Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

skillify(skillify 搜索)

skillify 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

skillify 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 12,141。

总安装 1,420周安装 58GitHub Stars 26下载 455核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:skillify(skillify 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vesely/skills
仓库路径:skills/skillify
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vesely/skills --skill skillify
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vesely/skills --skill skillify

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。skillify 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/skillify

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vesely/skills --skill skillify;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

skillify 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vesely/skills --skill skillify。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

skillify 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

skillify 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

skillify 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

skillify 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,420 次,近一周安装 58 次,下载 455 次,GitHub 26 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

skillify 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
skillify

skillify 搜索 · 本页

1,42026只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Skillify

Capture this session's repeatable process into a reusable SKILL.md skill file. Call at the end of the process you want to capture, optionally with a description.

Inputs

  • $description: (Optional) Description of the process you want to capture as a skill.

Goal

Create a well-structured, reusable SKILL.md file that captures a repeatable process from the current session so it can be invoked again later.

Steps

1. Analyze the Session

Before asking any questions, analyze the conversation to identify:

  • What repeatable process was performed
  • What the inputs/parameters were
  • The distinct steps (in order)
  • The success artifacts/criteria (e.g. not just "writing code," but "an open PR with CI fully passing") for each step
  • Where the user corrected or steered you
  • What tools and permissions were needed
  • What agents were used
  • What the goals and success artifacts were

Success criteria: You have a clear mental model of the process, its steps, inputs, outputs, and success criteria.

2. Interview the User

Use AskUserQuestion for ALL questions. Never ask questions via plain text. For each round, iterate as much as needed until the user is happy. The user always has a freeform "Other" option to type edits or feedback -- do NOT add your own "Needs tweaking" option. Just offer the substantive choices.

Round 1: High-level confirmation
  • Suggest a name and description for the skill based on your analysis. Ask the user to confirm or rename.
  • Suggest high-level goal(s) and specific success criteria for the skill.
Round 2: More details
  • Present the high-level steps you identified as a numbered list. Tell the user you will dig into the detail in the next round.
  • If you think the skill will require arguments, suggest arguments based on what you observed. Make sure you understand what someone would need to provide.
  • If it's not clear, ask if this skill should run inline (in the current conversation) or forked (as a sub-agent with its own context). Forked is better for self-contained tasks that don't need mid-process user input; inline is better when the user wants to steer mid-process.
  • Ask where the skill should be saved. Suggest a default based on context. Options:

- This repo (.claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md) -- for workflows specific to this project - Personal (~/.claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md) -- follows you across all repos

Round 3: Breaking down each step

For each major step, if it's not glaringly obvious, ask:

  • What does this step produce that later steps need? (data, artifacts, IDs)
  • What proves that this step succeeded, and that we can move on?
  • Should the user be asked to confirm before proceeding? (especially for irreversible actions like merging, sending messages, or destructive operations)
  • Are any steps independent and could run in parallel? (e.g., posting to Slack and monitoring CI at the same time)
  • How should the skill be executed? (e.g. always use a Task agent to conduct code review, or invoke an agent team for a set of concurrent steps)
  • What are the hard constraints or hard preferences? Things that must or must not happen?

You may do multiple rounds of AskUserQuestion here, one round per step, especially if there are more than 3 steps or many clarification questions.

IMPORTANT: Pay special attention to places where the user corrected you during the session, to help inform your design.

Round 4: Final questions
  • Confirm when this skill should be invoked, and suggest/confirm trigger phrases too. (e.g. "Use when the user wants to cherry-pick a PR to a release branch. Examples: 'cherry-pick to release', 'CP this PR', 'hotfix'.")
  • Ask for any other gotchas or things to watch out for, if still unclear.

Stop interviewing once you have enough information. Don't over-ask for simple processes!

Success criteria: You have all the information needed to write the SKILL.md file and the user has confirmed the design.

3. Write the SKILL.md

Create the skill directory and file at the location the user chose in Round 2. Use this format:

---
name: {{skill-name}}
description: {{one-line description}}
allowed-tools:
  {{list of tool permission patterns observed during session}}
when_to_use: {{detailed description of when Claude should automatically invoke this skill, including trigger phrases and example user messages}}
argument-hint: "{{hint showing argument placeholders}}"
arguments:
  {{list of argument names}}
context: {{inline or fork -- omit for inline}}
---

# {{Skill Title}}

Description of skill

## Inputs

- `$arg_name`: Description of this input

## Goal

Clearly stated goal for this workflow. Best if you have clearly defined artifacts or criteria for completion.

## Steps

### 1. Step Name

What to do in this step. Be specific and actionable. Include commands when appropriate.

**Success criteria**: ALWAYS include this! This shows that the step is done and we can move on. Can be a list.

Per-step annotations (include where relevant):

  • Success criteria is REQUIRED on every step.
  • Execution: Direct (default), Task agent (straightforward subagents), Teammate (agent with true parallelism and inter-agent communication), or [human] (user does it). Only needs specifying if not Direct.
  • Artifacts: Data this step produces that later steps need (e.g., PR number, commit SHA). Only include if later steps depend on it.
  • Human checkpoint: When to pause and ask the user before proceeding. Include for irreversible actions (merging, sending messages), error judgment (merge conflicts), or output review.
  • Rules: Hard rules for the workflow. User corrections during the reference session can be especially useful here.

Step structure tips:

  • Steps that can run concurrently use sub-numbers: 3a, 3b
  • Steps requiring the user to act get [human] in the title
  • Keep simple skills simple -- a 2-step skill doesn't need annotations on every step

Frontmatter rules:

  • allowed-tools: Minimum permissions needed (use patterns like Bash(gh:*) not Bash)
  • context: Only set context: fork for self-contained skills that don't need mid-process user input.
  • when_to_use is CRITICAL -- tells the model when to auto-invoke. Start with "Use when..." and include trigger phrases.
  • arguments and argument-hint: Only include if the skill takes parameters. Use $name in the body for substitution.

Success criteria: The complete SKILL.md content has been drafted.

4. Review and Save

Before writing the file, output the complete SKILL.md content as a yaml code block in your response so the user can review it with proper syntax highlighting. Then ask for confirmation using AskUserQuestion with a simple question like "Does this SKILL.md look good to save?"

After writing, tell the user:

  • Where the skill was saved
  • How to invoke it: /{{skill-name}} [arguments]
  • That they can edit the SKILL.md directly to refine it

Success criteria: The file is written to disk and the user has been informed how to use it.

平台分布

Codex

34.92%
按下载量换算159

Claude

28.03%
按下载量换算128

Cursor

18.16%
按下载量换算83

Gemini CLI

9.36%
按下载量换算43

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills