Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

afrexai-tokenomicsafrexai 代币经济学

Agent Skill

afrexai-tokenomics 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

14,938

周安装

625

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

5,150
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:afrexai-tokenomics(afrexai 代币经济学)
来源仓库:https://github.com/1kalin/afrexai-tokenomics
安装命令:
openclaw skills install afrexai-tokenomics
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install afrexai-tokenomics

简介

分析代币类型并对代币经济学健康状况进行评分,以通过风险和成本洞察来指导接受、持有、发行或拒绝代币。

SKILL.md

Token Economics Analyzer

Evaluate token and digital asset economics for business decisions. Covers utility tokens, governance tokens, loyalty points, and tokenized assets.

When to Use

  • Evaluating a token-based product or partnership
  • Designing tokenomics for a new product launch
  • Assessing token treasury risk exposure
  • Due diligence on token-incentivized vendor platforms

Framework

1. Token Classification (5 Types)

TypeExamplesKey RiskBusiness Use
UtilityAPI credits, compute tokensDemand volatilityPay-per-use vendor pricing
GovernanceDAO votes, protocol tokensConcentration riskVendor influence, roadmap control
PaymentStablecoins, settlement tokensRegulatory, counterpartyCross-border payments, payroll
SecurityRevenue-share tokens, equity tokensSecurities law complianceFundraising, employee comp
Loyalty/RewardPoints, cashback tokensLiability accountingCustomer retention, engagement

2. Tokenomics Health Score (0-100)

Score each dimension 0-20:

Supply Mechanics (0-20)

  • Fixed vs inflationary supply
  • Emission schedule and vesting
  • Burn mechanisms
  • Current circulating vs total supply ratio

Demand Drivers (0-20)

  • Real utility (not just speculation)
  • Number of active use cases
  • Revenue correlation
  • Network effect strength

Distribution (0-20)

  • Team/insider allocation (red flag if >30%)
  • Vesting schedules for large holders
  • Concentration (top 10 wallets %)
  • Public vs private sale ratio

Governance (0-20)

  • Voting mechanism fairness
  • Proposal threshold accessibility
  • Treasury management transparency
  • Fork/exit rights

Regulatory Posture (0-20)

  • Howey test assessment
  • Jurisdiction clarity
  • KYC/AML compliance
  • Tax treatment documentation

Scoring:

  • 80-100: Strong fundamentals, proceed with confidence
  • 60-79: Acceptable with risk mitigation
  • 40-59: Significant concerns, negotiate protections
  • Below 40: Walk away or demand restructuring

3. Business Decision Matrix

Should We Accept This Token as Payment?

  • Daily volume > 10x your expected monthly receipts? Yes
  • Listed on 3+ regulated exchanges? Yes
  • Stablecoin or pegged? Lower risk
  • Score above 60? Proceed with hedging strategy

Should We Hold Token Treasury?

  • Never hold >5% of company liquid assets in any single token
  • Convert to stablecoin or fiat within 48 hours unless strategic hold
  • Set automatic rebalancing triggers at +/-15%

Should We Launch a Token?

  • Do you have real utility that requires a token? (Not just fundraising)
  • Can you sustain demand without speculation?
  • Legal budget of $50K-$200K for compliance?
  • If all three = no, use traditional pricing instead

4. Vendor Token Lock-In Assessment

When a vendor uses token-based pricing:

  • Calculate true USD cost per unit over 12 months
  • Compare to non-token alternatives
  • Assess token price volatility impact on budget
  • Check if vendor holds majority supply (price manipulation risk)
  • Review token unlock schedule for supply shock risk

5. Red Flags (Immediate Walk-Away)

  1. Team allocation >40% with <2 year vesting
  2. No audit of smart contracts
  3. Anonymous team with no legal entity
  4. Token required but adds no functional value
  5. Circular tokenomics (token rewards for holding token)
  6. No clear revenue model beyond token sales
  7. Jurisdiction shopping to avoid regulation

6. Cost Framework

ActionSmall BusinessMid-MarketEnterprise
Token evaluation (one-time)$2K-$5K$5K-$15K$15K-$50K
Tokenomics design$15K-$40K$40K-$120K$120K-$500K
Legal compliance (US)$25K-$75K$75K-$200K$200K-$1M+
Smart contract audit$10K-$30K$30K-$80K$80K-$250K
Ongoing treasury management$2K-$8K/mo$8K-$25K/mo$25K-$100K/mo

7. Industry Applications

IndustryToken Use CaseRisk LevelROI Potential
FintechPayment rails, lendingHigh (regulatory)$500K-$5M/yr
SaaSUsage-based compute creditsMedium$100K-$800K/yr
EcommerceLoyalty programs, cross-borderMedium$200K-$1.2M/yr
Real EstateTokenized fractional ownershipHigh (securities)$1M-$10M+
HealthcareData marketplace tokensHigh (HIPAA + securities)$300K-$2M/yr
LegalSmart contract automationMedium$150K-$600K/yr
ManufacturingSupply chain provenanceLow-Medium$200K-$900K/yr
ConstructionMilestone payment tokensMedium$100K-$500K/yr
RecruitmentCredential verificationLow$50K-$300K/yr
Professional ServicesClient billing tokensLow-Medium$80K-$400K/yr

Output Format

Present findings as:

  1. Token Classification + Health Score (0-100)
  2. Business Decision (accept/hold/launch/walk away)
  3. Risk factors with mitigation steps
  4. Cost estimates for recommended path
  5. 90-day action plan

Resources

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

72.22%
按下载量换算3,719

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills