Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

architecture-patterns(架构模式)

architecture-patterns 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

architecture-patterns 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 1,276。

总安装 103,584周安装 4,316GitHub Stars 6下载 34,528核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:architecture-patterns(架构模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wpank/architecture-patterns
安装命令:
openclaw skills install architecture-patterns
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install architecture-patterns

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

提供后端架构模式(干净架构、六角形、DDD),用于构建具有清晰分层和可维护、可测试和可扩展的系统。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install architecture-patterns;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

architecture-patterns 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install architecture-patterns。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

architecture-patterns 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

architecture-patterns 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

architecture-patterns 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

architecture-patterns 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 103,584 次,近一周安装 4,316 次,下载 34,528 次,GitHub 6 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

architecture-patterns 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
architecture-patterns

架构模式 · 本页

103,5846需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
architecture-patterns
model
reasoning

Architecture Patterns

WHAT

Backend architecture patterns for building maintainable, testable systems: Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design.

WHEN

  • Designing new backend systems from scratch
  • Refactoring monoliths for better maintainability
  • Establishing architecture standards for teams
  • Creating testable, mockable codebases
  • Planning microservices decomposition

KEYWORDS

clean architecture, hexagonal, ports and adapters, DDD, domain-driven design, layers, entities, use cases, repositories, aggregates, bounded contexts


Decision Framework: Which Pattern?

SituationRecommended Pattern
Simple CRUD appNone (over-engineering)
Medium complexity, team standardizationClean Architecture
Multiple external integrations that change frequentlyHexagonal (Ports & Adapters)
Complex business domain with many rulesDomain-Driven Design
Large system with multiple teamsDDD + Bounded Contexts

Quick Reference

Clean Architecture Layers

┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│      Frameworks & Drivers (UI, DB)   │  ← Outer: Can change
├──────────────────────────────────────┤
│      Interface Adapters              │  ← Controllers, Gateways
├──────────────────────────────────────┤
│      Use Cases                       │  ← Application Logic
├──────────────────────────────────────┤
│      Entities                        │  ← Core Business Rules
└──────────────────────────────────────┘

Dependency Rule: Dependencies point INWARD only. Inner layers never import outer layers.

Hexagonal Architecture

         ┌─────────────┐
    ┌────│   Adapter   │────┐    (REST API)
    │    └─────────────┘    │
    ▼                       ▼
┌──────┐              ┌──────────┐
│ Port │◄────────────►│  Domain  │
└──────┘              └──────────┘
    ▲                       ▲
    │    ┌─────────────┐    │
    └────│   Adapter   │────┘    (Database)
         └─────────────┘

Ports: Interfaces defining what the domain needs Adapters: Implementations (swappable for testing)


Directory Structure

app/
├── domain/           # Entities & business rules (innermost)
│   ├── entities/
│   │   └── user.py
│   ├── value_objects/
│   │   └── email.py
│   └── interfaces/   # Ports
│       └── user_repository.py
├── use_cases/        # Application business rules
│   └── create_user.py
├── adapters/         # Interface implementations
│   ├── repositories/
│   │   └── postgres_user_repository.py
│   └── controllers/
│       └── user_controller.py
└── infrastructure/   # Framework & external concerns
    ├── database.py
    └── config.py

Pattern 1: Clean Architecture

Entity (Domain Layer)

from dataclasses import dataclass
from datetime import datetime

@dataclass
class User:
    """Core entity - NO framework dependencies."""
    id: str
    email: str
    name: str
    created_at: datetime
    is_active: bool = True

    def deactivate(self):
        """Business rule in entity."""
        self.is_active = False

    def can_place_order(self) -> bool:
        return self.is_active

Port (Interface)

from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
from typing import Optional

class IUserRepository(ABC):
    """Port: defines contract, no implementation."""
    
    @abstractmethod
    async def find_by_id(self, user_id: str) -> Optional[User]:
        pass
    
    @abstractmethod
    async def save(self, user: User) -> User:
        pass

Use Case (Application Layer)

@dataclass
class CreateUserRequest:
    email: str
    name: str

@dataclass  
class CreateUserResponse:
    user: Optional[User]
    success: bool
    error: Optional[str] = None

class CreateUserUseCase:
    """Use case: orchestrates business logic."""
    
    def __init__(self, user_repository: IUserRepository):
        self.user_repository = user_repository  # Injected dependency
    
    async def execute(self, request: CreateUserRequest) -> CreateUserResponse:
        # Business validation
        existing = await self.user_repository.find_by_email(request.email)
        if existing:
            return CreateUserResponse(user=None, success=False, error="Email exists")
        
        # Create entity
        user = User(
            id=str(uuid.uuid4()),
            email=request.email,
            name=request.name,
            created_at=datetime.now()
        )
        
        saved = await self.user_repository.save(user)
        return CreateUserResponse(user=saved, success=True)

Adapter (Implementation)

class PostgresUserRepository(IUserRepository):
    """Adapter: PostgreSQL implementation of the port."""
    
    def __init__(self, pool: asyncpg.Pool):
        self.pool = pool
    
    async def find_by_id(self, user_id: str) -> Optional[User]:
        async with self.pool.acquire() as conn:
            row = await conn.fetchrow(
                "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1", user_id
            )
            return self._to_entity(row) if row else None
    
    async def save(self, user: User) -> User:
        async with self.pool.acquire() as conn:
            await conn.execute(
                """INSERT INTO users (id, email, name, created_at, is_active)
                   VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5)
                   ON CONFLICT (id) DO UPDATE SET email=$2, name=$3, is_active=$5""",
                user.id, user.email, user.name, user.created_at, user.is_active
            )
            return user

Pattern 2: Hexagonal (Ports & Adapters)

Best when you have multiple external integrations that may change.

# Domain Service (Core)
class OrderService:
    def __init__(
        self,
        order_repo: OrderRepositoryPort,      # Port
        payment: PaymentGatewayPort,          # Port
        notifications: NotificationPort       # Port
    ):
        self.orders = order_repo
        self.payments = payment
        self.notifications = notifications
    
    async def place_order(self, order: Order) -> OrderResult:
        # Pure business logic - no infrastructure details
        if not order.is_valid():
            return OrderResult(success=False, error="Invalid order")
        
        payment = await self.payments.charge(order.total, order.customer_id)
        if not payment.success:
            return OrderResult(success=False, error="Payment failed")
        
        order.mark_as_paid()
        saved = await self.orders.save(order)
        await self.notifications.send(order.customer_email, "Order confirmed")
        
        return OrderResult(success=True, order=saved)

# Adapters (swap these for testing or changing providers)
class StripePaymentAdapter(PaymentGatewayPort):
    async def charge(self, amount: Money, customer: str) -> PaymentResult:
        # Real Stripe implementation
        ...

class MockPaymentAdapter(PaymentGatewayPort):
    async def charge(self, amount: Money, customer: str) -> PaymentResult:
        return PaymentResult(success=True, transaction_id="mock-123")

Pattern 3: Domain-Driven Design

For complex business domains with many rules.

Value Objects (Immutable)

@dataclass(frozen=True)
class Email:
    """Value object: validated, immutable."""
    value: str
    
    def __post_init__(self):
        if "@" not in self.value:
            raise ValueError("Invalid email")

@dataclass(frozen=True)
class Money:
    amount: int  # cents
    currency: str
    
    def add(self, other: "Money") -> "Money":
        if self.currency != other.currency:
            raise ValueError("Currency mismatch")
        return Money(self.amount + other.amount, self.currency)

Aggregates (Consistency Boundaries)

class Order:
    """Aggregate root: enforces invariants."""
    
    def __init__(self, id: str, customer: Customer):
        self.id = id
        self.customer = customer
        self.items: List[OrderItem] = []
        self.status = OrderStatus.PENDING
        self._events: List[DomainEvent] = []
    
    def add_item(self, product: Product, quantity: int):
        """Business logic in aggregate."""
        if quantity > product.max_quantity:
            raise ValueError(f"Max {product.max_quantity} allowed")
        
        item = OrderItem(product, quantity)
        self.items.append(item)
        self._events.append(ItemAddedEvent(self.id, item))
    
    def submit(self):
        """State transition with invariant enforcement."""
        if not self.items:
            raise ValueError("Cannot submit empty order")
        if self.status != OrderStatus.PENDING:
            raise ValueError("Order already submitted")
        
        self.status = OrderStatus.SUBMITTED
        self._events.append(OrderSubmittedEvent(self.id))

Repository Pattern

class OrderRepository:
    """Persist/retrieve aggregates, publish domain events."""
    
    async def save(self, order: Order):
        await self._persist(order)
        await self._publish_events(order._events)
        order._events.clear()

Testing Benefits

All patterns enable the same testing approach:

# Test with mock adapter
async def test_create_user():
    mock_repo = MockUserRepository()
    use_case = CreateUserUseCase(user_repository=mock_repo)
    
    result = await use_case.execute(CreateUserRequest(
        email="test@example.com",
        name="Test User"
    ))
    
    assert result.success
    assert result.user.email == "test@example.com"

NEVER

  • Anemic Domain Models: Entities with only data, no behavior (put logic IN entities)
  • Framework Coupling: Business logic importing Flask, FastAPI, Django ORM
  • Fat Controllers: Business logic in HTTP handlers
  • Leaky Abstractions: Repository returning ORM objects instead of domain entities
  • Skipping Layers: Controller directly accessing database
  • Over-Engineering: Using Clean Architecture for simple CRUD apps
  • Circular Dependencies: Use cases importing controllers

平台分布

OpenClaw

96.14%
按下载量换算33,195

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills