Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

user-research-techniques(用户研究技术)

user-research-techniques 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

user-research-techniques 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 73,543。

总安装 1周安装 8GitHub Stars 80下载 65核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:user-research-techniques(用户研究技术)
来源仓库:https://github.com/slgoodrich/agents
仓库路径:skills/user-research-techniques
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/slgoodrich/agents --skill user-research-techniques
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/slgoodrich/agents --skill user-research-techniques

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息检索的场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否触发联网或文件读写操作。

user-research-techniques 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/user-research-techniques

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/slgoodrich/agents --skill user-research-techni…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

user-research-techniques 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/slgoodrich/agents --skill user-research-techniques。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

user-research-techniques 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

user-research-techniques 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

user-research-techniques 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

user-research-techniques 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 65 次,GitHub 80 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

user-research-techniques 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
user-research-techniques

用户研究技术 · 本页

180只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

User Research Techniques

Guide to qualitative and quantitative research methods for understanding users, validating ideas, and informing product decisions.

When to Use This Skill

Auto-loaded by agents:

  • research-ops - For research methods, planning, and best practices

Use when you need:

  • Planning research studies
  • Choosing research methods
  • Conducting interviews or tests
  • Analyzing research data
  • Validating product decisions

Research Methods Matrix

           Quantitative <-- --> Qualitative
           (What & How Many)    (Why & How)
              |
Behavioral --+-- Analytics        Usability Testing
(What they  |    Surveys          Field Studies
  do)       |    A/B Tests        Diary Studies
              |
Attitudinal -+-- Surveys          Interviews
(What they  |    NPS              Focus Groups
  say)      |    Questionnaires   Concept Tests

Qualitative Methods

User Interviews

Understand problems, validate solutions, assess products. Use open-ended questions, listen more than talk (80/20 rule), and ask "why" 5 times. 5-8 participants per segment.

Usability Testing

Test product usability with moderated or unmoderated sessions. Recruit 5-8 participants, use think-aloud protocol, measure task completion, time on task, and satisfaction.

Field Studies

Observe users in their natural environment through contextual inquiry, shadowing, or diary studies. Best for understanding context and discovering workarounds.

Card Sorting

Understand mental models and information architecture. Open (users create categories), closed (sort into given categories), or hybrid.

Focus Groups

6-10 participant moderated discussions. Good for exploring opinions and generating ideas. Avoid for validation (groupthink risk).

Comprehensive guide: references/qualitative-methods-guide.md


Quantitative Methods

Surveys

Measure attitudes at scale with NPS (0-10), CSAT (1-5), CES (1-7), or custom questions. Keep short (<10 questions), avoid leading/double-barreled questions. 100+ respondents for directional insights, 384+ for statistical significance.

Analytics

Track behavioral data: engagement (DAU/WAU/MAU), conversion funnels, retention cohorts, feature adoption.

A/B Testing

Test variants with statistical rigor. Requires a clear hypothesis ("Changing CTA color from blue to green will increase click-through by 10%"), a single variable change, sufficient sample size (use an online calculator -- typically 1,000+ per variant for small effects), and a 1-2 week runtime. Only test when you have enough traffic; for early-stage products with <1,000 weekly visitors, use qualitative methods instead.

Key pitfalls: Stopping tests early when results look promising (peeking problem), testing too many variants at once (diluted significance), and ignoring segment effects (overall neutral but positive for one cohort).

Research Synthesis

Combine findings across studies to identify patterns. Three core approaches:

  • Affinity mapping: Group observations by similarity, name the clusters, identify themes. Start here when you have raw interview notes.
  • Thematic analysis: Code data into themes using a three-level system (codes → categories → themes). More rigorous than affinity mapping.
  • Jobs-to-be-Done: Frame findings around the job users are hiring your product to do. Structure: "When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]."

For deeper synthesis methods, see synthesis-frameworks.

Comprehensive guide: references/quantitative-methods-guide.md


Best Practices

1. Avoid Bias

Confirmation Bias: Seek disconfirming evidence Leading Questions: Ask neutral questions Selection Bias: Recruit diverse participants Observer Effect: Users behave differently when watched

2. Sample Sizes

Qualitative:

  • 5-8 users per segment (diminishing returns)
  • 15-20 total for diverse product

Quantitative:

  • 100+ for trends
  • 384+ for statistical significance
  • Use power calculations

3. Triangulate

Combine Methods:

  • Interviews (why) + Analytics (what)
  • Usability tests + Surveys
  • Quantitative -> Qualitative -> Quantitative

4. Continuous Discovery (Teresa Torres)

Weekly Touchpoints:

  • Talk to 2-3 customers per week
  • Mix research types
  • Share with team
  • Document insights
  • Map to opportunities

Common Mistakes

Avoid:

  • Asking what users want (they don't know)
  • Leading questions ("Do you love this?")
  • Only talking to power users
  • Research without action
  • Skipping synthesis

Do:

  • Observe behavior, not just opinions
  • Ask open-ended questions
  • Recruit diverse participants
  • Act on findings
  • Share insights widely

Tools

Research Platforms:

  • UserTesting, Maze (unmoderated testing)
  • User Interviews, Respondent.io (recruitment)
  • Lookback, Zoom (moderated testing)

Analysis:

  • Dovetail, Airtable (synthesis)
  • Miro, FigJam (affinity mapping)
  • Typeform, SurveyMonkey (surveys)

Analytics:

  • Mixpanel, Amplitude (product analytics)
  • Hotjar, FullStory (session replay)
  • Google Analytics (web analytics)

Templates and References

Assets (Ready-to-Use)

  • assets/research-plan-template.md - Research plan template with goals, methods, questions, and deliverables

References (Deep Dives)

  • references/qualitative-methods-guide.md - User interviews, usability testing, field studies, card sorting, focus groups
  • references/quantitative-methods-guide.md - Surveys, analytics, A/B testing, research synthesis methods
  • references/research-planning-guide.md - Defining research questions, choosing methods, recruiting participants

Resources

Books:

  • "The Mom Test" - Rob Fitzpatrick
  • "Just Enough Research" - Erika Hall
  • "Continuous Discovery Habits" - Teresa Torres
  • "Don't Make Me Think" - Steve Krug

Online:

  • Nielsen Norman Group articles
  • IDEO Design Kit
  • Google Ventures Research Sprint

Quick Guide

Need to understand why? -> Interviews
Testing usability? -> Usability Tests
Measure satisfaction? -> Survey (NPS/CSAT)
Understand behavior? -> Analytics
Validate solution? -> Prototype Test
Deep context? -> Field Study

Always: Define questions, recruit right users, synthesize, act on insights

Troubleshooting

"I don't know which research method to use": Start with your question type. Exploring "why" = interviews. Testing usability = usability test. Measuring satisfaction = survey. If you're unsure, default to 5 user interviews -- they're the highest insight-per-hour method.

"I can't recruit enough participants": Lower the bar. For qualitative research, 5 is enough. Use your existing users, social media, or offer small incentives ($25 gift cards). For guerrilla testing, find people at coffee shops or coworking spaces.

"Leadership wants data but we have no budget for research": Use free methods: 5-second tests (UsabilityHub free tier), unmoderated testing (Maze free plan), or analyze existing support tickets and app reviews as proxy research data.


Related Skills

  • interview-frameworks - Deep-dive interview techniques and question design
  • usability-frameworks - Usability testing methodology and heuristic evaluation
  • synthesis-frameworks - Turning research data into actionable insights
  • validation-frameworks - Experiment design for validating assumptions

平台分布

Codex

37.12%
按下载量换算24

Claude

30.67%
按下载量换算20

Cursor

18.84%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

9.26%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills