Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

wolf-howl(狼嚎)

wolf-howl 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

wolf-howl 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 27,299。

总安装 3,411周安装 138GitHub Stars 75下载 1,071核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:wolf-howl(狼嚎)
来源仓库:https://github.com/senpi-ai/senpi-skills
仓库路径:skills/wolf-howl
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/senpi-ai/senpi-skills --skill wolf-howl
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/senpi-ai/senpi-skills --skill wolf-howl

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

wolf-howl 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持关键词匹配。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件操作。

注意该技能当前无底部简介,实际能力依赖仓库内实现。

来源仓库内路径:skills/wolf-howl

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/senpi-ai/senpi-skills --skill wolf-howl;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

wolf-howl 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/senpi-ai/senpi-skills --skill wolf-howl。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

wolf-howl 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

wolf-howl 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

wolf-howl 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

wolf-howl 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,411 次,近一周安装 138 次,下载 1,071 次,GitHub 75 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

wolf-howl 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
wolf-howl

狼嚎 · 本页

3,41175调用外部服务未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

HOWL v2 — Hunt, Optimize, Win, Learn

The WOLF hunts all day. At night, it HOWLs — reviewing every kill and miss, sharpening its instincts, and waking up sharper tomorrow.

Automated daily retrospective with data-driven self-improvement suggestions for the WOLF strategy.


Setup

Run the setup script to configure the nightly HOWL:

python3 scripts/howl-setup.py --wallet {WALLET} --chat-id {CHAT_ID}

The agent already knows wallet and chat ID — it just needs to create the cron. Optionally set run time (default: 23:55 local) and timezone.


How It Works

The cron fires daily and spawns an isolated sub-agent that:

1. Gathers Data

  • Reads memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md (today + yesterday)
  • Reads MEMORY.md for cumulative context
  • Reads all dsl-state-WOLF-*.json files (active = current positions, inactive = closed trades)
  • Reads wolf-strategy.json for current config
  • Reads wolf-trade-counter.json for FDR data (v5.1+)
  • Queries Senpi trade history via mcporter
  • Reads scanner script for current filter thresholds

2. Analyzes Each Closed Trade

For every trade: asset, direction, entry/exit price, PnL (gross and net), ROE, fees paid, duration, max ROE (high water), DSL tier reached, entry signal type and quality (reason count, rank jump, contrib velocity, trader count), SM conviction at entry vs exit, close trigger (DSL breach/Phase 1 auto-cut/stagnation/conviction collapse/rotation/manual).

3. Computes Metrics

Core:

  • Win rate, avg winner vs avg loser PnL, profit factor (gross AND net)
  • Total fees paid, fee drag ratio (fees / account value)
  • Net PnL vs gross PnL — if gross is positive but net is negative, fees are the problem

Signal Quality:

  • Signal quality correlation (do higher reason counts → better outcomes?)
  • FIRST_JUMP vs IMMEDIATE_MOVER vs DEEP_CLIMBER win rates
  • Entry rank vs outcome — are entries from rank #20-30 better than #10-20?

DSL Performance:

  • Tier distribution (how many reached Tier 1/2/3/4 vs Phase 1 closes?)
  • Phase 1 auto-cut count and savings (what would they have lost without the cut?)

Holding Period Buckets (v2 — critical):

  • < 30 min: count, win rate, PnL, fees (expect: poor — rotations and panic cuts)
  • 30-90 min: count, win rate, PnL, fees (expect: sweet spot)
  • 90+ min: count, win rate, PnL, fees (expect: dead weight)

Direction Analysis (v2):

  • LONG win rate, PnL, profit factor
  • SHORT win rate, PnL, profit factor
  • Flag if one direction is dramatically worse (regime mismatch)

Other:

  • Slot utilization (% time filled vs empty)
  • Dead weight duration (how long losers sat before cut)
  • Missed opportunities (top movers we didn't trade)
  • Rotation count and net cost (fees paid for rotation trades)

4. Identifies Patterns

  • Entry patterns distinguishing winners from losers
  • DSL effectiveness (too tight? too loose?)
  • Stagnation thresholds (cutting dead weight fast enough?)
  • Scanner filter accuracy (catching right signals?)
  • Position sizing optimization
  • Timing patterns
  • Fee drag pattern (v2): Is the agent overtrading? How many trades before FDR hits 10%?
  • Holding period pattern (v2): Are short-hold trades systematically worse?
  • Direction bias (v2): Is the agent fighting the trend? LONGs in a selloff = disaster.
  • Monster trades (v2): Did a few big winners save the day? How many trades produced 80% of PnL?

5. Produces Report

Saves full report to memory/howl-YYYY-MM-DD.md with:

  • Summary stats (trades, win rate, gross PnL, net PnL, fees, FDR, profit factor gross/net)
  • Trade log table
  • Holding period buckets breakdown
  • Direction breakdown (LONG vs SHORT)
  • What worked / what didn't (data-backed)
  • Pattern insights
  • Recommended improvements (high/medium/low confidence)
  • Config change suggestions

6. Updates Memory & Delivers

  • Appends distilled summary to MEMORY.md
  • Sends concise Telegram summary to user
  • Drift check (v2): If 3+ consecutive HOWLs suggest the same change, escalate urgency in the report

Report Format

See references/report-template.md for the exact output format.


v2 Analysis Additions

These were discovered by running HOWL v1 on live WOLF v5 trading data and finding blind spots:

Fee Drag Ratio Analysis

The single biggest insight from the first HOWL: fees ate an entire profitable day. 32 trades × $32 avg = $1,034 in fees (18.3% of account). Gross PnL was +$888, but net was -$146. HOWL must compute and prominently display FDR alongside PnL. If gross PF > 1.0 but net PF < 1.0, the recommendation is fewer, higher-quality trades — not better entries.

Holding Period Buckets

Trades bucketed by hold time revealed that < 30 min trades were systematically terrible (-$705 combined) while 60-90 min trades were the sweet spot (+$704, 57% WR). HOWL must bucket every trade and flag if < 30 min trades are negative contributors.

Direction Regime Detection

4W/12L on LONGs (25% WR, PF 0.05) vs profitable SHORTs. HOWL must split metrics by direction and flag when one side is dramatically underperforming — this indicates a regime mismatch (trading LONGs in a selloff).

Monster Trade Dependency

3 Tier 4 trades produced +$1,443 while everything else combined was -$556. HOWL must identify what % of PnL came from top N trades and whether the strategy would survive without them.

Rotation Cost Tracking

Each rotation costs ~$65 (close fee + open fee). HOWL must track rotation count, total rotation cost, and whether rotations produced net positive outcomes.


Rules

  • Every recommendation must be backed by data from the last 24h
  • Don't change things that are working — if win rate is high, don't fix what isn't broken
  • Small incremental improvements > big overhauls
  • If < 3 trades in 24h, still analyze "why so few?" — don't just skip. Was the FDR gate locked? Was the market dead? Were signals filtered too aggressively?
  • Compare today vs cumulative stats to spot trends
  • Be brutally honest — no sugarcoating losses
  • Always separate gross vs net. A "profitable" strategy that loses money after fees is not profitable.
  • Flag regime mismatches early. If LONGs are 0-for-5, say "stop taking LONGs" — don't wait for 0-for-12.

Customization

Edit references/analysis-prompt.md to adjust what the sub-agent analyzes. The prompt is read by the sub-agent at runtime, so changes take effect on the next HOWL without restarting crons.


Files

FilePurpose
scripts/howl-setup.pySetup wizard — creates the nightly HOWL cron
references/analysis-prompt.mdFull sub-agent analysis prompt (editable)
references/report-template.mdOutput report format

License

MIT — Built by Senpi (https://senpi.ai). Source: https://github.com/Senpi-ai/senpi-skills

平台分布

Codex

36.71%
按下载量换算393

Claude

31.38%
按下载量换算336

Cursor

18.95%
按下载量换算203

Gemini CLI

9.88%
按下载量换算106

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills