Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

workflow-lite-execute工作流程精简版执行

Agent Skill

workflow-lite-execute 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

620

周安装

17

GitHub Stars

1,865

下载量

140
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:workflow-lite-execute(工作流程精简版执行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/catlog22/claude-code-workflow
仓库路径:skills/workflow-lite-execute
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/catlog22/claude-code-workflow --skill workflow-lite-execute
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/catlog22/claude-code-workflow --skill workflow-lite-execute

简介

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中整理协作事项。

  • 支持围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行信息组织与汇总,适用于精简执行场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限与维护状态。
  • 安装前建议核实是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • 可结合原始 README 进一步了解具体用法和功能边界。

SKILL.md

Workflow-Lite-Execute

Execution engine for workflow-lite-plan handoff and standalone task execution.


Usage

<input>                    Task description string, or path to file (required)
FlagDescription
--in-memoryMode 1: Use executionContext from workflow-lite-plan handoff (via Skill({skill: "workflow-lite-execute", args: "--in-memory"})

Input Modes

Mode 1: In-Memory Plan

Trigger: --in-memory flag or executionContext global variable available

Input Source: executionContext global variable set by workflow-lite-plan

Behavior: Skip execution method/code review selection (already chosen in LP-Phase 4), directly proceed with full context (exploration, clarifications, plan artifacts all available)

Note: LP-Phase 4 is the single confirmation gate. Mode 1 invocation means user already approved — no further prompts.

Mode 2: Prompt Description

Trigger: User calls with task description string (e.g., "Add unit tests for auth module")

Behavior: Store prompt as originalUserInput → create simple execution plan → run selectExecutionOptions() → proceed

Mode 3: File Content

Trigger: User calls with file path (ends with.md/.json/.txt)

fileContent = Read(filePath)
try {
  jsonData = JSON.parse(fileContent)
  // plan.json detection: two-layer format with task_ids[]
  if (jsonData.summary && jsonData.approach && jsonData.task_ids) {
    planObject = jsonData
    originalUserInput = jsonData.summary
    isPlanJson = true
    const planDir = filePath.replace(/[/\\][^/\\]+$/, '')
    planObject._loadedTasks = loadTaskFiles(planDir, jsonData.task_ids)
  } else {
    originalUserInput = fileContent
    isPlanJson = false
  }
} catch {
  originalUserInput = fileContent
  isPlanJson = false
}
  • isPlanJson === true: Use planObject directly → run selectExecutionOptions()
  • isPlanJson === false: Treat as prompt (same as Mode 2)

User Selection (Mode 2/3 shared)

function selectExecutionOptions() {
  // autoYes: set by -y flag (standalone only; Mode 1 never reaches here)
  const autoYes = workflowPreferences?.autoYes ?? false

  if (autoYes) {
    return { execution_method: "Auto", code_review_tool: "Skip", convergence_review_tool: "Skip" }
  }

  return AskUserQuestion({
    questions: [
      {
        question: "Select execution method:",
        header: "Execution",
        multiSelect: false,
        options: [
          { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" },
          { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" },
          { label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" }
        ]
      },
      {
        question: "Code review after execution? (runs here in lite-execute)",
        header: "Code Review",
        multiSelect: false,
        options: [
          { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI: git diff quality review" },
          { label: "Codex Review", description: "Codex CLI: git-aware code review (--mode review)" },
          { label: "Agent Review", description: "@code-reviewer agent" },
          { label: "Skip", description: "No code review" }
        ]
      },
      {
        question: "Convergence review in test-review phase?",
        header: "Convergence Review",
        multiSelect: false,
        options: [
          { label: "Agent", description: "Agent: verify convergence criteria" },
          { label: "Gemini", description: "Gemini CLI: convergence verification" },
          { label: "Codex", description: "Codex CLI: convergence verification" },
          { label: "Skip", description: "Skip convergence review, run tests only" }
        ]
      }
    ]
  })
}

Execution Steps

Step 1: Initialize & Echo Strategy

previousExecutionResults = []

// Mode 1: echo strategy for transparency
if (executionContext) {
  console.log(`
  Execution Strategy (from lite-plan):
   Method: ${executionContext.executionMethod}
   Code Review: ${executionContext.codeReviewTool}
   Convergence Review: ${executionContext.convergenceReviewTool}
   Tasks: ${getTasks(executionContext.planObject).length}
   Complexity: ${executionContext.planObject.complexity}
${executionContext.executorAssignments ? `   Assignments: ${JSON.stringify(executionContext.executorAssignments)}` : ''}
  `)
}

// Helper: load .task/*.json files (two-layer format)
function loadTaskFiles(planDir, taskIds) {
  return taskIds.map(id => JSON.parse(Read(`${planDir}/.task/${id}.json`)))
}
function getTasks(planObject) {
  return planObject._loadedTasks || []
}

Step 2: Task Grouping & Batch Creation

// Dependency extraction: explicit depends_on only (no file/keyword inference)
function extractDependencies(tasks) {
  const taskIdToIndex = {}
  tasks.forEach((t, i) => { taskIdToIndex[t.id] = i })
  return tasks.map((task, i) => {
    const deps = (task.depends_on || [])
      .map(depId => taskIdToIndex[depId])
      .filter(idx => idx !== undefined && idx < i)
    return { ...task, taskIndex: i, dependencies: deps }
  })
}

// Executor resolution: executorAssignments[taskId] > executionMethod > Auto fallback
function getTaskExecutor(task) {
  const assignments = executionContext?.executorAssignments || {}
  if (assignments[task.id]) return assignments[task.id].executor  // 'gemini' | 'codex' | 'agent'
  const method = executionContext?.executionMethod || 'Auto'
  if (method === 'Agent') return 'agent'
  if (method === 'Codex') return 'codex'
  return planObject.complexity === 'Low' ? 'agent' : 'codex'  // Auto fallback
}

function groupTasksByExecutor(tasks) {
  const groups = { gemini: [], codex: [], agent: [] }
  tasks.forEach(task => { groups[getTaskExecutor(task)].push(task) })
  return groups
}

// Batch creation: independent → per-executor parallel, dependent → sequential phases
function createExecutionCalls(tasks, executionMethod) {
  const tasksWithDeps = extractDependencies(tasks)
  const processed = new Set()
  const calls = []

  // Phase 1: Independent tasks → per-executor parallel batches
  const independentTasks = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => t.dependencies.length === 0)
  if (independentTasks.length > 0) {
    const executorGroups = groupTasksByExecutor(independentTasks)
    let parallelIndex = 1
    for (const [executor, tasks] of Object.entries(executorGroups)) {
      if (tasks.length === 0) continue
      tasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
      calls.push({
        method: executionMethod, executor, executionType: "parallel",
        groupId: `P${parallelIndex++}`,
        taskSummary: tasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '), tasks
      })
    }
  }

  // Phase 2+: Dependent tasks → respect dependency order
  let sequentialIndex = 1
  let remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
  while (remaining.length > 0) {
    let ready = remaining.filter(t => t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d)))
    if (ready.length === 0) { console.warn('Circular dependency detected, forcing remaining'); ready = [...remaining] }

    if (ready.length > 1) {
      const executorGroups = groupTasksByExecutor(ready)
      for (const [executor, tasks] of Object.entries(executorGroups)) {
        if (tasks.length === 0) continue
        tasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
        calls.push({
          method: executionMethod, executor, executionType: "parallel",
          groupId: `P${calls.length + 1}`,
          taskSummary: tasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '), tasks
        })
      }
    } else {
      ready.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
      calls.push({
        method: executionMethod, executor: getTaskExecutor(ready[0]),
        executionType: "sequential", groupId: `S${sequentialIndex++}`,
        taskSummary: ready[0].title, tasks: ready
      })
    }
    remaining = remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
  }
  return calls
}

executionCalls = createExecutionCalls(getTasks(planObject), executionMethod).map(c => ({ ...c, id: `[${c.groupId}]` }))

TodoWrite({
  todos: executionCalls.map((c, i) => ({
    content: `${c.executionType === "parallel" ? "⚡" : `→ [${i+1}/${executionCalls.filter(x=>x.executionType==="sequential").length}]`} ${c.id} [${c.executor}] ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}`,
    status: "pending",
    activeForm: `Waiting: ${c.tasks.length} task(s) via ${c.executor}`
  }))
})

Step 3: Launch Execution & Track Progress

CHECKPOINT: Verify Phase 2 execution protocol (Step 3-5) is in active memory. If only a summary remains, re-read phases/02-lite-execute.md now.

Batch Routing (by batch.executor field):

function executeBatch(batch) {
  const executor = batch.executor || getTaskExecutor(batch.tasks[0])
  const sessionId = executionContext?.session?.id || 'standalone'
  const fixedId = `${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}`

  if (executor === 'agent') {
    return Agent({ subagent_type: "code-developer", run_in_background: false,
      description: batch.taskSummary, prompt: buildExecutionPrompt(batch) })
  } else {
    // CLI execution (codex/gemini): background with fixed ID
    const tool = executor  // 'codex' | 'gemini'
    const mode = executor === 'gemini' ? 'analysis' : 'write'
    const previousCliId = batch.resumeFromCliId || null
    const cmd = previousCliId
      ? `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool ${tool} --mode ${mode} --id ${fixedId} --resume ${previousCliId}`
      : `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool ${tool} --mode ${mode} --id ${fixedId}`
    return Bash(cmd, { run_in_background: true })
    // STOP - wait for task hook callback
  }
}

Parallel execution rules:

  • Each batch = one independent CLI instance or Agent call
  • Parallel = multiple Bash(run_in_background=true) or multiple Agent() in single message
  • Never merge independent tasks into one CLI prompt
  • Agent: run_in_background=false, but multiple Agent() calls can be concurrent in single message

Execution Flow: Parallel batches concurrently → Sequential batches in order

const parallel = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "parallel")
const sequential = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "sequential")

// Phase 1: All parallel batches (single message, multiple tool calls)
if (parallel.length > 0) {
  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
    status: c.executionType === "parallel" ? "in_progress" : "pending",
    activeForm: c.executionType === "parallel" ? `Running [${c.executor}]: ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}` : `Blocked by parallel phase`
  })) })
  parallelResults = await Promise.all(parallel.map(c => executeBatch(c)))
  previousExecutionResults.push(...parallelResults)
  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
    status: parallel.includes(c) ? "completed" : "pending",
    activeForm: parallel.includes(c) ? `Done [${c.executor}]` : `Ready`
  })) })
}

// Phase 2: Sequential batches one by one
for (const call of sequential) {
  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
    status: c === call ? "in_progress" : (c.status === "completed" ? "completed" : "pending"),
    activeForm: c === call ? `Running [${c.executor}]: ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}` : undefined
  })) })
  result = await executeBatch(call)
  previousExecutionResults.push(result)
  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
    status: sequential.indexOf(c) <= sequential.indexOf(call) ? "completed" : "pending"
  })) })
}

Resume on Failure:

if (bash_result.status === 'failed' || bash_result.status === 'timeout') {
  // fixedId = `${sessionId}-${groupId}` (predictable, no auto-generated timestamps)
  console.log(`Execution incomplete. Resume: ccw cli -p "Continue" --resume ${fixedId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedId}-retry`)
  batch.resumeFromCliId = fixedId
}

Progress tracked at batch level. Icons: ⚡ parallel (concurrent), → sequential (one-by-one).

Unified Task Prompt Builder

Each task is a self-contained checklist. Same template for Agent and CLI.

function buildExecutionPrompt(batch) {
  const formatTask = (t) => `
## ${t.title}

**Scope**: \`${t.scope}\`  |  **Action**: ${t.action}

### Files
${(t.files || []).map(f => `- **${f.path}** → \`${f.target || ''}\`: ${f.change || (f.changes || []).join(', ') || ''}`).join('\n')}

${t.rationale ? `### Why this approach (Medium/High)
${t.rationale.chosen_approach}
${t.rationale.decision_factors?.length > 0 ? `Key factors: ${t.rationale.decision_factors.join(', ')}` : ''}
${t.rationale.tradeoffs ? `Tradeoffs: ${t.rationale.tradeoffs}` : ''}` : ''}

### How to do it
${t.description}
${t.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')}

${t.code_skeleton ? `### Code skeleton (High)
${t.code_skeleton.interfaces?.length > 0 ? `**Interfaces**: ${t.code_skeleton.interfaces.map(i => `\`${i.name}\` - ${i.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
${t.code_skeleton.key_functions?.length > 0 ? `**Functions**: ${t.code_skeleton.key_functions.map(f => `\`${f.signature}\` - ${f.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
${t.code_skeleton.classes?.length > 0 ? `**Classes**: ${t.code_skeleton.classes.map(c => `\`${c.name}\` - ${c.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}` : ''}

### Reference
- Pattern: ${t.reference?.pattern || 'N/A'}
- Files: ${t.reference?.files?.join(', ') || 'N/A'}
${t.reference?.examples ? `- Notes: ${t.reference.examples}` : ''}

${t.risks?.length > 0 ? `### Risk mitigations (High)
${t.risks.map(r => `- ${r.description} → **${r.mitigation}**`).join('\n')}` : ''}

### Done when
${(t.convergence?.criteria || []).map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')}
${(t.test?.success_metrics || []).length > 0 ? `**Success metrics**: ${t.test.success_metrics.join(', ')}` : ''}`

  const sections = []
  if (originalUserInput) sections.push(`## Goal\n${originalUserInput}`)
  sections.push(`## Tasks\n${batch.tasks.map(formatTask).join('\n\n---\n')}`)

  const context = []
  if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0)
    context.push(`### Previous Work\n${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `- ${r.tasksSummary}: ${r.status}`).join('\n')}`)
  if (clarificationContext)
    context.push(`### Clarifications\n${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- ${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}`)
  if (executionContext?.planObject?.data_flow?.diagram)
    context.push(`### Data Flow\n${executionContext.planObject.data_flow.diagram}`)
  if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan)
    context.push(`### Artifacts\nPlan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`)
  context.push(`### Project Guidelines\n(Loaded via ccw spec load --category planning)`)
  if (context.length > 0) sections.push(`## Context\n${context.join('\n\n')}`)

  sections.push(`Complete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.`)
  return sections.join('\n\n')
}

Step 4: Code Review

Skip if: codeReviewTool === 'Skip'

Resolve review tool: From executionContext.codeReviewTool (Mode 1) or userSelection.code_review_tool (Mode 2/3).

const codeReviewTool = executionContext?.codeReviewTool || userSelection?.code_review_tool || 'Skip'
const resolvedTool = (() => {
  if (!codeReviewTool || codeReviewTool === 'Skip') return 'skip'
  if (/gemini/i.test(codeReviewTool)) return 'gemini'
  if (/codex/i.test(codeReviewTool)) return 'codex'
  return 'agent'
})()

if (resolvedTool === 'skip') {
  console.log('[Code Review] Skipped')
} else {
  // proceed with review
}

Agent Code Review (resolvedTool === 'agent'):

Agent({
  subagent_type: "code-reviewer",
  run_in_background: false,
  description: `Code review: ${planObject.summary}`,
  prompt: `## Code Review — Post-Execution Quality Check

**Goal**: ${originalUserInput}
**Plan Summary**: ${planObject.summary}

### Changed Files
Run \`git diff --name-only HEAD~${getTasks(planObject).length}..HEAD\` to identify changes.

### Review Focus
1. **Code quality**: Readability, naming, structure, dead code
2. **Correctness**: Logic errors, off-by-one, null handling, edge cases
3. **Patterns**: Consistency with existing codebase conventions
4. **Security**: Injection, XSS, auth bypass, secrets exposure
5. **Performance**: Unnecessary loops, N+1 queries, missing indexes

### Instructions
1. Run git diff to see actual changes
2. Read changed files for full context
3. For each issue found: severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low) + file:line + description + fix suggestion
4. Return structured review: issues[], summary, overall verdict (PASS/WARN/FAIL)`
})

CLI Code Review — Codex (resolvedTool === 'codex'):

const reviewId = `${sessionId}-code-review`
Bash(`ccw cli -p "Review code changes for quality, correctness, security, and pattern compliance. Focus: ${planObject.summary}" --tool codex --mode review --id ${reviewId}`, { run_in_background: true })
// STOP - wait for hook callback

CLI Code Review — Gemini (resolvedTool === 'gemini'):

const reviewId = `${sessionId}-code-review`
Bash(`ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Post-execution code quality review for: ${planObject.summary}
TASK: • Run git diff to identify all changes • Review each changed file for quality, correctness, security • Check pattern compliance with existing codebase • Identify potential bugs, edge cases, performance issues
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: lite-execute completed, reviewing code quality
EXPECTED: Per-file review with severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low), file:line references, fix suggestions, overall verdict
CONSTRAINTS: Read-only | Focus on code quality not convergence" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-review-code-quality --id ${reviewId}`, { run_in_background: true })
// STOP - wait for hook callback

Write review artifact (if session folder exists):

if (executionContext?.session?.folder) {
  Write(`${executionContext.session.folder}/code-review.md`, codeReviewOutput)
}

Step 5: Chain to Test Review & Post-Completion

Resolve convergence review tool: From executionContext.convergenceReviewTool (Mode 1) or userSelection.convergence_review_tool (Mode 2/3).

function resolveConvergenceTool(ctx, selection) {
  const raw = ctx?.convergenceReviewTool || selection?.convergence_review_tool || 'skip'
  if (!raw || raw === 'Skip') return 'skip'
  if (/gemini/i.test(raw)) return 'gemini'
  if (/codex/i.test(raw)) return 'codex'
  return 'agent'
}

Build testReviewContext and handoff:

testReviewContext = {
  planObject: planObject,
  taskFiles: executionContext?.taskFiles
    || getTasks(planObject).map(t => ({ id: t.id, path: `${executionContext?.session?.folder}/.task/${t.id}.json` })),
  convergenceReviewTool: resolveConvergenceTool(executionContext, userSelection),
  executionResults: previousExecutionResults,
  originalUserInput: originalUserInput,
  session: executionContext?.session || {
    id: 'standalone',
    folder: executionContext?.session?.folder || '.',
    artifacts: { plan: null, task_dir: null }
  }
}

// Chain to lite-test-review (Mode 1: In-Memory)
Skill("lite-test-review")
// testReviewContext passed as global variable

After test-review returns: Ask user whether to expand into issues (enhance/refactor/doc). Selected items call /issue:new "{summary} - {dimension}".

Error Handling

ErrorResolution
Missing executionContext"No execution context found. Only available when called by lite-plan."
File not found"File not found: {path}. Check file path."
Empty file"File is empty: {path}. Provide task description."
Invalid plan JSONWarning: "Missing required fields. Treating as plain text."
Malformed JSONTreat as plain text (expected for non-JSON files)
Execution failureUse fixed ID ${sessionId}-${groupId} for resume
Execution timeoutUse fixed ID for resume with extended timeout
Codex unavailableShow installation instructions, offer Agent execution
Fixed ID not foundCheck ccw cli history, verify date directories

Data Structures

executionContext (Input - Mode 1)

{
  planObject: {
    summary: string,
    approach: string,
    task_ids: string[],
    task_count: number,
    _loadedTasks: [...],        // populated at runtime from .task/*.json
    estimated_time: string,
    recommended_execution: string,
    complexity: string
  },
  taskFiles: [{id: string, path: string}] | null,
  explorationsContext: {...} | null,
  explorationAngles: string[],
  explorationManifest: {...} | null,
  clarificationContext: {...} | null,
  executionMethod: "Agent" | "Codex" | "Auto",
  codeReviewTool: "Skip" | "Gemini Review" | "Codex Review" | "Agent Review",
  convergenceReviewTool: "Skip" | "Agent" | "Gemini" | "Codex",
  originalUserInput: string,
  executorAssignments: {            // per-task override, priority over executionMethod
    [taskId]: { executor: "gemini" | "codex" | "agent", reason: string }
  },
  session: {
    id: string,                     // {taskSlug}-{shortTimestamp}
    folder: string,                 // .workflow/.lite-plan/{session-id}
    artifacts: {
      explorations: [{angle, path}],
      explorations_manifest: string,
      plan: string                  // always present
    }
  }
}

executionResult (Output)

{
  executionId: string,              // e.g., "[Agent-1]", "[Codex-1]"
  status: "completed" | "partial" | "failed",
  tasksSummary: string,
  completionSummary: string,
  keyOutputs: string,
  notes: string,
  fixedCliId: string | null         // for resume: ccw cli detail ${fixedCliId}
}
// Appended to previousExecutionResults[] for context continuity

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.6%
按下载量换算50

Claude

31.03%
按下载量换算43

Cursor

20.24%
按下载量换算28

Gemini CLI

10.16%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills