Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

quality-manager-qmr(质量经理 qmr)

quality-manager-qmr 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

quality-manager-qmr 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 1,664。

总安装 82,586周安装 3,407GitHub Stars 1下载 26,983核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
2.1.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:quality-manager-qmr(质量经理 qmr)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/quality-manager-qmr
安装命令:
openclaw skills install quality-manager-qmr
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install quality-manager-qmr

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

quality-manager-qmr 作为高级质量负责人,提供体系治理和监管事务协调支持。适合健康科技企业应对 FDA 审查或国际认证挑战。输出管理评审报告、风险监控计划和纠正措施方案。重大决策需管理层签字确认,不能由 AI 直接签发文件。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install quality-manager-qmr;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

quality-manager-qmr 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install quality-manager-qmr。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

quality-manager-qmr 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

quality-manager-qmr 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

quality-manager-qmr 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

quality-manager-qmr 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 82,586 次,近一周安装 3,407 次,下载 26,983 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

quality-manager-qmr 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
quality-manager-qmr

质量经理 qmr · 本页

82,5861只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
quality-manager-qmr
description
Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2.
triggers

Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR)

Quality system accountability, management review leadership, and regulatory compliance oversight per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2 requirements.


Table of Contents


QMR Responsibilities

ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2 Requirements

ResponsibilityScopeEvidence
QMS effectivenessMonitor system performance and suitabilityManagement review records
Reporting to managementCommunicate QMS performance to top managementQuality reports, dashboards
Quality awarenessPromote regulatory and quality requirementsTraining records, communications
Liaison with external partiesInterface with regulators, Notified BodiesMeeting records, correspondence

QMR Accountability Matrix

DomainAccountable ForReports ToFrequency
Quality PolicyPolicy adequacy and communicationCEO/BoardAnnual review
Quality ObjectivesObjective achievement and relevanceExecutive TeamQuarterly
QMS PerformanceSystem effectiveness metricsManagementMonthly
Regulatory ComplianceCompliance status across jurisdictionsCEOQuarterly
Audit ProgramAudit schedule completion, findings closureManagementPer audit
CAPA OversightCAPA effectiveness and timelinessExecutive TeamMonthly

Authority Boundaries

Decision TypeQMR AuthorityEscalation Required
Process changes within QMSApprove with ownerMajor process redesign
Document approvalFinal QA approvalPolicy-level changes
Nonconformity dispositionAccept/reject with MRBProduct release decisions
Supplier quality actionsQuality holds, auditsSupplier termination
Audit schedulingAdjust internal audit scheduleExternal audit timing
Training requirementsDefine quality training needsOrganization-wide training budget

Management Review Workflow

Conduct management reviews per ISO 13485 Clause 5.6 requirements.

Workflow: Prepare and Execute Management Review

  1. Schedule management review (minimum annually, typically quarterly or semi-annually)
  2. Notify all required attendees minimum 2 weeks prior
  3. Collect required inputs from process owners:

- Audit results (internal and external) - Customer feedback (complaints, satisfaction, returns) - Process performance and product conformity - CAPA status and effectiveness - Previous review action items - Changes affecting QMS (regulatory, organizational) - Recommendations for improvement

  1. Compile input summary report with trend analysis
  2. Prepare presentation materials with supporting data
  3. Distribute agenda and input package 1 week prior
  4. Conduct review meeting per agenda
  5. Validation: All required inputs reviewed; decisions documented with owners and due dates

Required Attendees

RoleRequirementInput Responsibility
CEO/General ManagerRequiredStrategic decisions
QMRChairOverall QMS status
Department HeadsRequiredProcess performance
RA ManagerRequiredRegulatory changes
Production ManagerRequiredProduct conformity
Customer QualityRequiredComplaint data

Management Review Input Template

MANAGEMENT REVIEW INPUT SUMMARY

Review Period: [Start Date] to [End Date]
Review Date: [Scheduled Date]
Prepared By: [QMR Name]

1. AUDIT RESULTS
   Internal audits completed: [X] of [X] planned
   External audits completed: [X]
   Total findings: [X] major / [X] minor
   Open findings: [X]
   Finding trends: [Analysis]

2. CUSTOMER FEEDBACK
   Complaints received: [X]
   Complaint rate: [X per 1000 units]
   Customer satisfaction score: [X.X/5.0]
   Returns: [X] units ([X]%)
   Top issues: [Categories]

3. PROCESS PERFORMANCE
   [Process 1]: [Metric] vs [Target] - [Status]
   [Process 2]: [Metric] vs [Target] - [Status]
   Out-of-spec processes: [List]

4. PRODUCT CONFORMITY
   First pass yield: [X]%
   Nonconformance rate: [X]%
   Scrap cost: $[X]
   Top defect categories: [List]

5. CAPA STATUS
   Open CAPAs: [X]
   Overdue: [X]
   Effectiveness rate: [X]%
   Average age: [X] days

6. PREVIOUS ACTIONS
   Total from last review: [X]
   Completed: [X] | In progress: [X] | Overdue: [X]

7. CHANGES AFFECTING QMS
   Regulatory: [List changes]
   Organizational: [List changes]
   Process: [List changes]

8. RECOMMENDATIONS
   [Collected improvement opportunities]

Management Review Output Requirements

OutputDocumentationOwner
QMS improvement decisionsAction items with due datesAssigned per item
Resource needsResource plan updatesDepartment heads
Quality objectives changesUpdated objectives documentQMR
Process improvement needsImprovement project chartersProcess owners

See: references/management-review-guide.md


Quality KPI Management Workflow

Establish, monitor, and report quality performance indicators.

Workflow: Establish Quality KPI Framework

  1. Identify quality objectives requiring measurement
  2. Select KPIs per objective using SMART criteria:

- Specific: Clear definition and calculation - Measurable: Quantifiable with available data - Actionable: Team can influence results - Relevant: Aligned to quality objectives - Time-bound: Defined measurement frequency

  1. Define target values based on baseline data and benchmarks
  2. Assign data source and collection responsibility
  3. Establish reporting frequency per KPI category
  4. Configure dashboard displays and trend analysis
  5. Define escalation thresholds and alert triggers
  6. Validation: Each KPI has owner, target, data source, and escalation criteria

Core Quality KPIs

CategoryKPITargetCalculation
ProcessFirst Pass Yield>95%(Units passed first time / Total units) × 100
ProcessNonconformance Rate<1%(NC count / Total units) × 100
CAPACAPA Closure Rate>90%(On-time closures / Due closures) × 100
CAPACAPA Effectiveness>85%(Effective CAPAs / Verified CAPAs) × 100
AuditFinding Closure Rate>90%(On-time closures / Due closures) × 100
AuditRepeat Finding Rate<10%(Repeat findings / Total findings) × 100
CustomerComplaint Rate<0.1%(Complaints / Units sold) × 100
CustomerSatisfaction Score>4.0/5.0Average of survey scores

KPI Review Frequency

KPI TypeReview FrequencyTrend PeriodAudience
Safety/ComplianceDaily monitoringWeeklyOperations
Production QualityWeeklyMonthlyDepartment heads
Customer QualityMonthlyQuarterlyExecutive team
Strategic QualityQuarterlyAnnualBoard/C-suite

Performance Response Matrix

Performance LevelStatusAction Required
>110% of targetExceedingConsider raising target
100-110% of targetMeetingMaintain current approach
90-100% of targetApproachingMonitor closely
80-90% of targetBelowImprovement plan required
<80% of targetCriticalImmediate intervention

See: references/quality-kpi-framework.md


Quality Objectives Workflow

Establish and maintain measurable quality objectives per ISO 13485 Clause 5.4.1.

Workflow: Annual Quality Objectives Setting

  1. Review prior year objective achievement
  2. Analyze quality performance trends and gaps
  3. Align with organizational strategic plan
  4. Draft objectives with measurable targets
  5. Validate resource availability for achievement
  6. Obtain executive approval
  7. Communicate objectives organization-wide
  8. Validation: Each objective is measurable, has owner, target, and timeline

Quality Objective Structure

QUALITY OBJECTIVE [Number]

Objective Statement: [Clear, measurable statement]
Aligned to Policy Element: [Quality policy section]
Target: [Specific measurable target]
Baseline: [Current performance]
Owner: [Name and title]
Due Date: [Target achievement date]

Success Criteria:
- [Criterion 1]
- [Criterion 2]

Measurement Method: [How progress is tracked]
Reporting Frequency: [Monthly/Quarterly]

Supporting Initiatives:
- [Initiative 1]
- [Initiative 2]

Resource Requirements:
- [Resource 1]
- [Resource 2]

Objective Categories

CategoryExample ObjectivesTypical Targets
Customer QualityReduce complaint rate<0.1% of units sold
Process QualityImprove first pass yield>96%
ComplianceMaintain certificationZero major NCs
EfficiencyReduce quality costs<4% of revenue
CultureIncrease training completion>98% on-time

Quarterly Objective Review

Review ElementAssessmentAction
Progress vs. targetOn track / Behind / AheadAdjust resources if behind
RelevanceStill valid / Needs updateModify if conditions changed
ResourcesAdequate / InsufficientRequest additional if needed
BarriersIdentified obstaclesEscalate for resolution

Quality Culture Assessment Workflow

Assess and improve organizational quality culture.

Workflow: Annual Quality Culture Assessment

  1. Design or select quality culture survey instrument
  2. Define survey population (all employees or sample)
  3. Communicate survey purpose and confidentiality
  4. Administer survey with 2-week response window
  5. Analyze results by department, role, and tenure
  6. Identify strengths and improvement areas
  7. Develop action plan for culture gaps
  8. Validation: Response rate >60%; action plan addresses bottom 3 scores

Quality Culture Dimensions

DimensionIndicatorsAssessment Method
Leadership commitmentManagement visible support for qualitySurvey, observation
Quality ownershipEmployees feel responsible for qualitySurvey
CommunicationQuality information flows effectivelySurvey, audit
Continuous improvementSuggestions submitted and implementedMetrics
Training and competenceEmployees feel adequately trainedSurvey, records
Problem solvingIssues addressed at root causeCAPA analysis

Culture Survey Categories

CategorySample Questions
Leadership"Management demonstrates commitment to quality"
Resources"I have the tools and training to do quality work"
Communication"Quality expectations are clearly communicated"
Empowerment"I am encouraged to report quality issues"
Recognition"Quality achievements are recognized"

Culture Improvement Actions

Gap IdentifiedPotential Actions
Low leadership visibilityQuality gemba walks, all-hands quality updates
Inadequate trainingCompetency-based training program
Poor communicationQuality newsletters, department huddles
Low reportingAnonymous reporting system, no-blame culture
Lack of recognitionQuality award program, team celebrations

Regulatory Compliance Oversight

Monitor and maintain regulatory compliance across jurisdictions.

Multi-Jurisdictional Compliance Matrix

JurisdictionRegulationRequirementStatus Tracking
EUMDR 2017/745CE marking, Notified BodyTechnical file, annual review
USA21 CFR 820FDA registration, QSR complianceAnnual registration, inspections
InternationalISO 13485QMS certificationSurveillance audits
GermanyMPG/MPDGNational implementationCompetent authority filings

Compliance Monitoring Workflow

  1. Maintain regulatory requirement register
  2. Subscribe to regulatory update services
  3. Assess impact of regulatory changes monthly
  4. Update affected processes within 90 days of effective date
  5. Verify training completion for regulatory changes
  6. Document compliance status in management review
  7. Maintain inspection readiness checklist
  8. Validation: All applicable requirements mapped; no expired registrations

Regulatory Authority Interface

ActivityQMR RolePreparation Required
Notified Body auditPrimary contactAudit package, personnel schedules
FDA inspectionHost, escort coordinatorInspection readiness review
Competent Authority inquiryResponse coordinatorTechnical file access
Regulatory meetingAttendee or delegateBriefing materials

Inspection Readiness Checklist

AreaReadyAction Needed
Document control system current☐
Training records complete☐
CAPA system current, no overdue items☐
Complaint files complete☐
Equipment calibration current☐
Supplier qualification files complete☐
Management review records available☐
Internal audit program current☐

Decision Frameworks

Escalation Decision Tree

Issue Identified
      │
      ▼
Is it a regulatory violation?
      │
  Yes─┴─No
  │      │
  ▼      ▼
Escalate to    Is it a safety issue?
Executive          │
immediately    Yes─┴─No
               │      │
               ▼      ▼
          Escalate to   Does it affect
          Safety Team   multiple departments?
                             │
                         Yes─┴─No
                         │      │
                         ▼      ▼
                    Escalate to  Handle at
                    Executive    department level

Quality Investment Prioritization

CriteriaWeightScore Method
Regulatory requirement30%Required=10, Recommended=5, Optional=2
Customer impact25%Direct=10, Indirect=5, None=0
Cost savings potential20%>$100K=10, $50-100K=7, <$50K=3
Implementation complexity15%Simple=10, Moderate=5, Complex=2
Strategic alignment10%Core=10, Supporting=5, Peripheral=2

Resource Allocation Matrix

Resource TypeAllocation AuthorityEscalation Threshold
Quality personnelQMR>1 FTE addition
Quality equipmentQMR>$25K
External consultantsQMR>$50K or >30 days
Quality systemsExecutive approval>$100K

Tools and References

Scripts

ToolPurposeUsage
management_review_tracker.pyTrack review inputs, actions, metricspython management_review_tracker.py --help

Management Review Tracker Features:

  • Track input collection status from process owners
  • Monitor action item completion and aging
  • Generate metrics summary for review
  • Produce recommendations for review focus areas

References

DocumentContent
management-review-guide.mdISO 13485 Clause 5.6 requirements, input/output templates, action tracking
quality-kpi-framework.mdKPI categories, targets, calculations, dashboard templates

Quick Reference: Management Review Inputs (ISO 13485 Clause 5.6.2)

InputSourceRequired
FeedbackCustomer complaints, surveysYes
Audit resultsInternal and external auditsYes
Process performanceProcess metricsYes
Product conformityInspection, NC dataYes
CAPA statusCAPA systemYes
Previous actionsPrior review recordsYes
ChangesRegulatory, organizationalYes
RecommendationsAll sourcesYes

Quick Reference: Management Review Outputs (ISO 13485 Clause 5.6.3)

OutputDocumentation Required
Improvement to QMS and processesAction items with owners
Improvement to productProject initiation if needed
Resource needsResource plan updates

Related Skills

SkillIntegration Point
quality-manager-qms-iso13485QMS process management
capa-officerCAPA system oversight
qms-audit-expertInternal audit program
quality-documentation-managerDocument control oversight

平台分布

OpenClaw

95.73%
按下载量换算25,831

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills