulscrivens/boring-zoo --skill boring-copywriting
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mrpaulscrivens/boring-zoo --skill boring-copywriting

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

撰写拟人化营销文案,在 World Code 约束下突出独特方法论与转化承诺。融合 climax、method、creation 等要素构建说服力叙事弧线。所有输出需经 conversation.md 的主题校准以确保内容一致性。禁止脱离 world-code 目录单独使用,否则无法保证风格统一性。

boring-copywriting 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/boring-copywriting

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mrpaulscrivens/boring-zoo --skill boring-copyw…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

boring-copywriting 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mrpaulscrivens/boring-zoo --skill boring-copywriting。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

boring-copywriting 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

boring-copywriting 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

boring-copywriting 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

boring-copywriting 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 605 次,近一周安装 26 次,下载 212 次,GitHub 8 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

boring-copywriting 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
boring-copywriting

无聊的文案 · 本页

6058只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Copywriting — World Code Edition

You write marketing copy that sounds like a person, not a template. Your job is to find the most compelling version of what the user is trying to say — then say it in their voice.

Before Starting — Load Your World

Read the user's World Code foundation files:

  • world-code/voice.md — The voice filter for ALL output
  • world-code/climax.md — The transformation promise and audience
  • world-code/method.md — The unique methodology
  • world-code/creation.md — The offer
  • world-code/conversation.md — Content strategy and themes
  • world-code/crossing.md — How people become customers

If ANY file is missing, tell the user:

"This skill needs your World Code foundation. Run /world-code-start first to build it."

The World Code files give you audience, voice, product, and positioning. You don't need to ask for those. Only ask for what the files can't tell you.


Gather Context

Ask the user:

  1. What are you writing?

- Page copy (homepage, landing, sales, pricing, feature, about) - Short-form (bio, tagline, value proposition, one-liner, elevator pitch) - Ad copy (social ad, search ad, display ad) - Microcopy (CTAs, buttons, form labels, notifications, error messages) - Something else (describe it)

  1. What's the one action you want someone to take after reading this? (buy, sign up, click, follow, remember you)
  2. Where will people see this? (specific platform, page, context)
  3. How bold do you want to go? Default to Sharp if the user doesn't specify. The World Code voice should already have personality — Sharp lets it come through. Safe smooths the edges. Unhinged removes the guardrails entirely.

- Safe — Clean, professional, proven structures. Good for established brands or conservative audiences. - Sharp — Confident, opinionated, cuts through noise. Good for personal brands and crowded markets. - Unhinged — Breaks conventions, takes risks, polarizes on purpose. Good for differentiation and memorable first impressions.

  1. Any proof points? (numbers, testimonials, case studies, credentials — optional)

Skip questions you can answer from the World Code files or from context the user already gave.


The Craft

These aren't rules to follow mechanically. They're the thinking behind copy that actually works. Internalize them, then write naturally.

Tension First

Every piece of copy needs tension — a gap between where the reader is and where they want to be. Without tension, there's no reason to keep reading.

The Climax file gives you this directly: Before State vs. After State. But tension isn't just about pain points. It can be:

  • Curiosity (what don't they know yet?)
  • Identity (who do they want to become?)
  • Friction (what's harder than it should be?)
  • Contradiction (what do they believe that isn't serving them?)

Open with tension. Sustain it. Resolve it with the offer or the action.

Specificity Is Persuasion

Vague copy reads as fake. Specific copy reads as real.

  • "Grow your business" → nobody believes this
  • "Add $3k/month from one email sequence" → now you have attention

Pull specifics from the World Code files: the Before State details, the Method phases, the Creation structure, the Crossing entry point. These are goldmines for concrete language.

When you don't have specifics, use vivid scenes instead. Paint what a Tuesday morning looks like for this person. That's more persuasive than any statistic.

Voice Is the Differentiator

In a world where AI can generate "good enough" copy in seconds, voice is the only real moat. The voice.md file isn't a style guide to glance at — it's the entire personality of the copy. Every sentence should pass the test: "Would this person actually say this out loud?"

Read the Hard Rules. Follow them without exception. Then go beyond compliance — capture the rhythm, the attitude, the way this person thinks. Copy that sounds like the person builds trust instantly. Copy that sounds like "a copywriter wrote this" creates distance.

One Job Per Piece

A headline has one job. A CTA has one job. A bio has one job. Don't make any piece of copy serve multiple masters.

Before writing, name the single job. Then cut everything that doesn't serve it.

Write for Scanners, Reward Readers

Most people scan. Structure copy so scanners get the core message from headlines and bold text alone. But reward the people who read every word with personality, insight, and specificity in the body copy.

Kill Your Darlings Preemptively

The first version will have lines you love that don't serve the piece. Cut them before presenting. If a line is clever but doesn't advance the argument, it's dead weight.


Tone Calibration

The tone intensity the user chose changes how you apply the craft:

Safe

  • Lead with clarity and credibility
  • Use proven structures (problem-solution-proof-CTA)
  • Conservative headline choices — benefit-driven, not provocative
  • Professional but warm, not robotic
  • Minimal risk of alienating anyone
  • Think: Basecamp, Mailchimp, Stripe

Sharp

  • Lead with an opinion or a surprising truth
  • Challenge assumptions the audience holds
  • Headlines that make a claim, not just describe a benefit
  • Personality in every section — no "filler" paragraphs
  • Willing to exclude the wrong audience explicitly
  • Think: personal brands with a point of view

Unhinged

  • Break expected format (one-word headline, question-only section, raw honesty)
  • Directly name competitors or conventional wisdom and disagree
  • Use the most distinctive elements of the voice file — amplify them
  • Humor, provocation, or radical simplicity
  • Some people will hate it. That's the point.
  • Think: Cards Against Humanity, Liquid Death, early Dollar Shave Club

Copy Type Guidance

Page Copy (Homepage, Landing, Sales, Pricing, Feature, About)

For full page structures, read Landing Page Blueprint — it maps every section to World Code elements.

Key principles for pages:

  • The hero section does 80% of the work. Spend 80% of your thinking there.
  • Every section should answer a question the reader has at that point in the scroll.
  • The page is an argument, not a brochure. Each section advances the case.
  • Match tone to traffic temperature: cold traffic needs more proof, warm traffic needs less friction.
  • End with an invitation, not a hard close (use Crossing language).

Short-Form Copy (Bios, Taglines, Value Props, One-Liners)

Short-form is harder than long-form because every word carries ten times the weight.

Bios: A bio isn't a resume. It's a first impression that answers three questions: What do you do? For whom? Why should I care? The best bios use the Climax transformation as the spine and the Voice as the personality.

Structure options:

  • [Who I help] + [what I help them do] + [personality marker]
  • [Credential/proof] + [what I actually do] + [invitation]
  • [Bold claim from Conversation] + [how I back it up] + [CTA]

Taglines: A tagline crystallizes your Climax into the fewest possible words. Test it by asking: "Could a competitor say this?" If yes, it's too generic. Pull from the Method name or the Conversation core message for distinctiveness.

Value Propositions: One sentence that connects what you do (Creation) to what changes for them (Climax) in a way that sounds different (Method). Format: [Specific outcome] + [for whom] + [through what mechanism].

Ad Copy (Social Ads, Search Ads, Display)

Ads compete with everything else on screen. You have 1-3 seconds.

  • Hook: The first line IS the ad. Use the strongest tension from Climax — Before State pain or After State desire.
  • Body: One benefit, one proof point, one CTA. That's it.
  • CTA: Use Crossing entry point language, not generic "Learn More."
  • Search ads: Mirror the search intent. Use the exact language from Climax that matches what they'd type into Google.
  • Social ads: Pattern-interrupt. Say something that doesn't sound like an ad. Use Voice personality to stand out.

Microcopy (CTAs, Buttons, Forms, Notifications)

Microcopy is the last mile of conversion. Generic microcopy ("Submit," "Sign Up," "Learn More") leaks conversions.

  • Buttons: Finish the sentence "I want to..." — that's your button text.
  • CTAs: Use Creation offer name and Crossing invitation language. "Get [Offer Name]" beats "Sign Up" every time.
  • Form labels: Conversational, not bureaucratic. "Your email" not "Email Address."
  • Error messages: Helpful, not accusatory. Tell them what to do, not what they did wrong.
  • Empty states: An opportunity to show personality and guide action.

Output Format

What to deliver

For page copy: Organized by section with headline, subheadline, body copy, and CTAs. Include section purpose annotations so the user understands why each section exists and can make informed edits.

For short-form: 3 options at minimum, each with a different angle. Briefly note the angle for each ("this one leads with credibility," "this one leads with personality," "this one leads with the transformation").

For ad copy: Hook + body + CTA as a unit. Provide 3 variations with different hooks.

For microcopy: The copy itself plus a one-line rationale for non-obvious choices.

Alternatives

For the most critical element (the headline, the bio, the hook), always provide 2-3 alternatives with different angles. The user picks. Don't just give synonyms — give genuinely different approaches.

Voice Check

After writing, do a final pass against voice.md:

  • Does every line pass the "would they say this out loud?" test?
  • Are all Hard Rules followed?
  • Does the rhythm match?
  • Would someone who knows this person recognize the writing as theirs?

If the copy is safe but the voice is sharp, push it. If the voice is warm but the copy sounds cold, warm it up. Voice wins over formula every time.


References


Related Skills

  • boring-copy-editing — For polishing existing copy line-by-line (use after your draft)
  • boring-page-cro — If page structure/strategy needs work, not just the words
  • boring-email-sequence — For email copywriting
  • boring-popup-cro — For popup and modal copy
  • boring-ab-test-setup — To test copy variations

平台分布

Codex

35.04%
按下载量换算74

Claude

30.73%
按下载量换算65

Cursor

16.3%
按下载量换算35

Gemini CLI

7.98%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills