Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery(验证备份完整性以进行恢复)

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 61,288。

总安装 353周安装 15GitHub Stars 5,936下载 124核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery(验证备份完整性以进行恢复)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery 用于查找和筛选相关信息,支持基于关键词的任务检索。适用于快速定位候选结果,辅助根据来源线索进行信息聚合。通过 GitHub 安装,使用 npx skills add 命令添加指定仓库的技能模块。

建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill validati…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 353 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 124 次,GitHub 5,936 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 5,936 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

验证备份完整性以进行恢复 · 本页

3535,936调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Validating Backup Integrity for Recovery

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Verifying backup integrity before relying on backups for ransomware recovery
  • Building automated backup validation pipelines that run after each backup job
  • Auditing backup infrastructure to confirm recoverability for compliance (SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF RC.RP-03)
  • Detecting silent data corruption (bit rot) in backup storage before a disaster occurs
  • Validating that immutable or air-gapped backups have not been tampered with

Do not use for initial backup configuration or scheduling. This skill focuses on post-backup validation.

Prerequisites

  • Access to backup storage (local, NAS, S3, Azure Blob, GCS)
  • Python 3.9+ with hashlib (standard library)
  • Backup manifests or baseline hash files for comparison
  • Isolated restore environment for restore testing
  • Backup tool CLI access (restic, borgbackup, rclone, or vendor-specific)

Workflow

Step 1: Generate Baseline Hash Manifest

Create a cryptographic fingerprint of every file at backup time:

# Generate SHA-256 manifest for a directory
find /data/production -type f -exec sha256sum {} \; > /manifests/prod_baseline_$(date +%Y%m%d).sha256

# Verify manifest format
head -5 /manifests/prod_baseline_20260319.sha256
# e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb924...  /data/production/config.yaml
# a7ffc6f8bf1ed76651c14756a061d662...  /data/production/database.sql

Step 2: Verify Backup Archive Integrity

Check that the backup archive itself is not corrupted:

# Restic: verify backup repository integrity
restic -r s3:s3.amazonaws.com/backup-bucket check --read-data

# Borg: verify backup archive
borg check --verify-data /backup/repo::archive-2026-03-19

# Tar with gzip: verify archive integrity
gzip -t backup_20260319.tar.gz && echo "Archive OK" || echo "Archive CORRUPTED"

# AWS S3: verify object checksums
aws s3api head-object --bucket backup-bucket --key daily/2026-03-19.tar.gz \
  --checksum-mode ENABLED

Step 3: Perform Restore Test to Isolated Environment

# Restore to isolated test directory
restic -r s3:s3.amazonaws.com/backup-bucket restore latest --target /restore-test/

# Generate hash manifest of restored data
find /restore-test -type f -exec sha256sum {} \; > /manifests/restored_$(date +%Y%m%d).sha256

# Compare baseline and restored manifests
diff <(sort /manifests/prod_baseline_20260319.sha256) \
     <(sort /manifests/restored_20260319.sha256)

Step 4: Validate Data Completeness

# Count files in original vs restored
echo "Original: $(find /data/production -type f | wc -l) files"
echo "Restored: $(find /restore-test -type f | wc -l) files"

# Check total size
echo "Original: $(du -sh /data/production | cut -f1)"
echo "Restored: $(du -sh /restore-test | cut -f1)"

# Database consistency check after restore
pg_restore --list backup.dump | wc -l  # Count objects in dump
psql -c "SELECT schemaname, tablename FROM pg_tables WHERE schemaname='public';" restored_db

Step 5: Detect Ransomware Artifacts in Backups

Before trusting a backup for recovery, scan for ransomware indicators:

# Check for common ransomware file extensions
find /restore-test -type f \( \
  -name "*.encrypted" -o -name "*.locked" -o -name "*.crypt" \
  -o -name "*.ransom" -o -name "*.pay" -o -name "*.wncry" \
  -o -name "*.cerber" -o -name "*.locky" -o -name "*.zepto" \
\) -print

# Check for ransom notes
find /restore-test -type f \( \
  -name "README_TO_DECRYPT*" -o -name "HOW_TO_RECOVER*" \
  -o -name "DECRYPT_INSTRUCTIONS*" -o -name "HELP_DECRYPT*" \
\) -print

# Check file entropy (high entropy = possible encryption)
# Files with entropy > 7.9 out of 8.0 are likely encrypted
python agent.py --entropy-scan /restore-test

Step 6: Automate and Schedule Validation

# cron-based validation schedule
# Run nightly after backup window
0 4 * * * /opt/backup-validator/agent.py --validate-latest --notify-on-failure
# Weekly full restore test
0 6 * * 0 /opt/backup-validator/agent.py --full-restore-test --config /etc/backup-validator/config.json

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Hash ManifestFile containing cryptographic hashes (SHA-256) for every file in a dataset, used as integrity baseline
Bit RotGradual data corruption on storage media that silently alters file contents
Immutable BackupBackup that cannot be modified or deleted for a defined retention period
Restore TestProcess of recovering data from backup to an isolated environment to verify recoverability
File EntropyMeasure of randomness in file contents; encrypted files have entropy near 8.0 bits/byte
3-2-1 RuleKeep 3 copies of data, on 2 different media types, with 1 offsite copy
Backup ChainSequence of full and incremental backups that must all be intact for recovery

Tools & Systems

ToolPurpose
ResticEncrypted, deduplicated backup with built-in integrity verification
BorgBackupDeduplicating backup with archive verification
RcloneCloud storage sync with checksum verification
AWS S3 Object LockImmutable backup storage with WORM compliance
Azure Immutable BlobTamper-proof backup storage for compliance
sha256sumStandard hash computation for file integrity
pg_restorePostgreSQL backup validation and restore testing

Common Pitfalls

  • Never testing restores: The most common failure mode. Backups that are never restored are untested assumptions.
  • Checking only archive integrity, not data integrity: A valid tar.gz can contain corrupted file contents. Always hash individual files.
  • Trusting last backup without scanning for ransomware: Backups may contain encrypted files if the infection predates the backup.
  • Ignoring incremental chain integrity: A single corrupted incremental backup can break the entire restore chain.
  • No alerting on validation failures: Backup validation must be monitored with alerts, not just logged silently.
  • Using MD5 for integrity: MD5 is cryptographically broken. Use SHA-256 or SHA-3 for integrity verification.

References

  • NIST SP 800-184: Guide for Cybersecurity Event Recovery
  • NIST CSF 2.0 RC.RP-03: Backup Integrity Verification
  • CIS Controls v8: Control 11 - Data Recovery
  • CISA Ransomware Guide: https://www.cisa.gov/stopransomware

平台分布

Codex

36.39%
按下载量换算45

Claude

26.95%
按下载量换算33

Cursor

19.91%
按下载量换算25

Gemini CLI

9.28%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills