子智能体驱动开发
通过为每个任务派发新的子智能体来执行计划，每个任务后进行两阶段审查：先规格符合性审查，再代码质量审查。
核心原则： 每任务一个新子智能体 + 两阶段审查（先规格后质量）= 高质量、快速迭代
开始时宣布：「我正在使用 subagent-driven-development 技能按计划派发子智能体并执行两阶段审查。」
何时使用
digraph when_to_use {
"Have implementation plan?" [shape=diamond];
"Tasks mostly independent?" [shape=diamond];
"Stay in this session?" [shape=diamond];
"subagent-driven-development" [shape=box];
"executing-plans" [shape=box];
"Manual execution or brainstorm first" [shape=box];
"Have implementation plan?" -> "Tasks mostly independent?" [label="yes"];
"Have implementation plan?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no"];
"Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Stay in this session?" [label="yes"];
"Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no - tightly coupled"];
"Stay in this session?" -> "subagent-driven-development" [label="yes"];
"Stay in this session?" -> "executing-plans" [label="no - parallel session"];
}与 Executing Plans（并行会话）相比：
- 同一会话（无上下文切换）
- 每任务一个新子智能体（无上下文污染）
- 每任务后两阶段审查：先规格符合性，再代码质量
- 更快迭代（任务间无人为介入）
流程
digraph process {
rankdir=TB;
subgraph cluster_per_task {
label="Per Task";
"Dispatch implementer subagent (./references/implementer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
"Implementer subagent asks questions?" [shape=diamond];
"Answer questions, provide context" [shape=box];
"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [shape=box];
"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./references/spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" [shape=diamond];
"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [shape=box];
"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./references/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" [shape=diamond];
"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [shape=box];
"Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [shape=box];
}
"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" [shape=box];
"More tasks remain?" [shape=diamond];
"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [shape=box];
"Use superpowers:finishing-development" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];
"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./references/implementer-prompt.md)";
"Dispatch implementer subagent (./references/implementer-prompt.md)" -> "Implementer subagent asks questions?";
"Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Answer questions, provide context" [label="yes"];
"Answer questions, provide context" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./references/implementer-prompt.md)";
"Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [label="no"];
"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./references/spec-reviewer-prompt.md)";
"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./references/spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?";
"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [label="no"];
"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./references/spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./references/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./references/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?";
"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [label="no"];
"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./references/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [label="yes"];
"Mark task complete in TodoWrite" -> "More tasks remain?";
"More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./references/implementer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
"More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [label="no"];
"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" -> "Use finishing-development";
}提示模板
references/implementer-prompt.md- 派发实施者子智能体references/spec-reviewer-prompt.md- 派发规格符合性审查者子智能体references/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md- 派发代码质量审查者子智能体
优势
与手动执行相比：
- 子智能体自然遵循 TDD
- 每任务新上下文（无混淆）
- 并行安全（子智能体互不干扰）
- 子智能体可提问（工作前后及期间）
与 Executing Plans 相比：
- 同一会话（无交接）
- 连续进展（无等待）
- 自动审查检查点
效率提升：
- 无文件读取开销（控制器提供全文）
- 控制器只提供所需上下文
- 子智能体预先获得完整信息
- 工作开始前暴露问题（而非之后）
质量门槛：
- 自审在交接前发现问题
- 两阶段审查：规格符合性，再代码质量
- 审查循环确保修复有效
- 规格符合性防止过度/不足实现
- 代码质量确保实现良好
红旗
绝不：
- 未经用户明确同意在 main/master 分支上开始实施
- 跳过审查（规格符合性或代码质量）
- 带着未修复问题继续
- 并行派发多个实施子智能体（会冲突）
- 让子智能体读取计划文件（改为提供全文）
- 跳过背景设定（子智能体需理解任务所处位置）
- 忽视子智能体问题（在让其继续前回答）
- 在规格符合性上接受「差不多」（规格审查发现问题 = 未完成）
- 跳过审查循环（审查者发现问题 = 实施者修复 = 再次审查）
- 用实施者自审替代实际审查（二者都需要）
- 在规格符合性 ✅ 之前开始代码质量审查（顺序错误）
- 任一审查有未解决问题时进入下一任务
若子智能体提问：
- 清晰完整地回答
- 必要时提供额外上下文
- 不要催促其进入实施
若审查者发现问题：
- 实施者（同一子智能体）修复
- 审查者再次审查
- 重复直至通过
- 不要跳过再次审查
若子智能体任务失败：
- 派发修复子智能体并给出具体指令
- 不要手动修复（会导致上下文污染）
集成
必需工作流技能：
- spec-init - 必需：开始前设置隔离工作区
- spec-plan - 创建本技能所执行的计划
- requesting-code-review - 审查者子智能体的代码审查模板
- finishing-development - 所有任务完成后做开发收尾确认
子智能体应使用：
- test-driven-development - 子智能体对每任务遵循 TDD
替代工作流：
- spec-execute - 用于并行会话而非同会话执行