Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

customer-research(客户研究)

customer-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

customer-research 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 64,698。

总安装 294周安装 12GitHub Stars 167下载 94核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:customer-research(客户研究)
来源仓库:https://github.com/whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/customer-research
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills --skill customer-research
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills --skill customer-research

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

customer-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,避免触发联网或命令执行。

建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/customer-research

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills --skill customer…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

customer-research 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills --skill customer-research。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

customer-research 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

customer-research 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

customer-research 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

customer-research 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 294 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 94 次,GitHub 167 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

customer-research 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
customer-research

客户研究 · 本页

294167只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Customer Research & Personas

Personas based on demographics are useless. Personas based on behaviors, goals, and constraints drive decisions. This skill helps you run interviews, apply Jobs-to-be-Done, and build personas that actually inform your product.

Core Principles

  • Personas based on demographics are useless. "34-year-old male marketer" tells you nothing about product design.
  • Personas based on behaviors, goals, and constraints drive decisions.
  • The goal of research is to discover what users DO, not what they SAY they want.
  • Five good interviews reveal 80% of usability issues.
  • Jobs-to-be-Done > traditional personas for SaaS product decisions.

Jobs-to-be-Done Framework

A "job" is the progress a user is trying to make in a specific circumstance.

Job statement format: "When I [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [desired outcome]."

Examples:

  • "When I'm preparing for a board meeting, I want to pull together our key metrics quickly, so I can spend my time on the narrative, not the data."
  • "When a new developer joins our team, I want to get them productive on day one, so I can maintain our shipping velocity."

Discover jobs by asking:

  1. "Walk me through the last time you [did the thing]."
  2. "What were you trying to accomplish?"
  3. "What did you try first? What happened?"
  4. "What was frustrating about that?"
  5. "What would 'good enough' look like?"
  6. "What would 'amazing' look like?"

Behavioral Persona Template

## [Persona Name] — [One-line role description]

### Behavioral Segment
What behavior defines this group? (e.g., "Uses the product daily for team
coordination" or "Evaluates tools quarterly for the team")

### Primary Job
[Job statement in JTBD format]

### Context
- Role and responsibilities (relevant to product usage)
- Team size and structure
- Tools they use alongside yours
- Technical sophistication level
- Decision-making authority (buyer, influencer, user)

### Current Workflow (without your product)
Step-by-step: How do they accomplish this job today?
Where are the friction points?

### Key Pain Points
1. [Specific, observed pain — not assumed]
2. [Another specific pain]
3. [Another specific pain]

### Success Criteria
How do they measure whether the job is done well?
What would make them say "this is working"?

### Objections / Barriers to Adoption
What would prevent them from trying or buying?

### Trigger Events
What circumstances push them to seek a new solution?
(Team growth, tool sunset, new mandate, frustration peak)

User Interview Guide

Before the interview:

  • Define your learning goal: What decision will this inform?
  • Recruit based on behavior, not demographics.
  • 5-8 interviews per persona segment is usually sufficient.

Opening (2 min): "Thanks for joining. I'm trying to understand how people [do X]. There are no right answers — I'm learning from your experience. Can I ask you some questions about how you currently handle [topic]?"

Core questions (25 min):

  1. "Tell me about your role. What does a typical week look like?"
  2. "When was the last time you [relevant task]? Walk me through it."
  3. "What tools do you use for this? How did you end up with those?"
  4. "What's the most frustrating part of this process?"
  5. "If you could wave a magic wand and fix one thing, what would it be?"
  6. "Have you tried other solutions? What happened?"
  7. "Who else is involved in this process?"
  8. "How do you decide when to invest in a new tool for this?"

Closing (3 min): "Is there anything about [topic] I should have asked but didn't?" "Would you be open to trying an early version and giving feedback?"

When You ARE the Persona

If you're building for your own profession, you have a unique advantage and a unique blind spot.

The advantage: You understand the pain deeply. You don't need to "discover" the problem — you've lived it.

The blind spot: You assume everyone does the job the way you do. They don't. After 20 years, your workflow is optimized. A 3-year practitioner's workflow is different. A solo practitioner's is different from someone at a large firm.

How to correct for this:

  • Interview people at different experience levels (junior, mid, senior)
  • Interview people at different organization sizes (solo, small firm, large firm)
  • When they describe their process and it's different from yours, don't correct them. That's data.
  • Ask: "What tools do you actually use?" — not "Would you use a tool that does X?"
  • The question isn't "Do I have this pain?" — it's "Do enough OTHER people have it, and will they pay?"

Interview Analysis

After interviews, synthesize:

  1. Common patterns: What did 3+ people say independently?
  2. Surprising insights: What contradicted your assumptions?
  3. Exact quotes: Capture the user's words, not your interpretation.
  4. Pain intensity: Rate each pain point (annoying vs. hair-on-fire).
  5. Willingness to pay: Would they pay to solve this? How much?

Turning Research into Action

Research is only valuable if it changes decisions:

  • Feature prioritization: "Persona A's #1 pain is X, which maps to feature Y."
  • Messaging: Use their exact words in marketing copy.
  • Onboarding: Design the first-run experience around their primary job.
  • Pricing: Align tiers with persona segments.
  • Roadmap: Sequence features by persona priority.

Capture Your ICP: Create MY-ICP.md

Research is useful in the moment. MY-ICP.md makes it useful forever. This file captures who your customer is so every other skill — landing pages, ads, email, pricing copy — can use their language instead of your marketing language.

When to create it

  • After completing interviews and synthesizing findings
  • After building behavioral personas above
  • Or right now, if you're a domain expert who already knows your customer deeply

Quick capture for domain experts

If you ARE your customer (or were recently), you can skip interviews and write this directly. But be honest about your blind spots — the "When You ARE the Persona" section above still applies.

Describe your ideal customer. Be specific about who they are, what frustrates them, what they're trying to accomplish, how they make buying decisions, and what words they actually use when talking about this problem. If you have multiple customer types, describe each one — start with your primary.

After interviews

Pull from your Interview Analysis above:

  • Exact quotes become the "Their Language" section
  • Common patterns become "Their Pain" and "Their Goals"
  • Pain intensity informs priority within sections

MY-ICP.md template

# My Ideal Customer Profile

## Primary ICP: [Name or label — e.g., "Solo Consultants" or "Marketing Managers at Series A startups"]

### Who They Are
[Role, company size, experience level, relevant demographics.
Not a persona — specific enough that you could find them on LinkedIn.]

### Their Pain
[Primary problems, current workarounds, what frustrates them.
Use THEIR words, not your marketing language.
Example: "I spend 3 hours every Monday pulling reports from 4 different tools"
not "inefficient multi-platform reporting workflows."]

### Their Goals
[What success looks like to them. What they're trying to achieve.
The outcome they'd pay for, in their framing.]

### How They Buy
[Decision process — do they decide alone or need approval?
Common objections. Price sensitivity. What triggers a purchase.
What makes them say no.]

### Their Language
[Actual words and phrases they use to describe the problem.
Pull directly from interviews, Reddit posts, reviews, support tickets.
This section is gold for landing pages, ads, and email subject lines.]

### Where They Are
[Communities, publications, events, Slack groups, subreddits, LinkedIn groups.
Where you can reach them. Where they go for advice.]

---

## Secondary ICP: [Name or label] (if applicable)

[Same sections as above. Only add a secondary if the audiences are
genuinely distinct — different roles, different pains, different language.
If they're similar, one profile is fine.]

What makes a good MY-ICP.md

  • Their words, not yours. "I waste hours on reporting" not "streamline analytics workflows."
  • Specific enough to find them. "Marketing managers at B2B SaaS companies with 20-100 employees" not "marketers."
  • Pain described with intensity. "Hair-on-fire: broken onboarding causes 40% of trials to churn in 3 days" not "onboarding could be improved."
  • Multiple ICPs only if truly distinct. Don't split into 5 segments. Most early-stage products have 1-2.

Related Skills

  • about-me — Creates ABOUT-ME.md, the companion file. MY-ICP.md is who your customer is. ABOUT-ME.md is who you are. Together they let skills personalize both message and voice.
  • validate — Validate demand before building (uses similar interview techniques)
  • prioritize — Turn research insights into feature prioritization
  • copywriting — Use customer language (from MY-ICP.md) in your marketing copy
  • landing-page — Uses MY-ICP.md "Their Language" and "Their Pain" sections for copy
  • feedback — Ongoing feedback collection after launch

平台分布

Codex

35.84%
按下载量换算34

Claude

27.73%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

18.86%
按下载量换算18

Gemini CLI

9.79%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills