Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

api-test-suite-builderAPI 测试 suite 构建器

Agent Skill

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

总安装

12,277

周安装

522

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

4,301
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:api-test-suite-builder(API 测试 suite 构建器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/api-test-suite-builder
安装命令:
openclaw skills install api-test-suite-builder
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install api-test-suite-builder

简介

自动生成 API 测试套件,覆盖常见请求与边界条件。

  • 适合自动化测试流水线中的接口验证环节。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • 通过 clawhub 安装,输出可执行的测试脚本。
  • 需补充实际业务逻辑断言,避免仅验证语法正确性。
  • api-test-suite-builder 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
api-test-suite-builder
description
API Test Suite Builder

API Test Suite Builder

Tier: POWERFUL Category: Engineering Domain: Testing / API Quality


Overview

Scans API route definitions across frameworks (Next.js App Router, Express, FastAPI, Django REST) and auto-generates comprehensive test suites covering auth, input validation, error codes, pagination, file uploads, and rate limiting. Outputs ready-to-run test files for Vitest+Supertest (Node) or Pytest+httpx (Python).


Core Capabilities

  • Route detection — scan source files to extract all API endpoints
  • Auth coverage — valid/invalid/expired tokens, missing auth header
  • Input validation — missing fields, wrong types, boundary values, injection attempts
  • Error code matrix — 400/401/403/404/422/500 for each route
  • Pagination — first/last/empty/oversized pages
  • File uploads — valid, oversized, wrong MIME type, empty
  • Rate limiting — burst detection, per-user vs global limits

When to Use

  • New API added — generate test scaffold before writing implementation (TDD)
  • Legacy API with no tests — scan and generate baseline coverage
  • API contract review — verify existing tests match current route definitions
  • Pre-release regression check — ensure all routes have at least smoke tests
  • Security audit prep — generate adversarial input tests

Route Detection

Next.js App Router

# Find all route handlers
find ./app/api -name "route.ts" -o -name "route.js" | sort

# Extract HTTP methods from each route file
grep -rn "export async function\|export function" app/api/**/route.ts | \
  grep -oE "(GET|POST|PUT|PATCH|DELETE|HEAD|OPTIONS)" | sort -u

# Full route map
find ./app/api -name "route.ts" | while read f; do
  route=$(echo $f | sed 's|./app||' | sed 's|/route.ts||')
  methods=$(grep -oE "export (async )?function (GET|POST|PUT|PATCH|DELETE)" "$f" | \
    grep -oE "(GET|POST|PUT|PATCH|DELETE)")
  echo "$methods $route"
done

Express

# Find all router files
find ./src -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" | xargs grep -l "router\.\(get\|post\|put\|delete\|patch\)" 2>/dev/null

# Extract routes with line numbers
grep -rn "router\.\(get\|post\|put\|delete\|patch\)\|app\.\(get\|post\|put\|delete\|patch\)" \
  src/ --include="*.ts" | grep -oE "(get|post|put|delete|patch)\(['\"][^'\"]*['\"]"

# Generate route map
grep -rn "router\.\|app\." src/ --include="*.ts" | \
  grep -oE "\.(get|post|put|delete|patch)\(['\"][^'\"]+['\"]" | \
  sed "s/\.\(.*\)('\(.*\)'/\U\1 \2/"

FastAPI

# Find all route decorators
grep -rn "@app\.\|@router\." . --include="*.py" | \
  grep -E "@(app|router)\.(get|post|put|delete|patch)"

# Extract with path and function name
grep -rn "@\(app\|router\)\.\(get\|post\|put\|delete\|patch\)" . --include="*.py" | \
  grep -oE "@(app|router)\.(get|post|put|delete|patch)\(['\"][^'\"]*['\"]"

Django REST Framework

# urlpatterns extraction
grep -rn "path\|re_path\|url(" . --include="*.py" | grep "urlpatterns" -A 50 | \
  grep -E "path\(['\"]" | grep -oE "['\"][^'\"]+['\"]" | head -40

# ViewSet router registration
grep -rn "router\.register\|DefaultRouter\|SimpleRouter" . --include="*.py"

Test Generation Patterns

Auth Test Matrix

For every authenticated endpoint, generate:

Test CaseExpected Status
No Authorization header401
Invalid token format401
Valid token, wrong user role403
Expired JWT token401
Valid token, correct role2xx
Token from deleted user401

Input Validation Matrix

For every POST/PUT/PATCH endpoint with a request body:

Test CaseExpected Status
Empty body {}400 or 422
Missing required fields (one at a time)400 or 422
Wrong type (string where int expected)400 or 422
Boundary: value at min-1400 or 422
Boundary: value at min2xx
Boundary: value at max2xx
Boundary: value at max+1400 or 422
SQL injection in string field400 or 200 (sanitized)
XSS payload in string field400 or 200 (sanitized)
Null values for required fields400 or 422

Example Test Files

→ See references/example-test-files.md for details

Generating Tests from Route Scan

When given a codebase, follow this process:

  1. Scan routes using the detection commands above
  2. Read each route handler to understand:

- Expected request body schema - Auth requirements (middleware, decorators) - Return types and status codes - Business rules (ownership, role checks)

  1. Generate test file per route group using the patterns above
  2. Name tests descriptively: "returns 401 when token is expired" not "auth test 3"
  3. Use factories/fixtures for test data — never hardcode IDs
  4. Assert response shape, not just status code

Common Pitfalls

  • Testing only happy paths — 80% of bugs live in error paths; test those first
  • Hardcoded test data IDs — use factories/fixtures; IDs change between environments
  • Shared state between tests — always clean up in afterEach/afterAll
  • Testing implementation, not behavior — test what the API returns, not how it does it
  • Missing boundary tests — off-by-one errors are extremely common in pagination and limits
  • Not testing token expiry — expired tokens behave differently from invalid ones
  • Ignoring Content-Type — test that API rejects wrong content types (xml when json expected)

Best Practices

  1. One describe block per endpoint — keeps failures isolated and readable
  2. Seed minimal data — don't load the entire DB; create only what the test needs
  3. Use beforeAll for shared setup, afterAll for cleanup — not beforeEach for expensive ops
  4. Assert specific error messages/fields, not just status codes
  5. Test that sensitive fields (password, secret) are never in responses
  6. For auth tests, always test the "missing header" case separately from "invalid token"
  7. Add rate limit tests last — they can interfere with other test suites if run in parallel

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

94.22%
按下载量换算4,052

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills