Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

api-rate-limitingAPI rate limiting 文档

Agent Skill

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

总安装

55,416

周安装

2,309

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

18,472
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:api-rate-limiting(API rate limiting 文档)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wpank/api-rate-limiting
安装命令:
openclaw skills install api-rate-limiting
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install api-rate-limiting

简介

速率限制算法、实施策略、HTTP 约定、分层限制、分布式模式和客户端处理。在保护 API 免遭滥用、实施使用层或配置网关级限制时使用。

SKILL.md

name
rate-limiting
model
standard
description
Rate limiting algorithms, implementation strategies, HTTP conventions, tiered limits, distributed patterns, and client-side handling. Use when protecting APIs from abuse, implementing usage tiers, or configuring gateway-level throttling.

Rate Limiting Patterns

Algorithms

AlgorithmAccuracyBurst HandlingBest For
Token BucketHighAllows controlled burstsAPI rate limiting, traffic shaping
Leaky BucketHighSmooths bursts entirelySteady-rate processing, queues
Fixed WindowLowAllows edge bursts (2x)Simple use cases, prototyping
Sliding Window LogVery HighPrecise controlStrict compliance, billing-critical
Sliding Window CounterHighGood approximationProduction APIs — best tradeoff

Fixed window problem: A user sends the full limit at 11:59 and again at 12:01, doubling the effective rate. Sliding window fixes this.

Token Bucket

Bucket holds tokens up to capacity. Tokens refill at a fixed rate. Each request consumes one.

class TokenBucket:
    def __init__(self, capacity: int, refill_rate: float):
        self.capacity = capacity
        self.tokens = capacity
        self.refill_rate = refill_rate  # tokens per second
        self.last_refill = time.monotonic()

    def allow(self) -> bool:
        now = time.monotonic()
        elapsed = now - self.last_refill
        self.tokens = min(self.capacity, self.tokens + elapsed * self.refill_rate)
        self.last_refill = now
        if self.tokens >= 1:
            self.tokens -= 1
            return True
        return False

Sliding Window Counter

Hybrid of fixed window and sliding window log — weights the previous window's count by overlap percentage:

def sliding_window_allow(key: str, limit: int, window_sec: int) -> bool:
    now = time.time()
    current_window = int(now // window_sec)
    position_in_window = (now % window_sec) / window_sec

    prev_count = get_count(key, current_window - 1)
    curr_count = get_count(key, current_window)

    estimated = prev_count * (1 - position_in_window) + curr_count
    if estimated >= limit:
        return False
    increment_count(key, current_window)
    return True

Implementation Options

ApproachScopeBest For
In-memorySingle serverZero latency, no dependencies
Redis (INCR + EXPIRE)DistributedMulti-instance deployments
API GatewayEdgeNo code, built-in dashboards
MiddlewarePer-serviceFine-grained per-user/endpoint control

Use gateway-level limiting as outer defense + application-level for fine-grained control.


HTTP Headers

Always return rate limit info, even on successful requests:

RateLimit-Limit: 1000
RateLimit-Remaining: 742
RateLimit-Reset: 1625097600
Retry-After: 30
HeaderWhen to Include
RateLimit-LimitEvery response
RateLimit-RemainingEvery response
RateLimit-ResetEvery response
Retry-After429 responses only

429 Response Body

{
  "error": {
    "code": "rate_limit_exceeded",
    "message": "Rate limit exceeded. Maximum 1000 requests per hour.",
    "retry_after": 30,
    "limit": 1000,
    "reset_at": "2025-07-01T12:00:00Z"
  }
}

Never return 500 or 503 for rate limiting — 429 is the correct status code.


Rate Limit Tiers

Apply limits at multiple granularities:

ScopeKeyExample LimitPurpose
Per-IPClient IP100 req/minAbuse prevention
Per-UserUser ID1000 req/hrFair usage
Per-API-KeyAPI key5000 req/hrService-to-service
Per-EndpointRoute + key60 req/min on /searchProtect expensive ops

Tiered pricing:

TierRate LimitBurstCost
Free100 req/hr10$0
Pro5,000 req/hr100$49/mo
Enterprise100,000 req/hr2,000Custom

Evaluate from most specific to least specific: per-endpoint > per-user > per-IP.


Distributed Rate Limiting

Redis-based pattern for consistent limiting across instances:

def redis_rate_limit(redis, key: str, limit: int, window: int) -> bool:
    pipe = redis.pipeline()
    now = time.time()
    window_key = f"rl:{key}:{int(now // window)}"
    pipe.incr(window_key)
    pipe.expire(window_key, window * 2)
    results = pipe.execute()
    return results[0] <= limit

Atomic Lua script (prevents race conditions):

local key = KEYS[1]
local limit = tonumber(ARGV[1])
local window = tonumber(ARGV[2])
local current = redis.call('INCR', key)
if current == 1 then
    redis.call('EXPIRE', key, window)
end
return current <= limit and 1 or 0

Never do separate GET then SET — the gap allows overcount.


API Gateway Configuration

NGINX:

http {
    limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=api:10m rate=10r/s;
    server {
        location /api/ {
            limit_req zone=api burst=20 nodelay;
            limit_req_status 429;
        }
    }
}

Kong:

plugins:
  - name: rate-limiting
    config:
      minute: 60
      hour: 1000
      policy: redis
      redis_host: redis.internal

Client-Side Handling

Clients must handle 429 gracefully:

async function fetchWithRetry(url: string, maxRetries = 3): Promise<Response> {
  for (let attempt = 0; attempt < maxRetries; attempt++) {
    const res = await fetch(url);
    if (res.status !== 429) return res;

    const retryAfter = res.headers.get('Retry-After');
    const delay = retryAfter
      ? parseInt(retryAfter, 10) * 1000
      : Math.min(1000 * 2 ** attempt, 30000);
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, delay));
  }
  throw new Error('Rate limit exceeded after retries');
}
  • Always respect Retry-After when present
  • Use exponential backoff with jitter when absent
  • Implement request queuing for batch operations

Monitoring

Track these metrics:

  • Rate limit hit rate — % of requests returning 429 (alert if >5% sustained)
  • Near-limit warnings — requests where remaining < 10% of limit
  • Top offenders — keys/IPs hitting limits most frequently
  • Limit headroom — how close normal traffic is to the ceiling
  • False positives — legitimate users being rate limited

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternFix
Application-only limitingAlways combine with infrastructure-level limits
No retry guidanceAlways include Retry-After header on 429
Inconsistent limitsSame endpoint, same limits across services
No burst allowanceAllow controlled bursts for legitimate traffic
Silent droppingAlways return 429 so clients can distinguish from errors
Global single counterPer-endpoint counters to protect expensive operations
Hard-coded limitsUse configuration, not code constants

NEVER Do

  1. NEVER rate limit health check endpoints — monitoring systems will false-alarm
  2. NEVER use client-supplied identifiers as sole rate limit key — trivially spoofed
  3. NEVER return 200 OK when rate limiting — clients must know they were throttled
  4. NEVER set limits without measuring actual traffic first — you'll block legitimate users or set limits too high to matter
  5. NEVER share counters across unrelated tenants — noisy neighbor problem
  6. NEVER skip rate limiting on internal APIs — misbehaving internal services can take down shared infrastructure
  7. NEVER implement rate limiting without logging — you need visibility to tune limits and detect abuse

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

85.71%
按下载量换算15,832

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills