Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

writing-linkedin-posts(撰写 linkedin 帖子)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

writing-linkedin-posts 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 10,080。

总安装 13,138周安装 542GitHub Stars 18下载 4,293核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:writing-linkedin-posts(撰写 linkedin 帖子)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jamesgray007/hoai-course
仓库路径:skills/writing-linkedin-posts
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jamesgray007/hoai-course --skill writing-linkedin-posts
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jamesgray007/hoai-course --skill writing-linkedin-posts

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

真实的 LinkedIn 帖子通过真正的洞察力而不是参与度优化来建立思想领导力。

强调真实性而非病毒式传播:真实的经历、具体的见解和诚实的反思比制造的漏洞或结构完美的故事更能引起共鸣 提供五种帖子格式(故事、列表、逆向、观察和基于媒体),每种格式都有模板和护栏,以及有关挂钩、正文结构和结束语的指导 涵盖语音开发,包括如何定义您的 POV、建立一致性标记以及校准优雅语气和人类语气之间的语气 包括战略漏洞框架、第一个小时的参与策略以及要避免的明确反模式(参与荚、谦虚的吹牛、回收格式) 提供发布前检查表,涵盖钩子强度、焦点、真实性、可扫描性和“畏缩测试”,以确保对已发布内容的长期信心

来源仓库内路径:skills/writing-linkedin-posts

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jamesgray007/hoai-course --skill writing-linke…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

writing-linkedin-posts 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jamesgray007/hoai-course --skill writing-linkedin-posts。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

writing-linkedin-posts 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

writing-linkedin-posts 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

writing-linkedin-posts 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

writing-linkedin-posts 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 13,138 次,近一周安装 542 次,下载 4,293 次,GitHub 18 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

writing-linkedin-posts 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
writing-linkedin-posts

撰写 linkedin 帖子 · 本页

13,13818只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

LinkedIn Post Writer

Create engaging, authentic LinkedIn posts that drive meaningful engagement and establish thought leadership.

Core Principles

Authenticity Over Performance

LinkedIn has matured. Readers can spot manufactured vulnerability and engagement bait instantly. The posts that resonate now are genuinely useful or genuinely human—not optimized for virality.

What works:

  • Real experiences with honest reflection
  • Specific insights from your actual work
  • Admitting what you don't know
  • Sharing without needing validation

What doesn't:

  • Performed vulnerability for engagement
  • Stories that feel too perfectly structured
  • Lessons that sound like motivational posters

One Idea Per Post

The biggest mistake is cramming multiple tips, stories, or angles into one post. Focus on:

  • One core idea
  • One story
  • One insight
  • One lesson

If you have five points, that's five posts.

Value Without Strings

Every post must educate, inspire, or entertain. Ask: "Would I find this valuable if a stranger posted it?" Not "Will this get engagement?"

Building Your Signature Voice

Top Voices don't just post well—they're recognizable. Their perspective, style, and focus areas are consistent.

Define Your POV

Answer these before writing:

  • What topic do I have genuine expertise in?
  • What's my contrarian belief in my industry?
  • What perspective do I bring that others don't?
  • What would I want to be known for saying?

Consistency Markers

Develop 2-3 recognizable elements:

  • A recurring theme or topic area
  • A consistent tone (analytical, warm, direct, witty)
  • A signature format you're known for
  • Phrases or frameworks you've coined

Voice Calibration

Your LinkedIn voice should be:

  • More polished than a text to a friend
  • Less formal than a company memo
  • As smart as your best work conversations
  • As human as your real personality

Post Anatomy

The Hook (Lines 1-2)

The first 2-3 lines appear before "See more" and determine everything.

Modern hooks that work (avoid overused patterns):

TypeExampleWhy It Works
Honest admission"I've been wrong about remote work."Genuine, not performed
Specific observation"I've noticed something in every founder who scaled past $10M."Credibility + curiosity
Direct challenge"Most career advice optimizes for the wrong thing."Provokes thought
Unexpected angle"The best hire I made had the worst resume."Subverts expectations
Simple truth"Nobody talks about how lonely leadership is."Resonates emotionally

Hooks to retire:

  • "This one thing made me $X" (feels like a scam ad)
  • "The CEO pulled me aside and said..." (overused curiosity bait)
  • "I'm excited to announce..." (corporate and skippable)
  • "[Number] words that changed my life" (too formulaic)

See references/hooks.md for comprehensive examples.

The Body

Structure for scannability:

  • Short paragraphs (1-3 sentences max)
  • Line breaks between thoughts
  • Bullet points for lists (but don't overuse)
  • Bold for emphasis sparingly

Storytelling framework:

  1. Set the scene (briefly—one sentence)
  2. Introduce tension or conflict
  3. Show the turning point
  4. Deliver the insight
  5. Make it applicable to the reader

The Close

End with purpose, not desperation:

Good closes:

  • Genuine question that invites perspective
  • Specific call to action ("Bookmark this for your next negotiation")
  • Reflection that lingers ("Something to sit with this week")

Avoid:

  • "Agree?" (lazy)
  • "Comment YES if..." (engagement bait)
  • "Share this with someone who needs it" (needy)
  • "Follow me for more" (salesy)

Vulnerability Done Right

Authentic sharing builds connection. Performed vulnerability destroys trust.

Strategic Vulnerability vs. Exploitation

Share when:

  • The experience taught you something others can learn
  • You've processed it enough to offer perspective
  • It serves the reader, not your need for validation
  • Time has passed and you have hindsight

Don't share when:

  • The wound is still fresh
  • You're seeking sympathy, not providing value
  • It could harm others involved
  • It feels performative even to you

The Vulnerability Test

Before posting something personal, ask:

  1. Am I sharing this to help others or to process my own feelings?
  2. Would I be comfortable if this went viral?
  3. Does this include genuine insight or just pain?
  4. Have I protected others who were involved?

Post Formats

Story Post

Best for: Personal experiences, lessons learned, career moments

[Hook - honest admission or surprising outcome]

[One sentence of context]

[What happened - the tension or challenge]

[The turning point]

[What you learned]

[Question or reflection for reader]

List Post

Best for: Frameworks, actionable advice, curated insights

[Hook - clear value promise]

[Why this matters - one sentence]

1. [Point with brief context]
2. [Point with brief context]
3. [Point with brief context]
(3-7 items max)

[Closing insight or question]

Contrarian Post

Best for: Challenging conventional wisdom (with substance)

[Your contrarian position, stated directly]

[The common belief you're challenging]

[Your reasoning - why you see it differently]

[Evidence or experience]

[Nuanced conclusion - acknowledge complexity]

[Invite discussion]

Contrarian guardrails:

  • Have genuine expertise on the topic
  • Argue against ideas, not people
  • Offer an alternative, not just criticism
  • Acknowledge what the other side gets right
  • Be open to being wrong

Observation Post

Best for: Industry insights, trends, patterns you've noticed

[What you've observed]

[Specific evidence or examples]

[Why it matters]

[Your interpretation]

[Question to test if others see it too]

Media Formats

Text-only posts aren't the only option. Different formats serve different purposes.

Document/Carousel Posts

  • Higher save rates and extended engagement
  • Best for: step-by-step guides, frameworks, before/after
  • Keep to 5-10 slides
  • Each slide should stand alone
  • End with a summary or CTA slide

Image Posts

  • Use when visual adds genuine value (charts, diagrams, photos from events)
  • Avoid: stock photos, generic graphics, memes (unless that's your brand)
  • Native uploads outperform links

Polls

  • Good for: genuine market research, sparking discussion
  • Bad for: obvious questions, engagement farming
  • Always follow up with your take on the results

Video

  • LinkedIn favors native video over links
  • Keep under 90 seconds for most content
  • Captions are essential (most watch muted)
  • Face-to-camera builds personal connection

Engagement Strategy

What happens after you post matters as much as what you post.

The First Hour

LinkedIn's algorithm weighs early engagement heavily:

  • Respond to every comment in the first 60 minutes
  • Ask follow-up questions to extend conversations
  • Thank people genuinely, not generically

Comment Quality

Your comments on others' posts build your brand too:

  • Add insight, not just agreement
  • Share relevant experience
  • Ask thoughtful follow-up questions
  • Avoid "Great post!" without substance

What Not to Do

  • Engagement pods (LinkedIn detects and penalizes these)
  • Asking people to "comment for a free resource"
  • Posting and disappearing
  • Commenting just to get visibility

Writing Guidelines

Tone Spectrum

Find your spot on each scale:

Corporate ←————————→ Casual
Reserved ←————————→ Vulnerable
Analytical ←————————→ Emotional
Serious ←————————→ Playful

Most Top Voices sit slightly right of center on each.

Length

  • Optimal: 150-300 words (enough for depth, short enough to finish)
  • Maximum: 3,000 characters
  • Use whitespace generously—dense text kills engagement

Formatting Rules

  • Never use hashtags inline with text
  • Place 3-5 hashtags at the very end, after a line break
  • One emoji max, if any (overuse signals inauthenticity)
  • Use "I" not "we" for personal posts

What to Avoid

Content anti-patterns:

  • "I'm excited to announce..." (corporate speak)
  • Humblebrags disguised as lessons
  • Recycled viral post formats (the airport conversation, the Uber driver wisdom)
  • Posting others' frameworks without credit
  • Tragedy exploitation (using global events for engagement)

Engagement anti-patterns:

  • "Comment YES if you agree"
  • "Share this with 3 people"
  • Tagging people who didn't ask to be tagged
  • Posting controversial takes you don't actually believe
  • Fake questions where you just want to share your answer

Format anti-patterns:

  • Every. Sentence. As. Its. Own. Line.
  • Excessive emoji strings
  • ALL CAPS FOR EMPHASIS
  • Hashtag stuffing

Content Categories That Perform

  1. Career lessons - Failures, pivots, decisions made
  2. Behind-the-scenes - Real work experiences, how things actually work
  3. Industry insights - Patterns you've noticed, trends you're seeing
  4. How-to frameworks - Actionable processes readers can apply
  5. Contrarian takes - Challenge assumptions (with substance)
  6. Personal milestones - Only when tied to broader insights

References

  • references/hooks.md - Complete hook patterns with examples
  • references/examples.md - Full post examples demonstrating best practices

Quick Checklist Before Posting

  1. Hook: Would this stop MY scroll?
  2. Focus: Is there ONE clear idea?
  3. Value: Would I find this useful if someone else posted it?
  4. Authenticity: Does this sound like me, not "LinkedIn me"?
  5. Format: Is it scannable with short paragraphs?
  6. Close: Does it invite genuine engagement?
  7. Vulnerability check: Am I sharing to help or to process?
  8. Cringe test: Will I be proud of this post in a year?

平台分布

Claude Code

27.41%
按下载量换算1,177

OpenCode

24.12%
按下载量换算1,035

Gemini CLI

19.08%
按下载量换算819

Antigravity

14.05%
按下载量换算603

Cursor

7.18%
按下载量换算308

Codex

3.59%
按下载量换算154

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills