Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

validation-testing(验证测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

validation-testing 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 18,134。

总安装 356周安装 15GitHub Stars 33下载 125核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:validation-testing(验证测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/josiahsiegel/claude-plugin-marketplace
仓库路径:skills/validation-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/josiahsiegel/claude-plugin-marketplace --skill validation-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/josiahsiegel/claude-plugin-marketplace --skill validation-testing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

validation-testing 辅助测试设计与回归验证,支持单元测试和端到端用例编写。适合根据失败日志定位问题、整理测试计划,需结合项目框架和夹具数据使用。通过 GitHub 安装,使用 npx skills add 命令添加指定仓库的技能模块。涉及浏览器或外部服务时应区分本地模拟与生产环境,避免误改真实逻辑。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/validation-testing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/josiahsiegel/claude-plugin-marketplace --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

validation-testing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/josiahsiegel/claude-plugin-marketplace --skill validatio…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

validation-testing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

validation-testing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

validation-testing 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

validation-testing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 356 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 125 次,GitHub 33 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

validation-testing 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
validation-testing

验证测试 · 本页

35633调用外部服务未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Power BI Validation and Self-Testing

Overview

Validation skill for any TMDL, PBIR, DAX, or M artifact a developer (or Claude) generates. The goal: catch syntax, schema, and best-practice errors locally before a Fabric REST deploy fails. This skill is essential for the powerbi-expert agent's Self-Validation Protocol -- whenever the agent writes TMDL or PBIR, it should describe (or run) the matching validation step from this skill.

As of 2026, Power BI validation has four distinct layers, each catching a different class of error:

LayerTMDL ToolPBIR ToolWhat it catches
1. Syntax / parserTmdlSerializer.DeserializeDatabaseFromFolder (.NET)JSON schema validation ($schema URLs)Indentation errors, invalid keywords, malformed JSON
2. Object / schemaTmdlSerializer -> TmdlSerializationException (valid syntax, invalid TOM metadata)PBIR JSON schemas in microsoft/json-schemas repoInvalid property combinations, type mismatches, missing required properties
3. Best practice (BPA)Tabular Editor BPA rules (BPARules.json) or semantic-link-labs.run_model_bpaPBI-InspectorV2 rules (Base-rules.json)Anti-patterns, missing display folders, ambiguous relationships, naming conventions
4. Lineage / cross-referenceDAX measure references resolve, sortByColumn exists, calculation group precedenceBookmarks reference real pages, drillthrough targets exist, theme files presentDangling references, broken bookmarks, missing visuals

The cardinal rule: never deploy without passing layers 1 and 2; never merge to main without passing layer 3.

2026 Validation Tooling Snapshot

ToolValidatesRuntimeStatus
TmdlSerializer (Microsoft.AnalysisServices.Tabular)TMDL syntax + TOM schema.NET / pythonnetGA
Tabular Editor 2 CLI (free)TMDL load + BPA + custom C# scripts.NET CLIGA, free
Tabular Editor 3 CLI (paid)Same + advanced rules + DAX debugger.NET CLIGA, commercial
semantic-link-labs.run_model_bpaTMDL/TOM model BPA from PythonFabric notebook (Python)GA, ~60 rules built in
semantic-link-labs.run_model_bpa_bulkBPA across all models in workspaceFabric notebookGA
PBI-InspectorV2 ("Fab Inspector")PBIR / PBIP / Fabric item rules.NET CLI / Dockerv2.3+, GA
pbi-toolsPBIX extract/compile + basic TMDL.NET CLIStable for TMDL, evolving for PBIR
fabric-cicd (built-in)parameter.yml + repo structure pre-deploymentPythonGA
DaxFormatter APIDAX syntaxHTTPGA
Microsoft TMDL VS Code extensionTMDL syntax in editorVS CodeGA
Community CPIM.TMDL-language-supportTMDL + DAX + M semantic highlightingVS CodeGA
INFO DAX functionsLive model introspection (replaces DMVs)XMLA / DesktopGA

Self-Validation Protocol (For Generated Artifacts)

When generating TMDL or PBIR artifacts inside an agent loop, follow this minimum protocol:

  1. Before writing files -- mentally validate the structure: every object reference must resolve, every required property must be set.
  2. After writing files -- run a syntax-level parse (TmdlSerializer for TMDL; JSON schema validation for PBIR).
  3. Before suggesting deployment -- run a BPA pass (Tabular Editor CLI or semantic-link-labs).
  4. Report results inline -- never silently swallow validation errors. Surface line numbers, file paths, and the specific rule that failed.

A valid agent response that generates a 50-line TMDL measure block should always be followed by either:

  • (a) A validation script the user can paste, OR
  • (b) An inline Bash/PowerShell/Python validation invocation if the environment supports it.

TMDL Validation -- Layer 1 (Syntax Parser)

The fastest, lowest-dependency TMDL syntax check is TmdlSerializer.DeserializeDatabaseFromFolder. It throws:

  • TmdlFormatException -- the TMDL text has invalid syntax (bad keyword, wrong indentation, malformed expression). Includes Document, Line, and LineText properties pointing to the exact location.
  • TmdlSerializationException -- the TMDL text parses but produces invalid TOM metadata (e.g., a column references a dataType that doesn't exist, or a partition references an unknown data source).

Minimal C# validator (.NET 8):

using Microsoft.AnalysisServices.Tabular;
using Microsoft.AnalysisServices.Tabular.Tmdl;

string folder = args[0];
try
{
    var db = TmdlSerializer.DeserializeDatabaseFromFolder(folder);
    Console.WriteLine($"OK: TMDL parsed. CompatLevel={db.CompatibilityLevel}, Tables={db.Model.Tables.Count}");
    return 0;
}
catch (TmdlFormatException fx)
{
    Console.Error.WriteLine($"SYNTAX ERROR  {fx.Document}:{fx.Line}");
    Console.Error.WriteLine($"  {fx.LineText}");
    Console.Error.WriteLine($"  -> {fx.Message}");
    return 1;
}
catch (TmdlSerializationException sx)
{
    Console.Error.WriteLine($"METADATA ERROR  {sx.Document}:{sx.Line}");
    Console.Error.WriteLine($"  {sx.Message}");
    return 2;
}

One-liner via Tabular Editor 2 CLI (no C# project required):

# Loads TMDL folder; non-zero exit on parse failure
TabularEditor.exe "MyProject.SemanticModel/definition" -B "MyProject.bim"

The -B (bim output) switch forces a deserialize + reserialize round-trip. Any parse failure exits non-zero with the error written to stderr.

For full scripted patterns and Python equivalents, see references/tmdl-validation-recipes.md.

TMDL Validation -- Layer 3 (Best Practice Analyzer)

The Best Practice Analyzer (BPA) is the canonical anti-pattern checker for tabular models. It is the same engine in Tabular Editor 2, Tabular Editor 3, semantic-link-labs, and Fabric > Workspace settings > Best Practice Analyzer.

Tabular Editor 2 CLI (free, recommended for CI):

# Run BPA against a TMDL folder using the official Microsoft rule set
TabularEditor.exe "MyProject.SemanticModel/definition" \
  -A "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TabularEditor/BestPracticeRules/master/BPARules.json" \
  -V \
  -G

# Exit codes:
#   0 = no violations
#   1 = warnings only
#   2 = errors found (any rule with Severity >= 3) -- pipeline should FAIL

Switches that matter for CI/CD:

SwitchPurpose
-A <rules.json>Run BPA with the specified rules file (URL or local path)
-VVerbose output (lists each violation)
-GGitHub Actions / Azure Pipelines log format (group sections, file paths)
-D <conn>Deploy after passing BPA
-S <script>Run a C# script before BPA (custom validation)

Severity-driven failure: when a BPA rule is set to Error (level 3), the CLI immediately stops and exits non-zero. Set BPA rules to Error severity for any anti-pattern that should block a PR; set to Warning for advisory-only rules.

Standard Microsoft rule set: TabularEditor/BestPracticeRules -- ~60 rules covering performance, error prevention, DAX, maintenance, and naming. Always pin to a specific commit in CI.

For a complete BPA rule reference (every Microsoft rule explained, plus how to author custom rules), see references/bpa-rules-reference.md.

TMDL Validation from Python (semantic-link-labs)

%pip install semantic-link-labs -q
import sempy_labs as labs

# Run the default BPA against a deployed model
results = labs.run_model_bpa(
    dataset="SalesModel",
    workspace="Sales-Dev",
    extended=True,        # adds VertiPaq Analyzer stats for performance rules
)
results.head(20)

# Run BPA against every model in a workspace and store to delta
labs.run_model_bpa_bulk(
    workspace="Sales-Dev",
    extended=True,
)

# Custom rule set from a JSON file in the lakehouse
my_rules = labs.model_bpa_rules()  # built-in rule definitions
my_rules.append({
    "ID": "AVOID_AUTO_DATE",
    "Name": "Disable auto date/time",
    "Category": "Performance",
    "Severity": 3,
    "Scope": "Model",
    "Expression": "DiscourageImplicitMeasures and not AutoDateTime",
})
labs.run_model_bpa(dataset="SalesModel", rules=my_rules)

semantic-link-labs is the Python path for layer 3. Use it inside Fabric notebooks, scheduled BPA runs, or Spark pipelines. See references/tmdl-validation-recipes.md for the full Python validation cookbook including offline TMDL parse from a local folder.

PBIR Validation -- Layer 1 (JSON Schema)

Every PBIR file embeds a $schema URL pointing to the official Microsoft schema in microsoft/json-schemas. This means any JSON Schema validator can syntax-check PBIR files locally.

Python jsonschema validator:

import json
import urllib.request
from pathlib import Path
from jsonschema import Draft202012Validator, RefResolver

def validate_pbir_file(pbir_file: Path) -> list[str]:
    doc = json.loads(pbir_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
    schema_url = doc.get("$schema")
    if not schema_url:
        return [f"{pbir_file}: no $schema declared"]

    schema = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(schema_url).read())
    validator = Draft202012Validator(schema)
    errors = sorted(validator.iter_errors(doc), key=lambda e: e.path)
    return [f"{pbir_file}#{'/'.join(map(str, e.path))}: {e.message}" for e in errors]

# Walk the entire PBIR folder
report_root = Path("MyProject.Report/definition")
all_errors = []
for f in report_root.rglob("*.json"):
    all_errors.extend(validate_pbir_file(f))

if all_errors:
    print(f"FAIL: {len(all_errors)} schema violations")
    for e in all_errors[:50]:
        print(f"  {e}")
    raise SystemExit(1)
print(f"OK: validated {sum(1 for _ in report_root.rglob('*.json'))} PBIR files")

Cache the schemas locally for offline CI: git clone https://github.com/microsoft/json-schemas.git once, then point RefResolver at the local copy. Stops your CI from making 1000+ HTTP calls per build.

PBIR Validation -- Layer 3 (PBI-InspectorV2 / Fab Inspector)

NatVanG/PBI-InspectorV2 (also known as Fab Inspector) is the canonical rules-based PBIR/PBIP validator. v2.3+ supports all Fabric item types (semantic models, reports, notebooks, lakehouses) via the -fabricitem switch and the new PBIR enhanced format (the original PBI-Inspector repo only handles PBIR-Legacy).

Install (cross-platform.NET tool):

# Download the latest release from https://github.com/NatVanG/PBI-InspectorV2/releases
# Or use the published Docker image
docker pull natvang/pbi-inspector-v2:latest

Run against a PBIP folder:

PBIInspectorCLI \
  -fabricitem "./MyProject.Report" \
  -rules "./pbi-inspector-rules.json" \
  -formats "JSON,HTML,GitHub" \
  -output "./inspector-results"

# Exit codes:
#   0 = all rules passed
#   1 = warnings only
#   2 = at least one Error-severity rule failed

Rules format -- start from Base-rules.json and customize. Each rule has:

  • Name (display)
  • Description
  • LogType (Error / Warning / Info)
  • Disabled (skip without deleting)
  • Path (JSONPath into PBIR file)
  • Test (one of isEqualTo, isGreaterThan, isLessThan, mustExist, mustNotExist, regex, etc.)

Common rules to enforce on every PBIR PR:

[
  {
    "Name": "All visuals have a title",
    "LogType": "Error",
    "Path": "$.visual.objects.title[0].properties.show.expr.Literal.Value",
    "Test": "isEqualTo",
    "Expected": "true"
  },
  {
    "Name": "Page count under limit",
    "LogType": "Error",
    "Path": "$.pages",
    "Test": "arrayLengthLessThan",
    "Expected": 1000
  },
  {
    "Name": "Bookmarks reference real pages",
    "LogType": "Error",
    "Path": "$.children[?(@.targetSection)].targetSection",
    "Test": "mustResolveToPage"
  }
]

Full rule examples and CI gating patterns in references/pbir-validation-recipes.md.

fabric-cicd Pre-Deployment Validation

fabric-cicd runs automatic parameter.yml validation before publishing. If parameter.yml is malformed or contains an unknown environment, the deployment fails before touching the workspace. This is the cheapest possible CI safety net.

Trigger validation manually without deploying:

# Use the debug script shipped in the fabric-cicd devtools folder
python debug_parameterization.py \
  --repository-directory ./MyProject \
  --environment prod \
  --item-type-in-scope SemanticModel,Report

This parses every *.tmdl, *.json, and *.pbir file, applies the find_replace and key_value_replace transformations, and reports any unresolved placeholder. Run this in CI on every PR, regardless of whether the PR actually deploys.

DAX Syntax Validation (No Server Required)

The free DaxFormatter API parses DAX text and reports formatting + syntax errors:

import requests

def check_dax(expression: str) -> tuple[bool, str]:
    r = requests.post(
        "https://www.daxformatter.com/api/daxformatter/DaxRichFormat",
        json={
            "dax": f"EVALUATE ROW(\"x\", {expression})",
            "maxLineLenght": 120,
            "skipSpaceAfterFunctionName": "BestPractice",
        },
    )
    body = r.json()
    return ("error" not in body, body.get("formatted", body.get("error", "")))

ok, formatted = check_dax("CALCULATE([Total Sales], DATESYTD('Date'[Date]))")

For an offline DAX parser, Tabular Editor 2's -S C# script switch can call Microsoft.AnalysisServices.Tabular.DAXLexer directly. Recipe in references/tmdl-validation-recipes.md.

Lineage and Cross-Reference Validation

Beyond syntax and BPA, an agent generating a model should verify:

  1. Every measure references columns/measures that exist
  2. Every sortByColumn resolves
  3. Every relationship endpoint is a real column
  4. Every PBIR bookmark targetSection exists in pages.json
  5. Every PBIR drillthrough/tooltip pageBinding resolves
  6. No circular relationships or measure references

The simplest tool: load the model with TmdlSerializer, then run model.Validate() (TOM method) which returns ValidationResult.Errors. For PBIR, walk the JSON tree comparing name references against the page/visual inventory.

A complete cross-reference linter (Python, ~80 lines) lives in references/pbir-validation-recipes.md.

CI Gate Pattern (GitHub Actions)

Minimum gate to put on every PR that touches a PBIP project:

name: Power BI Validation Gate

on:
  pull_request:
    paths:
      - "**/*.tmdl"
      - "**/*.pbir"
      - "**/*.json"
      - "MyProject.SemanticModel/**"
      - "MyProject.Report/**"

jobs:
  validate:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Setup .NET
        uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
        with:
          dotnet-version: '8.0'

      - name: Setup Python
        uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with:
          python-version: '3.12'

      - name: Install validators
        run: |
          pip install jsonschema fabric-cicd
          curl -L -o te2.zip https://github.com/TabularEditor/TabularEditor/releases/latest/download/TabularEditor.Portable.zip
          unzip te2.zip -d te2

      # Layer 1+2: TMDL parser + TOM schema
      - name: Validate TMDL syntax and metadata
        run: |
          mono te2/TabularEditor.exe "MyProject.SemanticModel/definition" -B "/tmp/check.bim"

      # Layer 3: BPA
      - name: Run BPA (fails on Error severity)
        run: |
          mono te2/TabularEditor.exe "MyProject.SemanticModel/definition" \
            -A "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TabularEditor/BestPracticeRules/master/BPARules.json" \
            -V -G

      # Layer 1: PBIR JSON schemas
      - name: Validate PBIR schemas
        run: python ./scripts/validate_pbir.py "MyProject.Report/definition"

      # Layer 3: PBIR rules
      - name: Run PBI-InspectorV2
        run: |
          docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/work" natvang/pbi-inspector-v2:latest \
            -fabricitem /work/MyProject.Report \
            -rules /work/pbi-inspector-rules.json \
            -formats GitHub

      # fabric-cicd parameter.yml + structure
      - name: Validate fabric-cicd parameters
        run: python -m fabric_cicd.debug_parameterization --repository-directory . --environment prod

This gate runs in under 3 minutes for a typical PBIP and catches ~95% of issues that would otherwise fail at deploy time.

Common Errors Catalog (What Each Tool Catches)

Error ClassCaught by
Indentation / keyword typo in TMDLTmdlSerializer (TmdlFormatException), Tabular Editor CLI -B
Unknown property on a TMDL objectTmdlSerializer (TmdlSerializationException)
Measure references undefined columnTOM model.Validate(), BPA, semantic-link-labs
sortByColumn points to missing columnTOM model.Validate(), BPA
DAX syntax errorDaxFormatter API, Tabular Editor (any deploy/load)
M syntax errorPower Query engine on first refresh; partial check via Tabular Editor -S
Implicit measures usedBPA DAX_PERFORMANCE_AVOID_IMPLICIT_MEASURES
Auto date/time enabledBPA MODEL_PERFORMANCE_DISABLE_AUTO_DATETIME
Many-to-many relationship without explicit intentBPA MODEL_PRACTICE_AVOID_MANY_TO_MANY
PBIR file fails JSON schemajsonschema Python library, VS Code with $schema IntelliSense
PBIR visual missing required fieldPBI-InspectorV2 mustExist rules
PBIR bookmark references deleted pagePBI-InspectorV2 lineage rule, custom Python linter
PBIR page count > 1000PBI-InspectorV2 arrayLengthLessThan, fabric-cicd at deploy
parameter.yml references unknown envfabric-cicd built-in pre-deployment validation
Connection string still has dev GUID after parameterizationfabric-cicd debug_parameterization.py
Service principal lacks workspace roleCaught only at deploy -- no static check

What Validation CANNOT Catch (Run-Time Checks)

These categories require an actual deploy or refresh and cannot be statically validated:

  • Data source credentials (gateway, Key Vault, OAuth tokens)
  • Direct Lake fallback to DirectQuery under load
  • DAX query timeouts on large data
  • Refresh failures on source schema drift
  • Visual rendering bugs in specific browsers
  • Mobile layout overflow

For these, rely on Fabric Deployment Pipeline test stages, scheduled refresh alerts, and semantic-link-labs.run_dax smoke-test queries after deploy.

Additional Resources

Reference Files

  • references/tmdl-validation-recipes.md -- Full TMDL validation cookbook: TmdlSerializer C# patterns, Python pythonnet wrapper, Tabular Editor C# scripts, INFO DAX introspection, offline parsing
  • references/pbir-validation-recipes.md -- PBIR JSON schema validation, PBI-InspectorV2 rule examples, lineage cross-reference linter, GitHub Actions integration
  • references/bpa-rules-reference.md -- The standard Microsoft BPA ruleset summary, rule authoring guide, severity strategy, and pinning recipes

Related Skills

  • powerbi-master:tmdl-mastery -- TMDL syntax reference (use this when generating TMDL; come back here to validate it)
  • powerbi-master:programmatic-development -- PBIR generation (use this when generating PBIR; come back here to validate it)
  • powerbi-master:performance-optimization -- For run-time validation via DAX Studio, VertiPaq Analyzer, Performance Analyzer

Official 2026 References

平台分布

Codex

36.73%
按下载量换算46

Claude

33.45%
按下载量换算42

Cursor

17.06%
按下载量换算21

Gemini CLI

10.13%
按下载量换算13

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills