Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

web-mocks-msw(网络模拟城市生活垃圾)

web-mocks-msw 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

web-mocks-msw 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 19,422。

总安装 272周安装 11GitHub Stars 5下载 85核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:web-mocks-msw(网络模拟城市生活垃圾)
来源仓库:https://github.com/agents-inc/skills
仓库路径:skills/web-mocks-msw
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/agents-inc/skills --skill web-mocks-msw
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/agents-inc/skills --skill web-mocks-msw

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 等代码协作信息。适合在需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。通过 GitHub 仓库安装,支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 等宿主。安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或命令执行。

web-mocks-msw 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/web-mocks-msw

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/agents-inc/skills --skill web-mocks-msw;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

web-mocks-msw 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/agents-inc/skills --skill web-mocks-msw。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

web-mocks-msw 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

web-mocks-msw 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

web-mocks-msw 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

web-mocks-msw 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 272 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 85 次,GitHub 5 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

web-mocks-msw 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
web-mocks-msw

网络模拟城市生活垃圾 · 本页

2725操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

API Mocking with MSW

Quick Guide: Handlers with variant switching (default, empty, error). Shared between browser (dev) and Node (tests). Separate mock data from handlers for reusability. Type-safe using your API's generated types. Use setupWorker (browser) and setupServer (Node) -- never swap them.

Detailed Resources:

  • examples/core.md - Mock data, variant handlers, server worker, per-test overrides, runtime switching, network simulation
  • examples/browser.md - Browser worker setup, SPA/SSR integration
  • reference.md - Decision frameworks, red flags, anti-patterns

<critical_requirements>

CRITICAL: Before Using This Skill

(You MUST separate mock data from handlers - handlers in handlers/, data in mocks/)

(You MUST use setupWorker for browser/development and setupServer for Node/tests - NEVER swap them)

(You MUST reset handlers after each test with server.resetHandlers() in afterEach)

(You MUST use named constants for HTTP status codes and delays - NO magic numbers)

</critical_requirements>


Auto-detection: MSW, msw, mock handlers, mock data, API mocking, setupWorker, setupServer, http.get, HttpResponse

When to use:

  • Mocking API responses during development before backend is ready
  • Testing different API scenarios (success, empty, error states)
  • Sharing the same mock definitions between browser dev and Node test environments
  • Simulating network conditions (latency, timeouts)
  • Per-test handler overrides for isolated test scenarios

When NOT to use:

  • Integration tests needing real backend validation (use a test database)
  • Production builds (MSW should never ship to production)
  • Pure function unit tests with no network calls
  • Testing actual network failure modes (use test containers)

Key patterns covered:

  • Handler/data separation for reusability and type safety
  • Variant-based handlers (default, empty, error scenarios)
  • Browser worker for development, server worker for tests
  • Per-test handler overrides with server.use()
  • Runtime variant switching for UI development

Philosophy

MSW intercepts network requests at the service worker (browser) or class extension (Node) level, providing realistic API mocking without changing application code. Keep mock data separate from handlers for reusability, type handlers against your generated API types, and organize handlers by domain/feature.


Core Patterns

Pattern 1: Separate Mock Data from Handlers

Define mock data as typed constants separate from MSW handlers. This enables type safety from your generated API types and reusability across handlers.

// mocks/features.ts
import type { GetFeaturesResponse } from "./api-types";

export const defaultFeatures: GetFeaturesResponse = {
  features: [
    { id: "1", name: "Dark mode", status: "done" },
    { id: "2", name: "Auth", status: "in progress" },
  ],
};

export const emptyFeatures: GetFeaturesResponse = { features: [] };

For full variant handler examples, see examples/core.md.

When not to use: When mock data is truly one-off and specific to a single test case (use inline data in the test instead).


Pattern 2: Handlers with Variant Switching

Create handlers that support multiple response scenarios (default, empty, error) with runtime switching for development and explicit overrides for testing.

import { http, HttpResponse } from "msw";

const API_ENDPOINT = "api/v1/features";
const HTTP_STATUS_OK = 200;
const HTTP_STATUS_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR = 500;

export const getFeaturesHandlers = {
  defaultHandler: () =>
    http.get(API_ENDPOINT, () =>
      HttpResponse.json(defaultFeatures, { status: HTTP_STATUS_OK }),
    ),
  emptyHandler: () =>
    http.get(API_ENDPOINT, () =>
      HttpResponse.json(emptyFeatures, { status: HTTP_STATUS_OK }),
    ),
  errorHandler: () =>
    http.get(
      API_ENDPOINT,
      () =>
        new HttpResponse("Server error", {
          status: HTTP_STATUS_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR,
        }),
    ),
};

For full implementation with runtime switching, see examples/core.md.


Pattern 3: Browser Worker (Development) vs Server Worker (Tests)

  • Use setupWorker from msw/browser for browser/development
  • Use setupServer from msw/node for Node/tests
  • Never swap them -- setupWorker needs service worker APIs, setupServer needs Node APIs
// browser-worker.ts
import { setupWorker } from "msw/browser";
export const browserWorker = setupWorker(...handlers);

// server-worker.ts
import { setupServer } from "msw/node";
export const server = setupServer(...handlers);

For browser app integration (SPA and SSR), see examples/browser.md.


Pattern 4: Test Lifecycle

Always follow this lifecycle to prevent test pollution:

beforeAll(() => server.listen());
afterEach(() => server.resetHandlers());
afterAll(() => server.close());

Use server.use() for per-test overrides -- they are automatically cleaned up by resetHandlers().

For per-test override examples, see examples/core.md.


<red_flags>

RED FLAGS

  • ❌ Using setupWorker in Node tests or setupServer in browser -- wrong API for environment causes cryptic failures
  • ❌ Not resetting handlers between tests (afterEach(() => server.resetHandlers())) -- causes test pollution
  • ❌ Mixing handlers and mock data in same file -- reduces reusability and type safety
  • ❌ Missing await when starting browser worker before render -- race conditions cause intermittent failures
  • ⚠️ Only testing happy path (no empty/error variants) -- incomplete coverage
  • ⚠️ No onUnhandledRequest configuration -- unclear which requests are mocked vs real

Gotchas & Edge Cases:

  • delay() with no arguments is automatically negated in Node.js -- use explicit duration if you need delay in tests
  • Handler overrides via server.use() persist until resetHandlers() -- they do NOT auto-reset between tests
  • http.all() matches any HTTP method on a path -- convenient but can mask bugs if overused
  • Dynamic imports are required for browser worker in SSR frameworks to avoid server bundling issues

See reference.md for detailed anti-pattern examples.

</red_flags>


<critical_reminders>

CRITICAL REMINDERS

(You MUST separate mock data from handlers - handlers in handlers/, data in mocks/)

(You MUST use setupWorker for browser/development and setupServer for Node/tests - NEVER swap them)

(You MUST reset handlers after each test with server.resetHandlers() in afterEach)

(You MUST use named constants for HTTP status codes and delays - NO magic numbers)

Failure to follow these rules will cause test pollution, environment-specific failures, and hard-to-debug race conditions.

</critical_reminders>

平台分布

Codex

37.43%
按下载量换算32

Claude

32.33%
按下载量换算27

Cursor

17.12%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

9.1%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills