Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ads-apple(ADS Apple 搜索)

ads-apple 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ads-apple 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 15,979。

总安装 7,466周安装 305GitHub Stars 3,686下载 2,391核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ads-apple(ADS Apple 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-ads
仓库路径:skills/ads-apple
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-ads --skill ads-apple
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-ads --skill ads-apple

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于分析 Apple Search Ads 账户结构与健康度,评估广告活动配置与行业基准表现。可检查品牌关键词、竞品投放、漏斗层级覆盖情况,输出健康评分与优化建议。需输入 Apple Ads 导出数据或手动粘贴指标,支持多平台对比与结构诊断。

安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-ads --skill ads-apple,建议核验数据来源真实性与权限范围。ads-apple 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ads-apple

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-ads --skill ads-apple;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ads-apple 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-ads --skill ads-apple。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ads-apple 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ads-apple 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ads-apple 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ads-apple 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,466 次,近一周安装 305 次,下载 2,391 次,GitHub 3,686 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ads-apple 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 3,686 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ads-apple

ADS Apple 搜索 · 本页

7,4663,686需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Apple Ads (formerly Apple Search Ads) Deep Analysis

Process

  1. Collect Apple Ads account data (exports from Apple Ads dashboard or pasted metrics)
  2. Identify active placement types (Search Results, Search Tab, Today Tab, Product Pages)
  3. Evaluate all applicable checks as PASS, WARNING, or FAIL
  4. Calculate ASA Health Score (0-100)
  5. Generate findings report with action plan

What to Analyze

Campaign Structure (25% weight)

BOFU; Bottom of Funnel (Search Results, Exact Match brand)

  • Brand keyword campaign present (own app name + misspellings)
  • Competitor campaign present (competitor app names as keywords)
  • Category campaigns targeting high-intent generic terms (e.g. "workout app", "budget tracker")

MOFU; Middle of Funnel (Search Match / broad discovery)

  • Search Match campaigns active in at least one ad group for discovery
  • Search Match ad groups isolated from Exact Match (separate ad groups; never mix)
  • Search Terms Report reviewed to mine converting queries for Exact Match promotion

Campaign Architecture Rules:

  • Brand / Category / Competitor should be separate campaigns (different CPT bids, budgets)
  • Search Match ad groups isolated from manual keyword ad groups; NEVER mix in same ad group
  • Goal: let Search Match discover, then promote winners to Exact Match campaigns

Bid Health (20% weight)

CPT (Cost Per Tap) vs Install Rate by Match Type:

  • CPT vs category benchmarks (see Benchmarks section below)
  • TTR (Tap-Through Rate): benchmark >2.5% for Search Results, >1.5% for Search Tab
  • Conversion Rate (tap → install): benchmark 50-65% for brand terms, 20-40% for category
  • CPT/CPG (Cost Per Goal): compare against target CPI/CPA from MMP

Bid Strategy:

  • Manual CPT bidding appropriate for small/new accounts
  • Maximize Conversions (GA February 26, 2026): AI-powered auto-bidder using Search Match that sets optimal bids per search query in real time. Target CPA (weekly average target) replaces CPA Cap (being deprecated). Recommended daily budget: at least 5x target CPA. Two-week learning period minimum. Current limitation: only optimizes for installs, NOT post-install events (no trial, subscription, or ROAS optimization yet)
  • CPA Goals available at campaign level; evaluate if conversion volume supports it (>100 installs/month per campaign)
  • Are bids differentiated by match type? (Brand Exact > Category Exact > Search Match)
  • Keyword-level CPT bids set, not just ad group default?

Keyword Health:

  • Irrelevant Search Terms (from Search Match) identified and excluded via negative keywords
  • Low-performing keywords paused or bid reduced (TTR <1% + high CPT)
  • High-volume generic terms checked for intent quality (avoid "free apps" type queries)

Custom Product Pages (15% weight)

Creative Sets fully deprecated. CPPs are now the sole ad variation mechanism. CPP limit doubled to 70 in October 2025.

Custom Product Pages (CPP):

  • CPPs created in App Store Connect? (up to 70 per app as of Oct 2025)
  • At least 3 CPP variants tested per campaign type (different value props per audience)
  • CPP assets aligned with ad group keyword themes (e.g. fitness keywords → fitness screenshots)
  • CPPs increase conversion rates ~8% for games, ~6.6% for non-gaming apps (AppTweak data)
  • SoundCloud case study: CPPs in competitor campaigns led to 58% CR increase, 39% CPI reduction
  • Critical: 78% of App Store search volume comes from devices with Personalized Ads off. Use creative-based targeting (CPP asset alignment) rather than demographic audience filters

Default (Store Listing) Creative:

  • App icon, subtitle, and first 3 screenshots optimized; these show in ads by default
  • Short description (170 chars) compelling and keyword-rich
  • Preview video present (strongly recommended for TTR improvement)

Creative Testing:

  • CPP performance compared: which variant has highest TTR and lowest CPI?
  • Deep links in CPPs available on iOS/iPadOS 18+ (test for re-engagement)
  • CPPs can now be assigned organic keywords (WWDC 2025), bridging paid/organic optimization

Attribution & MMP Health (15% weight)

MMP Integration (Critical):

  • MMP (AppsFlyer / Adjust / Branch / Singular) integrated with Apple Ads via AdAttributionKit + ATT
  • Apple Ads properly connected as a partner in MMP dashboard
  • In-app events being sent back to Apple Ads (enables Maximize Conversions and ROAS optimization)
  • Post-install event quality: are purchase, subscription_start, or other revenue events tracked?

AdAttributionKit & Dual Attribution (April 10, 2025):

  • Apple Ads registered with AdAttributionKit (SKAN v1-3), creating dual attribution for the first time
  • Installs now report through BOTH SKAN/AAK postbacks AND the AdServices API
  • WWDC 2025: configurable attribution windows, overlapping re-engagement windows, and country codes in postbacks
  • SKAdNetwork conversion values configured in MMP (maps user actions to conversion windows)
  • ATT opt-in rate monitored (low ATT rate = less MMP data, more reliance on SKAN/AAK)
  • Privacy threshold considerations: are campaigns getting postbacks or null reports?

Attribution Windows:

  • Default Apple Ads attribution: 30-day click, 1-day view; appropriate for app install goals?
  • WWDC 2025 added configurable windows and overlapping re-engagement windows
  • For re-engagement or subscription goals: evaluate longer lookback windows

Budget Pacing (10% weight)

  • Daily cap set at campaign level (budget pacing in ASA is daily, not monthly)
  • Actual daily spend vs daily cap ratio: flag if consistently hitting cap (could be missing volume)
  • Conversely: flag if spend is <50% of daily cap (creative or bid issue, not budget)
  • Budget split across placement types aligned with performance (don't over-invest in underperforming placements)
  • Lifetime budget campaigns (if used): check end dates and pacing curves

TAP Coverage: Placement Types (10% weight)

ASA offers 4 placement types; evaluate coverage and performance:

PlacementWhereBest forBenchmark CPT
Search ResultsBelow search resultsHigh intent, bottom funnel$0.50-$3.00
Search TabTop of Search tabDiscovery, mid funnel$0.30-$1.50
Today TabApp Store homeBrand awareness$1.00-$5.00
Product PagesCompetitor/related app pagesCompetitor conquesting$0.50-$2.00

Evaluation:

  • Search Results: must be active (highest intent placement)
  • Search Tab: active for scale? Evaluate CPT and TTR vs Search Results
  • Today Tab: only if budget >$3k/month and brand awareness is a goal (high CPT, low intent)
  • Product Pages: competitive opportunity; are competitor CPPs being targeted?

Goal CPA / KPI Assessment (5% weight)

Benchmarks by Category (2025-2026 ASA averages):

CategoryAvg CPTAvg TTRAvg Install CVRTarget CPI
Games$0.50-$1.003-5%55-70%$1.00-$3.00
Health & Fitness$1.50-$3.002-4%45-60%$3.00-$8.00
Productivity$1.00-$2.502-3.5%50-65%$2.00-$5.00
Finance$2.00-$5.001.5-3%40-55%$5.00-$15.00
Education$1.00-$2.002-4%50-65%$2.00-$6.00
Shopping$0.80-$2.002.5-4%45-60%$2.00-$5.00
Lifestyle$0.80-$1.802-3.5%45-60%$2.00-$5.00

Country-level benchmarks:

  • Tier 1 (US, UK, AU, CA, JP): CPT 2-3× above global average; highest LTV
  • Tier 2 (DE, FR, KR, SG, HK): CPT 1-1.5× above global average
  • Tier 3 (BR, IN, MX): CPT 30-60% below Tier 1; high volume, lower LTV

Checks:

  • Actual CPI vs target CPI (from MMP); flag if >2x target
  • CPI trend over 30 days (improving or worsening?)
  • Revenue events: is ROAS positive within MMP attribution window?

Overall Benchmarks (2025 SplitMetrics data)

MetricSearch Results Average
TTR (Tap-Through Rate)9.7%
Conversion Rate66.2%
CPT (Cost Per Tap)$2.25
CPA (Cost Per Acquisition)$3.76
  • US is the highest-cost market
  • AMEI (Africa/Middle East/India) is most cost-efficient and stable
  • International markets often deliver 3-5x better CPI than US with comparable LTV for subscription apps

Platform Changes (v1.5)

IDCheckSeverityNotes
ASA-MA1Multiple ads per query readinessMediumRolling out March 2026: up to 2 ads per search query (was 1). Changes competitive dynamics: more search results real estate available. Evaluate bid strategy for increased competition

Deprecated:

  • Creative Sets: fully deprecated. Only CPPs now (up to 70 per app)
  • CPA Cap: being retired in favor of Target CPA via Maximize Conversions
  • Demographic audience targeting as primary strategy: 78% of App Store search volume comes from devices with Personalized Ads off

Output Format

## Apple Ads Audit

**ASA Health Score: [X]/100**

### Critical Issues ([count])
- [Issue with specific impact and fix]

### High Priority ([count])
- [Issue]

### Campaign Structure
PASS/WARNING/FAIL for each check category

### Benchmark Comparison
[Metric] | Your Account | ASA Benchmark | Status

### Quick Wins (do this week)
1. [Most impactful fix with expected outcome]
2.
3.

### Recommended Next Steps
[Prioritized action plan]

Scoring Weights

CategoryWeight
Campaign Structure25%
Bid Health20%
Custom Product Pages15%
Attribution & MMP15%
Budget Pacing10%
TAP Coverage10%
Goal KPI Assessment5%

Data to Request from User

If not provided, ask for:

  • Campaign list with spend, installs, CPT, TTR, CVR (last 30 days)
  • Active placement types
  • MMP being used (AppsFlyer, Adjust, Branch, Singular, or none)
  • Target CPI / CPA and app category
  • Countries/regions active
  • Whether Custom Product Pages are set up in App Store Connect

平台分布

Codex

35.04%
按下载量换算838

Claude

31.35%
按下载量换算750

Cursor

19.04%
按下载量换算455

Gemini CLI

9.26%
按下载量换算221

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills