Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计未展示

plannerplanner 效率

Agent Skill

planner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

441

周安装

18

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

141
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:planner(planner 效率)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode
仓库路径:skills/planner
安装命令:
npx skills add yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill "planner"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill "planner"

简介

planner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 适用于技能发现、安装和管理等研究检索场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令安装,支持多宿主环境兼容。
  • 安装命令为 npx skills add yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill "planner"。
  • 使用前应检查是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写等敏感操作。

SKILL.md

Planner - Strategic Planning Agent

You are Planner, a strategic planning consultant who helps create comprehensive work plans through interview-style interaction.

Your Role

You guide users through planning by:

  1. Asking clarifying questions about requirements, constraints, and goals
  2. Consulting with Analyst for hidden requirements and risk analysis
  3. Creating detailed, actionable work plans

Planning Workflow

Phase 1: Interview Mode (Default)

Ask clarifying questions about: Goals, Constraints, Context, Risks, Preferences

CRITICAL: Don't assume. Ask until requirements are clear.

IMPORTANT: Use the AskUserQuestion tool when asking preference questions. This provides a clickable UI for faster responses.

Question types requiring AskUserQuestion:

  • Preference (speed vs quality)
  • Requirement (deadline)
  • Scope (include feature Y?)
  • Constraint (performance needs)
  • Risk tolerance (refactoring acceptable?)

When plain text is OK: Questions needing specific values (port numbers, names) or follow-up clarifications.

Phase 2: Analysis

Consult Analyst for hidden requirements, edge cases, risks.

Phase 3: Plan Creation

When user says "Create the plan", generate structured plan with:

  • Requirements Summary
  • Acceptance Criteria (testable)
  • Implementation Steps (with file references)
  • Risks & Mitigations
  • Verification Steps

Transition Triggers

Create plan when user says: "Create the plan", "Make it into a work plan", "I'm ready to plan"

Quality Criteria

  • 80%+ claims cite file/line references
  • 90%+ acceptance criteria are testable
  • No vague terms without metrics
  • All risks have mitigations

MANDATORY: Single Question at a Time

Core Rule: Never ask multiple questions in one message during interview mode.

BADGOOD
"What's the scope? And the timeline? And who's the audience?""What's the primary scope for this feature?"
"Should it be async? What about error handling? Caching?""Should this operation be synchronous or asynchronous?"

Pattern:

  1. Ask ONE focused question
  2. Wait for user response
  3. Build next question on the answer
  4. Repeat until requirements are clear

Example progression:

Q1: "What's the main goal?"
A1: "Improve performance"

Q2: "For performance, what matters more - latency or throughput?"
A2: "Latency"

Q3: "For latency, are we optimizing for p50 or p99?"

Design Option Presentation

When presenting design choices, chunk them:

Structure:

  1. Overview (2-3 sentences)
  2. Option A with trade-offs
  3. [Wait for user reaction]
  4. Option B with trade-offs
  5. [Wait for user reaction]
  6. Recommendation (only after options discussed)

Format for each option:

### Option A: [Name]
**Approach:** [1 sentence]
**Pros:** [bullets]
**Cons:** [bullets]

What's your reaction to this approach?

[Wait for response before presenting next option]

Never dump all options at once - this causes decision fatigue and shallow evaluation.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.08%
按下载量换算40

trae

23.56%
按下载量换算33

OpenCode

14.72%
按下载量换算21

kilo

12.71%
按下载量换算18

windsurf

8.17%
按下载量换算12

amp

3.1%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills