Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

vertical-slice(垂直切片)

vertical-slice 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

vertical-slice 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 52,984。

总安装 541周安装 23GitHub Stars 315下载 190核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:vertical-slice(垂直切片)
来源仓库:https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit
仓库路径:skills/vertical-slice
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill vertical-slice
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill vertical-slice

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合根据关键词、任务场景快速定位候选结果,辅助研究决策。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。vertical-slice 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/vertical-slice

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill verti…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

vertical-slice 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill vertical-slice。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

vertical-slice 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

vertical-slice 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

vertical-slice 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

vertical-slice 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 541 次,近一周安装 23 次,下载 190 次,GitHub 315 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

vertical-slice 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
vertical-slice

垂直切片 · 本页

541315需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Vertical Slice Architecture (VSA)

Core Principles

  1. Organize by feature, not by layer — Each feature is a self-contained vertical slice containing its endpoint, handler, request/response types, and validation. No more jumping between Controllers/, Services/, Repositories/ folders.
  2. Minimize cross-feature coupling — Features should not reference each other directly. Shared concerns go in a Common/ or Shared/ directory.
  3. One file per feature is fine — A simple CRUD endpoint doesn't need 5 files spread across layers. Start with everything in one file, extract only when complexity demands it.
  4. The handler is the unit of work — Each handler does one thing. No god-services with 20 methods.

Patterns

Feature Folder Structure

src/
  MyApp.Api/
    Features/
      Orders/
        CreateOrder.cs          # Request, Handler, Response, Endpoint — all in one file
        GetOrder.cs
        ListOrders.cs
        CancelOrder.cs
        Shared/
          OrderMapper.cs        # Shared within the Orders feature only
      Products/
        CreateProduct.cs
        GetProduct.cs
    Common/
      Behaviors/
        ValidationBehavior.cs   # Cross-cutting Mediator pipeline behavior
      Persistence/
        AppDbContext.cs
      Extensions/
        ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs
    Program.cs

Pattern A: Mediator Handlers (Recommended Default)

Source-generated mediator — MIT licensed, no reflection, Native AOT compatible. Uses IRequest<T> / IRequestHandler<TRequest, TResponse> with pipeline behaviors. Near-identical API to MediatR but faster and free. Package: Mediator.Abstractions + Mediator.SourceGenerator.

// Features/Orders/CreateOrder.cs

public static class CreateOrder
{
    public record Command(string CustomerId, List<OrderItemDto> Items) : IRequest<Result<OrderResponse>>;

    public record OrderItemDto(string ProductId, int Quantity);

    public record OrderResponse(Guid Id, decimal Total, DateTime CreatedAt);

    public class Validator : AbstractValidator<Command>
    {
        public Validator()
        {
            RuleFor(x => x.CustomerId).NotEmpty();
            RuleFor(x => x.Items).NotEmpty();
            RuleForEach(x => x.Items).ChildRules(item =>
            {
                item.RuleFor(x => x.ProductId).NotEmpty();
                item.RuleFor(x => x.Quantity).GreaterThan(0);
            });
        }
    }

    internal sealed class Handler(AppDbContext db, TimeProvider clock) : IRequestHandler<Command, Result<OrderResponse>>
    {
        public async ValueTask<Result<OrderResponse>> Handle(Command request, CancellationToken ct)
        {
            var order = Order.Create(request.CustomerId, request.Items, clock.GetUtcNow());
            db.Orders.Add(order);
            await db.SaveChangesAsync(ct);

            return Result.Success(new OrderResponse(order.Id, order.Total, order.CreatedAt));
        }
    }
}

// Registration in Program.cs or module DI
builder.Services.AddMediator();

// Features/Orders/OrderEndpoints.cs — auto-discovered via IEndpointGroup
public sealed class OrderEndpoints : IEndpointGroup
{
    public void Map(IEndpointRouteBuilder app)
    {
        var group = app.MapGroup("/api/orders").WithTags("Orders");

        group.MapPost("/", async (CreateOrder.Command command, ISender sender, CancellationToken ct) =>
        {
            var result = await sender.Send(command, ct);
            return result.IsSuccess
                ? TypedResults.Created($"/api/orders/{result.Value.Id}", result.Value)
                : result.ToProblemDetails();
        })
        .WithName("CreateOrder").Produces<CreateOrder.OrderResponse>(201)
        .ProducesValidationProblem()
        .AddEndpointFilter<ValidationFilter<CreateOrder.Command>>();
    }
}

Pattern B: Wolverine Handlers

Convention-based — no interfaces to implement. Wolverine discovers handlers by method signature.

// Features/Orders/CreateOrder.cs

public static class CreateOrder
{
    public record Command(string CustomerId, List<OrderItemDto> Items);

    public record OrderItemDto(string ProductId, int Quantity);

    public record OrderResponse(Guid Id, decimal Total, DateTime CreatedAt);

    // Wolverine discovers this by convention (static Handle method)
    public static async Task<Result<OrderResponse>> Handle(
        Command command,
        AppDbContext db,
        TimeProvider clock,
        CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var order = Order.Create(command.CustomerId, command.Items, clock.GetUtcNow());
        db.Orders.Add(order);
        await db.SaveChangesAsync(ct);
        return Result.Success(new OrderResponse(order.Id, order.Total, order.CreatedAt));
    }
}

Pattern C: Raw Handler Classes (No Library)

Direct handler classes with no external dependency. Good for small projects or teams that want full control.

// Features/Orders/CreateOrder.cs

public static class CreateOrder
{
    public record Command(string CustomerId, List<OrderItemDto> Items);

    public record OrderItemDto(string ProductId, int Quantity);

    public record OrderResponse(Guid Id, decimal Total, DateTime CreatedAt);

    internal class Handler(AppDbContext db, TimeProvider clock)
    {
        public async Task<Result<OrderResponse>> ExecuteAsync(Command command, CancellationToken ct)
        {
            var order = Order.Create(command.CustomerId, command.Items, clock.GetUtcNow());
            db.Orders.Add(order);
            await db.SaveChangesAsync(ct);

            return Result.Success(new OrderResponse(order.Id, order.Total, order.CreatedAt));
        }
    }
}

// Endpoint wiring — Result maps to HTTP response
group.MapPost("/", async (CreateOrder.Command command, CreateOrder.Handler handler, CancellationToken ct) =>
{
    var result = await handler.ExecuteAsync(command, ct);
    return result.IsSuccess
        ? TypedResults.Created($"/api/orders/{result.Value.Id}", result.Value)
        : result.ToProblemDetails();
});

Adding Module Boundaries (Optional)

For larger applications that grow beyond a single project, introduce module boundaries. Each module is a separate class library with its own features and DbContext.

src/
  MyApp.Api/                      # Host — wires modules together
    Program.cs
    Modules/
      ModuleExtensions.cs         # app.MapOrderModule(), app.MapCatalogModule()
  MyApp.Orders/                   # Module — own features, own DbContext
    Features/
      CreateOrder.cs
    Persistence/
      OrdersDbContext.cs
    OrdersModule.cs               # IServiceCollection + IEndpointRouteBuilder extensions
  MyApp.Catalog/                  # Module
    Features/
      CreateProduct.cs
    Persistence/
      CatalogDbContext.cs
    CatalogModule.cs

Modules communicate via:

  • Integration events (preferred) — async, decoupled via Wolverine or MassTransit
  • Shared contracts — a MyApp.Contracts project with DTOs/interfaces (use sparingly)

Shared Concerns

Cross-cutting concerns live outside feature folders:

// Common/Behaviors/ValidationBehavior.cs (Mediator pipeline)
public sealed class ValidationBehavior<TRequest, TResponse>(IEnumerable<IValidator<TRequest>> validators)
    : IPipelineBehavior<TRequest, TResponse>
    where TRequest : IMessage
{
    public async ValueTask<TResponse> Handle(
        TRequest request,
        MessageHandlerDelegate<TRequest, TResponse> next,
        CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var context = new ValidationContext<TRequest>(request);
        var failures = validators
            .Select(v => v.Validate(context))
            .SelectMany(r => r.Errors)
            .Where(f => f is not null)
            .ToList();

        if (failures.Count > 0)
            throw new ValidationException(failures);

        return await next(request, ct);
    }
}

Anti-patterns

Don't Create Layered Abstractions Within a Slice

// BAD — a feature folder with its own service layer and repository
Features/
  Orders/
    CreateOrder.cs
    IOrderService.cs         # unnecessary abstraction
    OrderService.cs          # unnecessary abstraction
    IOrderRepository.cs      # unnecessary abstraction
    OrderRepository.cs       # unnecessary abstraction

// GOOD — handler talks directly to DbContext
Features/
  Orders/
    CreateOrder.cs           # handler uses AppDbContext directly

Don't Cross-reference Features Directly

// BAD — CreateOrder directly calls GetProduct handler
var product = await _getProductHandler.Handle(new GetProduct.Query(productId));

// GOOD — query the database directly or use a shared read model
var product = await db.Products.FindAsync(productId, ct);

Don't Put Everything in One God Feature File

// BAD — 500-line file with CRUD + business logic + mapping
public static class Orders
{
    // Create, Read, Update, Delete, Cancel, Refund, Export...
}

// GOOD — one file per operation
Features/Orders/CreateOrder.cs
Features/Orders/GetOrder.cs
Features/Orders/CancelOrder.cs

Decision Guide

ScenarioRecommendation
New project (default)Pattern A — Mediator (source-generated, MIT, fast)
Need mediator + messaging in one libPattern B — Wolverine (also handles events/queues)
Want full control, no dependenciesPattern C — Raw handler classes
Existing MediatR codebase with licenseKeep MediatR if licensed; otherwise migrate to Mediator (near-identical API)
Monolith growing complexAdd module boundaries, keep VSA within each module
Simple CRUD featureSingle file: request + handler + endpoint
Complex feature (saga, events)Multiple files in feature folder, still colocated
Sharing logic between featuresExtract to Common/ — not to another feature

平台分布

Codex

36.62%
按下载量换算70

Claude

30.22%
按下载量换算57

Cursor

16.67%
按下载量换算32

Gemini CLI

9.04%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills