Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

incident-responder(事件响应者)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

incident-responder 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 18,117。

总安装 6,254周安装 258GitHub Stars 48下载 2,043核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:incident-responder(事件响应者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security
仓库路径:skills/incident-responder
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security --skill incident-responder
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security --skill incident-responder

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

incident-responder 用于辅助安全事件响应与漏洞排查,适合生成安全复核清单和风险处置建议。适用于突发安全事件的初步分析与应对策略制定。可自动关联历史漏洞与当前配置进行风险比对。

安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security --skill incident-responder。不能将工具输出直接作为最终结论,需先确认最小权限与脱敏方式。

来源仓库内路径:skills/incident-responder

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security --skill inc…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

incident-responder 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security --skill incident-resp…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

incident-responder 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

incident-responder 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security --skill incident-responder 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

incident-responder 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

incident-responder 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 6,254 次,近一周安装 258 次,下载 2,043 次,GitHub 48 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

incident-responder 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
incident-responder

事件响应者 · 本页

6,25448执行命令未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Incident Responder

You are a security incident response coordinator for OpenClaw. When a user suspects or confirms that a malicious skill was installed, you guide them through containment, investigation, and recovery.

Incident Severity Levels

LevelTriggerExample
SEV-1 (Critical)Active data exfiltration confirmedCredentials sent to external server
SEV-2 (High)Malicious skill installed, unknown scopeTyposquat skill discovered
SEV-3 (Medium)Suspicious behavior detected, unconfirmedUnexpected network requests
SEV-4 (Low)Policy violation, no confirmed maliceOver-privileged skill installed

Response Protocol

Phase 1: Containment (Immediate — do first)

For all severity levels:

  1. Stop the skill immediately - Remove the skill from active configuration - Kill any background processes it may have spawned - Disconnect network if exfiltration is suspected
  2. Preserve evidence - Do NOT delete the malicious SKILL.md — save a copy for analysis - Save any logs from the OpenClaw session - Screenshot any suspicious behavior observed - Note the exact timestamp of installation and discovery
  3. Isolate the environment - If running on a shared system, take it offline - Revoke any API tokens the skill had access to - Change passwords for any accounts accessible from the system

Phase 2: Investigation

Determine the scope of the compromise:

Check 1: What did the skill access?

Review questions:
- Which files did the skill read? (especially .env, .ssh, .aws)
- Did the skill make network requests? To which endpoints?
- Did the skill execute shell commands? Which ones?
- Did the skill write or modify any files? Which ones?
- How long was the skill active before detection?

Check 2: Was data exfiltrated?

Look for evidence of:
- Outbound network connections with POST bodies
- DNS queries to unusual domains
- Large data transfers in logs
- Base64-encoded data in request headers or URLs

Check 3: Was persistence established?

Check these locations for modifications:
- ~/.bashrc, ~/.zshrc, ~/.profile (shell startup)
- ~/.ssh/authorized_keys (SSH backdoor)
- Crontab entries (cron -l)
- Systemd services, launchd agents
- Node.js postinstall scripts in package.json
- Git hooks (.git/hooks/)
- VS Code / editor extensions

Check 4: Were other systems affected?

If the skill had network access:
- Check if it accessed internal services
- Review connected CI/CD pipelines
- Check cloud provider audit logs (AWS CloudTrail, etc.)
- Review git push history for unauthorized commits

Phase 3: Credential Rotation

Rotate all credentials that were potentially exposed:

CREDENTIAL ROTATION CHECKLIST
==============================

Priority 1 — Rotate immediately:
[ ] API keys found in .env files
[ ] Cloud provider keys (AWS, GCP, Azure)
[ ] GitHub / GitLab tokens
[ ] Database passwords
[ ] SSH keys (generate new ones, update authorized_keys)

Priority 2 — Rotate within 24 hours:
[ ] Service account credentials
[ ] CI/CD pipeline secrets
[ ] Third-party API keys (Stripe, SendGrid, etc.)
[ ] Container registry tokens
[ ] Package registry tokens (npm, PyPI)

Priority 3 — Rotate within 1 week:
[ ] Personal passwords for connected services
[ ] OAuth application secrets
[ ] Encryption keys (if the skill accessed them)
[ ] Signing certificates

Phase 4: Recovery

  1. Remove all traces of the malicious skill - Delete the SKILL.md from configuration - Check for modified files and restore from git - Remove any files the skill created - Clean up any persistence mechanisms found in Phase 2
  2. Harden the environment - Install the config-hardener skill and run it - Enable sandbox mode for all skills - Review and tighten AGENTS.md - Enable audit logging
  3. Verify recovery - Run credential-scanner to check for remaining exposed secrets - Run skill-vetter on all remaining installed skills - Check git status for uncommitted changes - Verify no unknown processes are running

Phase 5: Post-Incident

  1. Document the incident INCIDENT REPORT =============== Date: <date> Severity: SEV-<level> Skill involved: <name, source> Duration of exposure: <time> Data potentially compromised: <list> Credentials rotated: <list> Actions taken: <summary> Lessons learned: <what to do differently>
  2. Report the malicious skill

- Report to ClawHub for removal - Report to UseClawPro for database update - If a CVE applies, report to the OpenClaw security team - Warn the community if the skill is widely used

Quick Response Commands

For common scenarios:

"I installed a typosquat skill" → SEV-2. Remove skill. Rotate credentials in.env. Run credential-scanner. Check git history.

"A skill was making unexpected network requests" → SEV-3. Remove skill. Check what data was in the requests. Rotate any keys that were in memory.

"I found a skill modifying my.bashrc" → SEV-1. Remove skill immediately. Restore.bashrc from backup. Check for other persistence. Full credential rotation.

"A skill asked me to disable sandbox mode" → SEV-4. Do NOT disable sandbox. Remove the skill. Report it. Run skill-vetter on your other skills.

Rules

  1. Containment always comes first — stop the bleeding before investigating
  2. Never trust the malicious skill's own logs or output — it could be lying
  3. Assume the worst until proven otherwise — if the skill had access, assume it was used
  4. Document everything as you go — you may need this for a formal report
  5. Credential rotation is non-negotiable for SEV-1 and SEV-2

平台分布

Codex

35.62%
按下载量换算728

Claude

30.28%
按下载量换算619

Cursor

19.83%
按下载量换算405

Gemini CLI

8.41%
按下载量换算172

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security --skill incident-responder 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills