Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

error-recovery(错误恢复)

error-recovery 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

error-recovery 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 21,309。

总安装 4,903周安装 139GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,255核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:error-recovery(错误恢复)
来源仓库:https://github.com/zpankz/mcp-skillset
仓库路径:skills/error-recovery
安装命令:
npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "error-recovery"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "error-recovery"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正和经验缺口,帮助持续优化 Agent 表现。适合在希望让 Agent 沉淀问题修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库和 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写。

安装方式:github;适用宿主:Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。

来源仓库内路径:skills/error-recovery

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "error-recovery";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

error-recovery 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add zpankz/mcp-skillset --skill "error-recovery"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

error-recovery 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

error-recovery 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

error-recovery 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

error-recovery 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,903 次,近一周安装 139 次,下载 1,255 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

error-recovery 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
error-recovery

错误恢复 · 本页

4,903—接触敏感数据MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
Error Recovery
description
Comprehensive error handling methodology with 13-category taxonomy, diagnostic workflows, recovery patterns, and prevention guidelines. Use when error rate >5%, MTTD/MTTR too high, errors recurring, need systematic error prevention, or building error handling infrastructure. Provides error taxonomy (file operations, API calls, data validation, resource management, concurrency, configuration, dependency, network, parsing, state management, authentication, timeout, edge cases - 95.4% coverage), 8 diagnostic workflows, 5 recovery patterns, 8 prevention guidelines, 3 automation tools (file path validation, read-before-write check, file size validation - 23.7% error prevention). Validated with 1,336 historical errors, 85-90% transferability across languages/platforms, 0.79 confidence retrospective validation.
allowed-tools
Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob

Error Recovery

Systematic error handling: detection, diagnosis, recovery, and prevention.

Errors are not failures - they're opportunities for systematic improvement. 95% of errors fall into 13 predictable categories.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • 📊 High error rate: >5% of operations fail
  • ⏱️ Slow recovery: MTTD (Mean Time To Detect) or MTTR (Mean Time To Resolve) too high
  • 🔄 Recurring errors: Same errors happen repeatedly
  • 🎯 Building error infrastructure: Need systematic error handling
  • 📈 Prevention focus: Want to prevent errors, not just handle them
  • 🔍 Root cause analysis: Need diagnostic frameworks

Don't use when:

  • ❌ Error rate <1% (handling ad-hoc sufficient)
  • ❌ Errors are truly random (no patterns)
  • ❌ No historical data (can't establish taxonomy)
  • ❌ Greenfield project (no errors yet)

Quick Start (20 minutes)

Step 1: Quantify Baseline (10 min)

# For meta-cc projects
meta-cc query-tools --status error | jq '. | length'
# Output: Total error count

# Calculate error rate
meta-cc get-session-stats | jq '.total_tool_calls'
echo "Error rate: errors / total * 100"

# Analyze distribution
meta-cc query-tools --status error | \
  jq -r '.error_message' | \
  sed 's/:.*//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10
# Output: Top 10 error types

Step 2: Classify Errors (5 min)

Map errors to 13 categories (see taxonomy below):

  • File operations (12.2%)
  • API calls, Data validation, Resource management, etc.

Step 3: Apply Top 3 Prevention Tools (5 min)

Based on bootstrap-003 validation:

  1. File path validation (prevents 12.2% of errors)
  2. Read-before-write check (prevents 5.2%)
  3. File size validation (prevents 6.3%)

Total prevention: 23.7% of errors


13-Category Error Taxonomy

Validated with 1,336 errors (95.4% coverage):

1. File Operations (12.2%)

  • File not found, permission denied, path validation
  • Prevention: Validate paths before use, check existence

2. API Calls (8.7%)

  • HTTP errors, timeouts, invalid responses
  • Recovery: Retry with exponential backoff

3. Data Validation (7.5%)

  • Invalid format, missing fields, type mismatches
  • Prevention: Schema validation, type checking

4. Resource Management (6.3%)

  • File handles, memory, connections not cleaned up
  • Prevention: Defer cleanup, use resource pools

5. Concurrency (5.8%)

  • Race conditions, deadlocks, channel errors
  • Recovery: Timeout mechanisms, panic recovery

6. Configuration (5.4%)

  • Missing config, invalid values, env var issues
  • Prevention: Config validation at startup

7. Dependency Errors (5.2%)

  • Missing dependencies, version conflicts
  • Prevention: Dependency validation in CI

8. Network Errors (4.9%)

  • Connection refused, DNS failures, proxy issues
  • Recovery: Retry, fallback to alternative endpoints

9. Parsing Errors (4.3%)

  • JSON/XML parse failures, malformed input
  • Prevention: Validate before parsing

10. State Management (3.7%)

  • Invalid state transitions, missing initialization
  • Prevention: State machine validation

11. Authentication (2.8%)

  • Invalid credentials, expired tokens
  • Recovery: Token refresh, re-authentication

12. Timeout Errors (2.4%)

  • Operation exceeded time limit
  • Prevention: Set appropriate timeouts

13. Edge Cases (1.2%)

  • Boundary conditions, unexpected inputs
  • Prevention: Comprehensive test coverage

Uncategorized: 4.6% (edge cases, unique errors)


Eight Diagnostic Workflows

1. File Operation Diagnosis

  1. Check file existence
  2. Verify permissions
  3. Validate path format
  4. Check disk space

2. API Call Diagnosis

  1. Verify endpoint availability
  2. Check network connectivity
  3. Validate request format
  4. Review response codes

3-8. (See reference/diagnostic-workflows.md for complete workflows)


Five Recovery Patterns

1. Retry with Exponential Backoff

Use for: Transient errors (network, API timeouts)

for i := 0; i < maxRetries; i++ {
    err := operation()
    if err == nil {
        return nil
    }
    time.Sleep(time.Duration(math.Pow(2, float64(i))) * time.Second)
}
return fmt.Errorf("operation failed after %d retries", maxRetries)

2. Fallback to Alternative

Use for: Service unavailability

3. Graceful Degradation

Use for: Non-critical functionality failures

4. Circuit Breaker

Use for: Cascading failures prevention

5. Panic Recovery

Use for: Unhandled runtime errors

See reference/recovery-patterns.md for complete patterns.


Eight Prevention Guidelines

  1. Validate inputs early: Check before processing
  2. Use type-safe APIs: Leverage static typing
  3. Implement pre-conditions: Assert expectations
  4. Defensive programming: Handle unexpected cases
  5. Fail fast: Detect errors immediately
  6. Log comprehensively: Capture error context
  7. Test error paths: Don't just test happy paths
  8. Monitor error rates: Track trends over time

See reference/prevention-guidelines.md.


Three Automation Tools

1. File Path Validator

Prevents: 12.2% of errors (163/1,336) Usage: Validate file paths before Read/Write operations Confidence: 93.3% (sample validation)

2. Read-Before-Write Checker

Prevents: 5.2% of errors (70/1,336) Usage: Verify file readable before writing Confidence: 90%+

3. File Size Validator

Prevents: 6.3% of errors (84/1,336) Usage: Check file size before processing Confidence: 95%+

Total prevention: 317 errors (23.7%) with 0.79 overall confidence

See scripts/ for implementation.


Proven Results

Validated in bootstrap-003 (meta-cc project):

  • ✅ 1,336 errors analyzed
  • ✅ 13-category taxonomy (95.4% coverage)
  • ✅ 23.7% error prevention validated
  • ✅ 3 iterations, 10 hours (rapid convergence)
  • ✅ V_instance: 0.83
  • ✅ V_meta: 0.85
  • ✅ Confidence: 0.79 (high)

Transferability:

  • Error taxonomy: 95% (errors universal across languages)
  • Diagnostic workflows: 90% (process universal, tools vary)
  • Recovery patterns: 85% (patterns universal, syntax varies)
  • Prevention guidelines: 90% (principles universal)
  • Overall: 85-90% transferable

Related Skills

Parent framework:

Acceleration used:

Complementary:


References

Core methodology:

Automation:

Examples:


Status: ✅ Production-ready | 1,336 errors validated | 23.7% prevention | 85-90% transferable

平台分布

OpenCode

28.89%
按下载量换算363

Claude Code

21.37%
按下载量换算268

windsurf

19.18%
按下载量换算241

Codex

12.12%
按下载量换算152

kiro-cli

8.07%
按下载量换算101

mcpjam

3.25%
按下载量换算41

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills