Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

write-user-story编写用户故事

Agent Skill

write-user-story 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

343

周安装

14

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

111
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:write-user-story(编写用户故事)
来源仓库:https://github.com/folio-org/folio-eureka-ai-dev
仓库路径:skills/write-user-story
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/folio-org/folio-eureka-ai-dev --skill write-user-story
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/folio-org/folio-eureka-ai-dev --skill write-user-story

简介

write-user-story 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合围绕仓库状态或协作事项进行整理。

  • 适用于代码协作与项目管理场景,可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态。
  • 安装前建议确认是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写,避免误操作生产数据。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Write User Story

User Story Structure

Every story must have these sections (in order):

  1. Purpose/Overview — What it achieves and why. Include business context, user persona, and links. Optionally add a *Technical Details/Approach* sub-section for architectural decisions without over-specifying implementation.
  2. Requirements/Scope — Functional requirements (specific, measurable). Non-functional requirements only when they have measurable impact. Out of Scope only when genuine ambiguity exists.
  3. Acceptance Criteria — Testable conditions in Given-When-Then format.
  4. Testing Guidance — Manual testing scenarios only. No unit/integration test specs.

Template

## Purpose/Overview

[High-level description of what this story achieves and why it's important.
Include business context, user persona, and links to related work.]

### Technical Details/Technical Approach (Optional)

[Architectural decisions or implementation strategy — don't over-specify.]

---

## Requirements/Scope

### Functional Requirements
1. [Specific functionality to implement]
2. [Input/output expectations]
3. [Business rules and constraints]

### Non-Functional Requirements (only if significant)
1. [Data integrity requirements]
2. [Performance — only if measurable impact]
3. [Security — only if specific requirements exist]

### Out of Scope (only if needed for clarity)
- [Include ONLY if there's genuine ambiguity about scope]

---

## Acceptance Criteria

**AC1: [Scenario name]**
- Given [initial context]
  When [action occurs]
  Then [expected outcome]

**AC2: [Error handling scenario]**
- Given [error condition]
  When [action occurs]
  Then [expected error behavior]

---

## Testing Guidance

### Manual Testing

**Scenario 1: [Primary user workflow]**
1. [Step-by-step instructions]
2. [Expected outcomes]

**Scenario 2: [Edge case]**
1. [Steps]
2. [Expected outcomes]

**Note:** Unit test specs, integration test code, and test data details belong in the implementation plan, not here.

---

## Additional Notes (optional)

[Risks, dependencies, or other considerations]

## Related Links (optional)
- [Design documents, API specs, related stories]

Writing Guidelines

Standard User Story Format

As a [user persona/role]
I want [goal/desire]
So that [benefit/value]

INVEST Principles

  • Independent — deliverable separately
  • Negotiable — details can be refined
  • Valuable — delivers clear value
  • Estimable — team can estimate effort
  • Small — completable within one sprint
  • Testable — clear verification criteria

Best Practices

Do's ✓

  1. Write from the user perspective — focus on value, not implementation
  2. Make acceptance criteria specific and testable
  3. Include error scenarios and edge cases
  4. Use consistent domain terminology
  5. Link dependencies and related stories
  6. Collaborate with developers, testers, and stakeholders

Don'ts ✗

  1. Don't write technical tasks as stories ("Refactor UserService" is a task, not a story)
  2. Don't be vague — "improve performance" needs metrics
  3. Don't skip acceptance criteria
  4. Don't add non-functional requirements unless they have measurable impact
  5. Don't add "Out of Scope" unless there's genuine ambiguity
  6. Don't include unit/integration test specs in Testing Guidance
  7. Don't over-specify implementation — leave the "how" to developers

Quick Reference Checklist

  • Purpose clearly explains the value and context
  • Requirements are specific and measurable
  • Acceptance criteria are testable and unambiguous
  • Error scenarios and edge cases are covered
  • Testing guidance contains manual scenarios only
  • Dependencies are identified and linked
  • Story is sized for one sprint
  • Technical approach is outlined if needed, but not over-specified
  • Non-functional requirements included only if significant
  • "Out of Scope" omitted unless genuinely needed

For deep-dive guidance on each section, see references/section-details.md. For common pitfalls with before/after examples, see references/pitfalls.md. For a complete example story, see references/example.md. For JIRA markup conversion, see references/jira.md.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.09%
按下载量换算41

Claude

26.12%
按下载量换算29

Cursor

18.92%
按下载量换算21

Gemini CLI

8.99%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills