Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

wordpress-live-validation(WordPress live validation 搜索)

wordpress-live-validation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

wordpress-live-validation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 65,612。

总安装 279周安装 8GitHub Stars 353下载 65核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:wordpress-live-validation(WordPress live validation 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/notque/claude-code-toolkit
仓库路径:skills/wordpress-live-validation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/notque/claude-code-toolkit --skill wordpress-live-validation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/notque/claude-code-toolkit --skill wordpress-live-validation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

WordPress live validation 搜索聚焦表单校验、AJAX 响应和前端交互验证逻辑。适用于注册、登录和支付等关键流程的安全性与可用性检查。返回常见验证规则示例和错误消息本地化方案,加速开发进度。不能替代后端 sanitization,必须同时在服务端实施双重验证机制。

建议在 Chrome DevTools 中模拟网络延迟,测试极端情况下的用户体验。

来源仓库内路径:skills/wordpress-live-validation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/notque/claude-code-toolkit --skill wordpress-l…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

wordpress-live-validation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/notque/claude-code-toolkit --skill wordpress-live-valida…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

wordpress-live-validation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

wordpress-live-validation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

wordpress-live-validation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

wordpress-live-validation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 279 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 65 次,GitHub 353 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

wordpress-live-validation 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
wordpress-live-validation

WordPress live validation 搜索 · 本页

279353操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

WordPress Live Validation Skill

Overview

This skill loads a real WordPress post in a Playwright headless browser and verifies that what readers see matches what was uploaded. The browser is the source of truth -- REST API success does not guarantee correct rendering.

Browser backend selection: Playwright MCP (default) is used for automated validation and CI/CD. Use Chrome DevTools MCP when the user explicitly asks to "check in my browser" or "debug live", or when the task involves Lighthouse audits or performance profiling.

Instructions

Constraints (Always Applied)

  1. Read-Only Observation Only: Never click, type, fill forms, or modify anything on the WordPress site. This is observation-only validation—any write action risks mutating published content.
  2. Evidence-Based Reporting: Every check result must reference a concrete artifact (DOM value, network response, screenshot path). "Looks fine" is not acceptable. Report what the browser shows, not assumptions.
  3. Non-Blocking Reports: Failed validation produces a report but does not revert the upload or block the pipeline. The user decides how to act on findings.
  4. Severity Classification (enforce strictly):

- BLOCKER: Readers see broken content (missing title, broken images, placeholder text, wrong H1) - WARNING: Degraded quality but functional (missing OG tags, JS errors, responsive overflow) - INFO: Informational only (rendered values without comparison baseline) - Never inflate or deflate—alert fatigue and hidden problems are equal harms.

  1. Browser Availability: Requires either Playwright MCP or Chrome DevTools MCP. If neither is available, exit in Phase 1 with a skip report. Do not retry.
  2. Default Behaviors (ON):

- Run all check categories (content integrity, SEO/social, responsive) - Test three breakpoints: mobile (375px), tablet (768px), desktop (1440px) - Save screenshots at each breakpoint as evidence - Exclude known benign console patterns: ad networks (doubleclick, googlesyndication), analytics (gtag, fbevents), consent managers (cookiebot, onetrust) - Try content selectors in order: article → .entry-content → .post-content → main

  1. Optional Behaviors (OFF unless enabled):

- Draft preview mode (requires authenticated WordPress session) - Custom content selector override - Strict mode (treat all WARNINGs as BLOCKERs) - OG image fetch verification (navigates to og:image URL to check 200 response)

  1. Input Requirements:

- WordPress post URL (from wordpress-uploader, direct user input, or {WORDPRESS_SITE}/?p={post_id}&preview=true) - Optional: expected title (for title match comparison) - Optional: expected H2 count (for structure comparison) - Optional: custom content selector


Phase 1: NAVIGATE

Goal: Load the WordPress post and confirm the content area is present.

Step 1: Verify browser MCP availability

Before any browser operation, test Playwright tools are accessible. If unavailable, exit with skip report immediately rather than failing later.

Step 2: Navigate to the post URL

Use browser_navigate with a full HTTPS URL.

Step 3: Wait for content area

Use browser_wait_for with the content selector. Try selectors in order:

  1. article (most WordPress themes)
  2. .entry-content (classic themes)
  3. .post-content (premium themes)
  4. main (fallback)

Use custom selector if provided.

Step 4: Remove cookie/consent banners (if present)

Use browser_evaluate to remove visual overlays (DOM removal only—does not interact with tracking):

// Common cookie banner selectors
const banners = document.querySelectorAll(
  '[class*="cookie"], [class*="consent"], [id*="cookie"], [id*="consent"], .gdpr-banner'
);
banners.forEach(b => b.remove());

GATE: Page loaded with HTTP 200 (or 30x redirect to 200), content selector found. If 4xx/5xx or no selector found: capture screenshot, report FAIL with HTTP status, STOP. Do not proceed to Phase 2.


Phase 2: VALIDATE

Goal: Inspect rendered DOM and network activity for content integrity and SEO completeness. Run all checks without stopping on individual failures.

Check 1: Title Match (Severity: BLOCKER)

Extract the rendered title:

const titleEl = document.querySelector('h1, .entry-title, .post-title');
titleEl ? titleEl.textContent.trim() : null;

If expected title provided: compare (case-insensitive, trimmed). PASS if match, BLOCKER if differ or no title found. If no expected title: report rendered title as INFO.

Check 2: H2 Structure (Severity: WARNING)

Extract all H2s:

const h2s = Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('h2')).map(h => h.textContent.trim());
JSON.stringify(h2s);

If expected count provided: compare. PASS if match, WARNING if differ. Always report rendered H2 texts for inspection.

Check 3: Image Loading (Severity: BLOCKER)

Use browser_network_requests. Filter image URLs (common extensions or image MIME types). Check response status:

  • 2xx: loaded successfully
  • 4xx/5xx: BLOCKER (broken for readers)

Report total, loaded, and failed counts with URLs of failures.

Check 4: JavaScript Console Errors (Severity: WARNING)

Use browser_console_messages. Filter to error level. Exclude patterns:

  • Ad networks: doubleclick, googlesyndication, adsbygoogle
  • Analytics: gtag, analytics, fbevents
  • Consent: cookiebot, onetrust, quantcast
  • Browser extensions

Report count of genuine errors and their messages.

Check 5: OG Tags (Severity: WARNING)

Extract OG and social meta tags:

const getMeta = (sel) => {
  const el = document.querySelector(sel);
  return el ? el.getAttribute('content') : null;
};
JSON.stringify({
  'og:title': getMeta('meta[property="og:title"]'),
  'og:description': getMeta('meta[property="og:description"]'),
  'og:image': getMeta('meta[property="og:image"]'),
  'og:url': getMeta('meta[property="og:url"]'),
  'twitter:card': getMeta('meta[name="twitter:card"]')
});

Mark WARNING for missing tags. Report each tag's value and character count.

Check 6: Meta Description (Severity: WARNING)

const desc = document.querySelector('meta[name="description"]');
desc ? desc.getAttribute('content') : null;

PASS if present and non-empty, WARNING if missing or empty. Report value and character count.

Check 7: Placeholder/Draft Text (Severity: BLOCKER)

Search visible text for patterns:

const body = document.body.innerText;
const patterns = ['[TBD]', '[TODO]', 'PLACEHOLDER', 'Lorem ipsum', '[insert', '[FIXME]'];
const found = patterns.filter(p => body.toLowerCase().includes(p.toLowerCase()));
JSON.stringify(found);

Mark BLOCKER if any found, PASS if none.

GATE: All 7 checks executed, each with severity and evidence. Proceed to Phase 3.


Phase 3: RESPONSIVE CHECK

Goal: Verify rendering at three standard breakpoints. Capture visual evidence.

Test each viewport in sequence:

ViewportWidthHeightRepresents
Mobile375812iPhone-class
Tablet7681024iPad-class
Desktop1440900Standard laptop

For each viewport:

Step 1: Use browser_resize to set dimensions.

Step 2: Use browser_take_screenshot to capture. Save to known path.

Step 3: Check for horizontal overflow:

document.documentElement.scrollWidth > document.documentElement.clientWidth;

Mark WARNING if overflow detected—content extends beyond viewport (usually tables, images, or code blocks not responsive).

Step 4: Verify content container visibility:

const content = document.querySelector('article, .entry-content, .post-content, main');
if (content) {
  const rect = content.getBoundingClientRect();
  JSON.stringify({ visible: rect.width > 0 && rect.height > 0, width: rect.width, height: rect.height });
} else {
  JSON.stringify({ visible: false });
}

Mark WARNING if container not visible or zero dimensions at any breakpoint.

GATE: Screenshots captured at all three viewports. Overflow and visibility recorded. Proceed to Phase 4.


Phase 4: REPORT

Goal: Produce structured pass/fail report with severity counts and evidence artifacts.

Step 1: Classify results from Phase 2 and 3. Count BLOCKERs, WARNINGs, INFOs.

Step 2: Generate report:

===============================================================
 LIVE VALIDATION: {post_url}
===============================================================

 CONTENT INTEGRITY:
   [{status}] Title match: "{rendered_title}" vs "{uploaded_title}"
   [{status}] H2 structure: {rendered_count} rendered / {source_count} expected
   [{status}] Images: {loaded}/{total} loaded, {failed} failed
   [{status}] JS errors: {count} errors detected
   [{status}] Placeholder text: {found_patterns or "none"}

 SEO / SOCIAL:
   [{status}] og:title: "{value}" ({chars} chars)
   [{status}] og:description: "{value}" ({chars} chars)
   [{status}] og:image: {url}
   [{status}] og:url: {url}
   [{status}] twitter:card: {value}
   [{status}] meta description: "{value}" ({chars} chars)

 RESPONSIVE:
   [{status}] Mobile (375px): overflow: {yes/no} — screenshot: {path}
   [{status}] Tablet (768px): overflow: {yes/no} — screenshot: {path}
   [{status}] Desktop (1440px): overflow: {yes/no} — screenshot: {path}

===============================================================
 RESULT: {PASS | FAIL - N blockers, M warnings}
===============================================================

 Screenshots:
   - {mobile_screenshot_path}
   - {tablet_screenshot_path}
   - {desktop_screenshot_path}

Status markers:

  • [PASS] = check passed
  • [FAIL] = BLOCKER severity
  • [WARN] = WARNING severity
  • [INFO] = informational
  • [SKIP] = check could not be performed

Result classification:

  • PASS: Zero BLOCKERs. WARNINGs may be present but do not constitute failure.
  • FAIL: One or more BLOCKERs. List all blockers after result line.

GATE: Report generated with accurate severity counts. Screenshots saved. Result matches blocker tally.


Integration with wordpress-uploader

When invoked after wordpress-uploader, this skill acts as an optional Phase 5: POST-PUBLISH VALIDATION. The wordpress-uploader output provides:

  • post_url – the navigation target
  • post_id – for constructing draft preview URLs ({WORDPRESS_SITE}/?p={post_id}&preview=true)
  • The --title value or extracted H1 – the expected title for comparison

The validation is non-blocking by default: a FAIL result produces a report for the user but does not revert the upload. The user decides whether to act on findings.

Example integration flow:

wordpress-uploader Phase 4 completes
  -> post_url = "https://example.com/my-post/"
  -> post_title = "My Post Title"
  -> invoke wordpress-live-validation with post_url and expected title
  -> report generated
  -> user reviews and decides next action

Examples

Example 1: Post-Upload Validation

User says: "Upload this article and check if it looks right"

  1. wordpress-uploader creates the post, returns post_url
  2. NAVIGATE: Load post_url, wait for content area
  3. VALIDATE: Run all 7 checks
  4. RESPONSIVE: Screenshots at 375/768/1440px
  5. REPORT: Structured output with pass/fail and screenshots

Example 2: Standalone Live Check

User says: "Check if https://your-blog.com/posts/my-latest/ looks right"

  1. NAVIGATE: Load the URL
  2. VALIDATE: All checks run without expected title/H2 (reports rendered values as INFO)
  3. RESPONSIVE: Screenshots at all breakpoints
  4. REPORT: Structured output

Example 3: OG Tag Verification

User says: "Check the OG tags on my latest post"

  1. NAVIGATE: Load the URL
  2. VALIDATE: Full check suite (user focuses on SEO/SOCIAL section)
  3. RESPONSIVE: Run for completeness
  4. REPORT: Full report

Error Handling

Error: Playwright MCP Not Available

Cause: Playwright MCP server not running or not configured Solution:

  1. Detect in Phase 1 when first browser tool call fails
  2. Exit with skip report: "Playwright MCP not available. Skipping live validation."
  3. Do not retry—browser validation requires Playwright

Error: Page Returns 4xx/5xx

Cause: Wrong URL, post deleted, or WordPress down Solution:

  1. Capture screenshot of what browser shows
  2. Report HTTP status code
  3. STOP at Phase 1 gate—do not proceed to validation
  4. If draft preview URL, suggest checking that post exists and is accessible

Error: Content Selector Not Found

Cause: Theme uses non-standard content container, or page loaded but content empty Solution:

  1. Selector chain (article →.entry-content →.post-content → main) covers most themes
  2. If none match: capture screenshot and DOM snapshot
  3. Report FAIL with suggestion: "Content area not found. Try specifying a custom selector."
  4. Still attempt Phase 2 checks against full page (OG tags work without content selector)

Error: Network Timeout on Image Checks

Cause: CDN slow, images resolve but download slowly, intermittent network issues Solution:

  1. browser_network_requests reports what browser observed—timeout images appear as failed
  2. If all images fail: likely network issue rather than broken content
  3. Report failure with pattern note: "All {N} images failed—possible network/CDN issue rather than broken content"

Error: Cookie Banner Blocks Content

Cause: GDPR/consent overlay covers content Solution:

  1. Phase 1 Step 4 attempts DOM removal of common banners
  2. If banner persists (non-standard selector): screenshots may show overlay
  3. DOM-level checks (title, H2s, OG tags) still work—they query elements directly
  4. Note in report if consent overlay detected but not dismissed

References

For detailed check specifications and Playwright tool usage:

Complementary Skills

平台分布

Codex

39.81%
按下载量换算26

Claude

27.05%
按下载量换算18

Cursor

17.09%
按下载量换算11

Gemini CLI

10.13%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills