Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

write-ui-tests(编写用户界面测试)

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

write-ui-tests 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 59,464。

总安装 388周安装 16GitHub Stars 23,238下载 127核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:write-ui-tests(编写用户界面测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/dotnet/maui
仓库路径:skills/write-ui-tests
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/dotnet/maui --skill write-ui-tests
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/dotnet/maui --skill write-ui-tests

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范和交互体验优化,适合让 Agent 整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案或检查一致性。适用于前端设计与用户体验场景,需结合现有品牌和设计系统使用。不应只堆装饰元素,涉及真实页面改动时应通过截图或浏览器预览检查效果。建议配合本地构建和预览工具确认文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

write-ui-tests 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/write-ui-tests

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/dotnet/maui --skill write-ui-tests;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

write-ui-tests 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/dotnet/maui --skill write-ui-tests。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

write-ui-tests 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

write-ui-tests 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

write-ui-tests 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

write-ui-tests 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 388 次,近一周安装 16 次,下载 127 次,GitHub 23,238 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

write-ui-tests 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 23,238 星,维护活跃度相对可查。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
write-ui-tests

编写用户界面测试 · 本页

38823,238只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Write UI Tests Skill

Creates UI tests that reproduce a GitHub issue, following.NET MAUI conventions. Verifies the tests actually fail before completing.

🛑 BLOCKING REQUIREMENT

YOU CANNOT COMPLETE THIS SKILL UNTIL TESTS FAIL.

A test that passes does NOT prove it catches the bug. You MUST:

  1. Run tests and observe them FAIL
  2. If tests pass, iterate on test code until they fail
  3. Never report "done" with passing tests

If tests keep passing after 3 iterations:

  • STOP and ask user: "Tests are passing but they should fail to prove they catch the bug. The test scenario may not correctly reproduce the issue. Should I try a different approach?"

Common mistakes that lead to passing tests:

  • Test scenario doesn't match issue reproduction steps
  • Checking wrong element or property
  • Bug only manifests on specific platform (try different platform)
  • Bug requires specific timing or async behavior not captured
  • Issue description is incomplete - may need to ask user for clarification

When to Use

  • ✅ PR has no tests and needs them
  • ✅ Issue needs a reproduction test before fixing
  • ✅ Existing tests don't adequately cover the bug

Required Input

Before invoking, ensure you have:

  • Issue number (e.g., 33331)
  • Issue description or reproduction steps
  • Platforms affected (iOS, Android, Windows, MacCatalyst)

Platform selection guidance:

  • Start with the platform mentioned in the issue (often in title or labels)
  • If issue says "iOS" or has platform/iOS label → test on iOS first
  • If issue says "Android" or has platform/Android label → test on Android first
  • If issue affects "All" platforms → start with Android (faster emulator boot)
  • If test passes on one platform, try another before concluding test is wrong

Workflow

Step 1: Read the UI Test Guidelines

cat .github/instructions/uitests.instructions.md

This contains the authoritative conventions for:

  • File naming (IssueXXXXX.cs for C#-only, or IssueXXXXX.xaml/.xaml.cs for XAML)
  • File locations (TestCases.HostApp/Issues/, TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/)
  • Required attributes ([Issue()], [Category()])
  • Test patterns and assertions

Step 2: Create HostApp Page

Location: src/Controls/tests/TestCases.HostApp/Issues/IssueXXXXX.cs

namespace Maui.Controls.Sample.Issues;

[Issue(IssueTracker.Github, XXXXX, "Brief description of issue", PlatformAffected.All)]
public partial class IssueXXXXX : ContentPage
{
    public IssueXXXXX()
    {
        // Create UI that reproduces the issue
        var button = new Button
        {
            Text = "Test Button",
            AutomationId = "TestButton"  // Required for Appium
        };

        var resultLabel = new Label
        {
            Text = "Waiting...",
            AutomationId = "ResultLabel"
        };

        button.Clicked += (s, e) =>
        {
            resultLabel.Text = "Success";
        };

        Content = new VerticalStackLayout
        {
            Children = { button, resultLabel }
        };
    }
}

Key requirements:

  • Add AutomationId to all interactive elements
  • Use [Issue()] attribute with tracker, number, description, platform
  • Keep UI minimal - just enough to reproduce the bug

Note: XAML is optional. C#-only pages (as shown above) are simpler and preferred for most test scenarios. Use XAML only when the bug specifically relates to XAML parsing or markup behavior.

Step 3: Create NUnit Test

Location: src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/IssueXXXXX.cs

namespace Microsoft.Maui.TestCases.Tests.Issues;

public class IssueXXXXX : _IssuesUITest
{
    public override string Issue => "Brief description matching HostApp";

    public IssueXXXXX(TestDevice device) : base(device) { }

    [Test]
    [Category(UITestCategories.Button)]  // Pick ONE appropriate category
    public void ButtonClickUpdatesLabel()
    {
        // Wait for element to be ready
        App.WaitForElement("TestButton");

        // Interact with the UI
        App.Tap("TestButton");

        // Verify expected behavior
        var labelText = App.FindElement("ResultLabel").GetText();
        Assert.That(labelText, Is.EqualTo("Success"));
    }
}

Key requirements:

  • Inherit from _IssuesUITest
  • Use same AutomationId values as HostApp
  • Add ONE [Category()] attribute (check UITestCategories.cs for options)
  • Use App.WaitForElement() before interactions

Step 4: Verify Files Compile

# For Android
dotnet build src/Controls/tests/TestCases.HostApp/Controls.TestCases.HostApp.csproj -c Debug -f net10.0-android --no-restore -v q

# For iOS
dotnet build src/Controls/tests/TestCases.HostApp/Controls.TestCases.HostApp.csproj -c Debug -f net10.0-ios --no-restore -v q

# Test project (platform-independent)
dotnet build src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Controls.TestCases.Shared.Tests.csproj -c Debug --no-restore -v q

Step 5: Verify Tests Reproduce the Bug ⚠️ CRITICAL

Tests must FAIL to prove they catch the bug. Run verification:

pwsh .github/skills/verify-tests-fail-without-fix/scripts/verify-tests-fail.ps1 -Platform <platform> -TestFilter "IssueXXXXX"

Replace <platform> with android, ios, or maccatalyst based on the issue's affected platforms.

The script auto-detects that only test files exist (no fix files) and runs in "verify failure only" mode.

Why FAIL = success? The test must fail NOW (before the fix) to prove it catches the bug. After the fix is applied, it should pass. A test that passes now proves nothing.

If tests FAIL → ✅ Success! Tests correctly reproduce the bug. Proceed to Output.

If tests PASS → ❌ STOP. Test doesn't catch the bug. Iterate:

  1. Re-read the issue reproduction steps - Is your test doing exactly what the issue describes?
  2. Check if you're testing the right thing - Are you asserting on the correct element/property?
  3. Try a different platform - Bug may only manifest on iOS vs Android
  4. Add debug output - Use Console.WriteLine in HostApp to trace execution
  5. Simplify - Remove complexity until you isolate the bug behavior
  6. After 3 failed iterations, STOP and ask user: "Tests are passing after 3 iterations. This means either: (a) my test scenario doesn't correctly reproduce the bug, (b) the bug may already be fixed on this branch, or (c) I'm missing something from the issue description. How would you like me to proceed?"

Common reasons tests pass when they shouldn't:

SymptomLikely CauseFix
Test passes on all attemptsTest scenario doesn't match bugRe-read issue reproduction steps carefully
Test asserts pass but bug existsAsserting wrong property/elementCheck what exactly the bug affects
Works on Android, fails on iOSBug is platform-specificTry both platforms
Bug involves timingRace condition not capturedAdd delays or event handlers
Bug involves navigationPage lifecycle not exercisedEnsure pages are actually pushed/popped

Do NOT mark this skill complete until tests FAIL.

Output

⚠️ ONLY use this output format if tests FAIL. If tests pass, you have not completed this skill.

After completion (tests verified to fail), report:

✅ Tests created and verified for Issue #XXXXX

**Files:**
- `src/Controls/tests/TestCases.HostApp/Issues/IssueXXXXX.cs`
- `src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/IssueXXXXX.cs`

**Test method:** `ButtonClickUpdatesLabel`
**Category:** `UITestCategories.Button`
**Verification:** Tests FAIL as expected (bug reproduced)
**Failure message:** `Expected "X" but got "Y"` (include actual assertion failure)

If tests PASS after multiple iterations, report instead:

⚠️ Tests created but NOT verified for Issue #XXXXX

**Files:** [list files]
**Status:** Tests PASS when they should FAIL
**Iterations tried:** 3
**Problem:** [describe why test may not be catching the bug]
**Next steps:** Need guidance on reproduction steps

Common Patterns

Testing Property Changes

// HostApp: Add a way to trigger and observe the property
var picker = new Picker { AutomationId = "TestPicker" };
var statusLabel = new Label { AutomationId = "StatusLabel" };
picker.PropertyChanged += (s, e) => {
    if (e.PropertyName == nameof(Picker.IsOpen))
        statusLabel.Text = $"IsOpen={picker.IsOpen}";
};

// Test: Verify the property changes correctly
App.Tap("TestPicker");
App.WaitForElement("StatusLabel");
var status = App.FindElement("StatusLabel").GetText();
Assert.That(status, Does.Contain("IsOpen=True"));

Testing Layout/Positioning

// Test: Use GetRect() for position/size assertions
var rect = App.WaitForElement("TestElement").GetRect();
Assert.That(rect.Height, Is.GreaterThan(0));
Assert.That(rect.Y, Is.GreaterThanOrEqualTo(safeAreaTop));

Testing Visual State (Screenshots)

// Use retryTimeout for animations - keeps retrying until success
App.Tap("AnimatedButton");
VerifyScreenshot(retryTimeout: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2));

// retryTimeout handles timing variance, small tolerance for cross-machine rendering
VerifyScreenshot(tolerance: 0.5, retryTimeout: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2));

Testing Platform-Specific Behavior

// Only limit platforms when NECESSARY
[Test]
[Category(UITestCategories.Picker)]
public void PickerDismissResetsIsOpen()
{
    // This test should run on all platforms unless there's
    // a specific technical reason it can't
    App.WaitForElement("TestPicker");
    // ...
}

iOS Device Selection

When running tests on iOS, you may need to target a specific device or iOS version:

# Default: iPhone Xs with iOS 18.5
pwsh .github/scripts/BuildAndRunHostApp.ps1 -Platform ios -TestFilter "Issue12345"

# Find iPhone Xs with iOS 18.5 and get its UDID
UDID=$(xcrun simctl list devices available --json | jq -r '
  .devices | to_entries
  | map(select(.key | contains("iOS-18-5")))
  | map(.value) | flatten
  | map(select(.name == "iPhone Xs")) | first | .udid')

# Run with specific device
pwsh .github/scripts/BuildAndRunHostApp.ps1 -Platform ios -TestFilter "Issue12345" -DeviceUdid "$UDID"

Finding different device/version combinations:

# iPhone 16 Pro with any iOS version
UDID=$(xcrun simctl list devices available --json | jq -r '
  .devices[][] | select(.name == "iPhone 16 Pro") | .udid' | head -1)

# Any device with iOS 18.0
UDID=$(xcrun simctl list devices available --json | jq -r '
  .devices | to_entries
  | map(select(.key | contains("iOS-18-0")))
  | map(.value) | flatten | .[0].udid')

Pre-Run Checklist

Before running verify-tests-fail.ps1, confirm:

  • HostApp file exists: TestCases.HostApp/Issues/IssueXXXXX.cs
  • NUnit test file exists: TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/IssueXXXXX.cs
  • [Issue()] attribute present with all parameters
  • All AutomationId values match between HostApp and test
  • Test inherits from _IssuesUITest
  • ONE [Category()] attribute from UITestCategories.cs

References

  • Full conventions: .github/instructions/uitests.instructions.md
  • Category list: src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/UITestCategories.cs
  • Example tests: src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/

平台分布

Claude

34.34%
按下载量换算44

Codex

33.77%
按下载量换算43

Cursor

20.49%
按下载量换算26

Gemini CLI

9.07%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills