Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

amazon-review-workbook(亚马逊评论工作簿)

amazon-review-workbook 用于补充效率相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接效率相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

amazon-review-workbook 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 15,181。

总安装 3,184周安装 134GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,115核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.3

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:amazon-review-workbook(亚马逊评论工作簿)
来源仓库:https://github.com/aduo6668/amazon-review-workbook
安装命令:
openclaw skills install amazon-review-workbook
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install amazon-review-workbook

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

从Amazon页面收集全部客户评论并导出14列事实报告。支持按时间范围筛选与多ASIN批量整理任务。生成可直接用于Excel分析的标准化数据表格。安装命令:openclaw skills install amazon-review-workbook。必须配合已登录的Chrome浏览器实例才能正常工作。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install amazon-review-workbook;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

amazon-review-workbook 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install amazon-review-workbook。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

amazon-review-workbook 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

amazon-review-workbook 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

amazon-review-workbook 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

amazon-review-workbook 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,184 次,近一周安装 134 次,下载 1,115 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

amazon-review-workbook 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
amazon-review-workbook

亚马逊评论工作簿 · 本页

3,184—需要联网MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
amazon-review-workbook
description
Collect all customer reviews from an Amazon product URL or product-reviews URL through a logged-in Chrome session on port 9222, export a 14-column factual workbook, optionally fill translations through DeepLX, and then help the model tag the rows into a final delivery-ready spreadsheet. Use when the user sends an Amazon link and wants review scraping, competitor review analysis, review export, or a delivery-ready spreadsheet with usernames, review links, review time, helpful votes, translation, summary, sentiment, categories, and tags.

Amazon Review Workbook

Turn an Amazon product or review link into a two-phase delivery workbook.

This skill is designed to be portable: the scripts live inside the skill folder and do not depend on dashcamauto or any other local repo.

Quick Path

  1. If this is the first run on a machine, read references/setup.md.
  2. Run a quick health check:
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py doctor --url "<amazon-url>"
  1. Run factual collection:
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py intake --url "<amazon-url>" --output-dir "<workspace>/amazon-review-output"
  1. If DeepLX is configured and reachable, fill 评论中文版:
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py translate --input-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_<asin>_review_rows_factual.json" --output-dir "<workspace>/amazon-review-output"
  1. Check coverage before deciding whether keyword expansion is worth the extra requests:
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py coverage-check --url "<amazon-url>" --db-path "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_review_cache.sqlite3"
  1. Build canonical tags and a lightweight tagging payload:
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py taxonomy-bootstrap --input-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_<asin>_review_rows_translated.json" --output-dir "<workspace>/amazon-review-output"
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py prepare-tagging --input-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_<asin>_review_rows_translated.json" --output-dir "<workspace>/amazon-review-output" --canonical-tags-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/canonical_tags.json"

taxonomy-bootstrap is only for building a stable canonical vocabulary for the batch. prepare-tagging consumes the full factual or translated JSON and emits a trimmed *_tagging_input.json that contains pending rows only plus cache metadata. Do not use that trimmed file as the merge source.

  1. Read references/tagging-guidelines.md, let the model fill only the pending rows in a separate labels JSON, then merge the labels back into the full base JSON and build the final workbook:
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py merge-build --base-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_<asin>_review_rows_translated.json" --labels-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_<asin>_labels.json" --output-dir "<workspace>/amazon-review-output" --taxonomy-version "v1" --strict

Workflow

1. Verify prerequisites

  • Confirm doctor reports a valid asin.
  • Confirm chrome_debug_ready is true.
  • If you plan to use translate, confirm deeplx_env_ready is true.
  • If deeplx_reachable is false, do not block the workflow; let the model fill 评论中文版 during tagging.

If any of these fail, read references/setup.md before continuing.

2. Use the smallest command that fits

  • For raw review collection only: use collect
  • For factual extraction plus workbook scaffolding: use intake
  • For deciding whether a keyword pass is still needed: use coverage-check
  • For rebuilding the tuned keyword state from historical data: use keyword-autotune
  • For machine translation of 评论中文版: use translate
  • For canonical tag sampling: use taxonomy-bootstrap
  • For cache-aware lightweight model input: use prepare-tagging
  • For writing the final labeled workbook: use merge-build

Examples:

python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py collect --url "<amazon-url>" --output-dir "<workspace>/amazon-review-output"
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py translate --input-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_<asin>_review_rows_factual.json" --output-dir "<workspace>/amazon-review-output"
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py coverage-check --url "<amazon-url>" --db-path "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_review_cache.sqlite3"
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py keyword-autotune --output-dir "<workspace>/amazon-review-output" --db-path "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_review_cache.sqlite3"
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py taxonomy-bootstrap --input-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_<asin>_review_rows_translated.json" --output-dir "<workspace>/amazon-review-output"
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py prepare-tagging --input-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_<asin>_review_rows_translated.json" --output-dir "<workspace>/amazon-review-output" --canonical-tags-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/canonical_tags.json"
python scripts/amazon_review_workbook.py merge-build --base-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_<asin>_review_rows_translated.json" --labels-json "<workspace>/amazon-review-output/amazon_<asin>_labels.json" --output-dir "<workspace>/amazon-review-output" --taxonomy-version "v1" --strict

3. Keep the workbook stable

The factual and final workbooks always use the 14-column schema in references/output-schema.md.

Do not silently add or remove columns. If a field is unavailable from the page, leave it blank rather than inventing a value.

4. Tag rows only after grounding on the factual file

The model should not invent from the product page alone. Ground semantic tagging on the factual JSON/workbook created by intake or translate.

Keep the two JSON shapes distinct:

  • *_tagging_input.json from prepare-tagging is the cropped machine prompt payload for the model
  • --base-json for merge-build must be the full factual/translated record set, not the cropped tagging payload
  • --labels-json is the model's completed semantic output for the pending rows only

If translate prints translation_mode=model_fallback, fill 评论中文版 in the same tagging pass instead of waiting for DeepLX.

Use references/tagging-guidelines.md when filling:

  • 评论概括
  • 情感倾向
  • 类别分类
  • 标签
  • 重点标记

The preferred fast path is:

  1. taxonomy-bootstrap to build a canonical tag vocabulary for this batch
  2. prepare-tagging to create a minimal pending-row payload
  3. model labeling only for pending rows, written into a separate labels JSON
  4. merge-build to update cache and export the final workbook from the full base JSON

Collection Defaults

  • intake and collect no longer run keyword expansion implicitly in deep mode. deep now means the 18 combo pass only.
  • Run coverage-check after intake to compare current rows vs Amazon's visible reviews count before deciding to spend more requests.
  • Use --keywords only when you explicitly want a keyword pass.
  • Use --keywords with no values to run the built-in keyword preset for the selected --keyword-profile.
  • Use --keywords foo bar baz to provide an explicit keyword list.
  • Default pacing now inserts a 2.5s gap between combos/keywords to reduce rate-limit risk.
  • Built-in profiles:

- generic: universal consumer-product terms - electronics: universal terms + common app/setup/hardware terms - dashcam: electronics profile + recording/night/parking/GPS/Wi-Fi/mount terms

  • Default keyword reuse policy is successful: keywords that have produced results before are skipped on later runs; recent zero-result keywords are also suppressed for 72h to avoid immediate retries.
  • If you really want to brute-force rerun every keyword, use --keyword-reuse-scope none.
  • A tuned state file at <output-dir>/keyword_tuning_state.json is now read automatically when present, and refreshed after keyword runs so the skill gradually reorders towards higher-yield terms.
  • keyword-autotune can also ingest old keyword-run JSON reports via --report-glob to seed the tuned state from historical experiments.

Failure Boundaries

Do not claim success if any of these is true:

  • The script did not reach a real review page.
  • The expected XLSX/CSV for the current phase was not generated.
  • Review links, review time, or helpful votes were guessed rather than extracted.
  • The model tagged rows without first grounding on the factual JSON/workbook.
  • The cropped *_tagging_input.json was used as --base-json for merge-build.
  • The model re-labeled rows that were already cached for the same taxonomy version.
  • The workflow still claims a 13-column contract after 评论用户名 was added as a real output column.

Resources

平台分布

OpenClaw

87.67%
按下载量换算978

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills