Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

git-workflow(Git 工作流)

git-workflow 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

git-workflow 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 60,976。

总安装 360周安装 15GitHub Stars 2下载 120核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:git-workflow(Git 工作流)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wyattowalsh/agents
仓库路径:skills/git-workflow
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/wyattowalsh/agents --skill git-workflow
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/wyattowalsh/agents --skill git-workflow

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。适合在需要检索仓库信息或筛选线索时使用。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/wyattowalsh/agents --skill git-workflow。

安装前建议确认是否会触发联网或文件读写。

来源仓库内路径:skills/git-workflow

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/wyattowalsh/agents --skill git-workflow;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

git-workflow 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/wyattowalsh/agents --skill git-workflow。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

git-workflow 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

git-workflow 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

git-workflow 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

git-workflow 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 360 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 120 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

git-workflow 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
git-workflow

Git 工作流 · 本页

3602只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Git Workflow

Git operations assistant. Lightweight, high-frequency tool for commit messages, PR descriptions, branch strategy, conflict resolution, code archaeology, and bisect debugging.

Scope: Git workflow operations only. NOT for code review (honest-review), CI/CD pipelines (devops-engineer), changelogs or release notes (changelog-writer), or writing application code.

Dispatch

$ARGUMENTSMode
commitGenerate conventional commit message from staged diff
prGenerate PR description from branch diff
strategyRecommend branch strategy for project
conflictGuide merge conflict resolution
archaeology <file or function>Analyze git history for code understanding
bisectAssist with git bisect to find regression commits
EmptyShow mode menu with examples

Canonical Vocabulary

Use these terms exactly throughout all modes:

TermDefinition
conventional commitStructured commit format: type(scope): subject per Conventional Commits 1.0
commit typeOne of: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore, revert
breaking changeCommit with ! suffix or BREAKING CHANGE: footer requiring major version bump
scopeOptional parenthesized component name after type: feat(auth):...
trunk-basedStrategy where all developers commit to main/trunk with short-lived feature branches
git-flowStrategy with develop, feature, release, and hotfix branches
github-flowSimplified strategy: main + feature branches with PR-based merging
conflict markerGit-inserted <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> delimiters in conflicted files
blamegit blame annotation showing last modifier per line
archaeologyUsing git history commands to understand why code exists
bisectBinary search through commits to find the one introducing a bug
good/bad commitBisect terminology: good = before bug, bad = after bug

Mode 1: Commit

Generate a conventional commit message from the current staged diff.

Commit Steps

  1. Run git diff --cached to get staged changes
  2. If nothing staged, run git diff and report: "No staged changes. Stage files first with git add."
  3. Run uv run python skills/git-workflow/scripts/diff-summarizer.py on the diff output
  4. Analyze the diff to determine:

- Type: feat/fix/docs/style/refactor/perf/test/build/ci/chore/revert - Scope: affected component (from file paths, module names) - Subject: imperative, lowercase, no period, max 72 chars - Body: what changed and why (wrap at 72 chars) - Breaking: whether BREAKING CHANGE: footer is needed

  1. Reference data/conventional-commits.json rules for type selection
  2. Present the commit message. Ask: "Commit with this message? [yes / edit / cancel]"
  3. If approved, run git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'\n<message>\nEOF\n)"

Mode 2: PR

Generate a PR description from the branch diff against the base branch.

PR Steps

  1. Detect base branch: git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's@refs/remotes/origin/@@' (fallback: main)
  2. Run git log --oneline <base>..HEAD to list commits
  3. Run uv run python skills/git-workflow/scripts/commit-parser.py on git log output
  4. Run git diff <base>...HEAD --stat for change statistics
  5. Run uv run python skills/git-workflow/scripts/diff-summarizer.py on the diff stat
  6. Generate PR description with:

- Title: short summary under 70 chars - Summary: 1-3 bullet points of what changed - Changes: grouped by commit type from parsed commits - Test plan: checklist of verification steps - Breaking changes: if any commits have breaking changes

  1. Present the description. Ask: "Create PR with this? [yes / edit / skip]"

Mode 3: Strategy

Recommend a branch strategy for the project.

Strategy Steps

  1. Analyze the repository:

- Team size: check git shortlog -sn --all | wc -l - Release cadence: check tags with git tag -l --sort=-creatordate | head -20 - Branch count: git branch -r | wc -l - CI/CD presence: check for .github/workflows/, Jenkinsfile, .gitlab-ci.yml

  1. Reference data/branch-strategies.json for strategy comparison
  2. Score each strategy against the project profile
  3. Present recommendation with:

- Recommended strategy and why - Comparison table showing trade-offs - Migration steps if switching from current approach - Team size and release cadence alignment

Mode 4: Conflict

Guide merge conflict resolution.

Conflict Steps

  1. Run git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U to list conflicted files
  2. If no conflicts: "No merge conflicts detected."
  3. For each conflicted file:

- Read the file to identify conflict markers - Analyze both sides (ours vs theirs) - Check git log --merge -p -- <file> for context on diverging changes - Determine the intent of each side

  1. Present resolution guidance per file:

- What each side changed and why - Recommended resolution (keep ours / keep theirs / merge both / rewrite) - The resolved content

  1. Ask: "Apply this resolution? [yes / edit / skip per file]"
  2. After resolving: remind to git add <files> and continue the merge/rebase

Mode 5: Archaeology

Analyze git history to understand why code exists and how it evolved.

Archaeology Steps

  1. Parse $ARGUMENTS[1] as a file path or function name
  2. For file paths:

- git log --follow --oneline -- <file> for full history - git log --follow --diff-filter=A -- <file> for creation commit - git blame <file> for line-by-line attribution

  1. For function names:

- git log -p --all -S '<function>' -- '*.py' '*.js' '*.ts' (pickaxe search) - git log -L:<function>:<file> if file is known (function-level log)

  1. Analyze the history to answer:

- When was this code introduced and by whom? - What was the original intent? (from commit messages) - How has it evolved? (key modification commits) - Are there related changes in other files?

  1. Present a narrative timeline with key commits and their context

Mode 6: Bisect

Assist with git bisect to find the commit that introduced a regression.

Bisect Steps

  1. Ask for (if not provided):

- Bad commit: where the bug exists (default: HEAD) - Good commit: where the bug did not exist - Test command: how to verify (optional, for git bisect run)

  1. Start bisect: git bisect start <bad> <good>
  2. If test command provided:

- Run git bisect run <command> - Parse output for the first bad commit

  1. If manual:

- At each step, explain the current commit context - Ask: "Is this commit good or bad?" - Run git bisect good or git bisect bad

  1. When bisect identifies the commit:

- Show the full commit with git show <hash> - Explain what the commit changed - Suggest investigation areas

  1. Clean up: git bisect reset

Reference Files

Load ONE reference at a time. Do not preload all references into context.

FileContentLoad When
references/commit-and-pr-guide.mdConventional commit patterns, PR templates, diff analysiscommit or pr mode
references/branch-strategies.mdStrategy comparison, migration paths, team sizingstrategy mode
references/history-and-debugging.mdConflict resolution, archaeology techniques, bisect patternsconflict, archaeology, or bisect mode
Data FileContentLoad When
data/conventional-commits.jsonFull spec as structured data with type definitionscommit mode (script input)
data/branch-strategies.jsonStrategy comparison with pros/cons/team sizestrategy mode (script input)
ScriptWhen to Run
scripts/commit-parser.pypr mode -- parse git log into structured JSON
scripts/diff-summarizer.pycommit or pr mode -- summarize diff statistics

Critical Rules

  1. Never commit without user approval -- always present the message first
  2. Never force-push, reset --hard, or run destructive git commands
  3. Always use conventional commit format per the spec in data/conventional-commits.json
  4. Commit subjects must be imperative, lowercase, no period, max 72 chars
  5. PR descriptions must link changes to evidence from the diff
  6. Never skip git bisect reset after a bisect session
  7. Archaeology mode is read-only -- never modify code or history
  8. Conflict resolution must explain both sides before recommending
  9. Branch strategy must consider actual team size and release cadence, not ideals
  10. Scripts output JSON to stdout -- parse programmatically, never regex
  11. Stage-before-commit: if diff --cached is empty, do not fabricate a commit message
  12. Do not generate changelogs or release notes -- redirect to changelog-writer

平台分布

Codex

37.91%
按下载量换算45

Claude

29.13%
按下载量换算35

Cursor

17.67%
按下载量换算21

Gemini CLI

9.66%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills