Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

explore(探索)

explore 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

explore 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,029。

总安装 815周安装 35GitHub Stars 152下载 286核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:explore(探索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yonatangross/skillforge-claude-plugin
仓库路径:skills/explore
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/skillforge-claude-plugin --skill explore
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/skillforge-claude-plugin --skill explore

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

explore 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息搜集与整理的研究检索场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,注意是否触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。建议结合原始 README 和仓库内容进一步核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/explore

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/skillforge-claude-plugin --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

explore 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/skillforge-claude-plugin --skill explore。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

explore 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

explore 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

explore 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

explore 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 815 次,近一周安装 35 次,下载 286 次,GitHub 152 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

explore 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
explore

探索 · 本页

815152调用外部服务MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Codebase Exploration

Multi-angle codebase exploration using 3-5 parallel agents.

Quick Start

/ork:explore authentication
Opus 4.6: Exploration agents use native adaptive thinking for deeper pattern recognition across large codebases.

STEP 0: Verify User Intent with AskUserQuestion

BEFORE creating tasks, clarify what the user wants to explore:

AskUserQuestion(
  questions=[{
    "question": "What aspect do you want to explore?",
    "header": "Focus",
    "options": [
      {"label": "Full exploration (Recommended)", "description": "Code structure + data flow + architecture + health assessment", "markdown": "```\nFull Exploration (8 phases)\n───────────────────────────\n  4 parallel explorer agents:\n  ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐\n  │ Structure│ │ Data     │\n  │ Explorer │ │ Flow     │\n  ├──────────┤ ├──────────┤\n  │ Pattern  │ │ Product  │\n  │ Analyst  │ │ Context  │\n  └──────────┘ └──────────┘\n         ▼\n  ┌──────────────────────┐\n  │ Code Health    N/10  │\n  │ Dep Hotspots   map   │\n  │ Architecture   diag  │\n  └──────────────────────┘\n  Output: Full exploration report\n```"},
      {"label": "Code structure only", "description": "Find files, classes, functions related to topic", "markdown": "```\nCode Structure\n──────────────\n  Grep ──▶ Glob ──▶ Map\n\n  Output:\n  ├── File tree (relevant)\n  ├── Key classes/functions\n  ├── Import graph\n  └── Entry points\n  No agents — direct search\n```"},
      {"label": "Data flow", "description": "Trace how data moves through the system", "markdown": "```\nData Flow Trace\n───────────────\n  Input ──▶ Transform ──▶ Output\n    │          │            │\n    ▼          ▼            ▼\n  [API]    [Service]    [DB/Cache]\n\n  Traces: request lifecycle,\n  state mutations, side effects\n  Agent: 1 data-flow explorer\n```"},
      {"label": "Architecture patterns", "description": "Identify design patterns and integrations", "markdown": "```\nArchitecture Analysis\n─────────────────────\n  ┌─────────────────────┐\n  │ Detected Patterns    │\n  │ ├── MVC / Hexagonal  │\n  │ ├── Event-driven?    │\n  │ ├── Service layers   │\n  │ └── External APIs    │\n  ├─────────────────────┤\n  │ Integration Map      │\n  │ DB ←→ Cache ←→ Queue │\n  └─────────────────────┘\n  Agent: backend-system-architect\n```"},
      {"label": "Quick search", "description": "Just find relevant files, skip deep analysis", "markdown": "```\nQuick Search (~30s)\n───────────────────\n  Grep + Glob ──▶ File list\n\n  Output:\n  ├── Matching files\n  ├── Line references\n  └── Brief summary\n  No agents, no health check,\n  no report generation\n```"}
    ],
    "multiSelect": false
  }]
)

Based on answer, adjust workflow:

  • Full exploration: All phases, all parallel agents
  • Code structure only: Skip phases 5-7 (health, dependencies, product)
  • Data flow: Focus phase 3 agents on data tracing
  • Architecture patterns: Focus on backend-system-architect agent
  • Quick search: Skip to phases 1-2 only, return file list

STEP 0b: Select Orchestration Mode

MCP Probe

ToolSearch(query="select:mcp__memory__search_nodes")
Write(".claude/chain/capabilities.json", { memory, timestamp })

if capabilities.memory:
  mcp__memory__search_nodes({ query: "architecture decisions for {path}" })
  # Enrich exploration with past decisions

Exploration Handoff

After exploration completes, write results for downstream skills:

Write(".claude/chain/exploration.json", JSON.stringify({
  "phase": "explore", "skill": "explore",
  "timestamp": now(), "status": "completed",
  "outputs": {
    "architecture_map": { ... },
    "patterns_found": ["repository", "service-layer"],
    "complexity_hotspots": ["src/auth/", "src/payments/"]
  }
}))

Choose Agent Teams (mesh) or Task tool (star):

  1. Agent Teams mode (GA since CC 2.1.33) → recommended for 4+ agents
  2. Task tool mode → for quick/single-focus exploration
  3. ORCHESTKIT_FORCE_TASK_TOOL=1 → Task tool (override)
AspectTask ToolAgent Teams
Discovery sharingLead synthesizes after all completeExplorers share discoveries as they go
Cross-referencingLead connects dotsData flow explorer alerts architecture explorer
Cost~150K tokens~400K tokens
Best forQuick/focused searchesDeep full-codebase exploration
Fallback: If Agent Teams encounters issues, fall back to Task tool for remaining exploration.

Task Management (MANDATORY)

BEFORE doing ANYTHING else, create tasks to show progress:

# 1. Create main task IMMEDIATELY
TaskCreate(subject="Explore: {topic}", description="Deep codebase exploration for {topic}", activeForm="Exploring {topic}")

# 2. Create subtasks for each phase
TaskCreate(subject="Initial file search", activeForm="Searching files")                # id=2
TaskCreate(subject="Check knowledge graph", activeForm="Checking memory")              # id=3
TaskCreate(subject="Launch exploration agents", activeForm="Dispatching explorers")     # id=4
TaskCreate(subject="Assess code health (0-10)", activeForm="Assessing code health")    # id=5
TaskCreate(subject="Map dependency hotspots", activeForm="Mapping dependencies")       # id=6
TaskCreate(subject="Add product perspective", activeForm="Adding product context")     # id=7
TaskCreate(subject="Generate exploration report", activeForm="Generating report")      # id=8

# 3. Set dependencies for sequential phases
TaskUpdate(taskId="3", addBlockedBy=["2"])  # Memory check needs file search first
TaskUpdate(taskId="4", addBlockedBy=["3"])  # Agents need memory context
TaskUpdate(taskId="5", addBlockedBy=["4"])  # Health needs exploration done
TaskUpdate(taskId="6", addBlockedBy=["4"])  # Hotspots need exploration done
TaskUpdate(taskId="7", addBlockedBy=["4"])  # Product needs exploration done
TaskUpdate(taskId="8", addBlockedBy=["5", "6", "7"])  # Report needs all analysis done

# 4. Before starting each task, verify it's unblocked
task = TaskGet(taskId="2")  # Verify blockedBy is empty

# 5. Update status as you progress
TaskUpdate(taskId="2", status="in_progress")  # When starting
TaskUpdate(taskId="2", status="completed")    # When done — repeat for each subtask

Workflow Overview

PhaseActivitiesOutput
1. Initial SearchGrep, Glob for matchesFile locations
2. Memory CheckSearch knowledge graphPrior context
3. Deep Exploration4 parallel explorersMulti-angle analysis
4. AI System (if applicable)LangGraph, prompts, RAGAI-specific findings
5. Code HealthRate code 0-10Quality scores
6. Dependency HotspotsIdentify couplingHotspot visualization
7. Product PerspectiveBusiness contextFindability suggestions
8. Report GenerationCompile findingsActionable report

Progressive Output (CC 2.1.76)

Output findings incrementally as each phase completes — don't batch until the report:

After PhaseShow User
1. Initial SearchFile matches, grep results
2. Memory CheckPrior decisions and relevant context
3. Deep ExplorationEach explorer agent's findings as they return
5. Code HealthHealth score with dimension breakdown

For Phase 3 parallel agents, output each agent's findings as soon as it returns — don't wait for all 4 explorers. Early findings from one agent may answer the user's question before remaining agents complete, allowing early termination.


Phase 1: Initial Search

# PARALLEL - Quick searches
Grep(pattern="$ARGUMENTS[0]", output_mode="files_with_matches")
Glob(pattern="**/*$ARGUMENTS[0]*")

Phase 2: Memory Check

mcp__memory__search_nodes(query="$ARGUMENTS[0]")
mcp__memory__search_nodes(query="architecture")

Phase 3: Parallel Deep Exploration (4 Agents)

Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/exploration-agents.md") for Task tool mode prompts.

Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/agent-teams-mode.md") for Agent Teams alternative.

Phase 4: AI System Exploration (If Applicable)

For AI/ML topics, add exploration of: LangGraph workflows, prompt templates, RAG pipeline, caching strategies.

Phase 5: Code Health Assessment

Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/code-health-assessment.md") for agent prompt. Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/code-health-rubric.md") for scoring criteria.

Phase 6: Dependency Hotspot Map

Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/dependency-hotspot-analysis.md") for agent prompt. Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/dependency-analysis.md") for metrics.

Phase 7: Product Perspective

Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/rules/product-perspective.md") for agent prompt. Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/findability-patterns.md") for best practices.

Phase 8: Generate Report

Load Read("${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/exploration-report-template.md").

Common Exploration Queries

  • "How does authentication work?"
  • "Where are API endpoints defined?"
  • "Find all usages of EventBroadcaster"
  • "What's the workflow for content analysis?"

Related Skills

  • ork:implement: Implement after exploration

Version: 2.4.0 (April 2026) — Fork-eligible agents for 30-50% cost reduction (#1227)

平台分布

Claude Code

28.24%
按下载量换算81

OpenCode

20.07%
按下载量换算57

Antigravity

16.89%
按下载量换算48

Gemini CLI

12.44%
按下载量换算36

windsurf

7%
按下载量换算20

trae

3.43%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills