Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

security-audit(安全审计)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

security-audit 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 12,499。

总安装 1,248周安装 51GitHub Stars 14下载 404核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:security-audit(安全审计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework
仓库路径:skills/security-audit
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill security-audit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill security-audit

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

security-audit 用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和常见漏洞排查。适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险或分析鉴权逻辑。使用时不能将工具输出直接当作最终结论,需人工复核关键操作。涉及密钥、令牌或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限和操作边界。当前无更多功能说明,建议查阅来源仓库获取详细使用指南。

来源仓库内路径:skills/security-audit

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill securit…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

security-audit 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework --skill security-audit。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

security-audit 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

security-audit 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

security-audit 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

security-audit 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,248 次,近一周安装 51 次,下载 404 次,GitHub 14 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

security-audit 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
security-audit

安全审计 · 本页

1,24814接触敏感数据未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

security-audit

Description: Security requirements validation, vulnerability assessment, and compliance checking

Category: Security & Compliance

Complexity: High (multi-layer security analysis)


Purpose

Ensure security requirements are properly defined, implemented, and tested. Identify vulnerabilities across code, dependencies, infrastructure, and configurations. Validate compliance with security standards and best practices.


Capabilities

1. Security Requirements Validation

  • Validate security requirements from REQ documents
  • Check completeness of security specifications
  • Verify authentication/authorization requirements
  • Validate data protection requirements
  • Check encryption specifications

2. Code Security Scanning

  • SAST (Static Application Security Testing): bandit, semgrep
  • Dependency scanning: safety, pip-audit
  • Secret detection: detect-secrets, gitleaks
  • SQL injection detection: Pattern matching
  • XSS vulnerability detection: Input validation analysis
  • CSRF protection: Token validation checking

3. Infrastructure Security

  • IaC security scanning: checkov, tfsec
  • Container security: trivy, grype
  • Kubernetes security: kubesec, kube-bench
  • Cloud configuration: AWS Security Hub, Azure Security Center
  • Network security: Firewall rules, security groups

4. Dependency Vulnerability Assessment

  • Known CVE detection
  • License compliance
  • Outdated package identification
  • Transitive dependency analysis
  • Vulnerability severity scoring (CVSS)

5. Authentication & Authorization

  • JWT implementation validation
  • Password policy enforcement
  • Session management review
  • OAuth/OIDC configuration
  • Role-based access control (RBAC)

6. Data Protection

  • Encryption at rest validation
  • Encryption in transit (TLS/SSL)
  • PII/sensitive data handling
  • Data retention policies
  • Backup security

7. Compliance Checking

  • OWASP Top 10 coverage
  • CWE mapping
  • GDPR compliance (data protection)
  • HIPAA compliance (healthcare)
  • SOC 2 requirements
  • PCI DSS (payment card data)

8. Threat Modeling

  • STRIDE analysis
  • Attack surface mapping
  • Data flow diagrams
  • Trust boundary identification
  • Threat scenario generation

Security Audit Workflow

graph TD
    A[Security Audit] --> B[Requirements Analysis]
    B --> C{Security REQs Complete?}
    C -->|No| D[Flag Missing Requirements]
    C -->|Yes| E[Code Security Scan]

    E --> F[SAST Analysis]
    F --> G[Dependency Scan]
    G --> H[Secret Detection]

    H --> I{Critical Issues?}
    I -->|Yes| J[Block Deployment]
    I -->|No| K[Infrastructure Scan]

    K --> L[IaC Security]
    L --> M[Container Security]
    M --> N[Cloud Config Review]

    N --> O{Security Violations?}
    O -->|Yes| P[Generate Remediation Plan]
    O -->|No| Q[Compliance Check]

    Q --> R{Compliant?}
    R -->|No| S[Flag Compliance Gaps]
    R -->|Yes| T[Threat Modeling]

    T --> U[Identify Threats]
    U --> V[Risk Assessment]
    V --> W[Generate Security Report]

    D --> W
    J --> W
    P --> W
    S --> W

Usage Instructions

Comprehensive Security Audit

security-audit full-audit \
  --requirements reqs/ \
  --code src/ \
  --infrastructure infrastructure/ \
  --output reports/security/

Output:

=== Security Audit Report ===
Date: 2025-01-15
Scope: Full system audit

Overall Security Score: 72/100 (Acceptable)

CRITICAL ISSUES (2):
1. [CWE-89] SQL Injection vulnerability
   - File: src/api/users.py:145
   - Description: Direct string concatenation in SQL query
   - CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical)
   - Fix: Use parameterized queries
   - Status: BLOCKS DEPLOYMENT ❌

2. [CWE-798] Hardcoded credentials
   - File: src/config.py:23
   - Description: Database password hardcoded in source
   - CVSS Score: 9.1 (Critical)
   - Fix: Use environment variables or secrets manager
   - Status: BLOCKS DEPLOYMENT ❌

HIGH SEVERITY (5):
3. [CWE-200] Information exposure
   - File: src/api/error_handler.py:67
   - Description: Stack traces exposed in API responses
   - CVSS Score: 7.5 (High)
   - Fix: Return generic error messages in production

4. [CVE-2023-12345] Vulnerable dependency
   - Package: requests==2.25.0
   - Vulnerability: Authentication bypass
   - CVSS Score: 8.2 (High)
   - Fix: Upgrade to requests>=2.31.0

5. [CWE-352] Missing CSRF protection
   - File: src/api/forms.py
   - Description: No CSRF tokens on state-changing operations
   - CVSS Score: 8.8 (High)
   - Fix: Implement CSRF token validation

6. [CWE-862] Missing authorization
   - File: src/api/admin.py:89
   - Description: Admin endpoint lacks authorization check
   - CVSS Score: 7.5 (High)
   - Fix: Add @require_admin decorator

7. [Container] Running as root
   - File: Dockerfile:15
   - Description: Container runs with root privileges
   - CVSS Score: 7.0 (High)
   - Fix: Create and use non-root user

MEDIUM SEVERITY (12):
... (abbreviated)

LOW SEVERITY (23):
... (abbreviated)

COMPLIANCE STATUS:
✓ OWASP Top 10: 8/10 covered
✗ SQL Injection: Not protected (A03:2021)
✗ Broken Access Control: Partial (A01:2021)
✓ Encryption: TLS 1.3 enforced
✓ Authentication: JWT properly implemented
⚠ Authorization: Missing in 3 endpoints

RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Fix 2 critical issues immediately (block deployment)
2. Upgrade vulnerable dependencies
3. Implement CSRF protection
4. Add authorization checks to all admin endpoints
5. Review and fix information exposure
6. Container security hardening

NEXT STEPS:
1. Create remediation tickets for all HIGH+ issues
2. Schedule dependency updates
3. Conduct penetration testing after fixes
4. Re-audit in 2 weeks

Requirements Security Validation

security-audit requirements \
  --input reqs/security_requirements.md \
  --output reports/security/req-validation.json

Output:

{
  "summary": {
    "total_security_requirements": 45,
    "complete": 38,
    "incomplete": 7,
    "coverage_percentage": 84
  },
  "missing_requirements": [
    {
      "category": "Authentication",
      "requirement": "Multi-factor authentication",
      "severity": "high",
      "recommendation": "Add REQ-AUTH-MFA for critical operations"
    },
    {
      "category": "Encryption",
      "requirement": "Encryption key rotation policy",
      "severity": "medium",
      "recommendation": "Define key rotation schedule in REQ-ENC-*"
    }
  ],
  "incomplete_requirements": [
    {
      "id": "REQ-AUTH-01",
      "issue": "No password complexity specification",
      "current": "Password must be secure",
      "recommended": "Password: 8-128 chars, uppercase, lowercase, digit, special"
    }
  ]
}

Dependency Vulnerability Scan

security-audit dependencies \
  --requirements requirements.txt \
  --output reports/security/dependencies.json

Output:

{
  "total_packages": 87,
  "vulnerable_packages": 5,
  "vulnerabilities": [
    {
      "package": "requests",
      "installed_version": "2.25.0",
      "vulnerability": "CVE-2023-32681",
      "severity": "high",
      "cvss_score": 8.2,
      "description": "Proxy-Authorization header leak on cross-origin redirect",
      "fixed_in": "2.31.0",
      "recommended_action": "pip install --upgrade requests>=2.31.0"
    },
    {
      "package": "pillow",
      "installed_version": "9.0.0",
      "vulnerability": "CVE-2023-44271",
      "severity": "critical",
      "cvss_score": 9.8,
      "description": "Arbitrary code execution via crafted image",
      "fixed_in": "9.3.0",
      "recommended_action": "pip install --upgrade pillow>=9.3.0"
    }
  ],
  "license_issues": [
    {
      "package": "some-package",
      "license": "GPL-3.0",
      "issue": "Copyleft license may conflict with proprietary code",
      "recommendation": "Review license compatibility"
    }
  ]
}

Secret Detection

security-audit secrets --path . --output reports/security/secrets.json

Output:

{
  "secrets_found": 4,
  "files_scanned": 234,
  "secrets": [
    {
      "type": "AWS Access Key",
      "file": "scripts/deploy.sh",
      "line": 15,
      "matched_text": "AKIA...",
      "entropy": 4.5,
      "confidence": "high",
      "recommendation": "Move to AWS Secrets Manager or environment variable"
    },
    {
      "type": "Private Key",
      "file": "config/ssl/private.key",
      "line": 1,
      "matched_text": "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----",
      "confidence": "high",
      "recommendation": "Remove from Git, use secrets manager"
    },
    {
      "type": "Database Password",
      "file": "src/config.py",
      "line": 23,
      "matched_text": "password = 'SuperSecret123'",
      "confidence": "high",
      "recommendation": "Use environment variables or secrets manager"
    }
  ]
}

Security Categories

OWASP Top 10 (2021)

  1. A01:2021 - Broken Access Control

- Check: Authorization on all sensitive endpoints - Validate: User cannot access unauthorized resources - Test: Privilege escalation attempts

  1. A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures

- Check: TLS 1.2+ for data in transit - Validate: Encryption at rest for sensitive data - Test: Weak cipher detection

  1. A03:2021 - Injection

- Check: SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries) - Validate: Input validation and sanitization - Test: Command injection, XSS, LDAP injection

  1. A04:2021 - Insecure Design

- Check: Threat modeling performed - Validate: Security controls in design - Test: Business logic vulnerabilities

  1. A05:2021 - Security Misconfiguration

- Check: Default credentials changed - Validate: Unnecessary features disabled - Test: Information disclosure through errors

  1. A06:2021 - Vulnerable Components

- Check: Dependencies up to date - Validate: No known CVEs in dependencies - Test: Transitive dependency vulnerabilities

  1. A07:2021 - Authentication Failures

- Check: Strong password policy - Validate: Session management secure - Test: Brute force protection

  1. A08:2021 - Software and Data Integrity

- Check: Code signing - Validate: Integrity checks on updates - Test: Supply chain attacks

  1. A09:2021 - Security Logging Failures

- Check: Security events logged - Validate: Logs tamper-proof - Test: Log injection prevention

  1. A10:2021 - Server-Side Request Forgery

- Check: URL validation - Validate: Whitelist approach for external requests - Test: SSRF attack attempts


Security Testing

Authentication Testing

# Test: Weak password allowed
def test_weak_password_rejected():
    result = register_user(username="test", password="123")
    assert result.error == "Password too weak"

# Test: JWT token validation
def test_invalid_jwt_rejected():
    response = api_call(headers={"Authorization": "Bearer invalid_token"})
    assert response.status_code == 401

# Test: Session expiration
def test_session_expires():
    token = login_user()
    time.sleep(3600)  # Wait 1 hour
    response = api_call(headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"})
    assert response.status_code == 401

Authorization Testing

# Test: User cannot access admin endpoint
def test_user_cannot_access_admin():
    user_token = login_as_user()
    response = api_call("/admin", headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {user_token}"})
    assert response.status_code == 403

# Test: User cannot access other user's data
def test_user_data_isolation():
    user1_token = login_as_user("user1")
    response = api_call("/users/user2/profile", headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {user1_token}"})
    assert response.status_code == 403

Injection Testing

# Test: SQL injection prevented
def test_sql_injection_prevented():
    malicious_input = "admin' OR '1'='1"
    result = get_user(username=malicious_input)
    assert result is None  # Should not return admin user

# Test: XSS prevented
def test_xss_prevented():
    malicious_script = "<script>alert('XSS')</script>"
    response = create_comment(text=malicious_script)
    assert "<script>" not in response.html
    assert "<script>" in response.html  # Properly escaped

Threat Modeling (STRIDE)

STRIDE Analysis Template

## Threat Model: {Component Name}

### Spoofing
- Threat: Attacker impersonates legitimate user
- Mitigation: JWT with strong signing algorithm (RS256)
- Status: ✓ Implemented

### Tampering
- Threat: Request/response modification in transit
- Mitigation: TLS 1.3 for all communications
- Status: ✓ Implemented

### Repudiation
- Threat: User denies performing action
- Mitigation: Audit logging of all state-changing operations
- Status: ⚠ Partial (missing for some admin actions)

### Information Disclosure
- Threat: Sensitive data exposed in logs/errors
- Mitigation: Sanitize logs, generic error messages
- Status: ❌ Not implemented

### Denial of Service
- Threat: Resource exhaustion through API abuse
- Mitigation: Rate limiting, input validation
- Status: ✓ Implemented

### Elevation of Privilege
- Threat: User gains unauthorized permissions
- Mitigation: RBAC, authorization checks on all endpoints
- Status: ⚠ Partial (missing checks on 3 endpoints)

Compliance Checklists

GDPR Compliance

- [ ] Data minimization implemented
- [ ] User consent mechanism
- [ ] Right to access (data export)
- [ ] Right to erasure (data deletion)
- [ ] Right to portability
- [ ] Data breach notification process
- [ ] Privacy policy published
- [ ] Data protection impact assessment
- [ ] Encryption for personal data
- [ ] Data retention policies defined

OWASP ASVS (Level 2)

Authentication:
- [x] V2.1.1: Password length 8-128 characters
- [x] V2.1.2: Password complexity requirements
- [x] V2.1.3: No password reuse (last 3)
- [ ] V2.1.11: MFA for sensitive operations

Session Management:
- [x] V3.2.1: Session tokens use secure random generator
- [x] V3.2.2: Session token entropy ≥64 bits
- [x] V3.3.1: Session timeout after inactivity
- [ ] V3.3.4: Session invalidation on logout

Access Control:
- [x] V4.1.1: Authorization checked on all endpoints
- [ ] V4.1.5: Access control failures logged
- [x] V4.2.1: Deny by default

Security Metrics

Vulnerability Metrics

Vulnerability Density = Total Vulnerabilities / KLOC
Target: <5 vulnerabilities per 1000 lines of code

Critical Vulnerability Count
Target: 0

Mean Time to Remediate (MTTR)
- Critical: <24 hours
- High: <7 days
- Medium: <30 days
- Low: <90 days

Security Coverage

Security Test Coverage = (Security Tests / Total Tests) × 100%
Target: ≥20%

Security Requirement Coverage = (Implemented / Total) × 100%
Target: 100% for MUST requirements

Dependency Vulnerability Coverage = (Scanned Deps / Total Deps) × 100%
Target: 100%

Tool Access

Required tools:

  • Read: Read code, configurations, requirements
  • Bash: Execute security scanning tools
  • Grep: Search for security patterns
  • Glob: Find files to scan

Required software:

  • bandit: Python SAST
  • safety: Dependency scanning
  • semgrep: Semantic code analysis
  • trivy: Container scanning
  • checkov: IaC scanning
  • gitleaks: Secret detection

Integration Points

With doc-flow

  • Validate security requirements in REQ documents
  • Check security traceability (REQ → Implementation)
  • Generate security documentation

With code-review

  • Share vulnerability findings
  • Coordinate security fixes
  • Track security metrics

With test-automation

  • Generate security test cases
  • Validate security controls
  • Track security test coverage

With devops-flow

  • Security scanning in CI/CD
  • Block deployments with critical issues
  • Infrastructure security validation

Best Practices

  1. Shift left: Security testing early in development
  2. Defense in depth: Multiple security layers
  3. Least privilege: Minimal access by default
  4. Fail securely: Secure defaults on errors
  5. Keep it simple: Complexity is enemy of security
  6. Assume breach: Plan for compromise
  7. Zero trust: Verify everything
  8. Security by design: Not an afterthought
  9. Regular audits: Continuous security assessment
  10. Incident response: Plan and test response procedures

Limitations

  1. Cannot detect all vulnerability types (e.g., business logic flaws)
  2. May produce false positives (requires manual review)
  3. Depends on tool database currency
  4. Cannot test runtime behavior fully
  5. Limited threat modeling automation

Success Criteria

  • Zero critical vulnerabilities in production
  • <5 high severity vulnerabilities
  • 100% security requirement coverage
  • All dependencies with no known CVEs
  • No secrets in code repository
  • Security score ≥80/100
  • OWASP Top 10 coverage: 10/10

Notes

  • Security audits run automatically in CI/CD
  • Critical vulnerabilities block deployment
  • Vulnerability reports saved to reports/security/
  • Monthly comprehensive security review recommended
  • Penetration testing recommended quarterly
  • Security guidelines documentation for development team required

Version History

VersionDateChanges
1.02026-02-08Initial skill creation with YAML frontmatter standardization

平台分布

Codex

32.38%
按下载量换算131

Claude

30.45%
按下载量换算123

Cursor

19.9%
按下载量换算80

Gemini CLI

10.01%
按下载量换算40

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills