Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

agent-detector(Agent 探测器)

agent-detector 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

agent-detector 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 67,721。

总安装 242周安装 10GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 79核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agent-detector(Agent 探测器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog
仓库路径:skills/agent-detector
安装命令:
npx skills add nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog --skill "agent-detector"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog --skill "agent-detector"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

AI 代理技能探测工具,自动发现可用技能。agent-detector 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 等宿主环境。通过 github 安装,支持本地和远程技能库扫描。安装前需确认权限范围和网络访问权限,注意扫描性能。

建议结合原始 README 了解检测算法和集成方式。

来源仓库内路径:skills/agent-detector

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog --skill "agent-detector";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

agent-detector 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog --skill "agent-detector"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

agent-detector 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

agent-detector 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

agent-detector 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

agent-detector 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 242 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 79 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

agent-detector 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
agent-detector

Agent 探测器 · 本页

242—需要联网MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
agent-detector
description
CRITICAL: MUST run for EVERY message. Detects agent, complexity, AND model automatically. Always runs FIRST.
autoInvoke
true
priority
highest
model
haiku
triggers
allowed-tools
NONE

Aura Frog Agent Detector

Priority: HIGHEST - Runs FIRST for every message Version: 3.0.0


When to Use

ALWAYS - Every user message, no exceptions.


Auto-Complexity Detection

AI auto-detects task complexity. User doesn't need :fast or :hard variants.

Complexity Levels

complexity[3]{level,criteria,approach}:
  Quick,Single file/Simple fix/Clear scope,Direct implementation - skip research
  Standard,2-5 files/Feature add/Some unknowns,Scout first then implement
  Deep,6+ files/Architecture/Vague scope,Research + plan + implement

Auto-Detection Criteria

Quick (1-2 tool calls):

  • Typo fix, single variable rename
  • Add console.log/debugging
  • Simple CSS change
  • Clear file path given
  • "Just do X" explicit instruction

Standard (3-6 tool calls):

  • New component/function
  • Bug fix with clear error
  • API endpoint addition
  • File modification with tests

Deep (7+ tool calls, use plan mode):

  • New feature across multiple files
  • Refactoring/architecture change
  • Vague requirements ("make it better")
  • Security audit
  • Performance optimization
  • User asks to "plan" or "design"

Detection Logic

1. Count mentioned files/components
2. Check for vague vs specific language
3. Detect scope modifiers (all, entire, every)
4. Check for research keywords (how, why, best way)
5. Assign complexity level

Model Selection

Auto-select model based on task complexity and agent type.

Model Mapping

model_selection[3]{model,when_to_use,agents}:
  haiku,Quick tasks/Simple queries/Orchestration,pm-operations-orchestrator/project-detector/voice-operations
  sonnet,Standard implementation/Coding/Testing/Bug fixes,All dev agents/qa-automation/ui-designer
  opus,Architecture/Deep analysis/Security audits/Complex planning,security-expert (audits)/Any agent (architecture mode)

Complexity → Model

complexity_model[3]{complexity,default_model,override_to_opus}:
  Quick,haiku,Never
  Standard,sonnet,User asks for architecture/design
  Deep,sonnet,Always consider opus for planning phase

Task Type → Model

task_model[8]{task_type,model,reason}:
  Typo fix / config change,haiku,Minimal reasoning needed
  Bug fix / feature add,sonnet,Standard implementation
  API endpoint / component,sonnet,Standard implementation
  Test writing,sonnet,Requires code understanding
  Code review,sonnet,Pattern matching + analysis
  Architecture design,opus,Complex trade-off analysis
  Security audit,opus,Deep vulnerability analysis
  Refactoring / migration,opus,Cross-cutting impact analysis

Agent Default Models

agent_models[11]{agent,default_model,opus_when}:
  pm-operations-orchestrator,haiku,Never (orchestration only)
  project-manager,haiku,Never (detection/context loading)
  smart-agent-detector,haiku,Never (routing only)
  architect,sonnet,Schema design / migration planning / system architecture
  ui-expert,sonnet,Design system architecture
  mobile-expert,sonnet,Architecture decisions
  game-developer,sonnet,Game architecture decisions
  security-expert,sonnet,opus for full audits
  qa-automation,sonnet,Never
  devops-cicd,sonnet,Infrastructure architecture
  voice-operations,haiku,Never (notifications only)

Model Selection Output

Include in detection result:

## Detection Result
- **Agent:** backend-nodejs
- **Model:** sonnet
- **Complexity:** Standard
- **Reason:** API endpoint implementation

When spawning Task tool, use the detected model:

Task(subagent_type="backend-nodejs", model="sonnet", ...)

Multi-Layer Detection System

Layer 0: Task Content Analysis (NEW - Highest Priority)

Analyze the actual task, not just the repo. A backend repo may have frontend tasks (templates, PDFs, emails).

Full patterns: task-based-agent-selection.md

task_content_triggers[7]{category,example_patterns,activates,score_boost}:
  Frontend,html template/blade/twig/email template/pdf styling/css,ui-expert,+50 to +60
  Backend,api endpoint/controller/middleware/queue job/webhook,architect (+ framework skill),+50 to +55
  Database,migration/schema/query optimization/slow query/n+1,architect,+55 to +60
  Security,xss/sql injection/csrf/vulnerability/auth bypass,security-expert,+55 to +60
  DevOps,docker/kubernetes/ci-cd/terraform/deployment,devops-cicd,+50 to +55
  Testing,unit test/e2e test/coverage/mock/fixture,qa-automation,+45 to +55
  Design,figma/wireframe/design system/accessibility,ui-expert,+50 to +60

Key insight: Task content score ≥50 → Override or co-lead with repo-based agent.

Examples:

# Backend repo, but frontend task
Repo: Laravel API
Task: "Fix email template styling"
→ ui-expert (PRIMARY) + architect (SECONDARY)

# Frontend repo, but backend task
Repo: Next.js
Task: "Add rate limiting to API route"
→ architect (PRIMARY) + ui-expert (SECONDARY)

Layer 1: Explicit Technology Detection

Check if user directly mentions a technology:

tech_detection[10]{technology,keywords,agent,score}:
  React Native,react-native/expo/RN,mobile-react-native,+60
  Flutter,flutter/dart/bloc,mobile-flutter,+60
  Angular,angular/ngrx/rxjs,web-angular,+60
  Vue.js,vue/vuejs/pinia/nuxt,web-vuejs,+60
  React,react/reactjs/jsx,web-reactjs,+60
  Next.js,next/nextjs/ssr/ssg,web-nextjs,+60
  Node.js,nodejs/express/nestjs/fastify,backend-nodejs,+60
  Python,python/django/fastapi/flask,backend-python,+60
  Go,go/golang/gin/fiber,backend-go,+60
  Laravel,laravel/php/eloquent/artisan,backend-laravel,+60

Layer 2: Intent Detection Patterns

Detect user intent from action keywords:

intent_detection[8]{intent,keywords,primary,secondary}:
  Implementation,implement/create/add/build/develop,Dev agent,ui-designer/qa-automation
  Bug Fix,fix/bug/error/issue/broken/crash,Dev agent,qa-automation
  Testing,test/testing/coverage/QA/spec,qa-automation,Dev agent
  Design/UI,design/UI/UX/layout/figma/style,ui-designer,Dev agent
  Database,database/schema/query/migration/SQL,database-specialist,Backend agent
  Security,security/vulnerability/audit/owasp/secure,security-expert,Dev agent
  Performance,performance/slow/optimize/speed/memory,devops-cicd,Dev agent
  Deployment,deploy/docker/kubernetes/CI-CD/pipeline,devops-cicd,-

Layer 3: Project Context Detection

Read project files to infer tech stack:

project_detection[10]{file,indicates,agent,score}:
  app.json (with expo),React Native,mobile-react-native,+40
  pubspec.yaml,Flutter,mobile-flutter,+40
  angular.json,Angular,web-angular,+40
  *.vue files,Vue.js,web-vuejs,+40
  next.config.js,Next.js,web-nextjs,+40
  package.json + react (no next),React,web-reactjs,+40
  package.json + express/nestjs,Node.js,backend-nodejs,+40
  requirements.txt/pyproject.toml,Python,backend-python,+40
  go.mod/go.sum,Go,backend-go,+40
  artisan/composer.json + laravel,Laravel,backend-laravel,+40

Layer 4: File Pattern Detection

Check recent files and naming conventions:

file_patterns[9]{pattern,agent,score}:
  *.phone.tsx/*.tablet.tsx,mobile-react-native,+20
  *.dart/lib/ folder,mobile-flutter,+20
  *.component.ts/*.service.ts,web-angular,+20
  *.vue,web-vuejs,+20
  app/route.ts (Next.js),web-nextjs,+20
  *.controller.ts/*.module.ts,backend-nodejs,+20
  views.py/models.py,backend-python,+20
  *.go,backend-go,+20
  *Controller.php/*Model.php,backend-laravel,+20

Scoring Weights

weights[9]{criterion,weight,description}:
  Task Content Match,+50-60,Task-based patterns override repo (Layer 0) - HIGHEST PRIORITY
  Explicit Mention,+60,User directly mentions technology
  Keyword Exact Match,+50,Direct keyword match to intent
  Project Context,+40,CWD/file structure/package files
  Semantic Match,+35,Contextual/implied match
  Task Complexity,+30,Inferred complexity level
  Conversation History,+25,Previous context/active agents
  File Patterns,+20,Recent files/naming conventions
  Project Priority Bonus,+25,Agent in project-config.yaml priority list

Task Content Override Rule: When task content score ≥50 for a different domain than the repo, that domain's agent becomes PRIMARY or co-PRIMARY.


Agent Thresholds

thresholds[4]{level,score,role}:
  Primary Agent,≥80,Leads the task
  Secondary Agent,50-79,Supporting role
  Optional Agent,30-49,May assist
  Not Activated,<30,Not selected

QA Agent Conditional Activation

qa-automation is ALWAYS Secondary when:

  • Intent = Implementation (+30 pts as secondary)
  • Intent = Bug Fix (+35 pts as secondary)
  • New feature being created
  • Code modification requested

qa-automation is Primary when:

  • Intent = Testing (keywords: test, coverage, QA)
  • User explicitly asks for tests
  • Coverage report requested

qa-automation is SKIPPED when:

  • Pure documentation task
  • Pure design discussion (no code)
  • Research/exploration only

Detection Process

Step 0: Task Content Analysis (NEW - Do This First!)

Analyze the task itself before checking the repo.

User: "Update the invoice PDF layout - table breaks across pages"

Task Analysis:
- "PDF" → Frontend task pattern (+50)
- "layout" → Frontend keyword (+40)
- "table" → Frontend keyword (+30)
→ Total frontend score: 120 pts → web-expert is PRIMARY

Even if repo is pure backend, web-expert leads this task!

Apply patterns from: task-based-agent-selection.md

Step 1: Extract Keywords

User: "Fix the login button not working on iOS"

Extracted:
- Action: "fix" → Bug Fix intent
- Component: "login button" → UI element
- Platform: "iOS" → Mobile
- Issue: "not working" → Bug context

Step 2: Check Project Context (Use Cached Detection!)

IMPORTANT: Use cached project detection to avoid re-scanning every task.

# 1. Check detection first (fast path):
.claude/project-contexts/[project-name]/project-detection.json

# 2. If detection valid (< 24h, key files unchanged):
   → Use cached: framework, agents, testInfra, filePatterns

# 3. If detection invalid or missing:
   → Run full detection (reads package.json, etc.)
   → Save to project-contexts for next task

# 4. Load project-specific overrides:
.claude/project-contexts/[project]/project-config.yaml
.claude/project-contexts/[project]/conventions.md

Detection invalidation triggers:

  • Key config files changed (package.json mtime/size)
  • Detection older than 24 hours
  • User runs /project:refresh

Commands:

  • /project:status - Show project detection
  • /project:refresh - Force fresh scan

Step 3: Score All Agents (Combine Task + Repo)

mobile-react-native:
  - "iOS" keyword: +35 (semantic)
  - CWD = /mobile-app: +40 (context)
  - Recent *.phone.tsx: +20 (file pattern)
  → Total: 95 pts ✅ PRIMARY

qa-automation:
  - Bug fix intent: +35 (secondary for bugs)
  → Total: 35 pts ✅ OPTIONAL

ui-designer:
  - "button" keyword: +20 (UI element)
  → Total: 20 pts ❌ NOT SELECTED

Step 4: Select Agents

  • Primary: Highest score ≥80
  • Secondary: Score 50-79
  • Optional: Score 30-49

Step 5: Show Banner

See: rules/agent-identification-banner.md for official format.

Single Agent Banner:

⚡ 🐸 AURA FROG v1.2.0 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
┃ Agent: [agent-name] │ Phase: [phase] - [name]          ┃
┃ Model: [model] │ 🔥 [aura-message]                      ┃
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Multi-Agent Banner (when collaboration needed):

⚡ 🐸 AURA FROG v1.2.0 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
┃ Agents: [primary] + [secondary], [tertiary]            ┃
┃ Phase: [phase] - [name] │ 🔥 [aura-message]            ┃
┃ Model: [model]                                         ┃
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Available Agents

agents[4]{category,count,list}:
  Development,4,architect/ui-expert/mobile-expert/game-developer
  Quality & Security,2,security-expert/qa-automation
  DevOps & Operations,2,devops-cicd/voice-operations
  Infrastructure,3,smart-agent-detector/pm-operations-orchestrator/project-manager

Examples

Example 1: Explicit Technology Mention

User: "Create a React Native screen for user profile"

Layer 1 (Explicit): "React Native" → +60
Layer 2 (Intent): "create" → Implementation
Layer 4 (Files): *.phone.tsx present → +20

Detection Result:
  ✅ Agent: mobile-expert (PRIMARY, 80 pts)
  ✅ Model: sonnet
  ✅ Complexity: Standard
  ✅ Secondary: ui-expert (35), qa-automation (30)

Example 2: Context-Based Detection (No Tech Mention)

User: "Fix the login bug"

Layer 2 (Intent): "fix", "bug" → Bug Fix intent
Layer 3 (Context): CWD=/backend-api, composer.json has laravel → +40
Layer 4 (Files): AuthController.php recent → +20

Detection Result:
  ✅ Agent: architect (PRIMARY, 95 pts) + laravel-expert skill
  ✅ Model: sonnet
  ✅ Complexity: Standard
  ✅ Secondary: qa-automation (35)

Example 3: Architecture Task (Uses Opus)

User: "Design the authentication system architecture"

Layer 2 (Intent): "design", "architecture" → Architecture intent
Complexity: Deep (architecture keyword)

Detection Result:
  ✅ Agent: architect (PRIMARY)
  ✅ Model: opus (architecture task)
  ✅ Complexity: Deep
  ✅ Secondary: security-expert (55)

Example 4: Quick Fix (Uses Haiku)

User: "Fix typo in README.md line 42"

Complexity: Quick (single file, explicit location)

Detection Result:
  ✅ Agent: pm-operations-orchestrator
  ✅ Model: haiku
  ✅ Complexity: Quick

Example 5: Backend Repo, Frontend Task (Task-Based Override)

User: "Fix the password reset email template - the button styling is broken"

Repo Context: Laravel API (backend)
Task Content Analysis:
- "email template" → frontend_task_patterns (+55)
- "styling" → frontend_keywords (+40)
- "button" → frontend_keywords (+30)
→ Frontend score: 125 pts (OVERRIDE)

Detection Result:
  ✅ Agent: ui-expert (PRIMARY, 125 pts) - leads template fix
  ✅ Agent: architect (SECONDARY, 40 pts) - Blade context + laravel-expert skill
  ✅ Model: sonnet
  ✅ Complexity: Standard

Example 6: Frontend Repo, Database Task (Task-Based Override)

User: "The user list page is slow - optimize the query"

Repo Context: Next.js frontend
Task Content Analysis:
- "slow" → database_task_patterns (+50)
- "optimize" → database context
- "query" → database_task_patterns (+40)
→ Database score: 90 pts (OVERRIDE)

Detection Result:
  ✅ Agent: architect (PRIMARY, 90 pts) - database optimization
  ✅ Agent: ui-expert (SECONDARY, 40 pts) - API route context + nextjs-expert skill
  ✅ Model: sonnet
  ✅ Complexity: Standard

Example 7: Backend Repo, PDF Generation (Task-Based Override)

User: "Invoice PDF has layout issues - table breaks across pages incorrectly"

Repo Context: Node.js API
Task Content Analysis:
- "PDF" → frontend_task_patterns (+50)
- "layout" → frontend_keywords (+40)
- "table" → frontend_keywords (+30)
→ Frontend score: 120 pts (OVERRIDE)

Detection Result:
  ✅ Agent: ui-expert (PRIMARY, 120 pts) - HTML/CSS for PDF
  ✅ Agent: architect (SECONDARY, 40 pts) - PDF library integration + nodejs-expert skill
  ✅ Model: sonnet
  ✅ Complexity: Standard

After Detection

  1. Output detection result with agent, model, and complexity
  2. Load agent instructions from agents/[agent-name].md
  3. Use detected model when spawning Task tool:
   Task(subagent_type="[agent]", model="[detected-model]", ...)
  1. Invoke appropriate skill:

- Complex feature → workflow-orchestrator - Bug fix → bugfix-quick - Test request → test-writer - Code review → code-reviewer

  1. Always load project context via project-context-loader before major actions

Manual Override

User can force specific agent:

User: "Use only qa-automation for this task"
→ Override automatic selection
→ qa-automation becomes PRIMARY regardless of scoring

Full detection algorithm: agents/smart-agent-detector.md Selection guide: docs/AGENT_SELECTION_GUIDE.md

MANDATORY: Always show agent banner at start of EVERY response.

平台分布

OpenCode

28.37%
按下载量换算22

Claude Code

22.8%
按下载量换算18

windsurf

18.29%
按下载量换算14

cline

11.08%
按下载量换算9

Codex

7.37%
按下载量换算6

Antigravity

3.72%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills