Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

api-rate-limiting(API rate limiting 文档)

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

api-rate-limiting 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 2,740。

总安装 55,416周安装 2,309GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 18,472核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:api-rate-limiting(API rate limiting 文档)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wpank/api-rate-limiting
安装命令:
openclaw skills install api-rate-limiting
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install api-rate-limiting

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

速率限制算法、实施策略、HTTP 约定、分层限制、分布式模式和客户端处理。在保护 API 免遭滥用、实施使用层或配置网关级限制时使用。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install api-rate-limiting;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

api-rate-limiting 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install api-rate-limiting。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

api-rate-limiting 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

api-rate-limiting 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

api-rate-limiting 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

api-rate-limiting 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 55,416 次,近一周安装 2,309 次,下载 18,472 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

api-rate-limiting 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
api-rate-limiting

API rate limiting 文档 · 本页

55,416—接触敏感数据MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
rate-limiting
model
standard
description
Rate limiting algorithms, implementation strategies, HTTP conventions, tiered limits, distributed patterns, and client-side handling. Use when protecting APIs from abuse, implementing usage tiers, or configuring gateway-level throttling.

Rate Limiting Patterns

Algorithms

AlgorithmAccuracyBurst HandlingBest For
Token BucketHighAllows controlled burstsAPI rate limiting, traffic shaping
Leaky BucketHighSmooths bursts entirelySteady-rate processing, queues
Fixed WindowLowAllows edge bursts (2x)Simple use cases, prototyping
Sliding Window LogVery HighPrecise controlStrict compliance, billing-critical
Sliding Window CounterHighGood approximationProduction APIs — best tradeoff

Fixed window problem: A user sends the full limit at 11:59 and again at 12:01, doubling the effective rate. Sliding window fixes this.

Token Bucket

Bucket holds tokens up to capacity. Tokens refill at a fixed rate. Each request consumes one.

class TokenBucket:
    def __init__(self, capacity: int, refill_rate: float):
        self.capacity = capacity
        self.tokens = capacity
        self.refill_rate = refill_rate  # tokens per second
        self.last_refill = time.monotonic()

    def allow(self) -> bool:
        now = time.monotonic()
        elapsed = now - self.last_refill
        self.tokens = min(self.capacity, self.tokens + elapsed * self.refill_rate)
        self.last_refill = now
        if self.tokens >= 1:
            self.tokens -= 1
            return True
        return False

Sliding Window Counter

Hybrid of fixed window and sliding window log — weights the previous window's count by overlap percentage:

def sliding_window_allow(key: str, limit: int, window_sec: int) -> bool:
    now = time.time()
    current_window = int(now // window_sec)
    position_in_window = (now % window_sec) / window_sec

    prev_count = get_count(key, current_window - 1)
    curr_count = get_count(key, current_window)

    estimated = prev_count * (1 - position_in_window) + curr_count
    if estimated >= limit:
        return False
    increment_count(key, current_window)
    return True

Implementation Options

ApproachScopeBest For
In-memorySingle serverZero latency, no dependencies
Redis (INCR + EXPIRE)DistributedMulti-instance deployments
API GatewayEdgeNo code, built-in dashboards
MiddlewarePer-serviceFine-grained per-user/endpoint control

Use gateway-level limiting as outer defense + application-level for fine-grained control.


HTTP Headers

Always return rate limit info, even on successful requests:

RateLimit-Limit: 1000
RateLimit-Remaining: 742
RateLimit-Reset: 1625097600
Retry-After: 30
HeaderWhen to Include
RateLimit-LimitEvery response
RateLimit-RemainingEvery response
RateLimit-ResetEvery response
Retry-After429 responses only

429 Response Body

{
  "error": {
    "code": "rate_limit_exceeded",
    "message": "Rate limit exceeded. Maximum 1000 requests per hour.",
    "retry_after": 30,
    "limit": 1000,
    "reset_at": "2025-07-01T12:00:00Z"
  }
}

Never return 500 or 503 for rate limiting — 429 is the correct status code.


Rate Limit Tiers

Apply limits at multiple granularities:

ScopeKeyExample LimitPurpose
Per-IPClient IP100 req/minAbuse prevention
Per-UserUser ID1000 req/hrFair usage
Per-API-KeyAPI key5000 req/hrService-to-service
Per-EndpointRoute + key60 req/min on /searchProtect expensive ops

Tiered pricing:

TierRate LimitBurstCost
Free100 req/hr10$0
Pro5,000 req/hr100$49/mo
Enterprise100,000 req/hr2,000Custom

Evaluate from most specific to least specific: per-endpoint > per-user > per-IP.


Distributed Rate Limiting

Redis-based pattern for consistent limiting across instances:

def redis_rate_limit(redis, key: str, limit: int, window: int) -> bool:
    pipe = redis.pipeline()
    now = time.time()
    window_key = f"rl:{key}:{int(now // window)}"
    pipe.incr(window_key)
    pipe.expire(window_key, window * 2)
    results = pipe.execute()
    return results[0] <= limit

Atomic Lua script (prevents race conditions):

local key = KEYS[1]
local limit = tonumber(ARGV[1])
local window = tonumber(ARGV[2])
local current = redis.call('INCR', key)
if current == 1 then
    redis.call('EXPIRE', key, window)
end
return current <= limit and 1 or 0

Never do separate GET then SET — the gap allows overcount.


API Gateway Configuration

NGINX:

http {
    limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=api:10m rate=10r/s;
    server {
        location /api/ {
            limit_req zone=api burst=20 nodelay;
            limit_req_status 429;
        }
    }
}

Kong:

plugins:
  - name: rate-limiting
    config:
      minute: 60
      hour: 1000
      policy: redis
      redis_host: redis.internal

Client-Side Handling

Clients must handle 429 gracefully:

async function fetchWithRetry(url: string, maxRetries = 3): Promise<Response> {
  for (let attempt = 0; attempt < maxRetries; attempt++) {
    const res = await fetch(url);
    if (res.status !== 429) return res;

    const retryAfter = res.headers.get('Retry-After');
    const delay = retryAfter
      ? parseInt(retryAfter, 10) * 1000
      : Math.min(1000 * 2 ** attempt, 30000);
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, delay));
  }
  throw new Error('Rate limit exceeded after retries');
}
  • Always respect Retry-After when present
  • Use exponential backoff with jitter when absent
  • Implement request queuing for batch operations

Monitoring

Track these metrics:

  • Rate limit hit rate — % of requests returning 429 (alert if >5% sustained)
  • Near-limit warnings — requests where remaining < 10% of limit
  • Top offenders — keys/IPs hitting limits most frequently
  • Limit headroom — how close normal traffic is to the ceiling
  • False positives — legitimate users being rate limited

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternFix
Application-only limitingAlways combine with infrastructure-level limits
No retry guidanceAlways include Retry-After header on 429
Inconsistent limitsSame endpoint, same limits across services
No burst allowanceAllow controlled bursts for legitimate traffic
Silent droppingAlways return 429 so clients can distinguish from errors
Global single counterPer-endpoint counters to protect expensive operations
Hard-coded limitsUse configuration, not code constants

NEVER Do

  1. NEVER rate limit health check endpoints — monitoring systems will false-alarm
  2. NEVER use client-supplied identifiers as sole rate limit key — trivially spoofed
  3. NEVER return 200 OK when rate limiting — clients must know they were throttled
  4. NEVER set limits without measuring actual traffic first — you'll block legitimate users or set limits too high to matter
  5. NEVER share counters across unrelated tenants — noisy neighbor problem
  6. NEVER skip rate limiting on internal APIs — misbehaving internal services can take down shared infrastructure
  7. NEVER implement rate limiting without logging — you need visibility to tune limits and detect abuse

平台分布

OpenClaw

85.71%
按下载量换算15,832

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills