Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

using-tests(使用测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

using-tests 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 11,631。

总安装 1,656周安装 69GitHub Stars 14下载 552核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:using-tests(使用测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/andrelandgraf/fullstackrecipes
仓库路径:skills/using-tests
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/andrelandgraf/fullstackrecipes --skill using-tests
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/andrelandgraf/fullstackrecipes --skill using-tests

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试用例整理和回归验证,适合质量保障场景。可帮助编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据失败日志定位问题。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。使用时需确认项目测试框架和运行命令,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑。

using-tests 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/using-tests

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/andrelandgraf/fullstackrecipes --skill using-t…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

using-tests 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/andrelandgraf/fullstackrecipes --skill using-tests。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

using-tests 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

using-tests 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

using-tests 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

using-tests 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,656 次,近一周安装 69 次,下载 552 次,GitHub 14 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

using-tests 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
using-tests

使用测试 · 本页

1,65614操作浏览器MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Working with Tests

Testing strategy and workflow. Tests run in parallel with isolated data per suite. Prioritize Playwright for UI, integration tests for APIs, unit tests for logic.

Testing Strategy

Follow this hierarchy when deciding what kind of test to write:

  1. Playwright tests (browser) - Preferred for most features
  2. Integration tests (API) - When Playwright is not practical
  3. Unit tests (pure functions) - Only for complex isolated logic

When to Use Each Test Type

Playwright Tests (Default Choice)

Write Playwright tests when the feature involves:

  • User interactions (clicking, typing, navigation)
  • Visual feedback (toasts, loading states, error messages)
  • Form submissions and validation
  • Multi-step UI flows
  • Protected routes and redirects
  • Accessibility behavior

Example features best tested with Playwright:

  • Sign-in flow with error handling
  • Chat creation and deletion with confirmation dialogs
  • Theme toggle
  • Form validation messages
  • Navigation between pages

Integration Tests

Write integration tests when:

  • Testing API responses directly (status codes, JSON structure)
  • Verifying database state after operations
  • Testing server-side logic without UI
  • Playwright would be too slow or complex for the scenario

Example features best tested with integration tests:

  • API route returns correct status codes
  • User creation populates database correctly
  • Session cookies are set on sign-in
  • Protected API routes return 401/403

Unit Tests

Write unit tests only when:

  • Testing pure functions with complex logic
  • Testing code with many edge cases
  • Testing type narrowing and error messages
  • The function has no external dependencies

Example features best tested with unit tests:

  • Assertion helpers
  • Config schema validation
  • Data transformation functions
  • Utility functions

Running Tests

All tests run against an isolated Neon database branch that auto-deletes after 1 hour.

bun run test              # All tests with isolated Neon branch
bun run test:playwright   # Browser tests only
bun run test:integration  # Integration tests only
bun run test:unit         # Unit tests only

Folder Structure

src/
├── lib/
│   ├── common/
│   │   ├── assert.ts
│   │   └── assert.test.ts      # Unit test (co-located)
│   └── config/
│       ├── schema.ts
│       └── schema.test.ts      # Unit test (co-located)
tests/
├── integration/
│   ├── llms.test.ts            # Integration test
│   ├── r.test.ts
│   ├── mcp/
│   │   └── route.test.ts
│   └── recipes/
│       └── [slug]/
│           └── route.test.ts
└── playwright/
    ├── auth.spec.ts            # Playwright test
    ├── chat.spec.ts
    ├── home.spec.ts
    └── lib/
        └── test-user.ts        # Playwright-specific helpers

Writing Tests for New Features

Step 1: Determine Test Type

Ask: "How would a user verify this feature works?"

  • If through the UI → Playwright test
  • If through API calls → Integration test
  • If by calling a function directly → Unit test

Step 2: Create Test File

Playwright tests: tests/playwright/{feature}.spec.ts

import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("Feature Name", () => {
  test("should do expected behavior", async ({ page }) => {
    await page.goto("/feature");
    // Test implementation
  });
});

Integration tests: tests/integration/{feature}.test.ts

For API routes, import the handler directly for faster, more reliable tests:

import { describe, it, expect } from "bun:test";
import { GET } from "@/app/api/feature/route";

describe("GET /api/feature", () => {
  it("should return expected response", async () => {
    const response = await GET();

    expect(response.status).toBe(200);
    const data = await response.json();
    expect(data.value).toBeDefined();
  });
});

Unit tests: src/lib/{domain}/{file}.test.ts (co-located)

import { describe, it, expect } from "bun:test";
import { myFunction } from "./my-file";

describe("myFunction", () => {
  it("should do expected behavior", () => {
    expect(myFunction()).toBe("expected");
  });
});

Test Data Management

Database Isolation

Tests run against isolated Neon branches. Each test run:

  1. Creates a fresh schema-only branch
  2. Runs tests against the branch
  3. Branch auto-deletes after 1 hour

This ensures tests don't interfere with production data.

Parallel Test Isolation

Tests run in parallel by default. Each test suite must use its own test data to avoid conflicts:

  • Different test users - Each spec file should create unique users with distinct emails
  • Different resources - Tests creating chats, sessions, etc. should not depend on shared state
  • No cleanup required - The branch TTL handles cleanup automatically
// auth.spec.ts - uses auth-specific test user
const testUser = await createTestUser({
  email: `auth-test-${uuid}@example.com`,
});

// chat.spec.ts - uses chat-specific test user
const testUser = await createTestUser({
  email: `chat-test-${uuid}@example.com`,
});

Avoid patterns that rely on global state or specific database contents existing from other tests.


Common Patterns

Testing Protected Routes (Playwright)

test("should redirect unauthenticated user", async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto("/protected-page");
  await expect(page).toHaveURL(/sign-in/);
});

Testing Error States (Playwright)

test("should show error for invalid input", async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto("/form");
  await page.getByRole("button", { name: /submit/i }).click();

  await expect(page.getByText(/error|required/i)).toBeVisible({
    timeout: 5000,
  });
});

Testing API Responses (Integration)

Import route handlers directly for cleaner tests:

import { GET } from "@/app/api/endpoint/route";

it("should return 200 for valid request", async () => {
  const response = await GET();
  expect(response.status).toBe(200);
});

Debugging Failed Tests

Playwright

bunx playwright test --headed              # Watch browser
bunx playwright test --debug               # Step through test
bunx playwright show-report                # View HTML report

Integration/Unit

bun test --only "test name"                # Run single test
bun test --watch                           # Re-run on changes

View test artifacts

Failed Playwright tests save screenshots and traces to test-results/. Check this folder when CI fails.

平台分布

Claude Code

29.88%
按下载量换算165

OpenCode

24.05%
按下载量换算133

Cursor

17.05%
按下载量换算94

Gemini CLI

14.49%
按下载量换算80

Antigravity

9.25%
按下载量换算51

Codex

3.85%
按下载量换算21

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills