Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

market-research市场研究

Agent Skill

market-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

329

周安装

14

GitHub Stars

168

下载量

115
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:market-research(市场研究)
来源仓库:https://github.com/whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/market-research
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills --skill market-research
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills --skill market-research

简介

market-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适用于根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果的场景。
  • 支持在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 等宿主中使用。
  • 安装时需注意权限范围和是否触发外部网络请求。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Market Research & Competitive Analysis

Markets matter more than ideas. This skill helps you evaluate whether your market is worth entering — and how to validate demand before you build.

Core Principles

  • A mediocre product in a great market beats a brilliant product in a dead one.
  • All market sizing is wrong. The goal is order-of-magnitude clarity, not decimal precision.
  • Competitors are evidence that demand exists. Zero competitors is a warning sign, not an advantage.
  • The best solo-founder markets have high pain, fragmented incumbents, and willingness to pay — not the biggest TAM.
  • Research is only useful if it changes a decision. Every analysis should end with a clear recommendation.

Early Validation: Before You Build Anything

Finding Your First 10 People to Talk To

Before doing market sizing, validate that real people have this problem.

Method 1: Cold Outreach (Fastest — 1-2 weeks)

  • LinkedIn: Search for your ICP's job title → send connection request with a note
  • Twitter/X: Search hashtags related to the problem → DM active posters
  • Reddit: Find niche subreddits → comment helpfully → DM engaged users
  • Email: Find company websites of target customers → reach out to founders/decision-makers

Cold outreach template:

Subject: Quick question about [problem area]

Hi [Name],

I'm researching how [ICP role] handles [specific problem]. I noticed you [signal that they have this problem — e.g., posted about it, work in relevant role, use a competing tool].

Would you be open to a 15-minute call this week? I'm not selling anything — just trying to understand the problem better before I build a solution.

Happy to share what I learn from the research as a thank you.

[Your name]

Method 2: Communities (Higher quality — 2-4 weeks)

  • Indie Hackers: Search for threads where your ICP discusses the problem
  • Facebook Groups: Search for niche groups (e.g., "Freelance Copywriters", "SaaS Founders")
  • Slack communities: Industry-specific channels, FounderPath, etc.
  • Discord: More engaged than most channels for technical audiences

Method 3: Landing Page Test (Lowest effort — 2-3 weeks)

  1. Build a simple landing page describing the problem you solve (use Lovable or Claude Code)
  2. Drive 100-200 visits via communities, social posts, or $100-200 in ads
  3. Measure: Signups / Visitors = interest rate
  4. Below 5% signup rate → positioning is unclear or demand is weak

After 5 Conversations, Ask Yourself

  • Did 3+ people independently describe the same pain? → Demand likely real
  • Would they pay? Did anyone name a price unprompted? → Market likely exists
  • Do they already use 2+ workarounds? → Problem is acute
  • Did you learn something that surprised you? → Explore it in conversations 6-10

Decision threshold:

  • 3+ people confirm the problem AND 2+ say they'd pay → proceed to market sizing and build
  • Mixed signals after 10 conversations → either pivot your hypothesis or try a different ICP segment
  • Nobody cares after 10 conversations → this isn't a real problem. Pick a different idea.

Avoiding Analysis Paralysis

5 conversations reveal 80% of what you need to know. The other 20% you learn by building and shipping. Don't wait for certainty — it never comes.


Market Sizing (Napkin Math That Matters)

Tell AI:

Help me size the market for my SaaS idea:
- Product: [what it does]
- Target customer: [who — job title, company size, industry]
- Problem it solves: [the pain point]

Do a bottom-up calculation:
1. Estimate how many potential buyers exist (use industry data, LinkedIn job title counts)
2. Multiply by a realistic price point for this type of tool
3. Apply a 1-3% capture rate for a new entrant
4. Tell me: does this math support a solo-founder business ($200K-500K ARR)?

Bottom-Up (The Only Method That Matters for Solo Founders)

1. How many potential buyers exist?
   [Industry size] × [% that match your ICP]
   Example: 500,000 US marketing agencies × 12% that are 5-20 person = 60,000

2. What will each pay annually?
   [Price point] × [12 months]
   Example: $49/month × 12 = $588/year

3. Realistic addressable market:
   [Buyers] × [Annual price] × [Capture rate]
   Example: 60,000 × $588 × 2% = $705,600/year achievable

4. Sanity check: Does that number fund the business you want?
   Solo founder needs $200K-$500K ARR to replace income + reinvest.
   If max realistic capture is $100K, the market is too small.

Top-Down (Sanity Check Only)

TAM = Total market revenue (all possible buyers globally)
SAM = Segment you can serve (geography, vertical, size)
SOM = What you can realistically capture in 3 years

Rule of thumb: SOM is 1-5% of SAM for a new entrant.
If SOM doesn't fund your business, stop here.

Volume Estimation Sources

  • Government data: Census Bureau, BLS (industry counts)
  • Industry reports: IBISWorld, Statista (skim free summaries)
  • LinkedIn: Search ICP job titles → count results
  • Job boards: Volume of relevant roles = proxy for market size
  • Competitor traffic: SimilarWeb free tier → estimate active users
  • Subreddits/communities: Member counts = demand signal

Competitive Analysis

Tell AI:

Analyze the competitive landscape for my product:
- My product: [what it does]
- My target customer: [who]
- Known competitors: [list any you know, or "not sure"]

For each competitor, find: pricing, target audience, strengths, weaknesses
(check G2/Capterra reviews for complaints). Then build a 2x2 positioning
matrix showing where I could differentiate.

Substitute Mapping

Every product competes with four types:

  1. Direct competitors — Same solution, same audience (Basecamp vs. Asana)
  2. Indirect competitors — Different solution, same problem (spreadsheets vs. project tool)
  3. DIY / manual process — They do it by hand (Post-its, email threads)
  4. Do nothing — They tolerate the pain (this is your real enemy)

Competitor Research Template

For each direct competitor:

## [Competitor Name]

**What they do**: One sentence.
**Target audience**: Who they sell to.
**Pricing**: Tiers and price points.
**Strengths**: 2-3 things they do well.
**Weaknesses**: 2-3 gaps, complaints, or underserved areas.
**Positioning**: Homepage headline — how they describe themselves.
**Traffic/Scale**: Monthly visits (SimilarWeb), review count (G2/Capterra).

### Where You Win
What specific thing will you do 10x better?

Research Sources

  • Pricing: Visit their pricing page. Screenshot it.
  • Positioning: Read their homepage headline and subheadline.
  • Weaknesses: G2, Capterra, Product Hunt, Reddit threads, Twitter complaints.
  • Traffic: SimilarWeb (free tier).
  • Features: Their docs/changelog reveal what they've built and haven't.
  • Hiring: Job postings reveal strategic direction.

Competitive Positioning Matrix

Build a 2×2 matrix with the two dimensions your ICP cares most about:

Example axes:
  X: Simple ←————→ Powerful
  Y: Cheap  ←————→ Premium

Plot competitors on this grid. Find the empty quadrant. That's your positioning opportunity.

Solo-Founder Market Fit Assessment

Score each criterion 1-5. Minimum viable total: 25/40.

CriterionScoreNotes
Pain intensity — Hair-on-fire problem?/55 = actively searching for a fix
Willingness to pay — Already pay for substitutes?/55 = pay $50+/mo for something worse
Reachable audience — Can you find and contact them?/55 = concentrated in known communities
Fragmented competition — No dominant monopoly?/55 = many small players, no clear winner
Small enough for solo — Can one person serve this?/55 = low support burden, self-serve viable
Recurring need — Will they use it monthly?/55 = daily/weekly active use
Your unfair advantage — Domain expertise or distribution?/55 = deep insider knowledge
Technical feasibility — Build core in 4-8 weeks?/55 = well-understood, no R&D needed

Scoring:

  • 35-40: Exceptional fit. Move fast.
  • 25-34: Viable. Validate the weak spots.
  • Below 25: Reconsider. Weak markets kill good products.

Distribution Vector Analysis

ChannelCost to TestTime to SignalScalable?
Cold outreach$0 (time only)2-4 weeksSomewhat
Communities$0 (time only)1-3 monthsSomewhat
Paid search$200-5001-2 weeksYes (if CAC works)
SEO / Content$0 (time only)3-6 monthsYes
Directories$0-2001-2 monthsYes (passive)
Partnerships$0 (time only)2-6 monthsYes

Rule: Pick the ONE channel you can test in <30 days with <$500. Prove it works before diversifying.


Buyer Leverage Check

Confirm your ICP can actually buy:

  1. Controls budget? If they need 3 levels of approval, you lose.
  2. Below "just expense it" threshold? ($50-100/mo for individuals, $500-1K for teams)
  3. Can adopt without IT? Self-serve SaaS with optional SSO wins.
  4. Low switching cost? If migration takes weeks, adoption stalls.
  5. One person gets value alone? Network effects help growth but hurt initial adoption.

All five should be "yes" for a solo-founder SaaS.


Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Analysis paralysis — researching for months instead of shipping5 conversations + napkin math. Then build.
Inflating TAM to feel good ("it's a $10B market!")Bottom-up only. TAM is a vanity metric for solo founders.
Ignoring "do nothing" as a competitorMost of your market tolerates the pain. Your real competition is inertia.
Researching the wrong ICPTalk to the person who writes the check, not the person who has the problem.
Only talking to people who confirm your ideaSeek disconfirming evidence. Ask "why wouldn't you use this?"
Skipping competitive pricing researchVisit every competitor's pricing page. Screenshot them. This is your anchor.

Related Skills

  • validate — Test demand after market research confirms opportunity
  • customer-research — Go deeper with customer interviews and personas
  • prioritize — Use market research to prioritize what to build
  • pricing — Use competitive analysis to inform pricing decisions

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.32%
按下载量换算41

Claude

29.31%
按下载量换算34

Cursor

18.88%
按下载量换算22

Gemini CLI

9.24%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills