Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

workflow-ship-faster工作流程发货更快

Agent Skill

workflow-ship-faster 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,176

周安装

49

GitHub Stars

338

下载量

392
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:workflow-ship-faster(工作流程发货更快)
来源仓库:https://github.com/heyvhuang/ship-faster
仓库路径:skills/workflow-ship-faster
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/heyvhuang/ship-faster --skill workflow-ship-faster
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/heyvhuang/ship-faster --skill workflow-ship-faster

简介

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合整理项目状态与变更事项。

  • 可协助 Agent 梳理仓库结构、跟踪协作进展或分析代码提交历史。
  • 通过 npx 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,具体用法需结合原始 README 进一步确认。
  • 安装前建议核实权限范围、维护状态及是否涉及联网、命令执行或文件操作。
  • workflow-ship-faster 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Workflow: Ship Faster (Next.js 16.1.1)

The goal of this chain is: Ship an idea or small prototype to production-ready state in the shortest time, while maintaining iteration speed afterward.

When to use

Use this workflow when the user wants an end-to-end chain like:

  • “ship this MVP”, “make it production-ready”, “launch/deploy this project”
  • “take this prototype and turn it into a real app”
  • “set up the foundation + UI system + deployment”

Core principles (non-negotiable)

  • Pass paths only, not content: agents/sub-agents only pass ..._path.
  • Files are first-class citizens: Every step must persist artifacts; failures can be retried; replayable.
  • Confirmation points: Any "high-risk/high-effort/side-effect" action must write a plan first and wait for confirmation.
  • Plans are checklists: progress is tracked in tasks.md via - []- [x] (not in chat).
  • Progressive disclosure: Only open step files in this skill directory (foundation.md, deploy-vercel.md, etc.) when needed—avoid loading all details at once.
  • Hooks doctor (required check; non-blocking): If running under Claude Code and you want the evolution loop active, run tool-hooks-doctor once at the start of the session; if hooks are missing, offer to install project-level hooks (continue either way).

Inputs / outputs (paths only)

Inputs (paths only):

  • repo_root: project root (default ".")
  • Optional: run_dir (active run directory) if the user already has one

Outputs (artifacts, written under run_dir/):

  • Required: proposal.md, tasks.md, context.json
  • Optional: design.md, evidence/, logs/

Canonical contract (backends, templates, read order, auto-archive):

Step modules (open only when you hit that step)

Process (Default Route)

0) Initialize Run (Required)

  1. Resolve/create run_dir/ (see the deterministic backend rules in references/artifact-contract.md).
  2. Ensure core artifacts exist (create if missing; merge/append if already present):

- proposal.md, tasks.md, context.json

  1. In tasks.md, ensure:

- a status: active|blocked|done field near the top - a short Next action section (1–3 items) - an Approvals section (empty is fine until needed)

  1. Only create evidence/ and logs/ when you actually have large outputs to store.

0.2) Scope Confirmation (Required)

Problem this solves: a run summary that marks core steps as “skipped” without the user ever choosing to skip them is misleading and hard to audit.

Ask the user to select a scope before executing steps beyond build checks:

  • A) full (default): Foundation → Design system → UI/UX → Guardrails → Docs → Feature iteration → Deploy
  • B) deploy-only: Foundation (build + sanity) → Deploy only (no UI work, no guardrails/docs polish)
  • C) design-only: Design system + UI/UX plan only (no code changes)
  • D) feature-only: One feature iteration (plan + implementation), skip deploy

Rules:

  • Persist the chosen scope to context.json (add/update a scope field).
  • In tasks.md, do not mark a default step as “skipped” unless the user explicitly requested skipping it.

- Prefer: disabled (scope=...) with a short reason under a “Scope / Disabled steps” section

  • Any destructive action (e.g., force push overwriting an existing repo) is a high-risk side effect:

- Write an executable approval item under tasks.md first - Wait for explicit user confirmation before executing

0.25) Kickoff Clarification (Brainstorm-lite) (Recommended; required if goal is vague)

Problem this solves: people jump straight into “implement a feature” and end up with a very basic MVP that’s hard to demo.

Run this step if any of these are true:

  • proposal.md is missing clear acceptance criteria and non-goals
  • The user request is “build something like X” / “make a prototype” without specifying the core loop
  • The user explicitly wants a “demo-ready” prototype (animation, wow factor, shareable)

How:

  • Call workflow-brainstorm using the same repo_root + this run_dir.
  • Follow the one-question-at-a-time rule and converge on:

- the one core loop (1 sentence) - acceptance criteria (3–5 bullets) - non-goals (1–3 bullets) - constraints (timeline / risk preference) - a “demo moment” direction (see step 0.3)

  • Persist the confirmed spec to:

- evidence/YYYY-MM-DD-kickoff-design.md

  • Then update (merge, don’t overwrite) these inputs:

- proposal.md - context.json (ensure need_database/need_billing/need_deploy/need_seo are explicitly set)

0.3) Demo Moment First (Recommended for prototypes)

Principle: a prototype that feels real needs at least one “demo moment” (tastefully showy, not gimmicky).

Examples of “demo moment” (pick 1, keep it small):

  • A hero section with a live interactive preview (fake data is fine) + smooth, purposeful motion
  • A delightful micro-interaction: command palette, draggable cards, timeline scrubber, etc.
  • A “before/after” transformation animation (input → output) that makes the core loop obvious

Workflow:

  1. Write a small feature spec file (if it doesn’t exist):

- evidence/feature-00-demo-moment.md - Include mode: plan-only, feature_slug: demo-moment, and quality_bar: demo-ready

  1. Call workflow-feature-shipper to generate the plan only (no implementation yet).
  2. Defer actual UI implementation until after Step 2 (design-system.md exists), so the demo moment follows the chosen design system.

0.5) Dynamic Branch Decision (Required)

Dynamically adjust execution order based on context.json content:

  • Database integration: Only execute when context.json has "need_database": true
  • Payment integration: Only execute when context.json has "need_billing": true or "need_stripe": true
  • Auth: Only execute when context.json has "need_auth": true or "auth": true
  • Deployment: Only execute when context.json has "need_deploy": true or user explicitly requests deployment
  • SEO: Only execute when context.json has "need_seo": true or project is already live

Before starting each optional step:

  • Check context.json (and your chosen scope) to decide whether the step applies
  • If skipped, write a 1-line reason into tasks.md (so resume/audit doesn’t require chat history)

1) Foundation: Next.js Foundation (Default Required)

Open and follow: foundation.md.

Artifact requirements (minimum):

  • evidence/foundation.md (current state + risk assessment + chosen route)
  • tasks.md: add a Foundation checklist section (tasks + verification commands)
  • If upgrade/migration needed with significant changes: add an Approval item to tasks.md and wait for confirmation

Branch rules (important):

  • If conclusion is keep-current-stack (e.g., Vite static site), don't force continuing "Next.js-specific steps".

- Only continue steps that still apply to current stack: style (2), guardrails (3, adapted for current stack), docs (4), deploy (8 optional), SEO (9 optional) - If DB/payment integration still needed: First ask user "want to migrate to Next.js?", or add integration step for that stack (not in this chain's default scope)

2) Style Specification (Default Required)

Call tool-design-style-selector: Scan project intent and persist design-system.md.

Confirmation point: After user confirms style, deploy design-system.md, and enter 2.5 UI/UX Implementation (default required; if user explicitly skips, log reason).

2.5) UI/UX Implementation (Default Required)

Goal: Make design-system.md actually reflected in the interface, not "wrote spec but UI unchanged".

Recommended approach: Treat "redo UI/UX per design-system.md" as an independent feature and hand to workflow-feature-shipper:

  • Input: design-system.md (as sole design constraint) + current UI page list (from code scan)
  • Output: evidence/features/<feature_slug>-plan.md (scope/acceptance criteria/non-goals/risks/rollback) + code changes

Default enrichment (when installed):

  • If tool-ui-ux-pro-max is installed, use it to enrich the UI/UX plan with concrete palette/typography/UX guardrails, and use its pre-delivery checklist as acceptance criteria.
  • Only skip tool-ui-ux-pro-max enrichment if the user explicitly asks to skip it (e.g., “don’t over-design / keep it simple”), and log the reason.

For large-scale refactoring: add an Approval item to tasks.md first and wait for user confirmation before implementing.

3) Code Standards (Lightweight Required)

Open and follow: guardrails.md.

Artifact: tasks.md (Guardrails checklist section)

3.5) Trace Cleanup (De-branding & Source Hygiene) (Required if project was copied)

Problem this solves: many starter projects imported from Google AI Studio / v0 / Lovable ship with vendor branding, broken remnants (like importmap), and misleading README instructions.

Open and follow: cleanup-traces.md.

Artifacts:

  • evidence/trace-scan.md
  • tasks.md (Trace cleanup checklist section)

4) Documentation Standards (Lightweight Required)

Open and follow: docs-baseline.md.

Artifact: tasks.md (Docs checklist section, plus project README update)

5) Core Feature Development (Iterative Loop)

Call workflow-feature-shipper:

  • Each feature first produces evidence/features/<feature_slug>-plan.md (with acceptance criteria/non-goals)
  • Default split into PR-able small steps
  • After each batch (or before merge), recommend calling review-quality for a conclusive review + verdict
  • review-quality is the single entry point and will auto-triage: if React/Next.js performance risk is detected, it will also run review-react-best-practices (CRITICAL rules first)

Auth note (optional): if a feature includes login/session/permissions and tool-better-auth is installed, call it before implementation to lock down session strategy, redirects, cookies/CSRF, and middleware boundaries. Persist:

  • evidence/auth-plan.md
  • evidence/auth-summary.md

6) Database Integration (Optional)

Execution condition: context.json has "need_database": true or "database": "supabase"

Open and follow: supabase-integration.md.

7) Payment Integration (Optional)

Execution condition: context.json has "need_billing": true or "need_stripe": true or "payment": true

Open and follow: stripe-integration.md.

8) GitHub + Vercel Deployment (Optional but Recommended)

Execution condition: context.json has "need_deploy": true or "deploy_target" field exists and non-empty

Open and follow: deploy-vercel.md.

9) AI-Era SEO (Optional but Recommended)

Execution condition: context.json has "need_seo": true or "seo": true, or step 8 completed successfully (already deployed)

Open and follow: ai-seo-nextjs.md.

Final Delivery

Write to: final.md (in the run root), at minimum include:

  • Current project status (can run locally, can build, is deployed)
  • Completed steps and artifact paths
  • Next steps (prioritized by value)

And wrap up:

  • Update tasks.md status to done, and fill the Delivery summary
  • Run auto-archive after each batch (and at the end):

- python3 ~/.claude/skills/workflow-ship-faster/scripts/auto_archive.py --run-dir "<run_dir>"

  • If you want a clean workspace (without auto-archive): move active/<run_id>/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<run_id>/
  • Do a skill-evolution Evolution checkpoint (3 questions); if user chooses "want to optimize", run skill-improver based on this run_dir to produce minimal patch suggestions

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.95%
按下载量换算145

Claude

27.6%
按下载量换算108

Cursor

18.08%
按下载量换算71

Gemini CLI

9.88%
按下载量换算39

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills