Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

knowledge-graph-builder(知识图谱构建器)

knowledge-graph-builder 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

knowledge-graph-builder 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 18,647。

总安装 5,987周安装 285GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,883核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:knowledge-graph-builder(知识图谱构建器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/zpankz/mcp-skillset
仓库路径:skills/knowledge-graph-builder
安装命令:
npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "knowledge-graph-builder"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "knowledge-graph-builder"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。knowledge-graph-builder 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合在关键词搜索或任务场景中快速定位候选结果。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态。注意是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/knowledge-graph-builder

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "knowledge-graph-builder";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

knowledge-graph-builder 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "knowledge-graph-builder"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

knowledge-graph-builder 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

knowledge-graph-builder 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

knowledge-graph-builder 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

knowledge-graph-builder 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,987 次,近一周安装 285 次,下载 1,883 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

knowledge-graph-builder 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
knowledge-graph-builder

知识图谱构建器 · 本页

5,987—调用外部服务MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
Knowledge Graph Builder
description
Design and build knowledge graphs. Use when modeling complex relationships, building semantic search, or creating knowledge bases. Covers schema design, entity relationships, and graph database selection.
version
1.0.0

Knowledge Graph Builder

Build structured knowledge graphs for enhanced AI system performance through relational knowledge.

Core Principle

Knowledge graphs make implicit relationships explicit, enabling AI systems to reason about connections, verify facts, and avoid hallucinations.

When to Use Knowledge Graphs

Use Knowledge Graphs When:

  • ✅ Complex entity relationships are central to your domain
  • ✅ Need to verify AI-generated facts against structured knowledge
  • ✅ Semantic search and relationship traversal required
  • ✅ Data has rich interconnections (people, organizations, products)
  • ✅ Need to answer "how are X and Y related?" queries
  • ✅ Building recommendation systems based on relationships
  • ✅ Fraud detection or pattern recognition across connected data

Don't Use Knowledge Graphs When:

  • ❌ Simple tabular data (use relational DB)
  • ❌ Purely document-based search (use RAG with vector DB)
  • ❌ No significant relationships between entities
  • ❌ Team lacks graph modeling expertise
  • ❌ Read-heavy workload with no traversal (use traditional DB)

6-Phase Knowledge Graph Implementation

Phase 1: Ontology Design

Goal: Define entities, relationships, and properties for your domain

Entity Types (Nodes):

  • Person, Organization, Location, Product, Concept, Event, Document

Relationship Types (Edges):

  • Hierarchical: IS_A, PART_OF, REPORTS_TO
  • Associative: WORKS_FOR, LOCATED_IN, AUTHORED_BY, RELATED_TO
  • Temporal: CREATED_ON, OCCURRED_BEFORE, OCCURRED_AFTER

Properties (Attributes):

  • Node properties: id, name, type, created_at, metadata
  • Edge properties: type, confidence, source, timestamp

Example Ontology:

# RDF/Turtle format
@prefix : <http://example.org/ontology#> .

:Person a owl:Class ;
    rdfs:label "Person" .

:Organization a owl:Class ;
    rdfs:label "Organization" .

:worksFor a owl:ObjectProperty ;
    rdfs:domain :Person ;
    rdfs:range :Organization ;
    rdfs:label "works for" .

Validation:

  • [ ] Entities cover all domain concepts
  • [ ] Relationships capture key connections
  • [ ] Ontology reviewed with domain experts
  • [ ] Classification hierarchy defined (is-a relationships)

Phase 2: Graph Database Selection

Decision Matrix:

Neo4j (Recommended for most):

  • Pros: Mature, Cypher query language, graph algorithms, excellent visualization
  • Cons: Licensing costs for enterprise, scaling complexity
  • Use when: Complex queries, graph algorithms, team can learn Cypher

Amazon Neptune:

  • Pros: Managed service, supports Gremlin and SPARQL, AWS integration
  • Cons: Vendor lock-in, more expensive than self-hosted
  • Use when: AWS infrastructure, need managed service, compliance requirements

ArangoDB:

  • Pros: Multi-model (graph + document + key-value), JavaScript queries
  • Cons: Smaller community, fewer graph-specific features
  • Use when: Need document DB + graph in one system

TigerGraph:

  • Pros: Best performance for deep traversals, parallel processing
  • Cons: Complex setup, higher learning curve
  • Use when: Massive graphs (billions of edges), real-time analytics

Technology Stack:

graph_database: "Neo4j Community" # or Enterprise for production
vector_integration: "Pinecone" # For hybrid search
embeddings: "text-embedding-3-large" # OpenAI
etl: "Apache Airflow" # For data pipelines

Neo4j Schema Setup:

// Create constraints for uniqueness
CREATE CONSTRAINT person_id IF NOT EXISTS
FOR (p:Person) REQUIRE p.id IS UNIQUE;

CREATE CONSTRAINT org_name IF NOT EXISTS
FOR (o:Organization) REQUIRE o.name IS UNIQUE;

// Create indexes for performance
CREATE INDEX entity_search IF NOT EXISTS
FOR (e:Entity) ON (e.name, e.type);

CREATE INDEX relationship_type IF NOT EXISTS
FOR ()-[r:RELATED_TO]-() ON (r.type, r.confidence);

Phase 3: Entity Extraction & Relationship Building

Goal: Extract entities and relationships from data sources

Data Sources:

  • Structured: Databases, APIs, CSV files
  • Unstructured: Documents, web content, text files
  • Semi-structured: JSON, XML, knowledge bases

Entity Extraction Pipeline:

class EntityExtractionPipeline:
    def __init__(self):
        self.ner_model = load_ner_model()  # spaCy, Hugging Face
        self.entity_linker = EntityLinker()
        self.deduplicator = EntityDeduplicator()

    def process_text(self, text: str) -> List[Entity]:
        # 1. Extract named entities
        entities = self.ner_model.extract(text)

        # 2. Link to existing entities (entity resolution)
        linked_entities = self.entity_linker.link(entities)

        # 3. Deduplicate and resolve conflicts
        resolved_entities = self.deduplicator.resolve(linked_entities)

        return resolved_entities

Relationship Extraction:

class RelationshipExtractor:
    def extract_relationships(self, entities: List[Entity],
                            text: str) -> List[Relationship]:
        relationships = []

        # Use dependency parsing or LLM for extraction
        doc = self.nlp(text)
        for sent in doc.sents:
            rels = self.extract_from_sentence(sent, entities)
            relationships.extend(rels)

        # Validate against ontology
        valid_relationships = self.validate_relationships(relationships)
        return valid_relationships

LLM-Based Extraction (for complex relationships):

def extract_with_llm(text: str) -> List[Relationship]:
    prompt = f"""
    Extract entities and relationships from this text:
    {text}

    Format: (Entity1, Relationship, Entity2, Confidence)
    Only extract factual relationships.
    """

    response = llm.generate(prompt)
    relationships = parse_llm_response(response)
    return relationships

Validation:

  • [ ] Entity extraction accuracy >85%
  • [ ] Entity deduplication working
  • [ ] Relationships validated against ontology
  • [ ] Confidence scores assigned

Phase 4: Hybrid Knowledge-Vector Architecture

Goal: Combine structured graph with semantic vector search

Architecture:

class HybridKnowledgeSystem:
    def __init__(self):
        self.graph_db = Neo4jConnection()
        self.vector_db = PineconeClient()
        self.embedding_model = OpenAIEmbeddings()

    def store_entity(self, entity: Entity):
        # Store structured data in graph
        self.graph_db.create_node(entity)

        # Store embeddings in vector database
        embedding = self.embedding_model.embed(entity.description)
        self.vector_db.upsert(
            id=entity.id,
            values=embedding,
            metadata=entity.metadata
        )

    def hybrid_search(self, query: str, top_k: int = 10) -> SearchResults:
        # 1. Vector similarity search
        query_embedding = self.embedding_model.embed(query)
        vector_results = self.vector_db.query(
            vector=query_embedding,
            top_k=100
        )

        # 2. Graph traversal from vector results
        entity_ids = [r.id for r in vector_results.matches]
        graph_results = self.graph_db.get_subgraph(entity_ids, max_hops=2)

        # 3. Merge and rank results
        merged = self.merge_results(vector_results, graph_results)
        return merged[:top_k]

Benefits of Hybrid Approach:

  • Vector search: Semantic similarity, flexible queries
  • Graph traversal: Relationship-based reasoning, context expansion
  • Combined: Best of both worlds

Phase 5: Query Patterns & API Design

Common Query Patterns:

1. Find Entity:

MATCH (e:Entity {id: $entity_id})
RETURN e

2. Find Relationships:

MATCH (source:Entity {id: $entity_id})-[r]-(target)
RETURN source, r, target
LIMIT 20

3. Path Between Entities:

MATCH path = shortestPath(
  (source:Person {id: $source_id})-[*..5]-(target:Person {id: $target_id})
)
RETURN path

4. Multi-Hop Traversal:

MATCH (p:Person {name: $name})-[:WORKS_FOR]->(o:Organization)-[:LOCATED_IN]->(l:Location)
RETURN p.name, o.name, l.city

5. Recommendation Query:

// Find people similar to this person based on shared organizations
MATCH (p1:Person {id: $person_id})-[:WORKS_FOR]->(o:Organization)<-[:WORKS_FOR]-(p2:Person)
WHERE p1 <> p2
RETURN p2, COUNT(o) AS shared_orgs
ORDER BY shared_orgs DESC
LIMIT 10

Knowledge Graph API:

class KnowledgeGraphAPI:
    def __init__(self, graph_db):
        self.graph = graph_db

    def find_entity(self, entity_name: str) -> Entity:
        """Find entity by name with fuzzy matching"""
        query = """
        MATCH (e:Entity)
        WHERE e.name CONTAINS $name
        RETURN e
        ORDER BY apoc.text.levenshtein(e.name, $name)
        LIMIT 1
        """
        return self.graph.run(query, name=entity_name).single()

    def find_relationships(self, entity_id: str,
                         relationship_type: str = None,
                         max_hops: int = 2) -> List[Relationship]:
        """Find relationships within specified hops"""
        query = f"""
        MATCH (source:Entity {{id: $entity_id}})
        MATCH path = (source)-[r*1..{max_hops}]-(target)
        RETURN path, relationships(path) AS rels
        LIMIT 100
        """
        return self.graph.run(query, entity_id=entity_id).data()

    def get_subgraph(self, entity_ids: List[str],
                    max_hops: int = 2) -> Subgraph:
        """Get connected subgraph for multiple entities"""
        query = f"""
        MATCH (e:Entity)
        WHERE e.id IN $entity_ids
        CALL apoc.path.subgraphAll(e, {{maxLevel: {max_hops}}})
        YIELD nodes, relationships
        RETURN nodes, relationships
        """
        return self.graph.run(query, entity_ids=entity_ids).data()

Phase 6: AI Integration & Hallucination Prevention

Goal: Use knowledge graph to ground LLM responses and detect hallucinations

Knowledge Graph RAG:

class KnowledgeGraphRAG:
    def __init__(self, kg_api, llm_client):
        self.kg = kg_api
        self.llm = llm_client

    def retrieve_context(self, query: str) -> str:
        # Extract entities from query
        entities = self.extract_entities_from_query(query)

        # Retrieve relevant subgraph
        subgraph = self.kg.get_subgraph(
            [e.id for e in entities],
            max_hops=2
        )

        # Format subgraph for LLM
        context = self.format_subgraph_for_llm(subgraph)
        return context

    def generate_with_grounding(self, query: str) -> GroundedResponse:
        context = self.retrieve_context(query)

        prompt = f"""
        Context from knowledge graph:
        {context}

        User query: {query}

        Answer based only on the provided context. Include source entities.
        """

        response = self.llm.generate(prompt)

        return GroundedResponse(
            response=response,
            sources=self.extract_sources(context),
            confidence=self.calculate_confidence(response, context)
        )

Hallucination Detection:

class HallucinationDetector:
    def __init__(self, knowledge_graph):
        self.kg = knowledge_graph

    def verify_claim(self, claim: str) -> VerificationResult:
        # Parse claim into (subject, predicate, object)
        parsed_claim = self.parse_claim(claim)

        # Query knowledge graph for evidence
        evidence = self.kg.find_evidence(
            parsed_claim.subject,
            parsed_claim.predicate,
            parsed_claim.object
        )

        if evidence:
            return VerificationResult(
                is_supported=True,
                evidence=evidence,
                confidence=evidence.confidence
            )

        # Check for contradictory evidence
        contradiction = self.kg.find_contradiction(parsed_claim)

        return VerificationResult(
            is_supported=False,
            is_contradicted=bool(contradiction),
            contradiction=contradiction
        )

Key Principles

1. Start with Ontology

Define your schema before ingesting data. Changing ontology later is expensive.

2. Entity Resolution is Critical

Deduplicate entities aggressively. "Apple Inc", "Apple", "Apple Computer" → same entity.

3. Confidence Scores on Everything

Every relationship should have a confidence score (0.0-1.0) and source.

4. Incremental Building

Don't try to model entire domain at once. Start with core entities and expand.

5. Hybrid Architecture Wins

Combine graph traversal (structured) with vector search (semantic) for best results.


Common Use Cases

1. Question Answering:

  • Extract entities from question
  • Traverse graph to find answer
  • Return path as explanation

2. Recommendation:

  • Find similar entities via shared relationships
  • Rank by relationship strength
  • Return top-K recommendations

3. Fraud Detection:

  • Model transactions as graph
  • Find suspicious patterns (cycles, anomalies)
  • Flag for review

4. Knowledge Discovery:

  • Identify implicit relationships
  • Suggest missing connections
  • Validate with domain experts

5. Semantic Search:

  • Hybrid vector + graph search
  • Expand context via relationships
  • Return rich connected results

Technology Recommendations

For MVPs (<10K entities):

  • Neo4j Community Edition (free)
  • SQLite for metadata
  • OpenAI embeddings
  • FastAPI for API layer

For Production (10K-1M entities):

  • Neo4j Enterprise or ArangoDB
  • Pinecone for vector search
  • Airflow for ETL
  • GraphQL API

For Enterprise (1M+ entities):

  • Neo4j Enterprise or TigerGraph
  • Distributed vector DB (Pinecone, Weaviate)
  • Kafka for streaming
  • Kubernetes deployment

Validation Checklist

  • [ ] Ontology designed and validated with domain experts
  • [ ] Graph database selected and set up
  • [ ] Entity extraction pipeline tested (>85% accuracy)
  • [ ] Relationship extraction validated
  • [ ] Hybrid search (graph + vector) implemented
  • [ ] Query API created and documented
  • [ ] AI integration tested (RAG or hallucination detection)
  • [ ] Performance benchmarks met (query <100ms for common patterns)
  • [ ] Data quality monitoring in place
  • [ ] Backup and recovery tested

Related Resources

Related Skills:

  • rag-implementer - For hybrid KG+RAG systems
  • multi-agent-architect - For knowledge-graph-powered agents
  • api-designer - For KG API design

Related Patterns:

  • META/DECISION-FRAMEWORK.md - Graph DB selection
  • STANDARDS/architecture-patterns/knowledge-graph-pattern.md - KG architectures (when created)

Related Playbooks:

  • PLAYBOOKS/deploy-neo4j.md - Neo4j deployment (when created)
  • PLAYBOOKS/build-kg-rag-system.md - KG-RAG integration (when created)

平台分布

OpenCode

29.2%
按下载量换算550

Claude Code

24.72%
按下载量换算465

windsurf

16.24%
按下载量换算306

Codex

11.26%
按下载量换算212

kiro-cli

6.99%
按下载量换算132

mcpjam

3.46%
按下载量换算65

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills