Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

api-design-principles(API 设计 principles)

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

api-design-principles 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 4,970。

总安装 28,518周安装 1,225GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 9,996核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:api-design-principles(API 设计 principles)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wpank/api-design-principles
安装命令:
openclaw skills install api-design-principles
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install api-design-principles

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

设计清晰、可扩展的 REST 和 GraphQL API,包括资源建模、HTTP 方法、分页、错误处理、版本控制和架构最佳实践。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install api-design-principles;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

api-design-principles 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install api-design-principles。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

api-design-principles 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

api-design-principles 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

api-design-principles 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

api-design-principles 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 28,518 次,近一周安装 1,225 次,下载 9,996 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

api-design-principles 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
api-design-principles

API 设计 principles · 本页

28,518—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
api-design-principles
model
reasoning

API Design Principles

WHAT

Design intuitive, scalable REST and GraphQL APIs that developers love. Covers resource modeling, HTTP semantics, pagination, error handling, versioning, and GraphQL schema patterns.

WHEN

  • Designing new REST or GraphQL APIs
  • Reviewing API specifications before implementation
  • Establishing API design standards for teams
  • Refactoring APIs for better usability
  • Migrating between API paradigms

KEYWORDS

REST, GraphQL, API design, HTTP methods, pagination, error handling, versioning, OpenAPI, HATEOAS, schema design


Decision Framework: REST vs GraphQL

Choose REST when...Choose GraphQL when...
Simple CRUD operationsComplex nested data requirements
Public APIs with broad audienceMobile apps needing bandwidth optimization
Heavy caching requirementsClients need to specify exact data shape
Team is unfamiliar with GraphQLAggregating multiple data sources
Simple response structuresRapidly evolving frontend requirements

REST API Design

Resource Naming Rules

✓ Plural nouns for collections
  GET /api/users
  GET /api/orders
  GET /api/products

✗ Avoid verbs (let HTTP methods be the verb)
  POST /api/createUser     ← Wrong
  POST /api/users          ← Correct

✓ Nested resources (max 2 levels)
  GET /api/users/{id}/orders
  
✗ Avoid deep nesting
  GET /api/users/{id}/orders/{orderId}/items/{itemId}/reviews  ← Too deep
  GET /api/order-items/{id}/reviews                            ← Better

HTTP Methods and Status Codes

MethodPurposeSuccessCommon Errors
GETRetrieve200 OK404 Not Found
POSTCreate201 Created400/422 Validation
PUTReplace200 OK404 Not Found
PATCHPartial update200 OK404 Not Found
DELETERemove204 No Content404/409 Conflict

Complete Status Code Reference

SUCCESS = {
    200: "OK",           # GET, PUT, PATCH success
    201: "Created",      # POST success
    204: "No Content",   # DELETE success
}

CLIENT_ERROR = {
    400: "Bad Request",           # Malformed syntax
    401: "Unauthorized",          # Missing/invalid auth
    403: "Forbidden",             # Valid auth, no permission
    404: "Not Found",             # Resource doesn't exist
    409: "Conflict",              # State conflict (duplicate email)
    422: "Unprocessable Entity",  # Validation errors
    429: "Too Many Requests",     # Rate limited
}

SERVER_ERROR = {
    500: "Internal Server Error",
    503: "Service Unavailable",   # Temporary downtime
}

Pagination

Offset-Based (Simple)
GET /api/users?page=2&page_size=20

{
  "items": [...],
  "page": 2,
  "page_size": 20,
  "total": 150,
  "pages": 8
}
Cursor-Based (For Large Datasets)
GET /api/users?limit=20&cursor=eyJpZCI6MTIzfQ

{
  "items": [...],
  "next_cursor": "eyJpZCI6MTQzfQ",
  "has_more": true
}

Filtering and Sorting

# Filtering
GET /api/users?status=active&role=admin

# Sorting (- prefix for descending)
GET /api/users?sort=-created_at,name

# Search
GET /api/users?search=john

# Field selection
GET /api/users?fields=id,name,email

Error Response Format

Always use consistent structure:

{
  "error": {
    "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
    "message": "Request validation failed",
    "details": [
      {"field": "email", "message": "Invalid email format"}
    ],
    "timestamp": "2025-10-16T12:00:00Z"
  }
}

FastAPI Implementation

from fastapi import FastAPI, Query, Path, HTTPException, status
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, EmailStr
from typing import Optional, List
from datetime import datetime

app = FastAPI(title="API", version="1.0.0")

# Models
class UserCreate(BaseModel):
    email: EmailStr
    name: str = Field(..., min_length=1, max_length=100)

class User(BaseModel):
    id: str
    email: str
    name: str
    created_at: datetime

class PaginatedResponse(BaseModel):
    items: List[User]
    total: int
    page: int
    page_size: int
    pages: int

# Endpoints
@app.get("/api/users", response_model=PaginatedResponse)
async def list_users(
    page: int = Query(1, ge=1),
    page_size: int = Query(20, ge=1, le=100),
    status: Optional[str] = Query(None),
    search: Optional[str] = Query(None)
):
    """List users with pagination and filtering."""
    total = await count_users(status=status, search=search)
    offset = (page - 1) * page_size
    users = await fetch_users(limit=page_size, offset=offset, status=status, search=search)
    
    return PaginatedResponse(
        items=users,
        total=total,
        page=page,
        page_size=page_size,
        pages=(total + page_size - 1) // page_size
    )

@app.post("/api/users", response_model=User, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
async def create_user(user: UserCreate):
    """Create new user."""
    if await user_exists(user.email):
        raise HTTPException(
            status_code=status.HTTP_409_CONFLICT,
            detail={"code": "EMAIL_EXISTS", "message": "Email already registered"}
        )
    return await save_user(user)

@app.get("/api/users/{user_id}", response_model=User)
async def get_user(user_id: str = Path(...)):
    """Get user by ID."""
    user = await fetch_user(user_id)
    if not user:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found")
    return user

@app.delete("/api/users/{user_id}", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)
async def delete_user(user_id: str):
    """Delete user."""
    if not await fetch_user(user_id):
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found")
    await remove_user(user_id)

GraphQL API Design

Schema Structure

# Types
type User {
  id: ID!
  email: String!
  name: String!
  createdAt: DateTime!
  orders(first: Int = 20, after: String): OrderConnection!
}

# Pagination (Relay-style)
type OrderConnection {
  edges: [OrderEdge!]!
  pageInfo: PageInfo!
  totalCount: Int!
}

type OrderEdge {
  node: Order!
  cursor: String!
}

type PageInfo {
  hasNextPage: Boolean!
  hasPreviousPage: Boolean!
  startCursor: String
  endCursor: String
}

# Queries
type Query {
  user(id: ID!): User
  users(first: Int = 20, after: String, search: String): UserConnection!
}

# Mutations with Input/Payload pattern
input CreateUserInput {
  email: String!
  name: String!
  password: String!
}

type CreateUserPayload {
  user: User
  errors: [Error!]
}

type Error {
  field: String
  message: String!
  code: String!
}

type Mutation {
  createUser(input: CreateUserInput!): CreateUserPayload!
}

DataLoader (Prevent N+1)

from aiodataloader import DataLoader

class UserLoader(DataLoader):
    async def batch_load_fn(self, user_ids: List[str]) -> List[Optional[dict]]:
        """Load multiple users in single query."""
        users = await fetch_users_by_ids(user_ids)
        user_map = {user["id"]: user for user in users}
        return [user_map.get(uid) for uid in user_ids]

# In resolver
@user_type.field("orders")
async def resolve_orders(user: dict, info):
    loader = info.context["loaders"]["orders_by_user"]
    return await loader.load(user["id"])

Query Protection

# Depth limiting
MAX_QUERY_DEPTH = 5

# Complexity limiting
MAX_QUERY_COMPLEXITY = 100

# Timeout
QUERY_TIMEOUT_SECONDS = 10

Versioning Strategies

URL Versioning (Recommended)

/api/v1/users
/api/v2/users

Pros: Clear, easy to route, cacheable Cons: Multiple URLs for same resource

Header Versioning

GET /api/users
Accept: application/vnd.api+json; version=2

Pros: Clean URLs Cons: Less visible, harder to test

Deprecation Strategy

  1. Add deprecation headers: Deprecation: true
  2. Document migration path
  3. Give 6-12 months notice
  4. Monitor usage before removal

Rate Limiting

Headers

X-RateLimit-Limit: 1000
X-RateLimit-Remaining: 742
X-RateLimit-Reset: 1640000000

# When limited:
429 Too Many Requests
Retry-After: 3600

Implementation

from datetime import datetime, timedelta

class RateLimiter:
    def __init__(self, calls: int, period: int):
        self.calls = calls
        self.period = period
        self.cache = {}
    
    def check(self, key: str) -> tuple[bool, dict]:
        now = datetime.now()
        if key not in self.cache:
            self.cache[key] = []
        
        # Remove old requests
        cutoff = now - timedelta(seconds=self.period)
        self.cache[key] = [ts for ts in self.cache[key] if ts > cutoff]
        
        remaining = self.calls - len(self.cache[key])
        
        if remaining <= 0:
            return False, {"limit": self.calls, "remaining": 0}
        
        self.cache[key].append(now)
        return True, {"limit": self.calls, "remaining": remaining - 1}

Pre-Implementation Checklist

Resources

  • [ ] Nouns, not verbs
  • [ ] Plural for collections
  • [ ] Max 2 levels nesting

HTTP

  • [ ] Correct method for each action
  • [ ] Correct status codes
  • [ ] Idempotent operations are idempotent

Data

  • [ ] All collections paginated
  • [ ] Filtering/sorting supported
  • [ ] Error format consistent

Security

  • [ ] Authentication defined
  • [ ] Rate limiting configured
  • [ ] Input validation on all fields
  • [ ] HTTPS enforced

Documentation

  • [ ] OpenAPI spec generated
  • [ ] All endpoints documented
  • [ ] Examples provided

NEVER

  • Verbs in URLs: /api/getUser → use /api/users/{id} with GET
  • POST for Retrieval: Use GET for safe, idempotent reads
  • Inconsistent Errors: Always same error format
  • Unbounded Lists: Always paginate collections
  • Secrets in URLs: Query params are logged
  • Breaking Changes Without Versioning: Plan for evolution from day 1
  • Database Schema as API: API should be stable even when schema changes
  • Ignoring HTTP Semantics: Status codes and methods have meaning

平台分布

OpenClaw

95.3%
按下载量换算9,526

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills