Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

rag-retrieval(RAG retrieval 搜索)

用于搭建或维护带检索增强的 RAG 工作流,适合让 Agent 处理知识库问答、向量检索、来源引用和事实核查。它可以辅助整理数据接入、Embedding、向量库、召回参数和回答生成流程。使用时需要确认数据来源、更新频率、召回阈值和引用展示方式,避免把未命中的资料或过期内容包装成确定事实。

rag-retrieval 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 56,510。

总安装 449周安装 18GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 145核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:rag-retrieval(RAG retrieval 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yonatangross/skillforge-claude-plugin
仓库路径:skills/rag-retrieval
安装命令:
npx skills add yonatangross/skillforge-claude-plugin --skill "rag-retrieval"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add yonatangross/skillforge-claude-plugin --skill "rag-retrieval"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于搭建或维护带检索增强的 RAG 工作流。适合让 Agent 处理知识库问答、向量检索与来源引用。使用时需确认数据来源、更新频率与召回阈值,避免包装未命中内容为确定事实。涉及外部知识库时应先评估接入权限与数据脱敏要求。rag-retrieval 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/rag-retrieval

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add yonatangross/skillforge-claude-plugin --skill "rag-retrieval";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

rag-retrieval 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add yonatangross/skillforge-claude-plugin --skill "rag-retrieval"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

rag-retrieval 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

rag-retrieval 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

rag-retrieval 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

rag-retrieval 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 449 次,近一周安装 18 次,下载 145 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

rag-retrieval 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
rag-retrieval

RAG retrieval 搜索 · 本页

449—只读MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

RAG Retrieval

Comprehensive patterns for building production RAG systems. Each category has individual rule files in rules/ loaded on-demand.

Quick Reference

CategoryRulesImpactWhen to Use
Core RAG4CRITICALBasic RAG, citations, hybrid search, context management
Embeddings3HIGHModel selection, chunking, batch/cache optimization
Contextual Retrieval3HIGHContext-prepending, hybrid BM25+vector, pipeline
HyDE3HIGHVocabulary mismatch, hypothetical document generation
Agentic RAG4HIGHSelf-RAG, CRAG, knowledge graphs, adaptive routing
Multimodal RAG3MEDIUMImage+text retrieval, PDF chunking, cross-modal search
Query Decomposition3MEDIUMMulti-concept queries, parallel retrieval, RRF fusion
Reranking3MEDIUMCross-encoder, LLM scoring, combined signals
PGVector4HIGHPostgreSQL hybrid search, HNSW indexes, schema design

Total: 30 rules across 9 categories

Core RAG

Fundamental patterns for retrieval, generation, and pipeline composition.

RuleFileKey Pattern
Basic RAGrules/core-basic-rag.mdRetrieve + context + generate with citations
Hybrid Searchrules/core-hybrid-search.mdRRF fusion (k=60) for semantic + keyword
Context Managementrules/core-context-management.mdToken budgeting + sufficiency check
Pipeline Compositionrules/core-pipeline-composition.mdComposable Decompose → HyDE → Retrieve → Rerank

Embeddings

Embedding models, chunking strategies, and production optimization.

RuleFileKey Pattern
Models & APIrules/embeddings-models.mdModel selection, batch API, similarity
Chunkingrules/embeddings-chunking.mdSemantic boundary splitting, 512 token sweet spot
Advancedrules/embeddings-advanced.mdRedis cache, Matryoshka dims, batch processing

Contextual Retrieval

Anthropic's context-prepending technique — 67% fewer retrieval failures.

RuleFileKey Pattern
Context Prependingrules/contextual-prepend.mdLLM-generated context + prompt caching
Hybrid Searchrules/contextual-hybrid.md40% BM25 / 60% vector weight split
Complete Pipelinerules/contextual-pipeline.mdEnd-to-end indexing + hybrid retrieval

HyDE

Hypothetical Document Embeddings for bridging vocabulary gaps.

RuleFileKey Pattern
Generationrules/hyde-generation.mdEmbed hypothetical doc, not query
Per-Conceptrules/hyde-per-concept.mdParallel HyDE for multi-topic queries
Fallbackrules/hyde-fallback.md2-3s timeout → direct embedding fallback

Agentic RAG

Self-correcting retrieval with LLM-driven decision making.

RuleFileKey Pattern
Self-RAGrules/agentic-self-rag.mdBinary document grading for relevance
Corrective RAGrules/agentic-corrective-rag.mdCRAG workflow with web fallback
Knowledge Graphrules/agentic-knowledge-graph.mdKG + vector hybrid for entity-rich domains
Adaptive Retrievalrules/agentic-adaptive-retrieval.mdQuery routing to optimal strategy

Multimodal RAG

Image + text retrieval with cross-modal search.

RuleFileKey Pattern
Embeddingsrules/multimodal-embeddings.mdCLIP, SigLIP 2, Voyage multimodal-3
Chunkingrules/multimodal-chunking.mdPDF extraction preserving images
Pipelinerules/multimodal-pipeline.mdDedup + hybrid retrieval + generation

Query Decomposition

Breaking complex queries into concepts for parallel retrieval.

RuleFileKey Pattern
Detectionrules/query-detection.mdHeuristic indicators (<1ms fast path)
Decompose + RRFrules/query-decompose.mdLLM concept extraction + parallel retrieval
HyDE Comborules/query-hyde-combo.mdDecompose + HyDE for maximum coverage

Reranking

Post-retrieval re-scoring for higher precision.

RuleFileKey Pattern
Cross-Encoderrules/reranking-cross-encoder.mdms-marco-MiniLM (~50ms, free)
LLM Rerankingrules/reranking-llm.mdBatch scoring + Cohere API
Combinedrules/reranking-combined.mdMulti-signal weighted scoring

PGVector

Production hybrid search with PostgreSQL.

RuleFileKey Pattern
Schemarules/pgvector-schema.mdHNSW index + pre-computed tsvector
Hybrid Searchrules/pgvector-hybrid-search.mdSQLAlchemy RRF with FULL OUTER JOIN
Indexingrules/pgvector-indexing.mdHNSW (17x faster) vs IVFFlat
Metadatarules/pgvector-metadata.mdFiltering, boosting, Redis 8 comparison

Quick Start Example

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()

async def rag_query(question: str, top_k: int = 5) -> dict:
    """Basic RAG with citations."""
    docs = await vector_db.search(question, limit=top_k)
    context = "\n\n".join([f"[{i+1}] {doc.text}" for i, doc in enumerate(docs)])

    response = await llm.chat([
        {"role": "system", "content": "Answer with inline citations [1], [2]. Use ONLY provided context."},
        {"role": "user", "content": f"Context:\n{context}\n\nQuestion: {question}"}
    ])

    return {"answer": response.content, "sources": [d.metadata['source'] for d in docs]}

Key Decisions

DecisionRecommendation
Embedding modeltext-embedding-3-small (general), voyage-3 (production)
Chunk size256-1024 tokens (512 typical)
Hybrid weight40% BM25 / 60% vector
Top-k3-10 documents
Temperature0.1-0.3 (factual)
Context budget4K-8K tokens
RerankingRetrieve 50, rerank to 10
Vector indexHNSW (production), IVFFlat (high-volume)
HyDE timeout2-3 seconds with fallback
Query decompositionHeuristic first, LLM only if multi-concept

Common Mistakes

  1. No citation tracking (unverifiable answers)
  2. Context too large (dilutes relevance)
  3. Single retrieval method (misses keyword matches)
  4. Not chunking long documents (context gets lost)
  5. Embedding queries differently than documents
  6. No fallback path in agentic RAG (workflow hangs)
  7. Infinite rewrite loops (no retry limit)
  8. Using wrong similarity metric (cosine vs euclidean)
  9. Not caching embeddings (recomputing unchanged content)
  10. Missing image captions in multimodal RAG (limits text search)

Evaluations

See test-cases.json for 30 test cases across all categories.

Related Skills

  • ork:langgraph - LangGraph workflow patterns (for agentic RAG workflows)
  • caching - Cache RAG responses for repeated queries
  • ork:golden-dataset - Evaluate retrieval quality
  • ork:llm-integration - Local embeddings with nomic-embed-text
  • vision-language-models - Image analysis for multimodal RAG
  • ork:database-patterns - Schema design for vector search

Capability Details

retrieval-patterns

Keywords: retrieval, context, chunks, relevance, rag Solves:

  • Retrieve relevant context for LLM
  • Implement RAG pipeline with citations
  • Optimize retrieval quality

hybrid-search

Keywords: hybrid, bm25, vector, fusion, rrf Solves:

  • Combine keyword and semantic search
  • Implement reciprocal rank fusion
  • Balance precision and recall

embeddings

Keywords: embedding, text to vector, vectorize, chunk, similarity Solves:

  • Convert text to vector embeddings
  • Choose embedding models and dimensions
  • Implement chunking strategies

contextual-retrieval

Keywords: contextual, anthropic, context-prepend, bm25 Solves:

  • Prepend context to chunks for better retrieval
  • Reduce retrieval failures by 67%
  • Implement hybrid BM25+vector search

hyde

Keywords: hyde, hypothetical, vocabulary mismatch Solves:

  • Bridge vocabulary gaps in semantic search
  • Generate hypothetical documents for embedding
  • Handle abstract or conceptual queries

agentic-rag

Keywords: self-rag, crag, corrective, adaptive, grading Solves:

  • Build self-correcting RAG workflows
  • Grade document relevance
  • Implement web search fallback

multimodal-rag

Keywords: multimodal, image, clip, vision, pdf Solves:

  • Build RAG with images and text
  • Cross-modal search (text → image)
  • Process PDFs with mixed content

query-decomposition

Keywords: decompose, multi-concept, complex query Solves:

  • Break complex queries into concepts
  • Parallel retrieval per concept
  • Improve coverage for compound questions

reranking

Keywords: rerank, cross-encoder, precision, scoring Solves:

  • Improve search precision post-retrieval
  • Score relevance with cross-encoder or LLM
  • Combine multiple scoring signals

pgvector-search

Keywords: pgvector, postgresql, hnsw, tsvector, hybrid Solves:

  • Production hybrid search with PostgreSQL
  • HNSW vs IVFFlat index selection
  • SQL-based RRF fusion

适合场景

01

研究助手

02

事实核查

03

知识库问答

04

带来源的搜索总结

能力概览

能力 1

组合搜索和大模型调用

能力 2

支持多来源检索和总结

能力 3

强调引用来源和事实核查

能力 4

适合研究型 Agent 流程

平台分布

Claude Code

28.81%
按下载量换算42

OpenCode

21.38%
按下载量换算31

Antigravity

18.32%
按下载量换算27

Gemini CLI

12.72%
按下载量换算18

windsurf

7.35%
按下载量换算11

trae

3.14%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills